$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$
$$\longleftharp{xx}$$,
$$\longrightharp{xx}$$,
The role of motile respiratory cilia in both disease and development continues to evolve and be better appreciated. Synchronous, metachronal beating of multiple motile cilia on the apical surface of cells lining the tracheobronchial tree generate cephalad flow producing mucociliary clearance or MCC. MCC is compromised in ciliopathies like PCD22, acquired diseases like COPD18, and its importance is being recognized in CHDs, not traditionally considered to be ciliopathies. Recent data has shown respiratory ciliary dysfunction in both CHD with heterotaxy23 and without heterotaxy7. Such motile cilia dysfunction was shown to translate into greater respiratory symptoms9 as well as greater post-operative morbidity8. Most, if not all, of these diseases, have mouse models available and our protocol for measuring MCC in mice is a valuable tool that can be utilized to test potential therapeutics.
Animal models provide utility for understanding diseases and the development of therapies. In vivo animal imaging provides further utility with the ability to acquire multiple data points from the same animals, without the need to sacrifice the animals, allowing investigators to follow longitudinal course of disease as well as study duration of treatment effects. The mouse model of MCC has been developed over the course of decades by multiple investigators, initially being performed on beagle dogs using planar scintigraphy, a two dimensional nuclear imaging technique24. The technique was adapted for use in mice a decade later, followed by adaptation to SPECT imaging a decade after that25,26. The development of this technique in mouse models was a major development in the relevance of this technique, due to the availability of multiple mouse models of human diseases like PCD in which ciliary function is significantly altered. MCC has been assessed in mouse models of lung denervation and immunosuppression, and has the potential to be used in conjunction with other models19,26. MCC measurement studies in human patients with airway diseases such as CF, asthma, PCD, and ciliopathies associated with CHD have been conducted, and have yielded results that the technique can aid both studies of lung physiology and therapeutic efficacy13.
An important part of this protocol is setting up acquisitions with the correct imaging parameters to acquire accurate images for quantification. A number of factors are key when designing SPECT acquisition settings, including which collimators are used, the number of projections to acquire per revolution, and rotation step size. Collimator selection is a major factor in the sensitivity and resolution of the acquisition, and acquisition settings may need to be tailored to the collimator being used27. Alternately, when using bigger animals like rats, the collimators would need to be adjusted. Multiple pinhole collimators for example are more sensitive, but care should be taken when selecting a step size in order to avoid overlapping projections and causing undesired multiplexing, which can further increase sensitivity of the acquisition at the expense of some image ambiguity that can cause reconstruction artifacts25. Reconstruction setup is also key to generate quantifiable images. MAP3D is a commonly used iterative reconstruction algorithm, and PSF is a common reconstruction model. Both are reliable for reconstructing images, but care should be taken when setting the number of iterations and subsets. A higher number of iterations will increase the computational time required for the reconstruction, and increase the quality of the reconstruction with diminishing returns upon further increase.
In order to quantify images in ImageJ, the ideal measurement tool to use is RawIntDen, which outputs the sum value of pixels in a selection. When quantifying SPECT data across differently sized lung ROIs, the use of RawIntDen provides an absolute measure of counts and avoids adjusting the measurement to the area of the ROI, like the mean measurement would21.
This technique has a number of associated sources of error that the investigator should be cognizant of when applying this technique. A notable confounder is the use of anesthetic agents. Isoflurane is a fast acting, inhaled anesthetic that the mice recover from rapidly after completion of an acquisition. However, care should be taken to provide the mice with ample time to recover in their cages, and not kept anesthetized any longer than necessary. In our personal experience (unpublished data) mice that were kept anesthetized continuously using inhaled isoflurane between the 0 and 6 hour time-point showed negligible clearance. Likewise, a controlled dose of anesthetic is also necessary to ensure rapid recovery. When securing the animal to the pallet for imaging, the phantom tube used for co-registration should be kept low on the stomach to avoid artifacts from overlapping with the lungs. Likewise, to ensure a quality CT image, take care to remove any metal tags from the mouse to avoid artifacts from x-ray scattering.
The current MCC protocol can be applied to myriad animal models. This technique has a negligible effect on the health of the animal scanned, is well tolerated by mice, and because of this it can be used with disease models without risking the health of already delicate mice. The strength of this methodology comes from it being an in vivo technique, which allows for the acquisition of consistent and repeatable measurements of airway function without the sacrifice of animals to excise tracheas for video-microscopy, that ex vivo models require26. The consistency of this technique in producing repeatable measurements across multiple scans of the same animals, allows for the same animal to be treated with different agents or potential therapeutics, and statistical comparisons made between the same animal to reduce biological variability inherent in any animal model, thereby reducing the sample size needed to show statistically significant differences.
The assessment of airway function using the MCC technique can be adjusted to a variety of animal models and applied to many different models of airway health, as well as testing new therapies. The airways of mouse models of PCD can be assessed using this technique, as well as models of COPD. Our method can also be utilized to study differential effects of various anesthetics on MCC that are in common clinical use. Finally, the effects of therapeutic agents on the airway can also be assessed using this model. As previously stated but bears repetition, as it is an in vivo measurement it allows for repeat MCC assessments over the course of a disease, as well as test benefits of therapeutic interventions over time. Additionally, mice are the most common laboratory animals used to mimic/study human diseases, with, in some cases, multiple transgenic mouse models of human disease available to choose from.