$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$
$$\longleftharp{xx}$$,
$$\longrightharp{xx}$$,
Prior to the VLP capture assay, evaluate the formation of VLPs and the expression of the target antigen in the VLP producer cell lines. Instrumental methods are flow cytometric-analysis of the cell surface expression of the antigen as well as antigen- and viral core protein-specific ELISA of CFSN and pelleted VLPs.
Critical steps of the VLP capture assay are the coating of the beads with capture antibodies - here bNAbs - and the subsequent capture of the antigen-positive VLPs by the antibody-coated beads. Successful coating of the beads with antibodies depends on the choice of the conjugated immunoglobulin (Ig)-binding protein. The donor species as well as the Ig class of the antibodies determine whether protein G- or protein A-conjugated beads are preferable. For most species and Ig classes, protein G is the ligand of choice33. As an alternative to protein A/G-conjugated beads, streptavidin beads for the coating with biotinylated antibodies are available. Beads can also be covalently coupled with antibodies.
The capture of the VLPs by antibody-coated beads depends on thorough mixing, sufficient incubation time, antigen abundance, and affinity of the capture antibody. In our experience, thorough mixing of the antibody-coated beads with the VLP samples is best achieved by the utilization of volumes >500 µL in 1.5 mL tubes under rotation for at least 2 h at room temperature or 4 °C. Another potential hurdle is the too low amount of VLPs in the sample. For antibodies strongly binding the target antigen, VLP inputs as low as 15 ng of Gag protein usually allow for readily detectable amounts of the viral core proteins utilizing Western blot-analysis. However, low-affinity antibodies require higher input amounts, e.g., 100 ng of Gag protein, to obtain conclusive results (Figure 3, bNAb 3).
Some surface antigens are prone to protease degradation. Here, we recommend the addition of protease inhibitors to the VLP samples and incubation at 4 °C. Non-specific adhesion of host cell proteins and VLPs to the bead-bound antibodies is rarely observed and should be excluded by utilizing appropriate negative controls, as we demonstrated here using mock and bald VLP samples and isotype control antibodies. Strategies to reduce non-specific binding include extended washing steps and the addition of casein in the washing buffer34. Furthermore, the capture assay may also be improved by determining the optimal ratio of antibody to antigen-displaying VLP amount.
In the last step of the VLP capture assay, we describe the elution of the immune complexes from the beads by boiling in reducing Laemmli buffer. During this step, the VLPs are disassembled, and the capture antibodies and target antigens are separated from the beads. Notably, the donor species of the primary antibody used in the subsequent Western blot-analysis has to differ from the donor of the capture antibody to avoid the unintended detection of the capture antibody by the secondary anti-donor IgG HRP-conjugated antibodies.
The VLP capture assay presented here provides an easy-to-use and sensitive method to detect neutralization-sensitive epitopes in structural intact target antigens displayed on VLP surfaces. However, the capture assay does not enable direct epitope quantification. ELISA performed with bNAbs are instrumental for this purpose and should be conducted in parallel, particularly if examined VLPs are intended to be used in preclinical studies employing animal models35. This is pivotal, as the amount of antigen can directly correlate with the elicitation of a neutralizing antibody response in immunized animals, as shown for porcine circovirus type 2 (PCV2) vaccines36.
An ideal vaccine should result in the elicitation of bNAbs targeting the neutralization-sensitive epitopes on the virion surface. The analysis of these epitopes especially referring to their full structural integrity on the particulate vaccine surface is crucial for identifying potential vaccine candidates. This is not only the case for HIV-derived VLPs but also for many other VLP vaccines in development37. Prominent VLP-based vaccines are, for example, derived from non-enveloped or capsid parental viruses such as human papillomavirus (HPV). Unlike HIV-1 particles, which are formed by only one structural core protein, namely p55 Gag, and enveloped by the membrane originating from the VLP producer cell, HPV particles consist of only one or two structural core proteins38,39. Likewise and as presented here for enveloped VLPs, the VLP capture assay may also be applicable to the detection of neutralization-sensitive epitopes of non-enveloped VLPs.
As an alternative to the capture assay, VLP samples can be directly subjected to native PAGE followed by Western blot-analysis using bNAbs and appropriate secondary antibodies coupled to HRP40. However and for the analysis of HIV Env-decorated VLPs, this assay is less sensitive as only a low number of antigen proteins per VLP can be expected. In contrast, the capture assay facilitates the detection of the core proteins abundant at large amounts per VLP, in the case of HIV-derived VLPs more than 3,500 Gag proteins form a VLP27. This allows for the very sensitive indirect detection of epitopes in Env displayed even at low densities on VLPs.
The number of well-established methods to examine neutralization-sensitive epitopes in surface antigens of VLPs is limited. Labeling the antigens displayed on the VLPs is possible with epitope-specific antibody-fluorophore conjugates and subsequent detection by nanoparticle tracking-analysis (NTA), enabling detection and quantification of VLPs. This method has also been successfully developed and optimized for exosomes presenting cell surface markers41. Also, surface plasmon resonance (SPR) spectroscopy allows for the analysis of interactions between unconjugated neutralizing antibodies and cognate epitopes presented on VLPs. Although not suitable for higher throughput analysis, VLPs can also be labeled with bNAbs coupled to gold particles and subsequent transmission electron microscopic (TEM)-examination42.
In conclusion, the VLP capture assay provides some considerable advantages: (i) Assessment of the structural integrity of neutralization-sensitive epitopes on the surface of VLPs, (ii) sensitive and indirect detection of antigens even when displayed at low densities on VLPs, and (iii) the method does not require cost-intensive analytical equipment.