$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$
$$\longleftharp{xx}$$,
$$\longrightharp{xx}$$,
Traditionally, the diagnosis of skin cancer relies on visual inspection of the lesion followed by a closer look at suspicious lesions using a magnifying lens called a dermatoscope. A dermatoscope provides subsurface information that increases sensitivity and specificity over that of visual inspection for diagnosing skin cancers1,2. However, dermoscopy lacks cellular detail, often leading to a biopsy for histopathological confirmation. The low and variable (67% to 97%) specificity of dermoscopy3 results in false positives and biopsies that turn out to show benign lesions on pathology. A biopsy is not only an invasive procedure that causes bleeding and pain4 but is also highly undesirable on cosmetically sensitive regions such as the face due to scarring.
To improve patient care by overcoming existing limitations, many noninvasive, in vivo imaging devices are being explored5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18. RCM and OCT devices are the two main optical noninvasive devices that are used for diagnosing skin lesions, especially skin cancers. RCM has acquired Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) billing codes in the USA and is being increasingly used in academic tertiary care centers and some private clinics7,8,19. RCM images lesions at near-histological (cellular) resolution. However, images are in the en-face plane (visualization of one layer of skin at a time), and the depth of imaging is limited to ~200 µm, sufficient to reach the superficial (papillary) dermis only. RCM imaging relies on the reflectance contrast from various structures in the skin. Melanin imparts the highest contrast, making pigmented lesions bright and easier to diagnose. Thus, RCM combined with dermoscopy has significantly improved diagnosis (sensitivity of 90% and specificity of 82%) over dermoscopy of pigmented lesions, including melanoma20. However, due to a lack of melanin contrast in pink lesions, especially for BCCs, RCM has lower specificity (37.5%-75.5%)21. A conventional OCT device, another commonly used noninvasive device, images lesion up to 1 mm in depth within the skin and visualizes them in a vertical plane (similar to histopathology)9. However, OCT lacks cellular resolution. OCT is primarily used for diagnosing keratinocytic lesions, especially BCCs, but still has lower specificity9.
Thus, to overcome the existing limitations of these devices, a multi-modal RCM-OCT device has been built22. This device incorporates RCM and OCT within a single, handheld imaging probe, enabling the simultaneous acquisition of co-registered en-face RCM images and vertical OCT images of the lesion. OCT provides architectural detail of the lesions and can image deeper (up to a depth of ~1 mm) within the skin. It also has a larger field of view (FOV) of ~2 mm22 compared to the handheld RCM device (~0.75 mm x 0.75 mm). RCM images are used to provide cellular details of the lesion identified on OCT. This prototype is not yet commercialized and is being used as an investigational device in clinics23,24,25.
Despite their success in improving the diagnosis and management of skin cancers (as supported by the literature), these devices are not yet widely used in clinics. This is mainly due to the paucity of experts who can read these images but is also due to the lack of trained technicians who can acquire diagnostic-quality images efficiently (within a clinical time frame) at the bedside8. In this manuscript, the goal is to facilitate the awareness and eventual adoption of these devices in clinics. To achieve this goal, we familiarize dermatologists, dermatopathologists, and Mohs surgeons with images of normal skin and skin cancers acquired with the RCM and RCM-OCT devices. We will also detail the utility of each device for the diagnosis of skin cancers. Most importantly, the focus of this manuscript is to provide step-by-step guidance for image acquisition using these devices, which will ensure good-quality images for clinical use.