In this article, we present a protocol for creating a knee joint-on-a-chip system, in which bone, cartilage, adipose tissue, and synovium-like tissues are formed from MSCs and co-cultured within a customized bioreactor. This multi-component, human cell-derived system with plug-and-play features represents a new tool for studying the pathogenesis of joint diseases and developing drugs.
Given that different tissues favor specific culture media, it is critical to provide the respective medium for each tissue and prevent free medium exchange between flows. In particular, during the generation of biphasic osteochondral tissues, the fate of naive MSCs is determined by the medium to which they are exposed. In the current design, we use a gelatin-based hydrogel as the scaffold, which provides a template for cell growth and seals the potential gap between the tissues and the walls of the inserts. Therefore, it is critical to in situ photocrosslink the gel within the inserts. In addition, growth factors such as BMP7 and TGFβ3 are supplemented in the osteogenic medium and chondrogenic medium, respectively. To maintain their bioactivities for several days, the fresh media must be kept outside the incubator before being introduced to the chip culture. Therefore, we need to use syringes to withdraw the media from the reservoirs instead of infusing the media in the incubator.
Another critical point while handling the bioreactor is avoiding unnecessary pressure. The tissues rely on physical binding to the insert wall to stay in position. Since they are exposed to the top and bottom medium flows, if one phase of the flow has a higher pressure, it may push the tissues out of the inserts, thus resulting in leaking. Therefore, during the handling processes, such as when removing bubbles, a gentle push of the syringe is critical. If the hydrogel scaffold is pushed out, it can be put back, additional uncured hydrogel can be applied to fill the gap, and it can be cured, allowing for a secure and firm scaffold fit within the insert.
Given its proven biocompatibility, gelatin-based scaffolds are used to create all four tissues in the current system. It should be noted that gelatin may not represent the best material for supporting tissue formation. Therefore, if necessary, other types of scaffolds can be adapted for use. For example, one can use a porous and stiff scaffold and combine it with gelatin to further enhance MSC osteogenesis11. In this case, one needs to ensure there is no free medium change between the top and bottom flows. As discussed above, one can use biocompatible hydrogels to seal the potential leaking points. In addition, MSCs are used in the current tissue chip. Given their demonstrated differentiation potential into musculoskeletal tissues, induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) can also be used in the future to replace MSCs. As a first step toward this investigation, we have recently used iPSCs to create osteochondral tissues12.
Synovium inflammation, or synovitis, is a key feature of OA and many other joint diseases. Furthermore, Atukorala et al. found that synovitis is a strong predictor of subsequent radiographic OA13. Therefore, we induced SFT inflammation by IL-1β treatment to generate OA-like features in the miniJoint. However, we are aware that this disease induction method cannot capture all the facets of OA. Thus, in our future research, we will explore alternative approaches to modeling OA in the miniJoint by, for example, using hyperphysiological loading to induce mechanical injury of the cartilage component14. To apply mechanical loading, the adaptation of the miniJoint design will be necessary. For example, the bottom of the miniJoint chip can potentially be modified to make the cartilage tissue accessible to the impactor tip of a customized spring-loaded impact device developed in our lab15.
To the best of our knowledge, the knee joint-on-a-chip described here is the first in vitro model that includes multiple tissues within one system to simulate a synovial joint. The novel plug-and-play capacity allows for investigating the role of a single tissue in disease progression and its response to various treatments. This system can also be employed to model joint diseases other than OA. For example, bacteria and other pathogens can be possibly introduced into the SM to model septic arthritis16. In addition, the design enables real-time crosstalk between the tissues, thus overcoming the limitation of using the conditioned medium. Specifically, adipose, synovial, and cartilage tissues can communicate through the shared medium, and bone and cartilage can interact through direct physical binding. However, there are some limitations to the current miniJoint. First, stem cell-derived tissues are used, and whether their phenotype and function resemble their counterparts in the native knee joint needs further investigation. Second, immune cells such as macrophages, which play a critical role in OA pathogenesis, are not included. Our previous study has demonstrated the feasibility of including macrophages in gelatin scaffolds17. Lastly, a physical stress-enabled mechanism is not included to simulate the mechanical loading on the tissues in the native knee joint. Recently, Occhetta et al. developed a cartilage-on-a-chip model, in which strain-controlled compression was applied to stimulate the engineered cartilage tissue14. A similar method can be adopted to enable mechanical loading in the miniJoint.
In summary, the miniJoint can serve as a unique platform to investigate the pathogenesis of OA and related conditions in vitro and provide a mechanism for exploring potential DMOADs and interventions for personalized medicine. The miniJoint system can also be integrated with OoCs mimicking other organs to establish body-on-a-chip systems that can be used to study the interactions between various organ mimics.