-1::1
Simple Hit Counter
Skip to content

Products

Solutions

×
×
Sign In

EN

EN - EnglishCN - 简体中文DE - DeutschES - EspañolKR - 한국어IT - ItalianoFR - FrançaisPT - Português do BrasilPL - PolskiHE - עִבְרִיתRU - РусскийJA - 日本語TR - TürkçeAR - العربية
Sign In Start Free Trial

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal

Peer reviewed scientific video journal

Behavior
Biochemistry
Bioengineering
Biology
Cancer Research
Chemistry
Developmental Biology
View All
JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments

Video encyclopedia of advanced research methods

Biological Techniques
Biology
Cancer Research
Immunology
Neuroscience
Microbiology
JoVE Visualize

Visualizing science through experiment videos

EDUCATION

JoVE Core

Video textbooks for undergraduate courses

Analytical Chemistry
Anatomy and Physiology
Biology
Calculus
Cell Biology
Chemistry
Civil Engineering
Electrical Engineering
View All
JoVE Science Education

Visual demonstrations of key scientific experiments

Advanced Biology
Basic Biology
Chemistry
View All
JoVE Lab Manual

Videos of experiments for undergraduate lab courses

Biology
Chemistry

BUSINESS

JoVE Business

Video textbooks for business education

Accounting
Finance
Macroeconomics
Marketing
Microeconomics

OTHERS

JoVE Quiz

Interactive video based quizzes for formative assessments

Authors

Teaching Faculty

Librarians

K12 Schools

Biopharma

Products

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal

Peer reviewed scientific video journal

JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments

Video encyclopedia of advanced research methods

JoVE Visualize

Visualizing science through experiment videos

EDUCATION

JoVE Core

Video textbooks for undergraduates

JoVE Science Education

Visual demonstrations of key scientific experiments

JoVE Lab Manual

Videos of experiments for undergraduate lab courses

BUSINESS

JoVE Business

Video textbooks for business education

OTHERS

JoVE Quiz

Interactive video based quizzes for formative assessments

Solutions

Authors
Teaching Faculty
Librarians
K12 Schools
Biopharma

Language

English

EN

English

CN

简体中文

DE

Deutsch

ES

Español

KR

한국어

IT

Italiano

FR

Français

PT

Português do Brasil

PL

Polski

HE

עִבְרִית

RU

Русский

JA

日本語

TR

Türkçe

AR

العربية

    Menu

    JoVE Journal

    Behavior

    Biochemistry

    Bioengineering

    Biology

    Cancer Research

    Chemistry

    Developmental Biology

    Engineering

    Environment

    Genetics

    Immunology and Infection

    Medicine

    Neuroscience

    Menu

    JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments

    Biological Techniques

    Biology

    Cancer Research

    Immunology

    Neuroscience

    Microbiology

    Menu

    JoVE Core

    Analytical Chemistry

    Anatomy and Physiology

    Biology

    Calculus

    Cell Biology

    Chemistry

    Civil Engineering

    Electrical Engineering

    Introduction to Psychology

    Mechanical Engineering

    Medical-Surgical Nursing

    View All

    Menu

    JoVE Science Education

    Advanced Biology

    Basic Biology

    Chemistry

    Clinical Skills

    Engineering

    Environmental Sciences

    Physics

    Psychology

    View All

    Menu

    JoVE Lab Manual

    Biology

    Chemistry

    Menu

    JoVE Business

    Accounting

    Finance

    Macroeconomics

    Marketing

    Microeconomics

Start Free Trial
Loading...
Home
JoVE Journal
Neuroscience
Detecting Pre-Stimulus Source-Level Effects on Object Perception with Magnetoencephalography
Detecting Pre-Stimulus Source-Level Effects on Object Perception with Magnetoencephalography
JoVE Journal
Neuroscience
This content is Free Access.
JoVE Journal Neuroscience
Detecting Pre-Stimulus Source-Level Effects on Object Perception with Magnetoencephalography

Detecting Pre-Stimulus Source-Level Effects on Object Perception with Magnetoencephalography

Full Text
7,347 Views
09:25 min
July 26, 2019

DOI: 10.3791/60120-v

Elie Rassi1, Marco Fuscà1, Nathan Weisz1, Gianpaolo Demarchi1

1Center for Cognitive Neuroscience,Paris-Lodron Universität Salzburg

Overview

This article describes an experimental setup to detect pre-stimulus influences on object perception using magnetoencephalography (MEG). It details the methodology for stimulus material, experimental design, and data analysis to investigate brain connectivity changes before viewing objects.

Key Study Components

Area of Science

  • Neuroscience
  • Electrophysiology
  • Cognitive psychology

Background

  • MEG allows for the measurement of brain activity with high spatial resolution.
  • The influence of pre-stimulus brain connectivity on perception is poorly understood.
  • Understanding these processes can illuminate cognitive functions and neural mechanisms.

Purpose of Study

  • To assess the impact of transient connectivity changes on object perception.
  • To employ MEG for capturing source-level neural dynamics.
  • To develop a robust experimental protocol for MEG studies.

Methods Used

  • MEG was used to record brain activity while participants viewed visual stimuli.
  • Participants completed a series of trials involving face and vase recognition.
  • Data collection included resting-state measurements and task performance analytics.
  • Signal processing involved time-frequency analysis and connectivity assessments.
  • Detailed preparation and consent processes for participant safety were conducted.

Main Results

  • The experiment showed how pre-stimulus connectivity influences perceptual outcomes.
  • Data analysis revealed relevant coherence metrics across trial types.
  • Findings contribute to understanding cognitive mechanisms underlying perception.

Conclusions

  • This study enables a deeper understanding of the neural basis of perception.
  • Implementing MEG yields valuable insights into cognitive processing times.
  • These methods may inform future studies on brain connectivity and perception.

Frequently Asked Questions

What are the advantages of using MEG?
MEG provides high spatial resolution and is unaffected by the skull or scalp, making it superior in source localization compared to EEG.
How is the experimental design implemented?
Participants undergo a screening process for exclusions, followed by a structured series of visual tasks designed to measure perceptual responses.
What types of outcomes are measured?
The study collects behavioral responses and MEG data to analyze connectivity changes that influence perception based on visual stimuli.
How can the method be adapted for other experiments?
The protocol can be tailored to investigate various perceptual and cognitive functions by varying the stimuli and tasks performed by participants.
What critical steps should be considered for participant safety?
Ensure informed consent, confirm the absence of metallic objects, and use non-magnetic clothing during the MEG recording.
What limitations does the study have?
This method requires specific technical setups and trained staff, potentially limiting accessibility in some research environments.

This article describes how to set up an experiment that allows detecting pre-stimulus source-level influences on object perception using magnetoencephalography (MEG). It covers stimulus material, experimental design, MEG recording, and data analysis.

This method allows fast and transient changes in brain connectivity to be captured before objects are viewed, and the influence of these changes on object perception. The main advantage of MEG over EEG is that the brain's magnetic field is unperturbed by the head, enabling higher-resolution source reconstruction and better connectivity estimates. Begin by recording one minute of empty-room MEG data at one kilohertz.

Monitor the signals from the 102 magnetometers and 204 orthogonally placed planar gradiometers at 102 different positions by visualizing all signals in real time on the acquisition computer. You're not gonna sue us? And here-Next, obtain informed consent from the participant in accordance with the declaration of Helsinki and have them sign the form which includes a statement allowing the processing of personal data.

Is there any metal object from your body? But you can do this when you're inside as well. Next, provide them with non-magnetic clothes and make sure they have no metallic objects in or on their bodies.

Ask them to fill out an anonymous questionnaire to ensure this and to assure they do not have any other exclusion criteria and to document details such as handedness and level of rest. All right, perfect, thank you.Here. Seat the participant on a non-ferromagnetic chair and then attach five head position indicator coils to the head with adhesive, two above one eye, one above the other eye, and one behind each ear.

Place the tracker sensor for the digitization system firmly on the participant's head and fix it to the spectacles for maximum stability. Next, digitize the anatomical landmarks, the left and right pre-auricular points and the nasion, and assure that the pre-auricular points are symmetrical. Also, digitize the five HPI coil positions using a 3D digitizer stylus.

Now, digitize up to 300 points along the scalp and maximize the coverage of the head shape. Cover the well-defined areas of the scalp on MR images, above the inion on the back and the nasion on the front, as well as the nasal bridge. These points will be used for co-registration to an anatomical image.

At this point, remove the spectacles with the tracker sensor and attach disposable electrodes above and below the right eye to monitor vertical eye movements. Also attach electrodes to the right of the right eye and to the left of the left eye to monitor horizontal eye movements. Attach additional electrodes below the right collarbone and below the heart to monitor heart rate.

The signal in these areas is robust, so checking the impedance is not necessary. Also, attach an electrode as a ground below the neck.Please. Now, escort the participant to the MEG shielded room and instruct them to sit in the MEG chair.

Plug the HPI wiring harness and the disposable electrodes in the MEG system. Then raise the chair such that the participant's head touches the top of the helmet and assure the participant is comfortable. Is this okay now?

Yes.Perfect.Begin by instructing the participant to passively stare at an empty screen for five minutes while recording resting-state MEG data at one kilohertz. Keep the sampling rate at one kilohertz throughout the experiment. Then instruct the participant of the task requirements and have them perform 20 practice trials.

So now we'll go and have a practice session and make sure that everything is okay.Okay. All right? Start the experiment by first displaying instructions, telling the participant which button to press when they see faces and which button to press when they see a vase.

Create a single trial with four events which will apply to all trials in this order:fixation cross, Rubin image, mask, and response prompt. At the beginning of each block, before the task starts, start measuring MEG data and record the initial position of the participant's head position with respect to the MEG. Be sure to monitor the participant via video during the experiment.

In the MEG system, click Go to start. When the dialog asks if the HPI data is to be omitted or added to the recording, inspect the HPI coils signal, and click Accept to record that initial head position. After that, click Record raw to start recording MEG data.

At the beginning of each trial, display the fixation cross for a variable time period of one to 1.8 seconds. Then, display the Rubin image for 150 milliseconds. Next, remove the Rubin image and display the mask for 200 milliseconds, followed by a question prompting the participant to respond within two seconds.

Program the response period such that if participants respond within two seconds, the next trial begins. Otherwise, start the next trial after two seconds. Save the timing of all four events as well as the response choice and its timing.

Monitor the MEG signals by visualizing them in real time on the acquisition computer. When the experiment is complete, escort the participant out of the shielded room and help them detach the sensors. Analyze the acquired data by performing time-frequency analysis on both regions of interest separately from the two trial types using the code seen on the screen here.

First, implement multi-taper time-frequency transformation based on multiplication in the frequency domain. Also, set the taper option to dpss to use a discrete prolate spheroidal sequences function taper and define the frequencies of interest from eight to 13 hertz. Next, set the width of the time window to 200 milliseconds and the smoothing parameter to four hertz.

Set the keeptrials option to yes to return the time-frequency estimates of the single trials. Set the output to fourier to return the complex Fourier spectra. Perform a connectivity analysis on the resulting time-frequency data using the code seen onscreen here, using the settings shown to return the imaginary part of coherency.

Repeat the procedure for each participant before averaging the coherence spectra across frequencies and participants and plotting the resulting grand-averaged imaginary coherency values as a function of time. Here, we see an example trial structure and raw data. A trial starts with the display of a fixation cross.

After one to 1.8 seconds, the Rubin stimulus appears for 150 milliseconds, followed by a mask for 200 milliseconds. A response screen then appears to prompt participants to respond with face or vase. Above, we see multi-channel raw data from an example participant, time-locked to stimulus onset and averaged across trials.

This data in the pre-stimulus analysis window will be the target interval for analysis. Here, we see spectral power estimates from source-localized fusiform face area signals on face and vase trials. This figure shows the imaginary part of coherency between source-localized visual cortex and fusiform face area signals in face and vase trials, in the frequency range of eight to 13 hertz.

Shaded regions represent the standard error of the mean for within-subjects design. MEG is a passive method, much like the pickup of an electric guitar. The machine also bears the risk of being damaged by participants, unlike other modalities.

Explore More Videos

MagnetoencephalographyMEGObject PerceptionBrain ConnectivitySource ReconstructionData AcquisitionInformed ConsentParticipant SafetyNon-magnetic ClothingHead Position Indicator CoilsAnatomical Landmarks3D DigitizerEye Movement MonitoringCo-registrationExperimental Protocol

Related Videos

Functional Mapping with Simultaneous MEG and EEG

06:04

Functional Mapping with Simultaneous MEG and EEG

Related Videos

18.5K Views

Mapping Cortical Dynamics Using Simultaneous MEG/EEG and Anatomically-constrained Minimum-norm Estimates: an Auditory Attention Example

08:45

Mapping Cortical Dynamics Using Simultaneous MEG/EEG and Anatomically-constrained Minimum-norm Estimates: an Auditory Attention Example

Related Videos

15.2K Views

Simultaneous Electroencephalography and Magnetoencephalography to Identify Seizure-Prone Brain Regions

04:40

Simultaneous Electroencephalography and Magnetoencephalography to Identify Seizure-Prone Brain Regions

Related Videos

626 Views

How to Detect Amygdala Activity with Magnetoencephalography using Source Imaging

10:48

How to Detect Amygdala Activity with Magnetoencephalography using Source Imaging

Related Videos

22.8K Views

Extracting Visual Evoked Potentials from EEG Data Recorded During fMRI-guided Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation

09:36

Extracting Visual Evoked Potentials from EEG Data Recorded During fMRI-guided Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation

Related Videos

14.3K Views

Interictal High Frequency Oscillations Detected with Simultaneous Magnetoencephalography and Electroencephalography as Biomarker of Pediatric Epilepsy

10:22

Interictal High Frequency Oscillations Detected with Simultaneous Magnetoencephalography and Electroencephalography as Biomarker of Pediatric Epilepsy

Related Videos

21.2K Views

How to Find Effects of Stimulus Processing on Event Related Brain Potentials of Close Others when Hyperscanning Partners

09:52

How to Find Effects of Stimulus Processing on Event Related Brain Potentials of Close Others when Hyperscanning Partners

Related Videos

8.1K Views

Studying Brain Function in Children Using Magnetoencephalography

08:00

Studying Brain Function in Children Using Magnetoencephalography

Related Videos

9.6K Views

Stimulus-specific Cortical Visual Evoked Potential Morphological Patterns

09:42

Stimulus-specific Cortical Visual Evoked Potential Morphological Patterns

Related Videos

6.5K Views

Low-Cost Electroencephalographic Recording System Combined with a Millimeter-Sized Coil to Transcranially Stimulate the Mouse Brain In Vivo

05:26

Low-Cost Electroencephalographic Recording System Combined with a Millimeter-Sized Coil to Transcranially Stimulate the Mouse Brain In Vivo

Related Videos

4.4K Views

JoVE logo
Contact Us Recommend to Library
Research
  • JoVE Journal
  • JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments
  • JoVE Visualize
Business
  • JoVE Business
Education
  • JoVE Core
  • JoVE Science Education
  • JoVE Lab Manual
  • JoVE Quizzes
Solutions
  • Authors
  • Teaching Faculty
  • Librarians
  • K12 Schools
  • Biopharma
About JoVE
  • Overview
  • Leadership
Others
  • JoVE Newsletters
  • JoVE Help Center
  • Blogs
  • JoVE Newsroom
  • Site Maps
Contact Us Recommend to Library
JoVE logo

Copyright © 2026 MyJoVE Corporation. All rights reserved

Privacy Terms of Use Policies
WeChat QR code