In this protocol we combine RNAi-mediated gene silencing with an in vivo diuresis assay to study the effects knockdown of genes of interest has on mosquito fluid excretion.
This video protocol demonstrates an effective technique to knockdown a particular gene in an insect and conduct a novel bioassay to measure excretion rate. This method can be used to obtain a better understanding of the process of diuresis in insects and is especially useful in the study of diuresis in blood-feeding arthropods that are able to take up huge amounts of liquid in a single blood meal.
This RNAi-mediated gene knockdown combined with an in vivo diuresis assay was developed by the Hansen lab to study the effects of RNAi-mediated knockdown of aquaporin genes on Aedes aegypti mosquito diuresis1.
The protocol is setup in two parts: the first demonstration illustrates how to construct a simple mosquito injection device and how to prepare and inject dsRNA into the thorax of mosquitoes for RNAi-mediated gene knockdown. The second demonstration illustrates how to determine excretion rates in mosquitoes using an in vivo bioassay.
Part I – RNAi-mediated gene knockdown in adult Aedes aegypti mosquitoes. For experiment overview see Figure 1.
1. dsRNA Synthesis
2. Injection Preparation
3. Collect and Anesthetize Mosquitoes
4. Mosquito Injection
5. Mosquito Recovery and Storage
Part II – In vivo diuresis assay in adult Aedes aegypti mosquitoes
Note: This protocol has been developed by the authors and used for RNAi-mediated knockdown of aquaporin proteins in the yellow fever mosquito Aedes aegypti1. To avoid variability between individual mosquitoes, mosquitoes should be analyzed in groups. For technical reasons, we recommend groups of 5 mosquitoes per treatment – there is a limited amount of time to perform the first weight measurement before mosquitoes begin to excrete urine after injection.
6. Collect and Anesthetize Mosquitoes
7. Initial Weight Measurement
8. Injection Preparation
9. Mosquito Injection
10. Weighing Mosquitoes
11. Second and Subsequent Weight Measurements
Note: Weight measurements of the mosquitoes should be taken in 30 minute intervals, but this can be adjusted to shorter or longer intervals depending on excretion rates.
12. Determining Mosquito Excretion Rate
13. Representative Results
RNAi-mediated gene knockdown and in vivo diuresis assay have been used by the Hansen lab to study the effects of aquaporins in Aedes aegypti mosquito diuresis. Three aquaporins that are expressed in Aedes aegypti Malpighian tubules were knocked down with significant effects on excretion rates compared to control mosquitoes1. Figure 4 shows representative results of an experiment where the diuresis assay has been used to compare excretion rates between Aedes aegypti and Culex quinquefasciatus at different temperatures.
Figure 1. Flowchart of the RNAi/diuresis assay. 5 groups of 10 mosquitoes each are injected with dsRNA for a specific gene and another five groups of ten mosquitoes are injected with control dsRNA. Another group of mosquitoes injected with 200 μM HgCl2 in PBS is used as a positive control. These mosquitoes are weighed before injection, and after injection in thirty minute intervals for 3 hours.
Figure 2. A simple micro injection device for the RNAi-mediated gene knockdown and in vivo diuresis assay. A. The glass capillary needles used for injection. The gray triangle represents the millimeter increments drawn on the needle to indicate the amount of liquid injected into the mosquito. B. 1 ml syringe used to construct the micro injector. The white triangle represents the needle hub and the black triangle represents the rubber plunger head attached to the plunger in the syringe. C. The tubing used to attach the mouthpiece to the injector. D. 1 ml disposable pipette tip (blue tip) that is used as the mouthpiece of the microinjection device. E. The microinjection device that incorporates A-D parts. Click here to view larger figure.
Figure 3. Optimal mosquito injection site. A. Female Aedes aegypti mosquito injected with a glass capillary needle between the large scales on the thorax. The black bar indicates 1 mm for size comparison. B. A drawing of the female mosquito thorax and the white spots represent the white scales in the mosquito exoskeleton. The injection needle should pierce the mosquito between the spots to minimize mortality rate during injection.
Figure 4. Effects of temperature on Culex quinquefasciatus and Aedes aegypti diuresis. The diuresis assay was performed with two species of mosquitoes, Aedes aegypti and Culex quinquefasciatus, at different temperatures. The excretion rate during the first hour after injection is given in percent.
Group | TARA (g) |
not injected (g) |
after injection (g) |
1h post injection (g) |
average weight (mg) | amount injected (μl) |
amount excreted (μl) |
% excreted |
1 | 7.5938 | 7.6057 | 7.6104 | 7.6096 | 2.38 | 0.94 | 0.16 | 17.0 |
2 | 7.8252 | 7.8349 | 7.8415 | 7.8403 | 1.94 | 1.32 | 0.24 | 18.2 |
3 | 7.8896 | 7.9026 | 7.9077 | 7.906 | 2.6 | 1.02 | 0.34 | 33.3 |
Table 1. Aedes aegypti in vivo diuresis assay results. Raw data from the in vivo diuresis assay performed with Aedes aegypti female mosquitoes at 4 °C.
The RNAi protocol used has been developed in the laboratory of Alexander Raikhel at the University of California Riverside6,7 and is similar to a protocol published by Garver and Dimopoulos4. The experimental approach shown in this video protocol can be used to study genes involved in insect diuresis in an in vivo setting. The excretory organs of insects, the Malpighian tubules, have attracted the interest of generations of researchers as a ‘simple’ model system for diuresis. This organ is involved in xenobiotics clearance8 and work in Drosophila has identified numerous genes involved in Malpighian tubule physiology9,10 which now can be studied in other insect species with reverse genetic methods like RNAi. Many homologous genes can be easily identified in the published genome sequences of various insect species11. Three-day old mosquitoes were used in this protocol because at this time point they become competent to take a blood meal.
Several other excretion assays have been reported. The classic Ramsay assay has been used to study diuresis in isolated Malpighian tubules in vitro12. In this assay single tubules are isolated and the distal part is placed into a drop of saline solution while the proximal part is open. Diuretic activity is calculated by measuring the size of the urine droplet that forms at the end of the proximal part. Using the Ramsay assay, one can measure amounts of urine production by individual Malpighian tubules. Our diuresis assay allows for measurements of whole-mosquito excretion rates and is, therefore, not an alternative to the Ramsay assay. Instead, both assays can provide complementary information if used together.
Other in vivo excretion assays have been developed for Musca domestica and Aedes aegypti. The M. domestica study involved the measurement of water loss by a flow-through humidity meter 13. A similar technique was used to study Aedes aegypti diuresis by measuring excretion rates using a precision humidity chamber14. The in vivo diuresis assay presented here is not as technically demanding as the above mentioned techniques and nevertheless produces very precise data on excretion rates in the context of a complete organism.
There is a wide range of future applications for the in vivo diuresis assay presented here. In addition to reverse genetics methods like RNAi it can be used to study the effect of drugs, for example signal transduction inhibitors etc., on insect diuresis. It is also a powerful assay to study the process of xenobiotics clearance in target insects.
Problems that we will address while further developing this assay are: A) The concentration and composition of the injection buffer. We used PBS for the experiments we performed so far but other buffers like Aedes Physiological Saline15 might turn out to be more appropriate for mosquitoes and other insects. B) Applying this method to other species, especially non-blood sucking insects. The amounts of buffer that can be injected into such species has to be empirically determined for each species. C) Minimize experimental error. We will optimize our injection and measuring techniques.
The authors have nothing to disclose.
The authors thank Victoria Carpenter for her critical comments of this protocol.
Name of reagent or equipment | Company | Catalogue number | Comments |
MEGAscript T7 High Yield Kit | Ambion, Inc. | AM1334 | |
PBS buffer | Sigma-Aldrich | P4417 | |
Plastic tubing | Local vendor | PVC | |
1 ml plastic pipette tip | VWR | 83007-376 | Blue tip |
1 ml syringe | Becton, Dickinson and Company | 309602 | |
Scissors | Local vendor | ||
Metal needle | Carolina Biologicals | 654307 | Size 5 |
Fly pad | Genesee Scientific | 789060 | |
Battery-powered aspirator w/ collection vial | UPMA Labs | IPMM 2000 | |
Fine tip forceps | World Precision Instruments | 14095 | |
Glass capillary needles | World Precision Instruments | 1B200-6 | |
Stereo dissection microscope | Leica Microsystems | S6D | |
Analytical precision balance | Mettler Toledo | AB54S | |
Sucrose | Sigma-Aldrich | 84097 | |
One pint waxed lined cardboard cups | Local vendor | Manufactured soup cups | |
Mesh net | Local vendor | plastic fly gauze |