Waiting
Login processing...

Trial ends in Request Full Access Tell Your Colleague About Jove

Biology

Simultaneous pH Measurement in Endocytic and Cytosolic Compartments in Living Cells using Confocal Microscopy

Published: April 28, 2014 doi: 10.3791/51395

Summary

Several methods are available for measuring intracellular pH but very few of these allow simultaneous measurement of cytoplasmic and organellar pH. Here, we describe in detail a rapid and accurate methodology to simultaneously measure cytoplasmic and vesicular pH by ratiometric imaging of living cells.

Abstract

Intracellular pH is tightly regulated and differences in pH between the cytoplasm and organelles have been reported1. Regulation of cellular pH is crucial for homeostatic control of physiological processes that include: protein, DNA and RNA synthesis, vesicular trafficking, cell growth and cell division. Alterations in cellular pH homeostasis can lead to detrimental functional changes and promote progression of various diseases2. Various methods are available for measuring intracellular pH but very few of these allow simultaneous measurement of pH in the cytoplasm and in organelles. Here, we describe in detail a rapid and accurate method for the simultaneous measurement of cytoplasmic and organellar pH by using confocal microscopy on living cells3. This goal is achieved with the use of two pH-sensing ratiometric dyes that possess selective cellular compartment partitioning. For instance, SNARF-1 is compartmentalized inside the cytoplasm whereas HPTS is compartmentalized inside endosomal/lysosomal organelles. Although HPTS is commonly used as a cytoplasmic pH indicator, this dye can specifically label vesicles along the endosomal-lysosomal pathway after being taken up by pinocytosis3,4. Using these pH-sensing probes, it is possible to simultaneously measure pH within the endocytic and cytoplasmic compartments. The optimal excitation wavelength of HPTS varies depending on the pH while for SNARF-1, it is the optimal emission wavelength that varies. Following loading with SNARF-1 and HPTS, cells are cultured in different pH-calibrated solutions to construct a pH standard curve for each probe. Cell imaging by confocal microscopy allows elimination of artifacts and background noise. Because of the spectral properties of HPTS, this probe is better suited for measurement of the mildly acidic endosomal compartment or to demonstrate alkalinization of the endosomal/lysosomal organelles. This method simplifies data analysis, improves accuracy of pH measurements and can be used to address fundamental questions related to pH modulation during cell responses to external challenges.

Protocol

1. Preparation of Solutions for Cellular pH Calibration

  1. Add the following compounds to five separate 50 ml conical tubes to prepare 5 solutions to be used for calibration:
    • NaCl (1 ml of 1 M NaCl) (1 M NaCl = 0.58 g in 10 ml H20)
    • KCl (6.75 ml of 1 M KCl) (1 M KCl = 0.75 g in 10 ml H20)
    • Glucose (1 ml of 1 M D-Glucose) ( 1M D-Glucose = 1.80 g in 10 ml H20)
    • MgS04 (0.05 ml of 1 M MgSO4) (1 M MgSO4= 1.20 g in 10 ml H20)
    • 20 mM HEPES (1 ml of 1M HEPES) (1 M HEPES = 2.38 g in 10 ml H20)
    • CaCl2 (0.05 ml of 1M CaCl2) (1 M CaCl2= 1.47 g in 10 ml H20)
      Prepare all solutions in double distilled H2O (ddH2O).
  2. Complete each solution with 35 ml of ddH2O and mix with a magnetic stirrer until solution is achieved.
  3. Adjust the pH of each solution with 1 N KOH or 1 N HCl to obtain pH values of 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0 and 7.5. Then, adjust the volume with deionized water to a final volume of 50 ml.
  4. Measure 5 mg of nigericin and add it to 670 μl of absolute EtOH to prepare a 10 mM nigericin stock solution.
    Caution: nigericin is highly toxic and must be handled with great care (gloves, safety glasses and mask). Mix the solution by inversion until the nigericin is completely dissolved.
  5. Add 0.05 ml of 10 mM nigericin (final concentration 10 μM) to each calibration solution. Nigericin is an ionophore that increases cell membrane permeability and causes equilibration of intracellular and extracellular pH in the presence of a depolarizing concentration of extracellular K+.
  6. Calibration solutions can be stored up to 1 month at 4 °C

2. Cell Preparation

  1. Under a biological safety hood, seed cells in 35 mm x 10 mm culture dishes in 2 ml of growth medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum and antibiotics. Use the amount of cells needed to ensure approximately 50% confluence after 24 hr.
    NOTE: In our experiments, we use the HT-1080 cell line and plate 1 x 105 cells per culture dish.
  2. Determine the number of culture dishes needed for the experiment and plate 5 additional culture dishes to be used for calibration.
  3. Place culture dishes in a 37 °C/5% CO2 incubator for at least 24 hr.

3. Preparation of pH-sensing Probes

  1. Prepare a 1M stock solution of the fluorescent pH probe 8-hydroxypyrene-1,3,6 trisulfonic acid, trisodium salt (HPTS/pyranine) in ddH20. This solution must be stored at RT and protected from light.
  2. Prepare a stock solution of 1 mM 5-(and-6)-carboxyl seminaphthorhodafluor acetoxymethyl ester acetate (C-SNARF-1 AM; called thereafter SNARF-1) by dissolving 1 mg of SNARF-1 in 1.76 ml of DMSO. Thoroughly mix by repeated pipetting. SNARF-1 solution must be stored at -20 °C and protected from light.

4. Cell Labeling

  1. Sixteen hours before live-cell imaging, add 2 μl of 1M HPTS stock solution (final concentration 1 mM) to each culture dish containing 2 ml of complete medium.
  2. Return the culture dishes to the incubator. The HPTS probe is cell-impermeant, therefore to label organelles the probe must be taken up by pinocytosis. This condition requires that cell incubations with HPTS are performed in serum-supplemented culture medium.
  3. Following incubation with HPTS, wash the cells twice with sterile PBS and add 2 ml of serum-free medium for at least 2 hr. Incubation with SNARF-1 needs to be performed in serum-free medium because serum may prevent the uptake of the probe.
  4. Add 10 μl of a 1 mM SNARF-1 stock solution to obtain a final concentration of 5 μM and allow cells to incubate for 20 min at 37° C, under dim light. C-SNARF-1 concentration and time of incubation may vary according to cell type.
  5. At the end of incubation, wash cells twice in sterile PBS and add 2 ml of serum-free medium.

5. Addition of pH Modulators

  1. To assess whether the method can detect pH changes in cells, different reagents that modulate intracellular pH can be used:
    • Bafilomycin A1, a specific inhibitor of V-ATPase5
    • Na+/H+ exchanger isoform 1 (NHE-1)6
    • NH4Cl, a weak base that increases intracellular pH7
    1. Prepare stock solutions of the reagents mentioned above:
      • Bafilomycin A1: add 10 μg of bafilomycin A1 to 160 μl of DMSO to obtain a stock solution of 100 μM
      • EIPA: add 25 mg of EIPA to 1.67 ml of methanol to obtain a final concentration of 50 mM
      • NH4Cl: dissolve 0.53 g of ammonium chloride in 10 ml of ddH2O to obtain a final concentration of 1 mM.

      Note: All stock solutions must be kept at 4 °C except for bafilomycin A1 which must be stored at -20 °C and protected from light.
    2. In separate culture dishes, add one of the reagents as described below:
      • 2 μl of 100 μM bafilomycin A1 (final concentration 100 nM)
      • 1 μl of 50 mM EIPA (final concentration 25 μM)
      • 40 μl of 1M NH4Cl (final concentration 20 mM)
    3. Incubate the cells for 30 min at 37 °C.
  2. Proceed to image acquisition.

6. Specifications of the Live-cell Imaging Microscope and Acquisition Settings

  1. Perform live-cell imaging using a 40X objective mounted on a spectral inverted scanning confocal microscope equipped with a motorized XY stage, a chamber that accommodates glass bottom culture dishes in an environmentally controlled (temperature, humidity, CO2) stage incubator.
  2. The confocal instrument (Olympus FV1000) used here is equipped with:
    • A diode laser 405 nm
    • A 40 mW argon laser (458 nm, 488 nm, 515 nm)
    • A helium neon laser (543 nm)
    • Fluorite 10X objective, NA0.4
    • A LUCPLFLN 40X objective, NA0.60
    • A PLAPONSC PLAN APO 60X oil objective, NA1.4
    • A dichroic mirror DM 405/458/488/543
    • A SDM 560 and a SDM 640 dichroic filters
    • A BA655-755 barrier filter
    • A beam splitter BS20/80
    • Data analysis software for image acquisition and analysis,
  3. Once the stage incubator has warmed up to 37 °C and the microscope is set up, place a culture dish previously incubated with HPTS and SNARF-1 into the confocal stage imaging chamber.
  4. After locating an area of interest, adjust the software acquisition settings Figure 1.
    • Set up two virtual channel sets.
    • Initiate the first phase that corresponds to HPTS excitation at 405 nm and emission collection at 505 - 525 nm and SNARF-1 excitation at 543 nm and emission collection at 570 - 600 nm.
    • Initiate the second phase that corresponds to HPTS excitation at 458 nm and emission collection at 505 - 525 nm and SNARF-1 excitation at 543 nm and emission collection at 640 - 650 nm.
    • The confocal aperture is set to 175 μm by default and optimal aperture needs to be manually set at 300 μm.
    • Take Image by stacking serial horizontal optical sections (800 x 800 pixels) of 0.4 μm thickness.

NOTE: A 40X objective is useful to observe several cells simultaneously and works well for organelle viewing. However, spatial resolution and signal intensity are better achieved using a 60X oil objective. In addition, there is no excitation or emission cross-talk between the two dyes.

7. Calibration of pH-sensing Probes

  1. Before calibration, remove medium from the culture dish previously incubated with HPTS and SNARF-1, wash twice with sterile PBS and then add 2 ml of one of the five calibration solutions.
  2. Place the culture dish into the confocal stage chamber.
  3. Proceed to time-lapse image acquisition according to the following settings:
    1. Set the number of images and interval duration times for the experiment.
      NOTE: We typically use a 1 min interval between images for up to 30 min.
    2. Program the shutter to close between the acquisition of each image.
  4. Record the fluorescence intensity per min in a spreadsheet software and determine the time when fluorescence intensity is steady. Intracellular pH is usually stable after 15 - 20 min.
  5. Repeat steps 7.1 to 7.4 using a new culture dish for each remaining calibration solution.

8. Data Acquisition

  1. Once calibration has been done, acquire sample data from 4-5 randomly chosen fields containing 15-20 cells per field. Two images are obtained for each field: one for HPTS labeling (vesicles) and the second for SNARF-1 labeling (cytosol).
  2. Background fluorescence (extracellular area) is digitally subtracted from fluorescent images of both probes. Labeled vesicles and cytosol from their respective stored images are selected using a binary mask. For each pH-sensing probe, fluorescence intensities are measured on a numerical scale (0-4,095 gray level scale). A mean intensity for all pixels in the organelle or cytoplasm is calculated and values are used to calculate fluorescence ratios.

9. Data Analysis

  1. Various software packages are commercially available for data analysis. i.e. Fluoview Software.
  2. In a spreadsheet, record values and calculate fluorescence ratios as follows: In the case of HPTS, R = (F458 nm/F405 nm) and, in the case of SNARF-1, R = (F644 nm/F584 nm).
  3. Plot the data using scientific graphing software such as GraphPad Prism. The plot should portray fluorescence ratios (Y-axis) as a function of pH (X-axis). Curve fitting is achieved using non-linear regression.
  4. Collect fluorescence intensities of the samples as described in step 8.2 and calculate fluorescence ratios. Use calibration curves to transform ratios into pH values.

Subscription Required. Please recommend JoVE to your librarian.

Representative Results

For the simultaneous measurement of pH in both intracellular and endosomal/lysosomal cell compartments, the ratiometric fluorescent pH-sensing probes SNARF-1 and HPTS were used. SNARF-1 is restricted to the cytosolic compartment whereas HPTS allows ratiometric pH measurement of the endosomal/lysosomal compartment. Cell loading with HPTS for 16 hr allows its selective localization in endosomes/lysosomes4. A typical example of fluorescence recorded from HT-1080 cells loaded with the pH-sensing probes is shown in Figure 2A. Evidence that HPTS labels both endosomal and lysosomal compartments was obtained by co-staining with Alexa 546-conjugated transferrin (endosomes) or a fluorescent lysotrophic probe (Lysotracker Deep Reddye). Data clearly showed that HPTS stained both compartments Figure 2A.

Using the methodology described above, intracellular pH values in living cells were determined using a calibration curve for each probe Figures 2B and 2C, based on the ratiometric properties of each pH-sensitive dye. The five calibration solutions were used to convert fluorescence intensities to pH units. Data from three independent calibrations are reported for each pH-sensing probe Figure 2C. Each data point represents a ratio of fluorescence intensity at excitation wavelengths of 458/405 nm for HPTS or emission wavelengths of 644/584 nm for SNARF-1 at a given pH. The calibration curves for both probes showed a non-linear relationship that was best fitted with an exponential equation Figure 2C. The efficiency of the method for detecting cellular compartment-associated pH changes was evaluated in live HT-1080 cells using NH4Cl, a weak base that increases intracellular pH, bafilomycin A1, a pharmacological inhibitor of V-ATPases and EIPA, a NHE-1 inhibitor. NH4Cl triggered intravesicular and cytosolic pH increases from 6.35 to 7.10 and from 7.00 to 7.40, respectively Figures 3A and 3B. Bafilomycin A1 induced alkalinization of the endosomal and lysosomal compartments without altering cytosolic pH. In contrast, EIPA induced acidification of the cytosol reaching a pH value of 6.62 as compared to 7.00 in untreated cells Figures 3A and 3B.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Diagrams of acquisition settings for the confocal laser scanning microscope. (A) The first phase is set to excite HPTS at 405 nm and SNARF-1 at 543 nm simultaneously through a dichroic (DM405/488/543/633) mirror. Fluorescence emission is first recorded for HPTS at 505-525 nm using a dichroic mirror (SDM560). Fluorescence emission of SNARF-1 is then monitored through a bandpass interference filter in the range of 570-600 nm. (B) The second phase is set to simultaneously collect fluorescence emission of HPTS (exc, 458 nm) and SNARF-1 (exc, 543 nm). Probe excitation generated by the laser beam passes through a beam splitter (BS20/80) and fluorescence emission for each probe is collected through the dichroic mirrors used in the first phase. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 2
Figure 2. In situ calibration of pH-sensing probes. (A) Representative images of HPTS and SNARF-1 sub-cellular localization in HT-1080 fibrosarcoma cells. Upper images show that SNARF-1 labels the cytoplasm whereas HPTS-associated fluorescence shows intravesicular localization. HT-1080 cells were incubated for 30 min with Alexa 546-conjugated transferrin (5 μg/ml) or a lysotrophic dye (Lysotracker Deep Reddye) (100 nM), respectively. Lower images show that HPTS colocalizes with transferrin and the lysotrophic dye (60X). (B) Representative images of both pH-sensing probes in cells incubated for 15 min with calibration solutions at pH 6.0 and pH 7.5. (C) Relationship of fluorescence intensity ratios for HPTS and SNARF-1 determined using the calibration solutions as a function of pH. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 3
Figure 3. Modulation of intracellular pH by bafilomycin A1, EIPA and NH4Cl. Pharmacological inhibitors (bafilomycin A1, EIPA) and the intracellular pH modulator NH4Cl were used to validate the methodology. Graphs show pH values recorded in the endosomal/lysosomal compartment (A) or the cytoplasm (B) of HT-1080 cells loaded with HPTS and SNARF-1 and incubated for 30 min in the presence or absence (control) of NH4Cl (20 mM), EIPA (25 μM) or bafilomycin A1 (100 nM). Data are represented as the mean + SEM (** p 0.005, *** p 0.0001).

Subscription Required. Please recommend JoVE to your librarian.

Discussion

Quantitative pH measurement in live-cell imaging of different cellular compartments is needed to accurately measure pH variations in cell responses to external challenges. However, one of the major hurdles that remains is to easily and specifically target cellular compartments. In this respect, a few studies have highlighted the use of HPTS as an intracellular pH indicator introduced into cells by electroporation or microinjection8-10. These techniques suffer from serious drawbacks, namely electroporation causes extensive damages to cells, and microinjection requires special equipment and technical skills. Of interest, Hinton et al., have previously reported that HPTS can be taken up by cells by a process of pinocytosis and that the combination of SNARF-1 and HPTS can be used to monitor the pH of the cytosol and endosomal/lysosomal compartments3. We have used this property to record pH variations in the lysosomal/endosomal compartment of live HT-1080 cells. Evidence that HPTS was located in this compartment and, therefore, could serve as a reliable pH indicator was obtained by co-staining with fluorophore-conjugated transferrin, a marker of the lysosomal/endosomal compartment, or with an acidophilic dye that mostly labels lysosomes Figure 2. In addition, the use of different intracellular pH modulators targeting distinct cellular compartments indicated that bafilomycin A1 specifically increased intravesicular pH without altering cytoplasmic pH. In contrast, EIPA mainly altered cytosolic pH but had little or no effect on endosomal and lysosomal pH while ammonium chloride affected pH of both compartments. These results provided evidence that SNARF-1 and HPTS could be used to simultaneously monitor pH changes in these two different cellular compartments.

One important feature of the method described here is the use of confocal laser scanning microscopy. Most studies reported in the literature on intracellular pH measurements have been done by spectrofluorometry. Although easy to use and providing rapid data acquisition, this approach does not allow observation of cells during the experiment. This drawback may become of significance since it has been our experience that during the calibration step, extended incubation under acidic (pH 5.5) or alkaline (pH 8.0) conditions may adversely affect various cell types and trigger apoptosis. In the case of HT-1080 cells, apoptosis leads to red autofluorescence, thus interfering with the pH-dependent fluorescence of SNARF-1 (data not shown). To circumvent this problem, we have used a separate culture dish for each calibration and discarded experiments where signs of apoptosis or other cell alterations were observed. The use of the confocal microscope for pH measurements also makes analysis of data easier. For instance, analysis of confocal fluorescence microscopy images can be used to discard artifacts, apoptotic cells and background noise, making calculations easier and more accurate.

Although the method described here offers many advantages over other approaches, it has some limitations. One of these is related to the different loading conditions required for each probe. With respect to HPTS, the dye has to be taken up by pinocytosis. This restriction requires that cells must be maintained for an extended period of time (e.g. 12 hr) in a serum-supplemented medium to promote pinocytosis and thereby labeling of the endocytic compartment. In contrast, cell-permeant SNARF-1 needs to be incubated in a serum-free medium to prevent the possibility of acetoxymethyl ester (AM) hydrolysis by serum-containing non-specific esterases. These restrictions will exclude experimental protocols that require loading-incompatible cell culture conditions. In addition, the sensitivity of HPTS to acidic medium is an important limitation. As shown in Figure 2, fluorescence intensities of HPTS excited at 458 nM show minimal variation at pH 6.0 or lower, with ratios close to background values. This intrinsic property of HPTS ought to be taken into account in the case of studies of very acidic cellular compartments such as lysosomes that have pH values as low as 4.0 to 5.0. However, to our knowledge, HPTS is the only available ratiometric dye that can be used to measure intraendosomal pH. For example, the commonly used lysosensor dye will mostly partition within the more acidic lysosomal compartment. The extent of partition of this dye within the endosomal compartment will depend on pH values within these vesicles, which is a major drawback when measuring intravesicular pH in cells where endosomal pH homeostasis is altered.

In conclusion, we describe herein an approach to simultaneously measure cytosolic and endosomal pH values in single cells. This is especially important for the study of pH homeostasis in cells where mutations or drugs can affect efflux and influx of protons in endosomes.

Subscription Required. Please recommend JoVE to your librarian.

Disclosures

No conflict of interest declared.

Acknowledgments

We thank Dr. Gilles Dupuis for critical reading of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the Canadian Institutes for Health Research, grant # MOP-126173. C.M.D is a member of the Fonds de la Recherche en Santé (FRSQ)-funded Centre de Recherche Clinique Étienne LeBel.

Materials

Name Company Catalog Number Comments
Solutions for calibration
Sodium chloride Fischer L-11621
Potassium chloride Fischer M-12445
D-Glucose (dextrose) Fischer D16-1
Magnesium sulfate Fischer M65-500
HEPES Sigma-Aldrich H3375
Calcium chloride dihydrate Fischer M-1612
Deionized water N/A N/A
Nigericin Calbiochem 481990 Toxic by inhalation or in contact with skin
Keep protected from the light at 4 °C
Culture dishes ∅ 35mm BD Biosciences 354456
pH-sensing probes
8-Hydroxypyrene-1,3,6-trisulfonic acid (HPTS) Life technologies H-348 Keep away from the light at room temperature
5-(and-6)-Carboxy SNARF®-1, Acetoxymethyl Ester, Acetate Life technologies C-1271 Keep away from the light and humidity at -20 °C
Dimethyl Sufoxide (DMSO) Fischer BP231-1  Harmful
Phosphate buffered saline (PBS) 100X
Potassium chloride Fischer M-12445 20 g
Sodium phosphate monobasic Fischer S369-1 115 g
Potassium phosphate monobasic J.T Baker 3246-01 20 g
Deionized water N/A N/A Bring to 1 L
Autoclave and adjust pH to 7.4
Phosphate buffered saline (PBS) 1X
PBS 100X N/A N/A 50 ml
Sodium chloride Fischer L-11621 40.5 g
Deoinized water N/A N/A Bring to 5 L
pH modulators
Bafilomycin A1 Sigma-Aldrich B-1793
5-(N-Ethyl-N-isopropyl)amiloride (EIPA) Sigma-Aldrich A3085
Ammonium chloride Fischer A649-500

DOWNLOAD MATERIALS LIST

References

  1. Demaurex, N. pH Homeostasis of cellular organelles. News Physiol Sci. 17, 1-5 (2002).
  2. Webb, B. A., Chimenti, M., Jacobson, M. P., Barber, D. L. Dysregulated pH: a perfect storm for cancer progression. Nat Rev Cancer. 11, 671-677 (2011).
  3. Hinton, A., et al. Function of a subunit isoforms of the V-ATPase in pH homeostasis and in vitro invasion of MDA-MB231 human breast cancer cells. J Biol Chem. 284, 16400-16408 (2009).
  4. Overly, C. C., Lee, K. D., Berthiaume, E., Hollenbeck, P. J. Quantitative measurement of intraorganelle pH in the endosomal-lysosomal pathway in neurons by using ratiometric imaging with pyranine. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 92, 3156-3160 (1995).
  5. Drose, S., Altendorf, K. Bafilomycins and concanamycins as inhibitors of V-ATPases and P-ATPases. J Exp Biol. 200, 1-8 (1997).
  6. Pedersen, S. F., King, S. A., Nygaard, E. B., Rigor, R. R., Cala, P. M. NHE1 inhibition by amiloride- and benzoylguanidine-type compounds. Inhibitor binding loci deduced from chimeras of NHE1 homologues with endogenous differences in inhibitor sensitivity. J Biol Chem. 282, 19716-19727 (2007).
  7. Alfonso, A., Cabado, A. G., Vieytes, M. R., Botana, L. M. Calcium-pH crosstalks in rat mast cells: cytosolic alkalinization, but not intracellular calcium release, is a sufficient signal for degranulation. Br J Pharmacol. 130, 1809-1816 (2000).
  8. Han, J., Burgess, K. Fluorescent indicators for intracellular pH. Chem Rev. 110, 2709-2728 (2010).
  9. Giuliano, K. A., Gillies, R. J. Determination of intracellular pH of BALB/c-3T3 cells using the fluorescence of pyranine. Anal Biochem. 167, 362-371 (1987).
  10. Willoughby, D., Thomas, R., Schwiening, C. The effects of intracellular pH changes on resting cytosolic calcium in voltage-clamped snail neurones. J Physiol. 530, 405-416 (2001).

Tags

Simultaneous PH Measurement Endocytic Compartment Cytosolic Compartment Living Cells Confocal Microscopy Intracellular PH Homeostatic Control Physiological Processes Cellular PH Homeostasis Diseases Measurement Methods Cytoplasmic PH Indicator Organelle-specific Dye Ratiometric Dyes Confocal Microscopy On Living Cells SNARF-1 HPTS Endosomal/lysosomal Organelles
Simultaneous pH Measurement in Endocytic and Cytosolic Compartments in Living Cells using Confocal Microscopy
Play Video
PDF DOI DOWNLOAD MATERIALS LIST

Cite this Article

Lucien, F., Harper, K., Pelletier,More

Lucien, F., Harper, K., Pelletier, P. P., Volkov, L., Dubois, C. M. Simultaneous pH Measurement in Endocytic and Cytosolic Compartments in Living Cells using Confocal Microscopy. J. Vis. Exp. (86), e51395, doi:10.3791/51395 (2014).

Less
Copy Citation Download Citation Reprints and Permissions
View Video

Get cutting-edge science videos from JoVE sent straight to your inbox every month.

Waiting X
Simple Hit Counter