Use of a High-throughput In Vitro Microfluidic System to Develop Oral Multi-species Biofilms

Summary

The goal of this methods paper is to describe the use of a microfluidic system for the development of multi-species biofilms that contain species typically identified in human supragingival dental plaque. Methods to describe biofilm architecture, biofilm viability, and an approach to harvest biofilm for culture-dependent or culture-independent analyses are highlighted.

Abstract

There are few high-throughput in vitro systems which facilitate the development of multi-species biofilms that contain numerous species commonly detected within in vivo oral biofilms. Furthermore, a system that uses natural human saliva as the nutrient source, instead of artificial media, is particularly desirable in order to support the expression of cellular and biofilm-specific properties that mimic the in vivo communities. We describe a method for the development of multi-species oral biofilms that are comparable, with respect to species composition, to supragingival dental plaque, under conditions similar to the human oral cavity. Specifically, this methods article will describe how a commercially available microfluidic system can be adapted to facilitate the development of multi-species oral biofilms derived from and grown within pooled saliva. Furthermore, a description of how the system can be used in conjunction with a confocal laser scanning microscope to generate 3-D biofilm reconstructions for architectural and viability analyses will be presented. Given the broad diversity of microorganisms that grow within biofilms in the microfluidic system (including Streptococcus, Neisseria, Veillonella, Gemella, and Porphyromonas), a protocol will also be presented describing how to harvest the biofilm cells for further subculture or DNA extraction and analysis. The limits of both the microfluidic biofilm system and the current state-of-the-art data analyses will be addressed. Ultimately, it is envisioned that this article will provide a baseline technique that will improve the study of oral biofilms and aid in the development of additional technologies that can be integrated with the microfluidic platform.

Introduction

Biofilms are architecturally complex communities of bacteria that are aggregated on surfaces ¹. These communities typically contain numerous species that interact with one another within the biofilm ². Oral biofilms, the most visually conspicuous being dental plaque, are a persistent problem in humans and their uncontrolled development results in the generation of taxonomically diverse multi-species communities ³. The component bacteria of these diverse communities can be up to 1,000 times more resistant to antimicrobials than their free-floating (planktonic) counterparts ^4-6. Failure to treat these oral biofilm communities, which can cause dental caries and periodontal disease, has resulted in a significant public health burden: over 500 million visits to the dentist office per annum in the US, and an approximately $108 billion to treat or prevent periodontal disease and dental caries ⁷.

“While many microbiologists advocate studying microbial behavior under natural conditions, few of them do so. This is because their morale for overcoming the difficulties is constantly sapped by the attractive ease of working with laboratory cultures.” —Smith ⁸.

At present, oral biofilm research is conducted using a variety of in vivo and in vitro approaches, each with their own advantages and disadvantages ^9,10. In vitro approaches often use model biofilm systems that are relatively easy to set up but may lack clinical/real-world relevance ^10,11. In vivo approaches typically rely upon animal model systems that may reproduce certain aspects of the human oral environment, but again suffer from limitations due to differences in anatomy, physiology, microbiology and immunology between animals and humans ^12,13. It should be noted that oral biofilms can also be developed on enamel surfaces held in a stent within the mouths of human volunteers, but this approach is currently relatively costly and labor-intensive ^14,15. Ultimately, novel agents or technologies to improve oral healthcare are tested in humans under controlled clinical trial conditions ¹¹. At present, an often-used modus operandi for identifying and evaluating new oral healthcare agents is to first perform laboratory studies to discern potential efficacy, and then perform animal studies and “field trials” that employ clinicians to evaluate the success of the technology ^9,16,17. Unfortunately, laboratory studies tend to rely on model systems that occupy a large footprint, are technologically challenging to use, and often contain simplified communities of one or at most a few species to derive potential real-world meaning ^10,18. Given that dental plaque biofilms contain multiple species and form in a complex flowing salivary milieu, developing biofilms that contain one or a few species in artificial media is unlikely to generate communities that behave in a similar manner to those in a real-world scenario ^10,19. To address the time, cost, training requirements, and the poor representative nature of laboratory model biofilm systems compared to the real-world environment, we recently developed a high throughput and environmentally germane biofilm system ²⁰ (Figure 1). The system benefits from the use of cell-free pooled human saliva (CFS) as medium and untreated pooled human bacterial cell-containing saliva (CCS) as an inoculum. Uniquely, the system also combines microfluidic technology, a confocal laser scanning microscope, and culture-independent bacterial diversity analysis technology. Thus, the model system is environmentally germane (using saliva as an inoculum to grow multi-species biofilms at 37 °C in filter-sterilized flowing saliva) and the oral biofilms contain species (including Streptococcus, Neisseria, Veillonella, and Porphyromonas species) in abundances representative of those found in early supragingival plaque ²⁰.

When considering that this work describes the use of the newly developed model system, particular attention must be given to the amalgamation of a confocal laser scanning microscope (CLSM) microfluidics, and culture-independent diversity analysis technologies. The union of these technologies by our research group was intentional and not only adds a high-throughput capability to the newly developed model system, but also allows questions to be asked that could not be easily addressed before with other systems. Firstly, CLSM has distinct advantages over traditional microscopy as it allows for the three-dimensional analysis of biofilms. Often unappreciated, this is extremely important as biofilms are heterogeneous with respect to species composition and spatial position as well as the physiological conditions being imposed at different spatial locations within the biofilm ^6,21. In concert with three-dimensional rendering software and image analysis software, the biofilm architecture, spatial relationships between component species, and extent of antimicrobial killing can be analyzed ^22-24. Such abilities are not possible using standard transmitted light or epifluorescence microscopy. Next, microfluidics has garnered particular attention in the field of microbiology as it enables the study of biofilms under carefully controlled conditions (flow, temperature, pH, etc.) and only requires small volumes of liquid ^25-27. As a point of comparison, growing an oral biofilm in human saliva within a flow cell model system (a system that is arguably considered the mainstay model for many oral biofilm studies) for 20 hr at a similar flow-rate and shear as that achieved in a microfluidic system requires at least 200 ml, as opposed to 800 µl in the microfluidic device ^28-31. Thus, a microfluidic model biofilm system enables the study of quantity-limited material under defined conditions. Finally, pyrosequencing technology has been optimized in the last decade to require only small amounts of material to perform a community analysis and is sufficiently versatile to control depth of sequencing to obtain the identity of even rare biofilm species. The use of this technology, such as bacterial tag-encoded FLX amplicon pyrosequencing (bTEFAP), has allowed for pertinent questions concerning the ecology of biofilms to be addressed ^32,33. Such questions imbued difficulties in the past when pyrosequencing was not available because of the time and costs required to create plasmid libraries and the complex technological and analytical steps required to derive data ^33,34. Of course, a great advantage with culture-independent approaches, such as pyrosequencing, is that the bacterial species that cannot be grown in isolation within conventional laboratory media (i.e. viable but non-cultivable species) can be grown and identified within the model system and their relative abundance in the community quantified ^35,36. To add perspective, as early as 1963, the late Sigmund Socransky estimated that approximately 50% of the bacteria in material isolated from the human oral gingival crevice could not be cultured using laboratory growth conditions ³⁷.

The objective of this methods paper is to describe the approach to develop oral multi-species biofilms in a commercially available microfluidic (Bioflux) system under: (i) conditions representative of the human oral cavity and (ii) with a species composition and abundance that is comparable to supragingival plaque. Furthermore, using both freeware and commercial software, we highlight how basic biofilm architecture measures can be derived from CLSM data, with a focus on approaches to quantify biofilm biomass, roughness, and viability (based upon Live/Dead staining). Finally, the steps required to harvest biofilm material for diversity analysis by bTEFAP are described.

Protocol

The saliva collection protocol described herein was reviewed by the University of Michigan Institutional Review Board for Human Subject Research.
NOTE: With regard to institutional reviews for human subject work of this type, prior arrangements and permissions should be garnered from the host institution. In particular, depending on the institution, IRB or ethics approval might need to be sought and approved before saliva collection from human volunteers can proceed. As an aid to preparing an application, a useful NIH algorithm/chart can be found here: http://grants1.nih.gov/grants/policy/hs/PrivateInfoOrBioSpecimensDecisionChart.pdf

1. Preparation of Pooled Saliva for Use as an Environmentally Germane Growth Medium

1. Recruit >5 individuals for saliva donation. Do not take any identifying information, ensure no individuals will donate saliva if they are ill, or have taken oral antibiotics in the past 3 months, or have consumed food or liquid, with the exception of water, in the previous 2 hr before donation.
2. Collect saliva in 50 ml plastic tubes. Pool the collected saliva in a plastic beaker, keeping it on ice. Do not use glass as polymers in the saliva will adhere to the internal glass surfaces.
3. Add Dithiothreitol (DTT) to a final concentration of 2.5 mM from a 100x stock. (Stock is frozen in single-use aliquots at –20 °C). Stir for 10 min in a plastic beaker on ice.
4. In order to remove particulate matter, centrifuge the pooled saliva for 30 min at 17,500 x g.
5. Dilute the saliva with 3 volumes of dH₂O to give one-fourth concentrated saliva.
6. Filter-sterilize saliva using 0.22 µm polyethersulfone (PES), low protein binding filter. Use filter with large surface area, or use several small area filters. Keep saliva in a plastic container on ice while filtering.
7. Freeze the pooled saliva at –80 °C in 50 ml plastic tubes until needed to grow bacteria. Each plastic tube is for one use only and should contain no more than 35 ml as each microfluidic well holds a maximum of 1.2 ml (1.2 ml x 24 wells = 28.8 ml) and space is needed in each tube as saliva expands during freezing.
8. For use, thaw the pooled saliva at room temperature. Once thawed, filter-sterilize once more (0.22 µm polyethersulfone, low protein binding filter to remove any precipitates).

2. Preparation of Pooled Saliva for Use as an Inoculum

1. Recruit >5 individuals for saliva donation. Do not take any identifying information, ensure no individuals will donate saliva if they are ill, have taken oral antibiotics in the past 3 months, or have consumed food or liquid, with the exception of water, in the previous 2 hr before donation. Collect samples over 30 min.
2. Collect saliva in 50 ml plastic tubes at room temperature and pool the collected saliva in a plastic beaker at room temperature.
3. Dilute pooled saliva with autoclaved general reagent grade glycerol to yield a stock with a final ratio of 25% glycerol, 75% cell-containing saliva [CCS].
4. Freeze saliva at –80 °C in 3 ml single-use aliquots until needed.
5. When required to inoculate the microfluidic system, aliquots are thawed at room temperature and agitated gently on a vortexer for 5 sec before being pipetted into the microfluidic system as described in step 3 of the protocol, below.

3. Growth of Oral Multi-species Biofilms

1. CFS pre-treatment
   1. First coat the Bioflux microfluidic channels with CFS. Add 100 µl of CFS to each outlet well. Using the Bioflux control software, select “manual” and set flow from channels “B1-B24” that are to be used.
   2. Next, set shear to 1.0 dyne/cm² and start flow for 2 min at room temperature to ensure homogenous distribution of the CFS throughout the channel. Ensure there is fluid in each inlet channel to verify that CFS flowed through all channels evenly.
   3. Incubate plate at room temperature for 20 min.
   4. Remove the CFS/pretreat solution that remains in the outlet wells and transfer to the inlet wells. This total volume of 100 µl will serve to balance against the pressure being applied to the inoculum from the outlet well.
2. Inoculation
   1. To each outlet well, add 100 µl of CCS inoculum. Place the microfluidic plate on the heat plate (temperature set at 37 °C), select manual within the control software, and set flow from outlet wells to the inlet wells (i.e., reverse) at 1.0 dyne/cm² for exactly 6 sec.
   2. Incubate the microfluidic plate at 37 °C for 40 min to allow for initial adherence and growth of the bacteria in the inoculum.
3. Overnight Growth
   1. For the inoculated channels being used, aspirate the waste inoculum from each of the outlet wells. Add up to 1 ml total volume of CFS into each of the inlet wells (can be done on top of existing CFS).
   2. Incubate the microfluidic plate at 37 °C, select manual and set the program to run at 0.2 dyne/cm² for 20 hr.
4. Stain prewash
   1. Aspirate all fluid from the inlet and outlet wells and add 100 µl of PBS (pH 7.4) to each of the inlet wells. Flow for 20 min at 0.2 dyne/cm².
5. Stain mixture addition
   1. For cell viability staining make 100 µl of stain mixture for each channel to be stained. Specifically, add 3 µl of SYTO 9 and 3 µl of propidium iodide per ml of PBS using commercial cell viability staining kit such as LIVE/DEAD. This generates a staining mixture containing 10 µM SYTO 9 and 60 µM propidium iodide.
   2. Aspirate the remaining PBS from the inlet wells and then add 100 µl of the cell viability stain mixture to each inlet well. Set to flow at 0.2 dyne/cm² and run the solution from inlet to outlet for 45 min at room temperature.
6. Post-staining wash
   1. Aspirate the remaining stain in each of the inlet wells and add 100 µl of PBS to each inlet well. Set to flow at 0.2 dyne/cm² and run the PBS solution from inlet to outlet for 20 min at room temperature to remove any excess stain.

4. Image Collection, 3D Rendering, and Image Analysis

1. Use an inverted confocal laser scanning microscope (CLSM) to collect biofilm image data from the microfluidic system. Make sure that the CLSM is able to withstand the weight of the Bioflux plate, which can reach 150 g.
   NOTE: Given the dimensions of the microfluidic channels, the need for sensitivity to discern biofilm structure, and the requirements to detect fluorescence signal of varying intensity, fit the CLSM with a 40X 1.25 NA objective lens or one with similar optical quality, magnification, and numerical aperture.
2. Standardize the emission capture gates with gain and offset measurements being kept constant. Ensure that the laser power does not exceed 25% as this can result in photo-bleaching.
3. Convert CLSM files from the Leica Image File type (LIF) to OME (Open Microscopy Environment) file type. This allows for greater ease of access and compatibility between software programs. Use commercially available software such as, IMARIS to convert files to this type.

3D Rendering for Images/Figures

4. Once converted to OME format, use commercially available software such as IMARIS to render the images in 3D. Perform this using a combination of “Easy3D” and “Surpass” options.
   NOTE: Attention to background signal and thresholding should be made. The histogram function in IMARIS can be used to obtain the collection range and this should be kept constant between images being analyzed.
5. Save images using the “snapshot” function and make careful consideration to image resolution before saving file types.
6. Assemble images into figures using image editing software such as CorelDraw or Adobe Illustrator.

3D Image Analysis for Graphs and Tables

7. Use freely available IMAGEJ ²³ and COMSTAT/COMSTAT2 ³⁸ for image analysis. Download the packages from http://rsb.info.nih.gov/ij/ and http://comstat.dk/, respectively. Have the most recent Java update installed.
   NOTE: The software platform JAVA will need to be installed prior to the use of the image analysis software.
   1. Use the IMAGEJ software with COMSTAT2 plugin to import the OME files for each biofilm image in “hyperstack” mode and view with “split channels”.
   2. Individually analyze the two channels (red/propidium-iodide/dead being channel 0, green/SYTO-9/LIVE being channel 1) using the “histogram” function of IMAGEJ. This function lists the total number of pixels of 8-bit OME files (shown as “count”) at each color intensity from 0 to 255 (shown as “value”), with 0 being pixels with no signal (background) and 255 being pixels with complete signal saturation.
   3. Export the data into a spreadsheet program and standardize all signal values by weighting each pixel by the corresponding signal intensity. This is performed by multiplying the total count at a given signal intensity by the numerical 8-bit value (0-255) of that signal intensity.
   4. Sum all weighted values, 0-255, for both channels for each biofilm image captured. Take the sum of the weighted values for both channels to determine the percent total signal from either channel. Do this to determine the relative ratio or percent red and percent green signal (i.e. the percent “DEAD” and percent “LIVE” for each treatment).
   5. Perform statistical analyses, for example using two-tailed Student's T-test modified for unequal variance. Values of p <0.05 are considered significant and those values of p <0.01 are considered highly significant.

5. Harvesting Biofilm Cells for Culture-independent Analysis

1. Remove all spent and unused saliva from inlet and outlet wells. Wash the wells with 1 ml sterile distilled water three times.
2. Add 100 µl of sterile distilled water to the inlet wells and, using the software control interface, pass the sterile distilled water forward through the channels at >8.0 dyne/cm² (flow rate >745 µl/hr, shear of 800 sec^-1) for at least 5 min. Repeat in the reverse direction for at least 5 min and then repeat the forward and reverse washing step process.
3. Check by light or by epifluorescence microscopy (if cells were stained/labeled) for thorough biofilm removal (Figure 2). Collect the 100 µl cell-suspension and store at -80 °C for culture-independent analysis. A cost-effective analysis of community composition can be achieved through using bacterial tag-encoded FLX amplicon pyrosequencing (bTEFAP) using the approach described in Nance et al. ²⁰

Results

3D Rendering of Biofilms

Representative results are shown in Figure 3. A useful tool in IMARIS software is the option to examine each slice of the collected biofilm stack and to combine them to create three-dimensional reconstructions. In addition, artificial shadowing effects can be added to help visually interpret three-dimensional structures. The rendered biofilms can be orientated in any direction with different magnifications to explore biofilm o...

Discussion

This methods paper highlights the basic steps required to setup and run a microfluidic system in a manner to allow for the development of oral multi-species biofilms derived from pooled human saliva and grown in filter-sterilized 25% pooled human saliva. Approaches to characterize the biofilm are given but it should be remembered that these described approaches are modifiable and additional technologies such as, for example, stains or labels can be introduced. As a matter of example, one could conceivably use labeled ant...

Materials

List of materials used in this article

Name	Company	Catalog Number	Comments
Falcon 50 ml Conical Centrifuge Tubes	Fisher Scientific	14-432-22
Falcon 15 ml Conical Centrifuge Tubes	Fisher Scientific	14-959-49D
Dithiothreitol (White Crystals or Powder/Electrophoresis), Fisher BioReagents	Fisher Scientific	BP172-5
Sorval ultracentrifuge  (SS-34 compatible)	Thermoscientific	Unit-dependent
Thermo Scientific SS-34 Rotor	Thermoscientific	28-020
Thermo Scientific Type 1 Reagent Grade Deionized Water	Thermo  Scientific Inc	23-290-065
Nalgene Rapid-Flow Filter Units and Bottle Top Filters, PES Membrane, Sterile.	VWR	73520-986
Glycerol	Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc	NC0542269
BioFlux microfluidic system	Fluxion	Bioflux 200 system
Bioflux 24-channel plate	Fluxion	910-0004
PBS (Gibco)	Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc	10010023
LIVE/DEAD stain (Invitrogen)	Invitrogen	L7012
Confocal Laser Scanning Microscope	Lecia	SPE or eqivalent system
Epifluorescence Microscope	Multiple choices	Multiple choices
Pyrosequencing facilities	Multiple choices	Multiple choices
Decon SaniHol 70 Ethanol Solution	Fisher Scientific	04-355-122
Ultra Low Temperature Freezer -80 °C	Multiple choices	Multiple choices
Tips (20, 200, and 1,000 μl)	Multiple choices	Multiple choices
Single Channel Variable Volume Pipettors (20, 200, 1,000 μl)	Multiple choices	Multiple choices
Software
Bioflux dedicated software	Bioflux
Imaris	Bitplane
Leica SPE	Leica
ImageJ	Freeware (http://imagej.nih.gov/ij/)
COMSTAT/COMSTAT 2	Freeware (http://www.comstat.dk/)