$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$
$$\longleftharp{xx}$$,
$$\longrightharp{xx}$$,
UBP is a common technique for the assessment of breathing patterns1,2,3,4. In this method, mice are placed in a closed chamber where pressure differences between the main chamber (where the animal is housed) and a reference chamber are filtered through a pneumotachograph to obtain values. The resulting UBP setup is noninvasive and unrestrained and allows for respiratory measures to be assessed without the requirement of anesthesia or surgery. Additionally, this technique is suitable for studies requiring multiple measurements in the same mouse over time. Variables such as breathing frequency, tidal volume, and minute ventilation can be quantified with this method, during a single trial or over several trials. Whole-body UBP also provides measures of peak flows and respiratory cycle duration. Together, these parameters quantify the pattern of breathing. The recorded breathing traces also make it possible to review the data and count the number of central apneas displayed within a given time period. This count can be used alongside an analysis of tidal volume and inspiratory times to gauge other alterations in the pattern of breathing.
While several noninvasive plethysmography techniques exist for the direct assessment of pulmonary physiological parameters, whole-body UBP allows for a way to screen for respiratory function with minimal undue stress to the mouse. Head-out plethysmography, which utilizes tidal midexpiratory flow measures and is also noninvasive, relies on restraint, like many other types of plethysmography (e.g., double-chamber plethysmography). While these methods have been used in rodent models to measure airway responsiveness5, the use of neck collars or small restraint tubes may take mice (vs. other species) longer to acclimate to and return their breathing to resting levels.
Obtaining an optimal air-breathing segment is an important consideration for baseline comparisons. The increased use of commercially available plethysmography systems makes collecting pattern-of-breathing data possible in many laboratories. Importantly, pattern of breathing is variable throughout the collection period, particularly for mice. With that said, it is necessary to standardize baseline analysis as a means of ensuring that the training level of experimenters does not confound results. There are numerous ways to collect an air-breathing segment, serving as one area of variation between experimental designs. One example includes averaging the final 10–30 min of data following a previously defined set of time within the chamber1, while another method involves waiting until the mouse is visibly calm for 5–10 min6. The latter can take 2–3 h to achieve and in some cases, a trial may need to be abandoned if the mouse is not calm for long enough. This concern is an especially important consideration for strains of mice where observed behaviors are more anxious and excitable7. These mice may take longer to adjust to the chamber environment and only remain calm for short bursts of time. Limiting the time devoted to baseline collection standardizes the chamber time for each mouse.
It is crucial that experimenters obtain a suitable baseline that encompasses resting behavior values in the mouse but also occurs in a timely manner. Hence, the goal of this report is to provide a description of methods used to obtain short quiet baseline values for breathing parameters in mice. Moreover, we report that apneas and augmented breaths can be quantified during the first hour in the chamber.