A subscription to JoVE is required to view this content. Sign in or start your free trial.

Method Article

A Macrophage Reporter Cell Assay to Examine Toll-Like Receptor-Mediated NF-kB/AP-1 Signaling on Adsorbed Protein Layers on Polymeric Surfaces

7K views

⸱

DOI:

10.3791/60317

⸱

January 7th, 2020

 ,  , 
1Department of Chemical Engineering, Queen's University

In This Article

Summary

This protocol provides researchers with a rapid, indirect method of measuring TLR-dependent NF-кB/AP-1 transcription factor activity in a murine macrophage cell line in response to a variety of polymeric surfaces and adsorbed protein layers that model the biomaterial implant microenvironment.

Abstract

The persistent inflammatory host response to an implanted biomaterial, known as the foreign body reaction, is a significant challenge in the development and implementation of biomedical devices and tissue engineering constructs. Macrophages, an innate immune cell, are key players in the foreign body reaction because they remain at the implant site for the lifetime of the device, and are commonly studied to gain an understanding of this detrimental host response. Many biomaterials researchers have shown that adsorbed protein layers on implanted materials influence macrophage behavior, and subsequently impact the host response. The methods in this paper describe an in vitro model using adsorbed protein layers containing cellular damage molecules on polymer biomaterial surfaces to assess macrophage responses. An NF-кB/AP-1 reporter macrophage cell line and the associated colorimetric alkaline phosphatase assay were used as a rapid method to indirectly examine NF-кB/AP-1 transcription factor activity in response to complex adsorbed protein layers containing blood proteins and damage-associated molecular patterns, as a model of the complex adsorbed protein layers formed on biomaterial surfaces in vivo.

Introduction

The foreign body reaction (FBR) is a chronic host response that can negatively impact the performance of an implanted material or device (e.g., drug delivery devices, biosensors), through the persistent release of inflammatory mediators and by impeding integration between the implanted material and the surrounding tissue1. This innate immune response is initiated by the implantation procedure and is characterized by the long-term presence of innate immune cells and fibrous capsule formation around the implant1. Within the context of material host responses, macrophage-material interactions have a significant impact on the progression of the host response and development of a FBR1. Macrophages are a diverse innate immune cell population, recruited to the implant site either from tissue-resident macrophage populations or from the blood as monocyte-derived macrophages. They begin to accumulate at the implant site shortly after implantation, and within days become the predominant cell population in the implant microenvironment. Material-adherent macrophages, along with foreign body giant cells (FBGC) formed through macrophage fusion, can persist at the material surface for the lifetime of the implant2,3. Consequently, macrophages are considered to be key players in the foreign body response due to their roles orchestrating the characteristic steps of the FBR: acute inflammatory response, tissue remodeling, and formation of fibrotic tissue1.

Toll-like receptors (TLRs) are a family of pattern recognition receptors that are expressed by many immune cells, including macrophages, and have been shown to play a significant role in inflammation and wound healing. In addition to pathogen-derived ligands, TLRs are able to bind endogenous molecules, known as damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs), which are released during cell necrosis and activate inflammatory signaling pathways resulting in the production of proinflammatory cytokines4. We and others have proposed that damage incurred during soft tissue biomaterial implantation procedures release DAMPs, which then adsorb to biomaterial surfaces in addition to blood proteins and modulate subsequent cell-material interactions5,6. When macrophages interact with the adsorbed protein layer on an implant, their surface TLRs may recognize adsorbed DAMPs and activate proinflammatory signaling cascades, leading to NF-κB and AP-1 transcription factor activation and production of proinflammatory cytokines. We have previously shown that murine macrophages have significantly increased NF-κB/AP-1 activity and tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α, proinflammatory cytokine) secretion in response to DAMP-containing adsorbed protein layers on a variety of polymeric surfaces compared to surfaces with adsorbed serum or plasma only (i.e., no DAMPs present), and that this response is largely mediated by TLR2, while TLR4 plays a lesser role5.

The NF-κB/AP-1 reporter macrophage cell line (Table of Materials) used in this protocol is a convenient method to measure relative NF-κB and AP-1 activity in macrophages5,7,8. In combination with TLR pathway inhibitors, this cell line is a useful tool for investigating TLR activation and its role in inflammation in response to a variety of stimuli5,7,8. The reporter cells are a modified mouse macrophage-like cell line that can stably produce secreted embryonic alkaline phosphatase (SEAP) upon NF-κB and AP-1 transcription factor activation9. The colorimetric enzymatic alkaline phosphatase assay (Table of Materials) can then be used to quantify relative amounts of SEAP expression as an indirect measure of NF-κB/AP-1 activity. As NF-κB and AP-1 are downstream of many cell signaling pathways, neutralizing antibodies and inhibitors targeting specific TLRs (e.g., TLR2) or TLR adaptor molecules (e.g., MyD88) can be used to verify the role of a specific pathway. The methodology described in this article provides a simple and rapid approach for assessing the contribution of TLR signaling in murine macrophage responses to a variety of polymeric surfaces with adsorbed protein layers containing both blood proteins and DAMPs as an in vitro model of implanted biomaterials.

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Protocol

1. Media and Reagent Preparation

  1. Prepare fibroblast media. Combine 450 mL of Dulbecco's modified Eagle medium (DMEM), 50 mL of fetal bovine serum (FBS), and 5 mL of penicillin/streptomycin. Store at 4 °C for up to 3 months.
  2. Prepare reporter macrophage growth media in 50 mL aliquots. Combine 45 mL of DMEM, 5 mL of FBS, 5 μg/mL mycoplasma elimination reagent (Table of Materials), and 200 μg/mL phleomycin D1 (Table of Materials). Store at 4 °C for up to 3 months.
  3. Prepare reporter macrophage assay media in 50 mL aliquots. Combine 45 mL of DMEM, 5 mL of heat inactivated FBS (HI-FBS), 5 μg/mL mycoplasma elimination reagent, and 200 μg/mL phleomycin D1. Store at 4 °C for up to 3 months.

2. Coating Cell Culture Surfaces with Poly(methyl methacrylate)

  1. Dissolve poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) in chloroform at 20 mg/mL (e.g., 100 mg of PMMA in 5 mL of chloroform) in a 20 mL glass scintillation vial. Place a magnetic stir bar in the vial and allow to stir for at least 2 h, until all solids are dissolved.
    CAUTION: Chloroform is harmful if inhaled. Ensure to use solvent in a fume hood while wearing PVA gloves.
  2. Pipette 400 µL of PMMA solution onto the center of a borosilicate glass microscope slide in a spin coater, and spin at 3000 rpm for 2 min. Prepare the number of slides required for the assay, as well as 3−5 extra for water contact angle measurement. Store slides in a clean box (sprayed and wiped with 70% ethanol) for future use.
    NOTE: Spin coating is often used to deposit a thin, uniform coating on a flat surface. A spin coater rotates a substrate at high speeds, using centrifugal force to spread the coating solution over the surface.
    1. Measure water contact angle at two random positions on the surface of extra coated slides (i.e., not the slides being used for cell culture) with a goniometer to ensure glass surface was completely coated with the polymer.
      NOTE: Only water of the highest purity (e.g., glass triple distilled) should be used for water contact angle measurements.
  3. In a biological safety cabinet (BSC) attach 8-chamber sticky wells to PMMA coated-slides using sterile forceps and following aseptic technique. Press firmly on the top of the sticky wells to make sure they are strongly attached. Incubate the slides with attached sticky-wells at 37 °C overnight to secure the seal.
    1. Test the seal of the sticky wells by adding 200 µL of cell culture grade (endotoxin-free) water to each well. Incubate at room temperature (RT) for 60 min and ensure no leakage before proceeding. Aspirate the water, being careful not to disturb the PMMA coating.
  4. Perform endotoxin-free water washes by adding 300 µL of endotoxin-free water to each well and incubating for 1 h (three times), 12 h, and 24 h prior to use to remove any remaining solvent.
  5. Test endotoxin concentration of the slides to be used for cell culture. Incubate 200 µL of endotoxin-free reagent water (Table of Materials) in one well of each slide for 1 h. Measure endotoxin concentration in the extract using an endpoint chromogenic endotoxin assay (Table of Materials).
    NOTE: The following protocol is specific to the endotoxin assay kit listed in the Table of Materials.
  6. Use only water and consumables (i.e., pipette tips, microcentrifuge tubes and well plates) that are certified pyrogen-free (i.e., endotoxin-free) for this work. Also, any glassware used in the preparation of the polymer-coated surfaces should be depyrogenated using dry heat sterilization (250 °C for 30 min) prior to use10. Measuring endotoxin in the extract solution, as described here, can result in an underestimation of endotoxin on the material surface11,12. Consequently, it is recommended that when developing a polymer coating protocol, perform the endotoxin assay reaction (i.e., steps 2.5.4−2.5.6 for test samples [reagent water] or spike controls) directly within wells containing the coated sample to ensure no sources of endotoxin are inadvertently introduced into the system during the coating process.
    1. Bring all test samples (i.e., extracts) and endotoxin assay reagents to RT. Reconstitute chromogenic reagent in assay buffer and endotoxin standard in reagent water, allow to dissolve for 5 min and gently swirl before using. Cover all bottles with paraffin film when not in use.
    2. Create a 5−8 point standard dilution curve of endotoxin standard ranging from the lower to the upper limit of the assay by performing a serial dilution of the endotoxin standard in reagent water.
    3. To control for enhancement or inhibition of the endotoxin assay in test samples, prepare a positive control (also called a spike control or spiked sample) by diluting a known amount of endotoxin in unused test sample solution.
      NOTE: The concentration of the positive control should be the same concentration as a standard in the middle of the standard curve. If the recovered amount of the endotoxin spike (i.e., concentration of the positive control minus the concentration of the unspiked test sample) is within 50−200% of the nominal concentration of the endotoxin spike, the extraction solution can be considered to not significantly interfere with the assay.
    4. Add 50 µL of standards, samples, or spike controls to each well of a 96-well plate in duplicate or triplicate. Use reagent water as a negative control.
    5. Add 50 µL of chromogenic reagent to every well. Add reagent quickly to all wells. Use a timer to record the amount of time it takes to add reagent to all wells. Cover the plate with an adhesive seal and incubate at 37 °C (incubation time is lot-dependent and stated on Certificate of Analysis included in the chromogenic reagent kit). Alternatively, check on the plate every 15 min during incubation until color change is observed in all standard wells.
    6. After incubation, add 25 µL of 50% acetic acid to each well (final concentration of 10% acetic acid per well) to stop the reaction. Add acetic acid in the same order as the chromogenic reagent was added. Read absorbance of the plate using a plate reader at 405 nm. Aspirate liquid and discard plate.
      NOTE: Acetic acid addition should take the same length of time to add to each well as the chromogenic reagent took (± 30 s).
  7. Ultraviolet (UV) sterilize the slides for 30 min prior to cell culture experiments.

3. Coating Cell Culture Surfaces with Polydimethylsiloxane

  1. Mix polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) elastomer in a 10:1 weight ratio (base:curing agent). In a biological safety cabinet, pipette approximately 10 mL of polydimethylsiloxane base into a sterile tube. Weigh the tube and slowly add curing agent until 10% has been added.
    CAUTION: Use PDMS reagents in a well-ventilated area and avoid eye contact by wearing safety glasses.
  2. Thoroughly mix the elastomer by stirring with a sterile serological pipette tip and by pipetting up and down. Add approximately 200 μL of the solution to each well of a 48-well plate. Tilt the well plate slowly to ensure complete coverage of wells with elastomer solution.
  3. Place the well plate with elastomer into a vacuum oven set at 50 cmHg, 40 °C. Remove the lid and cover with a single-ply wipe to prevent other debris from falling into the wells. Allow to incubate for at least 48 h.
    1. Confirm the wells are completely coated via visual inspection. Ensure the elastomer is fully cured by gently prodding with a sterile pipette tip before removing.
  4. Add 300 µL of 70% ethanol (made with absolute ethanol and endotoxin-free water) and incubate at RT for 1 h. Remove the ethanol and perform endotoxin-free water washes by adding 300 µL of endotoxin-free water to each well and incubating for 1 h (three times), 12 h, and 24 h prior to use to remove any remaining solvent.
    1. Incubate 200 µL of endotoxin-free water in three wells of each plate for 1 h. Measure endotoxin concentration of the water extracts using an endpoint chromogenic endotoxin assay (steps 2.5.1−2.5.6).

4. Coating Cell Culture Surfaces with Fluorinated Poly(tetrafluoroethylene)

  1. Make a 1 mg/mL solution of fluorinated poly(tetrafluoroethylene) (fPTFE) (e.g., add 10 mg of fPTFE to 10 mL of fluorinated solvent [Table of Materials]) in a 20 mL glass scintillation vial. Place a magnetic stir bar in the vial and allow to stir for at least 24 h, until all solids are dissolved.
  2. Add approximately 150 μL of the polymer solution to each well of a polystyrene 48-well plate (i.e., not tissue culture treated). Tilt the well plate slowly to ensure complete coverage of all wells with polymer solution. Replace lid.
    1. To ensure effective fPTFE-coating of wells, glass coverslips should be coated in fPTFE and used for water contact angle measurement (step 4.3.1). Place coverslips inside the wells of a 24-well plate. Add approximately 400 μL of the polymer solution to each well containing a coverslip. Push the coverslips down using sterile forceps, ensuring they are completely covered in polymer solution, and cover the well plate with a lid.
  3. Place the well plate with polymer solution and/or coverslips into a vacuum oven set at 50 cmHg, 40 °C. Remove the lid and cover with a single-ply wipe to prevent other debris from falling into the wells. Allow to incubate for at least 48 h.
    1. Measure water contact angle of fPTFE-coated coverslips with a goniometer to ensure effective coating.
      NOTE: Only water of the highest purity (e.g., glass triple distilled) should be used for water contact angle measurements.
  4. Add 300 µL of 70% ethanol (made with absolute ethanol and endotoxin-free water) and incubate at RT for 1 h. Remove the ethanol and perform endotoxin-free water washes by adding 300 µL of endotoxin-free water to each well and incubating for 1 h (three times), 12 h, and 24 h prior to use to remove any remaining solvent.
    1. Incubate 200 µL of endotoxin-free water in three wells of each plate for 1 h. Measure endotoxin concentration of water extracts using an endpoint chromogenic endotoxin assay (steps 2.5.1−2.5.6).
  5. UV sterilize the well plates for 30 min prior to cell culture experiments.

5. Making Lysate from 3T3 Cells

  1. Grow 3T3 cells in multiple T150 flasks to 70% confluence. To detach cells, aspirate media, wash surface with 5 mL of PBS, and aspirate PBS. Add 5 mL of animal origin-free, recombinant cell dissociation enzyme (Table of Materials) and incubate at 37 °C for 3−5 min.
  2. Detach cells by gently tilting the flask back and forth. Add 5 mL of PBS to neutralize the recombinant enzyme used for cell dissociation. Transfer the detached cells from the flasks into a centrifuge tube and mix via pipetting. Perform a live cell count using a hemocytometer and cell viability dye.
    NOTE: A cell dissociation enzyme that can be neutralized through dilution in PBS was selected to avoid the introduction of serum-based proteins in the lysate preparation. If trypsin is used to dissociate cells, it should be neutralized with a serum-containing solution, and an additional PBS wash should be performed to reduce the amount of serum proteins carried over into the lysate preparation.
  3. Centrifuge the cells at 200 x g for 5 min. Aspirate the supernatant and resuspend cells in original volume (i.e., 10 mL x number of flasks) of PBS to wash off any remaining media. Repeat.
  4. Centrifuge the cells again at 200 x g for 5 min and aspirate the supernatant. Add the volume of PBS required to achieve a final cell concentration of 1 x 106 cells/mL. Place the cell solution into a -80 °C freezer until sample is fully frozen (at least 2 h).
  5. Thaw cell solution in a 37 °C water bath. Once completely thawed, place the solution back into the -80 °C freezer until totally frozen. Repeat for a total of 3 freeze-thaw cycles.
  6. Perform a micro bicinchoninic acid (BCA) assay on the cell lysate at a variety of dilutions (e.g., 1/100, 1/200, 1/500, 1/1000) to determine the protein concentration. Dilute the cell lysate to a protein concentration of 468.75 µg/mL, aliquot, and store at -80 °C for future use.
    NOTE: Final protein concentration in a 48-well plate is 125 µg/cm2 (based on the surface area of one well, 0.75 cm2).
  7. Perform a Western blot to assess presence of DAMPs in lysate (e.g., heat shock protein 60 [HSP60], high mobility group box 1 [HMGB1]) by loading 40−60 µg of lysate protein in loading buffer onto a 1.5 mm thick 10% polyacrylamide gel and follow standard Western blot procedures.

6. Assessing Effect of Adsorbed Protein Layers and Toll-like Receptors on NF-κB Activity of Macrophages

NOTE: For a schematic of the experimental workflow and plate layout, refer to Figure 1A and Supplemental Figure 1, respectively.

  1. Grow reporter macrophages in an appropriately sized flask to 70% confluence. Aspirate media, wash surface with PBS, and aspirate PBS. Add the recombinant cell dissociation enzyme and incubate at 37 °C for 8 min.
  2. Detach cells by firmly tapping the sides of the flask. Inactivate the recombinant cell dissociation enzyme by adding an equal volume of growth media (containing 10% FBS). Perform a live cell count using a hemocytometer and cell viability dye.
    NOTE: Expected viability for the reporter macrophages following an 8 min incubation in the cell dissociation enzyme is 90%.
  3. Centrifuge cells at 200 x g for 5 min. Aspirate supernatant and resuspend in original volume of PBS to wash cells. Centrifuge again and resuspend cells at 7.3 x 105 cells/mL in assay media (containing heat inactivated FBS).
  4. Separate cell suspension into 3 different tubes: TLR4 inhibitor, anti-TLR2, and untreated. Incubate cells with 1 µg/mL TLR4 inhibitor for 60 min at RT or with 50 µg/mL anti-TLR2 for 30 min at RT.
  5. Add 200 µL of lysate, 10% FBS, 10% commercial mouse plasma (Table of Materials), or a mixture of the protein solutions to a 48-well plate (or equivalent) and allow protein to adsorb at 37 °C for the desired amount of time (i.e., 30 min, 60 min, or 24 h). Aspirate protein solutions from wells, using a fresh Pasteur pipette for each protein solution, and wash surfaces with 250 µL of PBS for 5 min. Aspirate PBS. Repeat for a total of 3 washes.
    NOTE: This step may need to be started earlier in the protocol depending on desired adsorption time. Adjust protocol accordingly.
  6. After incubation period with the TLR4 inhibitor or anti-TLR2, pipette cells to resuspend. Add 200 µL of cell solution to each well.
  7. For TLR2 positive control condition, add Pam3CSK4 to a final concentration of 150 ng/mL. For TLR4 positive control condition, add lipopolysaccharide (LPS) to a final concentration of 1.5 µg/mL. Incubate cells at 37 °C for 20 h.
  8. Sample 20 µL of supernatant from each well and plate in duplicate into a 96-well plate. Include three wells of 20 µL assay media as a background control. Add 200 µL of SEAP reporter assay reagent to each well. Cover the plate with an adhesive seal and incubate for 2.5 h at 37 °C.
    NOTE: The incubation time may vary depending on experimental conditions, and should be optimized for a strong difference in absorbance between positive and negative control wells.
    1. Transfer the remainder of the supernatant to a 1.5 mL tube (per well). Centrifuge at 1,000 x g for 10 min to pellet any debris. Transfer supernatant to a new 1.5 mL tube and store at -80 °C. Analyze supernatant for the presence of proinflammatory cytokines (e.g., TNF-α, interleukin 6) via enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA).
  9. Remove adhesive plate seal. Read absorbance of the plate using a plate reader at 635 nm. Aspirate liquid and discard plate.

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Results

Cleaning methods for the polymer-coated surfaces were tested to ensure there was no disruption of the coating, which would be seen as a change in the water contact angle to an uncoated glass coverslip (Figure 2). Soaking PMMA-coated microscope slides in 70% ethanol for 1 h was found to remove the PMMA coating (Figure 2, left panel), likely due to the solubility of PMMA in 80 wt% ethanol13, therefore PMMA-coated surfaces were cleaned using...

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Discussion

A primary focus of our lab is the host response to solid biomaterial soft tissue implants, and in particular how the cellular damage incurred during the implantation procedure impacts the host response. The work presented here describes preliminary experiments using a reporter macrophage cell line and in vitro-generated DAMP-containing cellular lysate, to investigate the influence of molecules released during cellular damage (i.e., from the implant surgery) on macrophage responses to biomaterials. Fibroblast cell lysate ...

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Disclosures

The authors have nothing to disclose.

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge operational funding from Canadian Institutes of Health Research Project (PTJ 162251), Queen's University Senate Advisory Research Committee and infrastructure support from the Canadian Foundation for Innovation John Evan's Leadership Fund (Project 34137) and the Ministry of Research and Innovation Ontario Research Fund (Project 34137). L.A.M. was supported by a Queen's University R. Samuel McLaughlin Fellowship, a Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada Canadian Graduate Scholarship Master's Award and an Ontario Graduate Scholarship. The authors would like to thank Dr. Myron Szewczuk for his generous gift of the NF-κB/AP-1 reporter macrophage cell line and Drs. Michael Blennerhassett and Sandra Lourenssen for the use of their gel imaging system and plate reader.

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Materials

List of materials used in this article
NameCompanyCatalog NumberComments
Cell culture reagents
anti-mouse/human CD282 (TLR2)Biolegend121802
CLI-095 (TLR4 inhibitor)InvivogenTLRL-CLI95
C57 complement plasma K2 EDTA 10ml, innovative grade US originInnovativeResearchIGMSC57-K2 EDTA-Compl-10mlMouse plasma
Dulbecco's modified eagle medium (DMEM)Sigma AldrichD6429-500ML
Dulbecco's phosphate buffered saline (DPBS)Fisher Scientific14190250No calcium, no magnesium
Fetal bovine serum (FBS), research gradeWisent98150
LPS-EKInvivogenTLRL-EKLPSLipopolysaccharide from Escherichia coli K12
NIH/3T3 fibroblastsATCCCRL-1658
Pam3CSK4Invivogentlrl-pmsSynthetic triacylated lipopeptide - TLR1/2 ligand
Penicillin/streptomycinSigma AldrichP4333-100ML
PlasmocinInvivogenANT-MPPMycoplasma elimination reagent
RAW-Blue cellsInvivogenraw-spNF-κB/AP-1 reporter macrophage cell line
Trypan blue solution, 0.4%Fisher Scientific15250061
TrypLE express enzyme (1X)Fisher Scientific12604021animal origin-free recombinant cell dissociation enzyme
ZeocinInvivogenANT-ZN-1
Kits and assays
ELISA precoated plates, mouse IL-6BiolegendB213022
ELISA precoated plates, mouse TNF-αBiolegendB220233
Endotoxin (Escherichia coli) - Control standard endotoxin (CSE)Associates of Cape Cope Inc.E0005-5Endotoxin for standard curve in chromogenic endotoxin assay
LAL water, 100 mLAssociates of Cape Cope Inc.WP1001Used with chromogenic endotoxin assay
Micro BCA protein assayFisher ScientificPI23235
Limulus amebocyte lysate (LAL) Pyrochrome endotoxin test kitAssociates of Cape Cope Inc.C1500-5Chromogenic endotoxin assay reagent
QUANTI-Blue alkaline phosphatase detection mediumInvivogenrep-qb2Alkaline phosphatase assay to indirectly measure NF-κB/AP-1 activity
Polymeric coating reagents
Chloroform, anhydrousSigma Aldrich288306-1L
Ethyl alcohol anhydrousCommercial AlcoholsP006EAANSigma: Reagent alcohol, anhydrous, 676829-1L
Straight tapered fine tip forcepsFisher Scientific16-100-113
Fluorinert FC-40 solventSigma AldrichF9755-100MLFluorinated solvent for fPTFE
Cell culture grade water (endotoxin-free)Fisher ScientificSH30529LS
Poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA)Sigma Aldrich182230-25G
Sylgard 184 elastomer kitFisher Scientific50822180
Teflon-AF (fPTFE)Sigma Aldrich469610-1GPoly[4,5-difluoro-2,2-bis(trifluoromethyl)-1,3-dioxole-co-tetrafluoroethylene]
Consumables
Adhesive plate sealsFisher ScientificAB-0580
Axygen microtubes, 1.5 mLFisher Scientific14-222-155
Borosilicate glass scintillation vials, with white polypropylene capsFisher Scientific03-337-4
Clear PS 48-well plateFisher Scientific08-772-52
Clear TCPS 96-well plateFisher Scientific08-772-2C
Clear TCPS 48-well plateFisher Scientific08-772-1C
Cover glasses, circlesFisher Scientific12-545-81
Falcon tissue culture treated flasks, T25Fisher Scientific10-126-10
sticky-Slide 8 WellIbidi80828
Superfrost microscope slidesFisher Scientific12-550-15
Tissue culture treated flasks, T150Fisher Scientific08-772-48

References

  1. Anderson, J. M., Rodriguez, A., Chang, D. T. Foreign body reaction to biomaterials. Seminars in Immunology. 20 (2), 86-100 (2008).
  2. Anderson, J. M., Miller, K. M. Biomaterial biocompatibility and the macrophage. Biomaterials. 5 (1), 5-10 (1984).
  3. Collier, T. O., Anderson, J. M. Protein and surface effects on monocyte and macrophage adhesion, maturation, and survival. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research. 60 (3), 487-496 (2002).
  4. Bianchi, M. E. DAMPs, PAMPs and alarmins: all we need to know about danger. Journal of Leukocyte Biology. 81 (1), 1-5 (2007).
  5. McKiel, L. A., Fitzpatrick, L. E. Toll-like Receptor 2-Dependent NF-κB/AP-1 Activation by Damage-Associated Molecular Patterns Adsorbed on Polymeric Surfaces. ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering. 4 (11), 3792-3801 (2018).
  6. Babensee, J. E. Interaction of dendritic cells with biomaterials. Seminars in Immunology. 20 (2), 101-108 (2008).
  7. Sintes, J., Romero, X., de Salort, J., Terhorst, C., Engel, P. Mouse CD84 is a pan-leukocyte cell-surface molecule that modulates LPS-induced cytokine secretion by macrophages. Journal of Leukocyte Biology. 88 (4), 687-697 (2010).
  8. Tom, J. K., Mancini, R. J., Esser-Kahn, A. P. Covalent modification of cell surfaces with TLR agonists improves and directs immune stimulation. Chemical Communications. 49 (83), 9618-9620 (2013).
  9. Abdulkhalek, S., et al. Neu1 sialidase and matrix metalloproteinase-9 cross-talk is essential for toll-like receptor activation and cellular signaling. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 286 (42), 36532-36549 (2011).
  10. Gorbet, M. B., Sefton, M. V. Endotoxin: The uninvited guest. Biomaterials. 26 (34), 6811-6817 (2005).
  11. Xing, Z., Pabst, M. J., Hasty, K. A., Smith, R. A. Accumulation of LPS by polyethylene particles decreases bone attachment to implants. Journal of Orthopaedic Research. 24 (5), 959-966 (2006).
  12. Ding, H., et al. Comparison of the cytotoxic and inflammatory responses of titanium particles with different methods for endotoxin removal in RAW264.7 macrophages. Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine. 23 (4), 1055-1062 (2012).
  13. Hoogenboom, R., Becer, C. R., Guerrero-Sanchez, C., Hoeppener, S., Schubert, U. S. Solubility and thermoresponsiveness of PMMA in alcohol-water solvent mixtures. Australian Journal of Chemistry. 63 (8), 1173-1178 (2010).
  14. Efimenko, K., Wallace, W. E., Genzer, J. Surface modification of Sylgard-184 poly(dimethyl siloxane) networks by ultraviolet and ultraviolet/ozone treatment. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science. 254 (2), 306-315 (2002).
  15. Godek, M. L., Sampson, J. A., Duchsherer, N. L., McElwee, Q., Grainger, D. W. Rho GTPase protein expression and activation in murine monocytes/macrophages is not modulated by model biomaterial surfaces in serum-containing in vitro cultures. Journal of Biomaterials Science. Polymer Edition. 17 (10), 1141-1158 (2006).
  16. Park, J. S., et al. Involvement of Toll-like Receptors 2 and 4 in Cellular Activation by High Mobility Group Box 1 Protein. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 279 (9), 7370-7377 (2004).
  17. Ohashi, K., Burkart, V., Flohé, S., Kolb, H. Cutting Edge: Heat Shock Protein 60 Is a Putative Endogenous Ligand of the Toll-Like Receptor-4 Complex. The Journal of Immunology. 164 (2), 558-561 (2000).
  18. Wong, T., McGrath, J. A., Navsaria, H. The role of fibroblasts in tissue engineering and regeneration. British Journal of Dermatology. 156 (6), 1149-1155 (2007).
  19. van Wachem, P. B., et al. The influence of protein adsorption on interactions of cultured human endothelial cells with polymers. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research. 21 (6), 701-718 (1987).
  20. Miller, K. M., Anderson, J. M. Human monocyte/macrophage activation and interleukin 1 generation by biomedical polymers. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research. 22 (8), 713-731 (1988).
  21. Bonfield, T. L., Colton, E., Anderson, J. M. Plasma protein adsorbed biomedical polymers: Activation of human monocytes and induction of interleukin 1. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research. 23 (6), 535-548 (1989).
  22. González, O., Smith, R. L., Goodman, S. B. Effect of size, concentration, surface area, and volume of polymethylmethacrylate particles on human macrophages in vitro. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research. 30 (4), 463-473 (1996).
  23. Anderson, J. M., et al. Protein adsorption and macrophage activation on polydimethylsiloxane and silicone rubber. Journal of Biomaterials Science. Polymer Edition. 7 (2), 159-169 (1995).
  24. Lord, M. S., Foss, M., Besenbacher, F. Influence of nanoscale surface topography on protein adsorption and cellular response. Nano Today. 5 (1), 66-78 (2010).
  25. Chen, S., et al. Characterization of topographical effects on macrophage behavior in a foreign body response model. Biomaterials. 31 (13), 3479-3491 (2010).
  26. Shen, M., Horbett, T. A. The effects of surface chemistry and adsorbed proteins on monocyte/macrophage adhesion to chemically modified polystyrene surfaces. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research. 57 (3), 336-345 (2001).
  27. Love, R. J., Jones, K. S. The recognition of biomaterials: Pattern recognition of medical polymers and their adsorbed biomolecules. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A. 101 (9), 2740-2752 (2013).
  28. McNally, A. K., Anderson, J. M. Phenotypic expression in human monocyte-derived interleukin-4-induced foreign body giant cells and macrophages in vitro: Dependence on material surface properties. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A. 103 (4), 1380-1390 (2015).
  29. Gambhir, V., et al. The TLR2 agonists lipoteichoic acid and Pam3CSK4 induce greater pro-inflammatory responses than inactivated Mycobacterium butyricum. Cellular Immunology. 280 (1), 101-107 (2012).
  30. Suzuki, O., Yagishita, H., Yamazaki, M., Aoba, T. Adsorption of Bovine Serum Albumin onto Octacalcium Phosphate and its Hydrolyzates. Cells and Materials. 5 (1), 45-54 (1995).
  31. Johnston, R. L., Spalton, D. J., Hussain, A., Marshall, J. In vitro protein adsorption to 2 intraocular lens materials. Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery. 25 (8), 1109-1115 (1999).
  32. Jin, J., Jiang, W., Yin, J., Ji, X., Stagnaro, P. Plasma proteins adsorption mechanism on polyethylene-grafted poly(ethylene glycol) surface by quartz crystal microbalance with dissipation. Langmuir. 29 (22), 6624-6633 (2013).
  33. Swartzlander, M. D., et al. Linking the foreign body response and protein adsorption to PEG-based hydrogels using proteomics. Biomaterials. 41, 26-36 (2015).
  34. Chamberlain, M. D., et al. Unbiased phosphoproteomic method identifies the initial effects of a methacrylic acid copolymer on macrophages. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 112 (34), 10673-10678 (2015).
  35. Dillman, W. J., Miller, I. F. On the adsorption of serum proteins on polymer membrane surfaces. Journal of Colloid And Interface Science. 44 (2), 221-241 (1973).
  36. Ishihara, K., Ziats, N. P., Tierney, B. P., Nakabayashi, N., Anderson, J. M. Protein adsorption from human plasma is reduced on phospholipid polymers. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research. 25 (11), 1397-1407 (1991).
  37. Warkentin, P., Wälivaara, B., Lundström, I., Tengvall, P. Differential surface binding of albumin, immunoglobulin G and fibrinogen. Biomaterials. 15 (10), 786-795 (1994).
  38. Berghaus, L. J., et al. Innate immune responses of primary murine macrophage-lineage cells and RAW 264.7 cells to ligands of Toll-like receptors 2, 3, and 4. Comparative Immunology, Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. 33 (5), 443-454 (2010).
  39. Zhang, Y., Karki, R., Igwe, O. J. Toll-like receptor 4 signaling: A common pathway for interactions between prooxidants and extracellular disulfide high mobility group box 1 (HMGB1) protein-coupled activation. Biochemical Pharmacology. 98 (1), 132-143 (2015).
  40. Mizel, S. B., Honko, A. N., Moors, M. A., Smith, P. S., West, A. P. Induction of macrophage nitric oxide production by Gram-negative flagellin involves signaling via heteromeric Toll-like receptor 5/Toll-like receptor 4 complexes. Journal of Immunology. 170 (12), 6217-6223 (2003).
  41. Das, N., et al. HMGB1 Activates Proinflammatory Signaling via TLR5 Leading to Allodynia. Cell Reports. 17 (4), 1128-1140 (2016).
  42. Pelegrin, P., Barroso-Gutierrez, C., Surprenant, A. P2X7 Receptor Differentially Couples to Distinct Release Pathways for IL-1β in Mouse Macrophage. The Journal of Immunology. 180 (11), 7147-7157 (2008).
  43. Tak, P. P., Firestein, G. S. NF-κB: A key role in inflammatory diseases. Journal of Clinical Investigation. 107 (1), 7-11 (2001).
  44. Ashkenazi, A., Dixit, V. M. Death receptors: signaling and modulation. Science. 281 (5381), 1305-1308 (1998).
  45. Erridge, C. Endogenous ligands of TLR2 and TLR4: agonists or assistants. Journal of Leukocyte Biology. 87 (6), 989-999 (2010).
  46. Feng, Y., et al. A macrophage-activating, injectable hydrogel to sequester endogenous growth factors for in situ angiogenesis. Biomaterials. 134, 128-142 (2017).
  47. Lonez, C., et al. Cationic lipid nanocarriers activate Toll-like receptor 2 and NLRP3 inflammasome pathways. Nanomedicine: Nanotechnology, Biology, and Medicine. 10 (4), 775-782 (2014).

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Reprints and Permissions

Explore More Articles

NF-kB AP-1 ReporterToll-Like Receptor SignalingMacrophage Cell AssaySEAP Reporter AssayFlow Cytometry AnalysisqPCR Gene ExpressionWestern Blot AnalysisELISA Cytokine Analysis
A Macrophage Reporter Cell Assay to Examine Toll-Like Receptor-Mediated NF-kB/AP-1 Signaling on Adsorbed Protein Layers on Polymeric Surfaces
Contact Us
Recommend to Library

Privacy

Terms of Use

Policies

Copyright © 2026 MyJoVE Corporation. All rights reserved.