Heart failure (HF) is a prevalent disease and is associated with high morbidity and mortality1. Rodent pressure-overload (PO) models of HF, produced by ascending or transverse aortic banding, are commonly used to explore molecular mechanisms leading to HF and to test potential novel therapeutic targets in HF. They also mimic changes seen in human HF secondary to prolonged systemic hypertension or severe aortic stenosis. Following PO, the left ventricular (LV) wall gradually increases in thickness, a process known as concentric LV hypertrophy (LVH), to compensate and adapt for the increase in LV wall stress. However, this is associated with the activation of a number of maladaptive signaling pathways, which lead to derangements in calcium cycling and homeostasis, metabolic and extracellular matrix remodeling and changes in gene expression as well as enhanced apoptosis and autophagy2,3,4,5,6. These molecular changes constitute the trigger for the initiation and propagation of myocardial remodeling and transition into a decompensated HF phenotype.
Despite the use of inbred rodent strains and standardization of clip size and surgical technique, there is tremendous phenotypic variability in LV chamber structure and function in aortic banding models7,8,9. The phenotypic variability encountered after PO in rat, Sprague-Dawley strain, is described elsewhere10,11. Of those, two HF phenotypes are encountered with evidence of myocardial remodeling and activation of signal transduction pathways leading to a state of heightened oxidative stress. This is associated with metabolic remodeling, altered gene expression and changes in posttranslational modification of proteins, altogether playing a role in the remodeling process10,12. The first is a phenotype of moderate remodeling and early systolic dysfunction (MOD) and the second is a phenotype of overt systolic HF (HFrEF).
The PO model of HF is advantageous over the myocardial infarction (MI) model of HF because the PO-induced circumferential and meridional wall stresses are homogeneously distributed across all segments of the myocardium. However, both models suffer from variability in the severity of PO10,11 and in infarct size13,14 along with intense inflammation and scarring at the infarct site15 as well as adhesion to the chest wall and surrounding tissues, which are observed in the MI model of HF. Moreover, the rat PO induced HF model is challenging to create as it is associated with high mortality and failure rates10, with only 20% of the operated rats developing the MOD HF phenotype10.
The MOD is an attractive HF phenotype and constitutes an evolution of the traditionally created HFrEF phenotype as it allows for early targeting of signal transduction pathways that play a role in myocardial remodeling, especially when it pertains to perturbations in mitochondrial dynamics and function, myocardial metabolism, calcium cycling and extracellular matrix remodeling. These pathophysiological processes are highly evident in the MOD HF phenotype11. In this manuscript, we describe how to create the MOD and HFrEF phenotypes and we address pitfalls while performing the ascending aortic banding (AAB) procedure. We also elaborate on how to best characterize by echocardiography the two HF phenotypes, MOD and HFrEF, and how to differentiate them from other phenotypes that fail to develop severe PO or that develop severe PO and concentric remodeling but without significant eccentric remodeling.