Source: Laboratory of Jonathan Flombaum—Johns Hopkins University
Human color vision is impressive. People with normal color vision can tell apart millions of individual hues. Most amazingly, this ability is achieved with fairly simple hardware.
Part of the power of human color vision comes from a clever bit of engineering in the human brain. There, color perception relies on what is known as an 'opponent system.' This means that the presence of one kind of stimulus is treated as evidence for the absence of another, and vice versa; absence of one kind of stimulus is taken as evidence for the presence of the other. In particular, in the human brain there are cells that fire both when they receive signals to suggest that blue light is present, or when they do not receive signals suggesting yellow light. Similarly, there are cells that fire in the presence of yellow or the absence of blue. Blue and yellow are thus treated as opponent values in one dimension, and can be thought of as negative versus positive values on one axis of a Cartesian plane. If a stimulus is characterized as having a negative value on that axis, it can't also have a positive value. So, if it is characterized as yellow, it can't also be characterized as blue. Similarly, green and red (or really, magenta), occupy another opponent dimension. There are cells in the human brain that respond to the presence of one or the absence of the other. Figures 1 and 2 explain color opponency in Cartesian terms.
Figure 1. Opponent color dimensions. The human brain processes color using an opponent dimensions system. This is a two-dimensional plane with blue and yellow occupying one axis, which can be thought of as simply positive or negative, and red and green occupying the other axis. The consequence of the system is that the brain processes the presence of some colors as indicating the absence of others, and vice-versa. All perceivable colors occupy a point in the opponent space.
Figure 2. All perceivable colors occupy a point in the opponent space. Shown here are examples of colors that have nonzero values in each of two dimensions of the opponent space.
One way that color opponency was discovered-in 1878 by Ewald Hering, even before scientists had access to techniques for imaging the brain itself-is through an illusion known as a color afterimage. Afterimages are still used today both to demonstrate the opponent properties of human color perception and to study them.
This video demonstrates how to create a color afterimage illusion, and a simple way to collect subjective perceptual responses from human observers.
- Open a blank white slide in a slide editor (software such as PowerPoint or Keynote will suffice).
- Use the shape tool to make two equally sized stars with no color fill, only a thin black outline. Center them vertically on the slide, and place one on each side (left and right).
- Place a small black disc in the center of the slide between the stars. This is the fixation point.
- Now, make a copy of this black and white slide. The second copy of it will be the second slide in your afterimage stimulus. Turn now to making the first slide by selecting the first of the two identical slides.
- Select the star on the left and fill it uniformly with a bright blue. Select the star on the right and fill it uniformly with a bright yellow.
- The stimulus is now ready. The first slide should be in color and the second should be entirely black and white. Figure 3 shows what the first slide should look like, and Figure 4 shows the second.
Figure 3. Slide #1 of a two-slide color afterimage. The first slide in an afterimage pair is in color. The dark disc in the center is the fixation point.
Figure 4. Slide #2 of a two-slide color afterimage. The second slide in an afterimage pair is in black and white. But observers will perceive illusory color inside the white fills of the objects in the frame (the stars in this case).
- Make additional stimuli for investigation following the same procedure. For example, make one with a red star on one side, and a green star on the other. Then, make one with a green star on one side, and a blue star on the other. Any other colors can be used as well.
- Each stimulus needs to include a color slide followed by an identical slide in black and white. Figure 5 shows two examples of additional slide pairs for inducing color afterimages.
Figure 5. Two additional examples of slides for inducing color afterimages. The first slide in each pair (top row) is always in color. The second slide in each pair (bottom row) is always in black and white.
2. Generating the illusion
- To cause someone to experience the color afterimage illusion, seat them in front of the computer monitor.
- Load one of the color slides, e.g., the one with the blue and yellow stars.
- Ask the observer to fixate on the black disc in the center of the screen, and to avoid moving their eyes.
- Count out 10 s, then advance the slides forward so that the black and white slide replaces the color one.
- Instruct the participant to continue to maintain their fixation. They should see the white stars as filled in with the opponent colors of those that filled them in previously. So, the formerly blue star will look yellow, and the formerly yellow one will look blue. Figure 6 schematizes the relationship between the colors in the first slide and the illusory colors that will be perceived.
Figure 6. Illusory colors perceived in relation to a particular slide-pair. In Slide #1, the left star is blue and the yellow star is yellow. Slide #2 is actually black and white. But when toggled to after an observer has fixated on Slide #1, Slide #2 will be perceived with illusory colors. Specifically, the stars will appear filled in by the opponent colors from the ones filling them before, so the left star will be perceived as yellow, and the right one as blue.
- Once the observer moves their eyes, the illusion fades quickly.
- Note, it is easy to do this on one's self, and it works.
3. Collecting data
- As with many visual illusions, the effects are phenomenologically salient, and experienced by nearly all people. So, quantitative data serves mainly to affirm what one experiences.
- A simple technique for collecting data is to include an X someplace in the white region in the second slide in a pair, and to supply a set of color options for observers to pick from.
- The task is for the observer to select the color option they perceive where the X is placed. Figure 7 shows the sequence of events in one trial of the experiment.
Figure 7. Sequence of events in a single trial of a color afterimage experiment. The observer fixates on the center disc in Slide #1. After 10 s, the experimenter advances forward to Slide #2. The participant's task is to select the color among the displayed options that best matches the color they perceive in the position of the 'X.'
- To run a complete version of the experiment, use several different slide pairs. During each trial of the experiment, place an X in a different part of one of the objects in the second slide.
- Run 5-10 participants in an experiment with 10-20 trials. Tally up the color chosen as a function of the color that was present in an X's position in a trial's slide #1. In other words, relate the color perceived at the position of an X on a white background to the color previously in that position. The color previously in that position is called the 'inducer color,' and the color perceived is called the 'after-color.'
Human color vision is impressive, and can help us see—and distinguish between—over a million distinct hues. Psychologists use a visual illusion called the color afterimage to study our perception of color.
What a person perceives as the hue of objects they encounter, like an orange, starts with sensory information received by the eyes.
When this light enters an individual’s eyes, the cornea and lens focus it onto photoreceptor cells in the retina. In response, these cells generate signals that are relayed to the visual cortex, where the colors of objects are identified.
Along this pathway, individual neurons exist that respond differently to distinct color signals.
For example, there are certain neurons—called "green on, red off" cells—that are only activated by green light. However, these same cells are inhibited by red light.
Similarly, there are neurons called "red on, green off" cells that respond to red, but which are inhibited by green. Thus, components of the brain treat these colors as "opponents": the presence of one is interpreted as the other being absent.
As a result, green and red can be thought of as occupying opposite values on a two-dimensional plane—respectively, negative and positive. In fact, all the specific individual colors that we see are ordered pairs of points in this coordinate system.
This video demonstrates how to investigate such opponency, originally discovered by Ewald Hering in 1878, using the color afterimage illusion—where individuals’ brains are tricked into perceiving an opponent color in a position previously filled by its antagonistic hue.
We not only explain how to generate stimuli, and collect and interpret color perception data, but we also explore how researchers can apply this illusion to study different facets of color vision.
In this experiment, participants are asked to perform several trials in which they must first stare at colored shapes—during what is called the inducer phase—and then while looking at the same shapes in black and white, state what hues they see—referred to as the afterimage phase.
During the first inducer phase, two of the same shape—like a star—are shown side-by-side on a computer screen for 10 s. These shapes are identical in size and orientation, but are filled with different colors, such as blue and yellow, each of which should have a distinct opponent—a stipulation critical for the second phase.
For the duration of each trial, participants are instructed to fixate on a circle centered between the shapes, in order to prevent eye movements that could interfere with the illusion.
In the afterimage phase, the black disc remains onscreen, but the colored pictures on either side of it are replaced by images of the same shapes devoid of color—white stars outlined in black.
Participants are then asked what hue they see in a random position in a star, and the color they report serves as the dependent variable.
The trick here is that during the inducer phase, color-sensitive cells are active—for example, some fire heavily in response to a blue stimulus. However, the switch from the inducer stars to black-and-white shapes results in these cells suddenly ceasing to signal due to the absence of any color.
Yet, participants’ brains interpret this abrupt stoppage as meaning that the opponent colors are present—a lack of signaling from previously active blue-sensitive cells is taken as evidence for yellow.
As a result, participants will fill in the black-and-white shapes with the opponent colors of those shown during the inducer phase—where a blue inducer star was, a yellow afterimage star is perceived, and vice versa.
This is the color afterimage illusion, which quickly fades as soon as participants move their eyes.
Due to how the brain organizes colors, it is expected that participants will predominantly see after-colors that are opponents of the inducer: green for red, for example.
To prepare stimuli for the experiment, first open a blank slide in a slide-editing program. Use the shape tool to generate two equally-sized stars—one on the right side and the other on the left—both centered vertically.
Then, create a small black disc positioned between them to serve as the fixation point.
To generate images for an inducer phase, outline both shapes in black. Then, select the star on the left and fill it uniformly with a bright blue. Similarly, fill the right one with a bright yellow.
Repeat this process, creating additional inducer slides with stars in different colors, like green and red and another set in green and blue.
Now, copy one of the inducer slides. In this replica, keep both stars outlined in black, but change their internal colors to white. This completed slide will be shown in the afterimage phase of all trials.
Finally, arrange them so that each stimulus series consists of two slides: a colored inducer set followed by an afterimage one in black and white for each trial.
When the participant arrives, direct them to a computer monitor and verify that they are not color-blind. Proceed by explaining the instructions for the task that they will be performing.
Emphasize that throughout a trial, the participant should try to avoid moving their eyes, and remain focused on the black disc that will appear in the center of the computer screen.
Once you are confident that the participant understands the afterimage task, have them perform between 10 and 20 trials. For each one, next to inducer-color, record the hue that was selected as the after-color.
To analyze the data, tally the results and construct a table depicting the most frequently selected after-color for each inducer color.
Notice that the selected after-colors are predominantly opponents of the inducer hues, indicating that the participants’ brains were tricked, causing them to see hues that weren’t actually there—color afterimage illusions.
Now that you know how to use visual stimuli to elicit a color afterimage illusion, let’s look at how researchers can use this technique to better understand the anatomical basis behind color vision, and diseases that affect this perception.
Up until now, we’ve focused on normal vision. However, variations of the afterimage test can also be employed to better understand diseases that affect color perception—like types of color blindness in which both hues of an opponent pair appear the same.
For example, researchers can compare how long an individual perceives a color afterimage to times reported by normal, control participants. Illusions persisting for abnormal lengths of time can be indicative of a color vision disease.
Afterimage tests can then be paired with other color perception assessments and imaging techniques to pinpoint whether a defect in the retina, visual cortex, or the visual pathway—which relays signals between these two areas—is responsible.
You’ve just watched JoVE’s video on color afterimages. By now, you should know how to use shapes of different hues to investigate this illusion, and collect and interpret opponent color data. Importantly, you should also have an understanding of how afterimages can help identify brain regions involved in color perception, and diagnose diseases relating to color vision.
Thanks for watching!
For each of the inducer colors in the experiment, identify the most frequently selected after-color. Make a table that visualizes the results, like the one in Figure 8.
Figure 8. Representative result. Most frequently selected after-colors as a function of inducer colors. The most frequently perceived after-colors will be opponent values of the respective inducers.
The most frequently perceived after-colors should be opponent values of the respective inducer colors. The reason is because color-sensitive cells in the human brain are mapped spatially-they respond to specific regions of space dependent on where the subject fixates their eyes. Normally, people move their eyes around, causing different cells to share the burden of responding to regions of external space. By fixating the disc in the inducer images (slide #1 in each pair), the observer causes the same groups of cells to respond in a sustained way to the saturated colors present in a given region of external space. During the fixation period, these cells respond heavily. Blue-sensitive cells produce large blue signals, yellow-sensitive cells produce large yellow signals, and so on. When the black and white image is suddenly shown, and while the observer still fixates, these cells are no longer stimulated-there is no color in the image. But, because they were signaling so strongly a moment before, the rest of the brain interprets their sudden lack of activity as signaling the presence of an opponent color. The sudden lack of signaling in blue-sensitive cells is interpreted as the presence of yellow. The sudden lack of signaling in the yellow-sensitive cells is interpreted as the presence of blue, and so on. The brain interprets the absence of activity in color cells as indicating the presence of opponent colors, when in fact the lack of activity in this case is caused by the absence of color altogether. The brain is effectively tricked, causing people to see colors where there aren't any because of the way it organizes color in terms of opponent dimensions.
Applications and Summary
Color opponency is among the great demonstrations of the scientific method. Researchers in the 1800s were able to infer the nature of color representation in the human brain without any ability to observe brain activity. Today, in fact, color afterimages have become a useful tool for identifying the brain regions involved in processing color. In monkeys, scientists have recorded neurons that fire as though color is present, when it is not, after showing the monkeys sequences of slides that produce afterimages in human observers.1,2 Similarly, with fMRI, scientists have found regions of visual cortex that respond selectively to presence of a color, and that also respond when that color is perceived as an illusion, induced by an afterimage pair of slides.
- Zeki, S. Colour coding in the cerebral cortex: the reaction of cells in monkey visual cortex to wavelengths and colours. Neuroscience, 9(4), 741-765 (1983).
- Conway, B. R., & Tsao, D. Y. Color architecture in alert macaque cortex revealed by FMRI. Cerebral Cortex, 16(11), 1604-1613 (2006).