JoVE Immunology and Infection

Demonstrating a Multi-drug Resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis Amplification Microarray

1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1

1Akonni Biosystems, Inc.

Article
    Downloads Comments Metrics Publish with JoVE

    You must be subscribed to JoVE to access this content.

    Enter your email to receive a free trial:

    Welcome!

    Enter your email below to get your free 10 minute trial to JoVE!


    Admit it, you like to watch.

     

    Summary

    An amplification microarray combines asymmetric PCR amplification and microarray hybridization into a single chamber, which significantly streamlines microarray workflow for the end user. Simplifying microarray workflow is a necessary first step for creating microarray-based diagnostics that can be routinely used in lower-resource environments.

    Date Published: 4/25/2014, Issue 86; doi: 10.3791/51256

    Cite this Article

    Linger, Y., Kukhtin, A., Golova, J., Perov, A., Qu, P., Knickerbocker, C., et al. Demonstrating a Multi-drug Resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis Amplification Microarray. J. Vis. Exp. (86), e51256, doi:10.3791/51256 (2014).

    Abstract

    Simplifying microarray workflow is a necessary first step for creating MDR-TB microarray-based diagnostics that can be routinely used in lower-resource environments. An amplification microarray combines asymmetric PCR amplification, target size selection, target labeling, and microarray hybridization within a single solution and into a single microfluidic chamber. A batch processing method is demonstrated with a 9-plex asymmetric master mix and low-density gel element microarray for genotyping multi-drug resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MDR-TB). The protocol described here can be completed in 6 hr and provide correct genotyping with at least 1,000 cell equivalents of genomic DNA. Incorporating on-chip wash steps is feasible, which will result in an entirely closed amplicon method and system. The extent of multiplexing with an amplification microarray is ultimately constrained by the number of primer pairs that can be combined into a single master mix and still achieve desired sensitivity and specificity performance metrics, rather than the number of probes that are immobilized on the array. Likewise, the total analysis time can be shortened or lengthened depending on the specific intended use, research question, and desired limits of detection. Nevertheless, the general approach significantly streamlines microarray workflow for the end user by reducing the number of manually intensive and time-consuming processing steps, and provides a simplified biochemical and microfluidic path for translating microarray-based diagnostics into routine clinical practice.

    Introduction

    Early case detection and rapid treatment are considered the most effective control strategies to reduce Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) transmission1, and there is now a broad consensus in the TB community that a point of care (POC) or near POC test to simultaneously diagnose TB and drug resistance (DR) is needed. Technologies such as Cepheid’s GeneXpert and other nucleic acid amplification tests reduce the time to diagnosis for many TB patients, and provide a rapid read-out indicating resistance to rifampin or selected mutations conferring resistance to other first or second line drugs2. Although real-time and isothermal nucleic acid amplification tests are designed to identify the drug resistance mutations that lead to MDR-TB, the spectrum of mutations they detect is often inadequate to design an individualized drug regimen corresponding to the drug resistance profile of the patient, and technical constraints related to optical cross-talk or the complexity of amplification and reporting chemistries3-7 may limit the number of loci or mutations that are detected. Thus, detection technologies with higher multiplexing capacity are required to address known gaps in MDR-TB POC diagnostics.

    Microarrays and the WHO-endorsed Hain line probe assays can address the “multiple gene, multiple mutations” challenge of diagnosing MDR-TB8-29. Unfortunately, these hybridization-based, multiplexed detection platforms use multistep, complicated, and open-amplicon protocols that require significant training and proficiency in molecular techniques. The amplification microarray30 was designed to address some of these microarray work-flow and operational concerns. The simplifying fluidic principles are to amplify, hybridize, and detect nucleic acid targets within a single microfluidic chamber. The user introduces the nucleic acid and amplification master mix into a fluidic chamber with a pipette and starts the thermal cycling protocol. For the batch processing method shown here, microarrays are subsequently washed in bulk solution, dried, and imaged. This study demonstrates the functionality of an amplification microarray using an MDR-TB microarray test for rpoB (30 mutations), katG (2 mutations), inhA (4 mutations), rpsL (2 mutations), embB (1 mutation), IS1245, IS6110, and an internal amplification and hybridization control. At least one matched pair of microarray probes (wildtype (WT) and single-nucleotide mutant (MU)) is included for each mutation of interest. Purified nucleic acids from multi-drug resistant M. tuberculosis are from the TDR Tuberculosis Strain Bank31. Gel element microarrays are manufactured on glass substrates by copolymerization essentially as described elsewhere32, except that we use 4% monomer and 0.05 mM each probe in the polymerization mixture. Arrays are surrounded with a 50 ml gasket prior to use. After thermal cycling, hybridization, and wash steps, amplification microarrays are imaged on an Akonni portable analyzer. Background-corrected, integrated signal intensities are obtained from the raw .tif images using a fixed circle algorithm. Noise for each gel element is calculated as three times the standard deviation of the local spot backgrounds. Gene targets are typically considered detectable for signal to noise ratio (SNR) values ≥3. In order to determine the presence or absence of a specific mutation in each gene or codon, a discriminant ratio is calculated from the SNR values as (WT-MU)/(WT+MU). Discriminant ratios <0 are indicative of a drug-resistance mutation at the locus, whereas ratios >0 are indicative of the wild-type sequence.

    Subscription Required. Please recommend JoVE to your librarian.

    Protocol

    For laboratories that follow universal PCR precautions, it is operationally more efficient to include several amplification microarrays and gaskets per substrate and wash all amplification microarrays simultaneously in a bulk container, as described here. Consumable formats are available for performing post-amplification microarray washing steps in an entirely sealed, closed amplicon test, as reported elsewhere30,33.

    1. Setup

    1. Extract and purify nucleic acids from the sample under appropriate biosafety conditions with a method of choice. The requirement is that nucleic acids be of sufficient purity for asymmetric, multiplex PCR amplification.
    2. Prepare workspace by wiping surfaces and equipment with decontaminating solutions.
    3. Place amplification reagents on ice or cold block.
    4. Label a sterile 1.5 ml microfuge tube for the amplification master mix, and label a sterile 0.2 ml microfuge tube for each sample.
    5. After reagents are thawed, briefly vortex and collect contents to the bottom of the tube with a pulse-spin in a mini-centrifuge. Do not vortex Taq polymerase Gently flick the tube to mix and follow with a pulse-spin in mini-centrifuge.
    6. Prepare an amplification master mix using the per-sample reaction volumes shown in Table 1. To account for possible pipetting inaccuracies, prepare at least one more reaction volume than the total number of samples being processed. Note that the master mix contains additional Taq polymerase, over and above what is provided with the muliplex PCR buffer. Only add the amplification/inhibition control to the master mix after all other reagents are combined, and the stock reagent tubes returned to storage.
    Reagent Per- Sample Volume (µl) Final [ ]
    Mulitplex PCR Buffer with HotStar Taq Plus 25 1x
    Bovine serum albumin (BSA) 0.55 0.6 mg/ml
    Formamide 3.8 7.6%
    Additional Taq polymerase 0.8 units/µl (4 units total)
    MDR-TB primer mix 15.75 -
    RNase-free H2O 2.1 -
    Amplification/Inhibition Control 1 5.0 fg/µl
    Total 49

    Table 1. MDR-TB amplification microarray master mix composition.

    1. Vortex the master mix and collect contents to the bottom of the tube with a pulse-spin in a mini-centrifuge.
    2. Combine 49 µl of master mix and 1 µl of M. tuberculosis DNA to each of the sample tubes from step 1.4, above. For an external, no template control (NTC), use 1 µl of molecular biology grade water in place of the M. tuberculosis DNA sample. Vortex and pulse-spin the tube(s) when finished.

    2. Load Amplification Microarrays

    1. Add 48 µl of each master mix/sample onto the center of their respective microarrays, being careful to not touch the microarray itself.
    2. Place a cover slip on top of the microarray gasket and seal, being careful not to trap any air bubbles in the microarray chamber. Air bubbles can negatively affect amplification efficiency and may create artifacts or noise in the subsequent microarray image.

    3. Thermal Cycling

    1. Once all microarrays are loaded with sample, place substrates on the flat block thermal cycler. Make sure that the heated lid option is turned “Off”. Equipment obtained from Akonni Biosystems will already be prequalified for use. Otherwise, it is very important to verify that the flat block thermal cycler(s) provide(s) uniform, consistent heating across all microarray substrates.
    2. Open the thermal cycler software, select the appropriate program, enter “50 µl” for the reaction volume, and initiate the run. The thermal cycling protocol described here consists of:
      Thermal Cycling Steps
      1 88 °C 5 min
      2 88 °C 30 sec
      3 55 °C 1 min
      4 65 °C 30 sec
      5 Repeat steps (2-4) for 50 cycles
      6 65 °C 3 min
      7 55 °C 3 hr
    3. The total number of thermal cycles and 55 °C post-amplification hold time are independent variables that the user may modify, as needed or appropriate for the specific experiment. Because the MDR-TB master mix creates asymmetric (predominantly single-stranded) amplicons, it is usually helpful to include more thermal cycles than might otherwise be utilized for a conventional, exponential PCR amplification protocol.
    4. When the thermal cycling and hybridization program is complete, end the program, remove the amplification microarrays, close the software, and turn off the thermal cycler(s).

    4. Wash and Dry

    1. For washing up to 24 substrates simultaneously, prepare at least 250 ml 1x SSPE – 0.1% Triton X-100 wash buffer, and two containers with at least 250 ml deionized or Milli-Q grade water each. The wash buffer can be prepared in advance.
    2. Carefully remove the cover slip and gasket from each amplification microarray chamber using flat-end forceps. This step is the point at which there is the greatest risk of physically damaging gel element arrays. Use appropriate PCR contamination controls to prevent the spread of amplified nucleic acids within the work environment.
    3. Place microarray substrates in a histology slide holder, and place all slides into the wash bin containing the wash buffer. Cover the container with a lid.
    4. Wash microarrays for 10 min at room temperature with gentle agitation.
    5. Dip the microarrays three times each in two successive washes of deionized or Milli-Q grade water, and air dry.

    5. Imaging

    The asymmetric MDR-TB primer mix generates Cy3-labeled amplicons Gel element microarrays can be imaged with any standard microarray imager capable of imaging Cy3. The following imaging procedure is specific for the MDR-TB master mix, Dx2100 field portable imager, and automated analysis software provided by Akonni.

    1. Ensure that the ethernet cable from the imager is connected to the computer.
    2. Turn on the imager. The power switch is located on the back panel of the instrument. Blue LEDs on the front of the imager will illuminate when imager is powered on.
    3. Turn on the computer.
    4. On the computer desktop, double click the software icon to launch the automated image analysis software.
    5. Wait for the software to establish a connection with the imager camera. Once the connection is established, the Analyze button becomes available, and the message “Connection Successful” will appear in the lower left corner of the screen.
    6. Insert the dried amplification microarray with the microarray facing away from the user, and toward the objective lens. If the microarray is improperly oriented with respect to the lens and camera, the automated analysis software will fail to place a grid on the fluorescence image.
    7. Close the access door. A preview image will be available on the computer screen.
    8. Select the MDR-TB analysis script from the drop-down menu and enter the desired Exposure Time (in milliseconds). A typical starting point for gel element amplification microarrays is 100-500 msec.
    9. Saturated pixels will be displayed on the Preview Image in red. Adjust the exposure time to minimize the number of saturated pixels within individual spots.
    10. Click Analyze to acquire and analyze the fluorescence image. The software will automatically place an MDR-TB assay-specific grid onto the image, extract integrated intensity and background values, and report drug resistance and genotyping results. The automated analysis will typically take a few seconds. For challenging images that contain scratches, dust, fluorescent artifacts, or physical damage to the microarray features, the software may need up to 1 min to complete the analysis.
    11. Once the analysis is complete, click on Save, select the destination folder, type in a filename, and click OK. Underlying microarray data are saved as an .xls file and can be exported for off-line analyses, if desired.
    12. Once the analysis is complete, remove the amplification microarray from the imager, and click on New to initiate the next analysis.
    13. When finished collecting data, close the software, shut down the computer, and turn off the imager.

    Subscription Required. Please recommend JoVE to your librarian.

    Representative Results

    Qualitative image analysis can provide insight into sources of experimental noise or variability that are challenging to identify in data tables generated by automated image analysis software. Thus, it can be useful to visually ascertain that 1) all gel elements are intact and undamaged, 2) the global background is free from fluorescent artifacts that might affect individual signal to noise ratio (SNR) values, 3) there is no evidence for bubble formation or nonuniform amplification/hybridization across the array, and 4) that the software accurately identified all spots on the microarray image. Example MDR-TB amplification microarray images are shown in Figure 1, illustrating a high-quality array and artifacts that may arise due to physical damage or bubbles during thermal cycling. Standard microarray image analysis software is usually able to place a grid and extract integral intensity and background data even from poor quality images such as shown in Figure 1B, so it is incumbent upon the researcher to establish quality control criteria and metrics for accepting or rejecting microarray images from further analysis. Probe redundancy may help ameliorate these issues. However, a fully automated, diagnostic MDR-TB amplification microarray reporting algorithm would otherwise declare the test from Figure 1B as “invalid”.

    Amplification microarray SNR values for a dilution series of wildtype H37Ra genomic DNA are shown in Table 2. At 6.25 pg input genomic DNA per reaction or approximately 1.25 x 103 cell equivalents, all wildtype probes are readily detected. SNR values for each of the internal amplification and inhibition controls ranged from 98.48 (rpoB) to 967.24 (Akonni-supplied internal positive control), indicating that all gene targets in the asymmetric multiplex amplification reaction are amplified and detectable. No template controls were negative (SNR <3) for all probes in the amplification microarray. Genotyping ratios at 6.25 pg input DNA ranged from 0.18-1.00 for all WT/MU probe pairs, which demonstrates correct behavior of WT and MU probes and appropriate genotyping.

    Representative genotyping data for a panel of World Health Organization reference isolates of known genotype are shown in Table 3. If a single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) is represented on the gel element microarray, then the amplification microarray test accurately detects the corresponding mutation in the MDR-TB genome. Some of the amplification microarray probes are also sensitive to near-neighbor mutations that are not explicitly represented on the array as a unique probe. For example, isolate TDR-0129 contains an S531E mutation in the rpoB gene, but there is not a specific probe on the amplification microarray for S531E. Nevertheless, five other SNP probes targeting codon 531 indicate that a mutation is present at codon 531 ― the amplification microarray therefore correctly indicates that this isolate is rifampin resistant. Similar sensitivity to the rpoB S513W mutation is evident for isolate TDR-0148. On the other hand, some SNP probes are not sensitive to near neighbor mutations, as illustrated by isolate TDR-0148 and the rpoB S512G mutation, and isolate TDR-0011 and the katG S315R mutation. We suspect that this type of probe behavior is a consequence of secondary and tertiary structure in the single-stranded amplicon and/or probe34, and is not something that can be predicted a priori. Nevertheless, probe sensitivity to near neighbor mutations is analogous to the use of sloppy molecular beacons to detect multiple drug resistance mutations with a minimal set of real-time PCR probes35,36, and can be diagnostically advantageous provided the test does not generate false positives relative to the phenotypic drug susceptibility.

    Figure 1
    Figure 1. (A) Example amplification microarray image for 100 pg wildtype M. tuberculosis H37Ra genomic DNA and a 100 msec exposure time. Cy3 beacons (for automated gridding and segmentation software) are on the periphery of the image. (B) Image of an amplification microarray showing a fluorescent halo artifact resulting from bubble formation during thermal cycling, and damaged gel elements/debris. Automated image analysis software is still able to place a grid and extract data from this image. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

    Company Catalog Number
    Akonni Biosystems Inquire
    Qiagen #206143
    Qiagen #201207
    Qiagen #206143
    Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc. #BP227-500
    Sigma-Aldrich #3B6917
    Akonni Biosystems Inquire
    Akonni Biosystems Inquire
    Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc. #BP1328-4
    Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc. #BP151-500
    Current Technologies, Inc. #BRSPRAY128
    Decon Labs, Inc. #8416
    Company Catalog Number
    Akonni Biosystems 100-20011
    Akonni Biosystems 100-10021
    ArrayIt HTW
    Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc. #10-300
    VWR #3365040
    VWR #93000-196
    Central Pneumatic #95630

    Table 2. Required Materials and Equipment. 

    Codon Probe
    ID
    WT Probe SNR Values
    500 pg 100 pg 50 pg 25 pg 12.5 pg 6.25 pg
    rpoB 507 1 900.22 644.46 523.17 431.08 364.49 287.47
    510 3 1016.37 699.38 600.16 525.07 446.51 361.64
    511 5 867.67 611.97 529.90 451.73 403.76 307.68
    512 8 810.69 544.04 488.85 436.89 391.62 257.46
    513 11 824.36 547.04 496.00 472.01 408.96 242.25
    515 15 715.48 536.59 416.96 335.81 267.48 189.10
    516 17 723.83 496.44 402.95 329.09 270.10 201.98
    522 27 674.37 413.33 360.40 316.75 236.19 153.40
    524 29 269.46 153.69 117.71 118.02 110.13 51.22
    526 31 136.37 109.90 82.63 76.76 53.61 37.76
    531 44 219.92 136.31 109.16 96.18 80.58 26.44
    533 51 130.54 83.60 76.03 63.47 61.35 41.54
    rpsL 43 54 10.41 12.75 53.30 767.18 5.39 362.42
    88 56 655.54 542.79 527.43 690.34 403.86 456.05
    katG 315 58 1037.03 873.46 816.64 974.83 811.79 876.47
    embB 306 66 940.81 781.13 788.75 837.65 787.05 696.69
    inhA 8 82 1069.43 934.38 862.58 936.88 809.85 682.56
    15 85 1111.66 931.88 918.22 957.87 795.72 723.16
    17 87 1114.49 926.03 920.60 970.70 854.15 744.41

    Table 3. Signal to noise ratios for wildtype probes and a dilution series of M. tuberculosis H37Ra genomic DNA. SNR values > 3 are considered detectable.

    Table 4
    Table 4. Representative genotyping data from MDR-TB isolates of known genotype at 25 pg per amplification microarray reaction. Asterisks identify mutations that are not represented by a unique probe on the gel element microarray. WT = wildtype nucleic acid sequence. Negative values (bold and shaded) are indicative of a mutation, hence phenotypic drug-resistance. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

    Subscription Required. Please recommend JoVE to your librarian.

    Discussion

    The extent of multiplexing with an amplification microarray is ultimately dictated by the efficiency of multiplex asymmetric PCR, not the microarray. In our experience, 10-12 unique primer pairs can be readily multiplexed in an amplification microarray format. Conventional primer and probe design criteria therefore apply to new assays, except that one also needs to consider potential interactions between solution-phase nucleic acids and immobilized microarray probes, the thermal efficiency of the thermal cycler, and probe hybridization behavior in a PCR buffer that also contains PCR primers and low molecular weight amplification artifacts. Highly multiplexed amplification approaches such as whole genome amplification are not conducive to a single-chamber amplification microarray protocol for a number of technical reasons, including interference between random hexamers and immobilized probes, and inefficient hybridization of long, double-stranded amplicons. There is also an inter-relationship between ease-of-use, total analysis time, and limits of detection that individual users will need to consider when designing custom assays or using the MDR-TB test described here. For example, reducing the number of amplification cycles and even eliminating the post-amplification hybridization step will significantly reduce total analysis time, but at the expense of test sensitivity. On the other hand, achieving a reproducible 10 gene copy detection limit may require more amplification cycles or hybridization time, thus extending the total analysis time beyond a single work shift.

    The genes, mutations, imager, analysis software, and reporting algorithm described here are illustrative of the amplification microarray method and system, rather than a report on their analytical performance and clinical utility. For example, the starting sample can be sputum, decontaminated sediment, solid- or liquid cultures ― the requirement for the amplification microarray is simply that the extracted nucleic acids are amplifiable by asymmetric, multiplexed PCR. Some researchers or clinicians may find little to no clinical value in detecting rpsL or embB mutations that confer resistance to streptomycin and ethambutol, respectively, only resistance to rifampin and isoniazid define MDR-TB. Thus, these PCR primers and microarray probes can be replaced with primers and probes that target genes and mutations conferring resistance to other first- or second-line antibiotics. It is possible to write a reporting algorithm to provide the user with detailed information on the specific mutations that are detected in a given specimen, rather than a simple “resistance detected” or “resistance not detected” result. For those researchers interested in using this specific assay to analyze M. tuberculosis isolates, it is also possible to provide the genotyping data even if the IS6110 element is not detected in the specimen.

    Regardless of the possible assay and reporting permutations, the amplification microarray and protocol described here is designed to significantly simplify microarray workflow by combining multiple molecular biology steps into a single biochemical reaction and microfluidic chamber. The representative data demonstrate the efficacy of approach by amplifying nine MDR-TB genomic regions and detecting those asymmetric amplicons with a low-density gel element microarray. The protocol described here uses a bulk washing procedure that requires the user to physically remove the gasket and cover slip from the amplification microarray before washing, and is therefore more appropriate for research-use-only applications rather than clinical diagnostics. As described elsewhere, however, it is certainly possible to incorporate a washing step on-chip using lateral-flow fluidics33 and therefore retain an entirely closed amplicon consumable, including one that can be readily incorporated into a sample-in answer-out diagnostic system that is appropriate for point-of-care applications.

    Subscription Required. Please recommend JoVE to your librarian.

    Disclosures

    The authors declare no competing financial interests.

    Acknowledgements

    This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) under grant RC3 AI089106.

    MDR-TB nucleic acids were provided by the United Nations Children's Fund/United Nations Development Programme/World Bank/World Health Organization Special Programme for Research and Training in Tropical Diseases (TDR), Geneva, Switzerland.

    We thank Dr. Tom Shinnick of the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention for guidance on the specific genes and mutations to include in the prototype assay.

    Materials

    Name Company Catalog Number Comments
    MDR-TB amplification microarrays, with applied gasket and pre-cut cover slips Akonni Biosystems Inquire
    Multiplex PCR kit, containing 2X PCR buffer with HotStar Taq plus Qiagen #206143
    Taq polymerase Qiagen #201207
    RNAse-free water Qiagen #206143 
    Formamide Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc. #BP227-500
    20 mg mL-1 non-acetlyated bovine serum albumin (BSA) Sigma-Aldrich #3B6917
    5X concentrated MDR-TB primer mix Akonni Biosystems Inquire
    500 fg uL-1 amplification and inhibition control Akonni Biosystems Inquire
    20X SSPE Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc. #BP1328-4
    Triton X-100 Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc. #BP151-500
    Disinfecting Spray  Current Technologies, Inc. #BRSPRAY128
    70% Isopropyl Alcohol Decon Labs, Inc. #8416
    Microarray imager, with automated image and data analysis software Akonni Biosystems 100-20011
    Thermal cycler with flat block insert Akonni Biosystems 100-10021
    High-throughput wash station and slide holder ArrayIt HTW
    Dissecting forceps Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc. #10-300
    Mini Vortexer VWR #3365040
    Mini-centrifuge VWR #93000-196
    Airbrush Compressor Kit Central Pneumatic #95630

    References

    1. Lemaire, J. -F., Casenghi, M. New diagnostics for tuberculosis: fulfilling patient needs first. J. Int. AIDS Soc. 13, 40 (2010).
    2. World Health Organization. Tuberculosis diagnostic technology landscape. 42, World Health Organization. Geneva, Switzerland. (2012).
    3. Notomi, T., Okayama, H., et al. Loop-mediated isothermal amplification of DNA. Nucl. Acids Res. 28, e63 (2000).
    4. Vincent, M., Xu, Y., Kong, H. Helicase-dependent isothermal DNA amplification. EMBO Rep. 5, 795-800 (2004).
    5. Pritchard, C. G., Stefano, J. E. Amplified detection of viral nucleic acid at subattomole levels using Q beta replicase. Ann. Biol. Clin. 48, 492-497 (1990).
    6. Compton, J. Nucleic acid sequence-based amplification. Nature. 350, 91-92 (1991).
    7. Guatelli, J. C., Whitfield, K. M., et al. Isothermal, in vitro amplification of nucleic acids by a multienzyme reaction modeled after retroviral replication. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 87, 1874-1878 (1990).
    8. Shi, X. C., Liu, X. Q., Xie, X. L., Xu, Y. C., Zhao, Z. X. Gene chip array for differentiation of mycobacterial species and detection of drug resistance. Chin. Med. J. 3292-3297 (2012).
    9. Troesch, A., Nguyen, H., et al. Mycobacterium species identification and rifampin resistance testing with high-density DNA probe arrays. J. Clin. Microbiol. 37, 49-55 (1999).
    10. Caoili, J. C., Mayorova, A., et al. Evaluation of the TB-biochip oligonucleotide microarray system for rapid detection of rifampin resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 44, 2378-2381 (2006).
    11. Waddell, S., Laing, K., Senner, C., Butcher, P. Microarray analysis of defined Mycobacterium tuberculosis populations using RNA amplification strategies. BMC Genomics. 9, 94 (2008).
    12. Fukushima, M., Kakinuma, K., et al. Detection and identification of mycobacterium species isolates by DNA microarray. J. Clin. Microbiol. 41, 2605-2615 (2003).
    13. Park, H., Jang, H., et al. Detection and genotyping of Mycobacterium species from clinical isolates and specimens by oligonucleotide array. J. Clin. Microbiol. 43, 1782-1788 (2005).
    14. Yao, C., Zhu, T., et al. Detection of rpoB, katG and inhA gene mutations in Mycobacterium tuberculosis clinical isolates from Chongqing as determined by microarray. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 16, 1639-1643 (2010).
    15. Sun, A. H., Fan, X. L., et al. Rapid detection of rpoB gene mutations in rif-resistant M. tuberculosis isolates by oligonucleotide microarray. Biomed. Environ. Sci. 22, 253-258 (2009).
    16. Volokhov, D. V., Chizhikov, V. E., Denkin, S., Zhang, Y. Molecular detection of drug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis with a scanning-frame oligonucleotide microarray. Methods Mol. Biol. 465, 395-417 (2009).
    17. Fu, L., Shinnick, T. M. Understanding the action of INH on a highly INH-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis strain using Genechips. Tuberculosis. 87, 63-70 (2007).
    18. Fu, L. M., Shinnick, T. M. Genome-wide exploration of the drug action of capreomycin on Mycobacterium tuberculosis using Affymetrix oligonucleotide GeneChips. J. Infect. 54, 277-284 (2007).
    19. Denkin, S., Volokhov, D., Chizhikov, V., Zhang, Y. Microarray-based pncA genotyping of pyrazinamide-resistant strains of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J. Med. Microbiol. 54, 1127-1131 (2005).
    20. Gryadunov, D. A., Mikhailovich, V., et al. Evaluation of hybridisation on oligonucleotide microarrays for analysis of drug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 11, 531-539 (2005).
    21. Tang, X., Morrix, S. L., Langone, J. J., Bockstahler, L. E. Microarray and allele specific PCR detection of point mutations in Mycobacterium tuberculosis genes associated with drug resistance. J. Microbiol. Methods. 63, 318-330 (2005).
    22. Wade, M. M., Volokhov, D., Peredelchuk, M., Chizhikov, V., Zhang, Y. Accurate mapping of mutations of pyrazinamide-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis strains with a scanning-frame oligonucleotide microarray. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 49, 89-97 (2004).
    23. Yue, J., Shi, W., et al. Detection of rifampin-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis strains by using a specialized oligonucleotide microarray. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 48, 47-54 (2004).
    24. Kim, S. Y., Park, Y. K., et al. Evaluation of the CombiChip Mycobacteria Drug-Resistance detection DNA chip for identifying mutations associated with resistance to isoniazid and rifampin in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 54, 203-210 (2006).
    25. Brown, T. J., Herrera-Leon, L., Anthony, R. M., Drobniewski, F. A. The use of macroarrays for the identification of MDR Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J. Microbiol. Methods. 65, 294-300 (2006).
    26. Brossier, F., Veziris, N., Truffot-Pernot, C., Jarlier, V., Sougakoff, W. Performance of the genotype MTBDR line probe assay for detection of resistance to rifampin and isoniazid in strains of Mycobacterium tuberculosis with low- and high-level resistance. J. Clin. Microbiol. 44, 3659-3664 (2006).
    27. Padilla, E., Gonzalez, V., et al. Comparative evaluation of the new version of the INNO-LiPA Mycobacteria and GenoType Mycobacterium assays for identification of Mycobacterium species from MB/BacT liquid cultures artificially inoculated with mycobacterial strains. J. Clin. Microbiol. 42, 3083-3088 (2004).
    28. Barnard, M., Gey van Pittius, N. C., et al. The diagnostic performance of the GenoType MTBDRplus Version 2 line probe assay is equivalent to that of the Xpert MTB/RIF assay. J. Clin. Microbiol. 50, 3712-3716 (2012).
    29. Sekiguchi, J. -I., Nakamura, T., et al. Development and evaluation of a line probe assay for rapid identification of pncA mutations in pyrazinamide-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis strains. J. Clin. Microbiol. 45, 2802-2807 (2007).
    30. Chandler, D. P., Bryant, L., et al. Integrated amplification microarrays for infectious disease diagnostics. Microarrays. 1, 107-124 (2012).
    31. Vincent, V., Rigouts, L., et al. The TDR Tuberculosis Strain Bank: a resource for basic science, tool development and diagnostic services. Int. J. Tuberc. Lung Dis. 16, 24-31 (2012).
    32. Golova, J. B., Chernov, B. K., et al. Non-volatile copolymer compositions for fabricating gel element microarrays. Anal. Biochem. 421, 526-533 (2012).
    33. Cooney, C. G., Sipes, D., Thakore, N., Holmberg, R., Belgrader, P. A plastic, disposable microfluidic flow cell for coupled on-chip PCR and microarray detection of infectious agents. Biomed. Microdevices. 14, 45-53 (2012).
    34. Lane, S., Evermann, J., Loge, F., Call, D. R. Amplicon secondary structure prevents target hybridization to oligonucleotide microarrays. Biosens. Bioelectron. 20, 728-735 (2004).
    35. El-Hajj, H. H., Marras, S. A. E., et al. Use of sloppy molecular beacon probes for identification of Mycobacterial species. J. Clin. Microbiol. 47, 1190-1198 (2009).
    36. Boehme, C. C., Nabeta, P., et al. Rapid molecular detection of tuberculosis and rifampin resistance. N. Engl. J. Med. 363, 1005-1015 (2010).

    Comments

    0 Comments

    Post a Question / Comment / Request

    You must be signed in to post a comment. Please or create an account.

    Metrics

    Waiting
    simple hit counter