Method Article

Selective Area Modification of Silicon Surface Wettability by Pulsed UV Laser Irradiation in Liquid Environment

DOI:

10.3791/52720

November 9th, 2015

In This Article

Summary

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

We report on a process of in situ alteration of HF treated Si (001) surface into a hydrophilic or hydrophobic state by irradiating samples in microfluidic chambers filled with H2O2/H2O solution (0.01%-0.5%) or methanol solutions using pulsed UV laser of a relative low pulse fluence.

Abstract

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

The wettability of silicon (Si) is one of the important parameters in the technology of surface functionalization of this material and fabrication of biosensing devices. We report on a protocol of using KrF and ArF lasers irradiating Si (001) samples immersed in a liquid environment with low number of pulses and operating at moderately low pulse fluences to induce Si wettability modification. Wafers immersed for up to 4 hr in a 0.01% H2O2/H2O solution did not show measurable change in their initial contact angle (CA) ~75°. However, the 500-pulse KrF and ArF lasers irradiation of such wafers in a microchamber filled with 0.01% H2O2/H2O solution at 250 and 65 mJ/cm2, respectively, has decreased the CA to near 15°, indicating the formation of a superhydrophilic surface. The formation of OH-terminated Si (001), with no measurable change of the wafer’s surface morphology, has been confirmed by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy and atomic force microscopy measurements. The selective area irradiated samples were then immersed in a biotin-conjugated fluorescein-stained nanospheres solution for 2 hr, resulting in a successful immobilization of the nanospheres in the non-irradiated area. This illustrates the potential of the method for selective area biofunctionalization and fabrication of advanced Si-based biosensing architectures. We also describe a similar protocol of irradiation of wafers immersed in methanol (CH3OH) using ArF laser operating at pulse fluence of 65 mJ/cm2 and in situ formation of a strongly hydrophobic surface of Si (001) with the CA of 103°. The XPS results indicate ArF laser induced formation of Si–(OCH3)x compounds responsible for the observed hydrophobicity. However, no such compounds were found by XPS on the Si surface irradiated by KrF laser in methanol, demonstrating the inability of the KrF laser to photodissociate methanol and create -OCH3 radicals.

Introduction

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

The remarkable electronic and chemical properties as well as its high mechanical strength have made silicon (Si) an ideal choice for microelectronic devices and biomedical chips1. Selective area control of the Si surface has received significant attention for applications involving microfluidic and lab-on-chip devices2,3.This is often obtained either by nano-scale modification of the surface roughness or by chemical treatment of the surface4. The surface roughening or patterning to produce disordered or ordered surface structures on the Si surface include photolithography5, ion beam lithography6 and laser techniques7. Compared with these methods, laser surface texturing process is reported to be less complicated with the potential to produce microstructures with high spatial resolution8. However, as Si has an elevated texturing threshold, requiring irradiation with pulse fluence to induce surface texturing in excess of its ablation threshold (~500 mJ/cm2)9, texturing of Si surface has frequently been assisted by employing reactive gas atmospheres, such as that of a high pressure SF6 environment4,7,8. Consequently, to modify wettability of the Si surface, numerous works have focused on chemical treatment by depositing organic10 and inorganic films2, or using plasma or electron beam surface treatment11,12. It is recognized that hydrophilicity of Si originating from the existence of singular and associated OH groups on its surface could be achieved by boiling it in a H2O2 solution at 100 °C for several minutes13. However, the hydrophobic Si surface states, most of which are due to the presence of Si-H or Si-O-CH3 groups, could be achieved by wet chemical handling involving etching with HF acid solution or coating with photoresist13-15. To achieve selective area control of wettability of Si, complex patterning steps are usually required, including treatment in chemical solutions16. The high chemical reactivity of UV laser radiation has also been used to selective area process organic film coated solid substrates and modify their wettability17. However, a limited amount of data is available on laser-assisted modification of Si wettability by irradiation of samples immersed in different chemical solutions.

In our previous research, UV laser irradiation of III-V semiconductors in air18-20 and NH321 was successfully used to alter the surface chemical composition of GaAs, InGaAs and InP. We established that UV laser irradiation of III-V semiconductors in deionized (DI) water decreases surface oxides and carbides, while the water adsorbed on semiconductor surface increases22. A strongly hydrophobic Si surface (CA~103°) was obtained by ArF laser irradiation of Si samples in methanol in our recent work 23. As indicated by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), this is primarily due to the ability of the ArF laser to photodissociate CH3OH. We have also used KrF and ArF lasers to irradiate Si (001) in a 0.01% of H2O2 in DI water. This allowed us to achieve selective area formation of superhydrophilic surface of Si (001) characterized by the CA of near 15°. The XPS results suggest that this is due to generation of Si-OH bonds on the irradiated surface24.

A detailed description of this new technique using KrF and ArF lasers for selective area in situ modification of the hydrophilic/hydrophobic surface of Si surface in low concentration of H2O2/H2O and methanol solutions is demonstrated in this article. The details provided here should be sufficient to allow similar experiments to be performed by interested researchers.

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Protocol

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

1. Sample Preparation

  1. Use a diamode scribe to cleave an n-type (P-doped) one-side polished Si wafer (resistivity 3.1~4.8 Ω.m) which is 3 inch in diameter, 380 µm thick, into samples of 12 mm x 6 mm; clean the samples in OptiClear, acetone and isopropyl alcohol (5 min for every step).
  2. Etch samples in a ~0.9% HF solution for 1  min to etch away initial oxide; rinse in DI water and dry in high-purity (99.999%) nitrogen (N2).
  3. Store prepared samples in N2 bag to curb their  oxidation in air.

2. Irradiate Samples by ArF (λ=193 nm) and KrF (λ=248 nm) Lasers.

  1. Place samples in a 0.74 mm tall chamber and then seal the chamber with a fused silica window that has high transmission in UV (≥90%). Fill the chamber with H2O2/H2O solution in the range of 0.01-0.2 % or with degassed methanol using a microfluidic channel.
  2. Irradiate samples with homogenized ArF or KrF lasers at demagnification of 2.6 and 1.8, respectively. Irradiate only  2 sites on each sample by increasing laser pulses from 100 to 600 in step of 100 pulses  through a circular mask (4 mm in diameter). Irradiate the samples in the same way with a “maple leaf” (9 mm x 7.2 mm) mask.
  3. Rinse samples in DI water,  dry with N2 flush; place the samples in a sealed container, then quickly fill this container with N2, in order to avoid exposure to air prior to further experiments.

3. Immobilization of Bio-conjugated Nanospheres

  1. Dilute biotin-conjugated and fluorescein stained 40-nm-diameter nanospheres in a pH 7.4 phosphate buffered saline (PBS, 1X) solution to 1012 particles/ml at RT (~25 °C). Immerse ArF or KrF laser irradiated samples for 2  hr in this solution at RT.
  2. Wash samples with PBS to eliminate physically bound fluorescein stained nanospheres on the surface.

4. Surface Characterization

  1. Contact angle (CA) measurement
    1. Carry out static CA measurements with a goniometer in an environment of RT and ambient humidity.
    2. Employ high purity DI water (resistivity 17.95 MΩ·cm) in a micro-syringe; generate similar volume (~5 µl) drops on the sample surface by lowering the micro-syringe to a similar height for every measurement.
    3. Capture and save the water drops profile images by CCD camera with software. Measure independently 4 different sites with same irradiation conditions.
    4. Estimate and average the CA values in drop analysis module from ImageJ software; load the image and change it into grayscale; launch the plugin Dropsnake; place roughly a few knots on the drop contour (~10 knots) from left to right to initialize snake; accept the curve connecting these knots and evolve the curve by pressing snake button. Note: contact angles are displayed in the image and the table.
  2. XPS measurement
    1. Investigate surface chemical modification with a XPS spectrometer(1x10-9 Torr base pressure) outfitted with an Al Kα source working at 150 W:
      1. Load the samples into the vacuum chamber.
      2. Acquire the surface survey data in constant energy modes of 50 eV pass energy from an area of 220 µm x 220 µm.
      3. Acquire high resolution scans data from the same analyzed area at 20 eV pass energy.
    2. Process XPS spectra data with XPS spectra quantification software, as referenced25,26.
  3. Fluorescence microscope imaging
    1. Excite samples, which were irradiated through “maple leaf” mask and exposed to fluorescein stained nanospheres, using a blue light source (λ=450~490 nm).
    2. Observe fluorescent images, emitting at 515 nm, with a fluorescence inverted microscope in magnification of 4X.
    3. Characterize the surface morphology of these samples with AFM, as referenced27.

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Results

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

These representative results have been presented in our previous published work23,24. Figure 1 shows the CA vs. N (number of pulses) on sites irradiated by KrF laser at 250 mJ/cm2 in DI H2O for different concentrations of H2O2/H2O solutions (e.g., 0.01, 0.02, 0.05 and 0.2%). The CA decreases with increasing pulse number for all the H2O2 solutions. The minimum CA (~15°) for the 0.02 and 0.01% H2O

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Discussion

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

We have proposed a protocol of UV laser irradiation of Si wafer in a microfluidic chamber filled with low concentration of H2O2 solution to induce a superhydrophilic Si surface, which is mainly due to the generation of Si-OH. UV laser photolysis of H2O2 was supposed to form negatively charged OH- radicals. Also, UV laser photoelectric effect leads to the formation of a positively charged surface37. Therefore, the interaction of these negative OH-

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Disclosures

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

The authors have nothing to disclose.

Acknowledgements

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

This work was supported by the Natural Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada (Discovery Grant No. 122795-2010) and the program of the Canada Research Chair in Quantum Semiconductors (JJD). The help provided by Xiaohuan Xuang, Mohamed Walid Hassen and technical assistance of Sonia Blais of the Université de Sherbrooke Centre de caractérisation de matériaux (CCM) in collecting XPS data are greatly appreciated. NL acknowledges the Merit Scholarship Program for Foreign Student, Fonds de recherche du Québec - Nature et technologies, for providing a graduate student scholarship.

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Materials

List of materials used in this article
NameCompanyCatalog NumberComments
fluorescein stained nanospheresInvitrogenF8795
OptiClearNational DiagnosticsOE-101
ArF laser (λ=193 nm)Lumonicspulse master 800
KrF laser (λ=248 nm)Lumonicspulse master 800
XPSKratos AnalyticalAXIS Ultra DLD
Fluorescence microscopeOlympusIX71
XPS quantitification softwareCasaXPS2.3.15

References

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,
  1. Liu, X., Fu, R. K. Y., Ding, C., Chu, P. K. Hydrogen plasma surface activation of silicon for biomedical applications. Biomol. Eng. 24, 113-117 (2007).
  2. Bayiati, P., Tserepi, A., Petrou, P. S., Kakabakos, S. E., Misiakos, K., Gogolides, E. Electrowetting on plasma-deposited fluorocarbon hydrophobic films for biofluid transport in microfluidics. J. Appl. Phys. 101, 103306-103309 (2007).
  3. Daniel, S., Chaudhury, M. K., Chen, J. C. Fast Drop Movements Resulting from the Phase Change on a Gradient Surface. Science. 291, 633-636 (2001).
  4. Sun, C., Zhao, X. W., Han, Y. H., Gu, Z. Z. Control of water droplet motion by alteration of roughness gradient on silicon wafer by laser surface treatment. Thin Solid Films. 516, 4059-4063 (2008).
  5. Krupenkin, T. N., Taylor, J. A., Schneider, T. M., Yang, S. From Rolling Ball to Complete Wetting:The Dynamic Tuning of Liquids on Nanostructured Surfaces. Langmuir. 20, 3824-3827 (2004).
  6. Martines, E., Seunarine, K., Morgan, H., Gadegaard, N., Wilkinson, C. D. W., Riehle, M. O. Superhydrophobicity and Superhydrophilicity of Regular Nanopatterns. Nano Lett. 5, 2097-2103 (2005).
  7. Ranella, A., Barberoglou, M., Bakogianni, S., Fotakis, C., Stratakis, E. Tuning cell adhesion by controlling the roughness and wettability of 3D micro/nano silicon structures. Acta Biomater. 6, 2711-2720 (2010).
  8. Zorba, V., et al. Making silicon hydrophobic: wettability control by two-lengthscale simultaneous patterning with femtosecond laser irradiation. Nanotechnology. 17, 3234(2006).
  9. Tsu, R., Lubben, D., Bramblett, T., Greene, J. Mechanisms of excimer laser cleaning of airexposed Si(100) surfaces studied by Auger electron spectroscopy, electron energyloss spectroscopy, reflection highenergy electron diffraction, and secondaryion mass spectrometry. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A. 9 (100), 223-227 (1991).
  10. Miramond, C., Vuillaume, D. 1-octadecene monolayers on Si (111) hydrogen-terminated surfaces: Effect of substrate doping. J. Appl. Phys. 96 (111), 1529-1536 (2004).
  11. Chasse, M., Ross, G. Effect of aging on wettability of silicon surfaces modified by Ar implantation. J. Appl. Phys. 92, 5872-5877 (2002).
  12. Aronov, D., Rosenman, G., Barkay, Z. Wettability study of modified silicon dioxide surface using environmental scanning electron microscopy. J. Appl. Phys. 101, 084901-084905 (2007).
  13. Bal, J. K., Kundu, S., Hazra, S. Growth and stability of langmuir-blodgett films on OH-, H-, or Br-terminated Si(001). Phys. Rev. B. 81, 045404(2010).
  14. Bal, J., Kundu, S., Hazra, S. Hydrophobic to hydrophilic transition of HF-treated Si surface during Langmuir lodgett film deposition. Chem. Phys. Lett. 500, 90-95 (2010).
  15. Grundner, M., Jacob, H. Investigations on hydrophilic and hydrophobic silicon (100) wafer surfaces by X-ray photoelectron and high-resolution electron energy loss-spectroscopy. Appl. Phys. A. 39 (100), 73-82 (1986).
  16. Li, Y., et al. Selective surface modification in silicon microfluidic channels for micromanipulation of biological macromolecules. Biomed. Microdevices. 3, 239-244 (2001).
  17. Li, X. M., Reinhoudt, D., Crego-Calama, M. What do we need for a superhydrophobic surface? A review on the recent progress in the preparation of superhydrophobic surfaces. Chem. Soc. Rev. 36, 1350-1368 (2007).
  18. Dubowski, J., et al. Enhanced quantum-well photoluminescence in InGaAs/InGaAsP heterostructures following excimer-laser-assisted surface processing. Appl. Phys. A. 69, 299-303 (1999).
  19. Genest, J., Beal, R., Aimez, V., Dubowski, J. J. ArF laser-based quantum well intermixing in InGaAs/InGaAsP heterostructures. Appl. Phys. Lett. 93, 071106(2008).
  20. Genest, J., Dubowski, J., Aimez, V. Suppressed intermixing in InAlGaAs/AlGaAs/GaAs and AlGaAs/GaAs quantum well heterostructures irradiated with a KrF excimer laser. Appl. Phys. A. 89, 423-426 (2007).
  21. Wrobel, J. M., Moffitt, C. E., Wieliczka, D. M., Dubowski, J. J., Fraser, J. W. XPS study of XeCl excimer-laser-etched InP. Appl. Surf. Sci. 127-129, 805-809 (1998).
  22. Liu, N., Dubowski, J. J. Chemical evolution of InP/InGaAs/InGaAsP microstructures irradiated in air and deionized water with ArF and KrF lasers. Appl. Surf. Sci. 270, 16-24 (2013).
  23. Liu, N., Hassen, W. M., Dubowski, J. J. Excimer laser-assisted chemical process for formation of hydrophobic surface of Si (001). Appl. Phys. A. , 1-5 (2014).
  24. Liu, N., Huang, X., Dubowski, J. J. Selective area in situ conversion of Si (0 0 1) hydrophobic to hydrophilic surface by excimer laser irradiation in hydrogen peroxide. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 47, 385106(2014).
  25. Mizuno, K., Maeda, S., Suzuki, K. Photoelectron emission from silicon wafer surface with adsorption of organic molecules. Anal. Sci. 7, 345(1991).
  26. Swift, J. L., Cramb, D. T. Nanoparticles as Fluorescence Labels: Is Size All that Matters? Biophys. J. 95, 865-876 (2008).
  27. Liu, N., Kh Moumanis,, Dubowski, J. J. Self-organized Nano-cone Arrays in InP/InGaAs/InGaAsP Microstructures by Irradiation with ArF and KrF Excimer Lasers. JLMN. 7, 130(2012).
  28. Grunthaner, P. J., Hecht, M. H., Grunthaner, F. J., Johnson, N. M. The localization and crystallographic dependence of Si suboxide species at the SiO2/Si interface. J. Appl. Phys. 61, 629-638 (1987).
  29. Heo, J., Kim, H. J. Effects of annealing condition on low-k a-SiOC: H thin films. Electrochem. Solid-st. 10, G11(2007).
  30. Chen, Y., Helm, C., Israelachvili, J. Molecular mechanisms associated with adhesion and contact angle hysteresis of monolayer surfaces. J. Phys. Chem. 95, 10736-10747 (1991).
  31. Miller, D., Biesinger, M., McIntyre, N. Interactions of CO2 and CO at fractional atmosphere pressures with iron and iron oxide surfaces: one possible mechanism for surface contamination? Surf Interface Anal. 33, 299-305 (2002).
  32. Stanowski, R., Voznyy, O., Dubowski, J. J. Finite element model calculations of temperature profiles in Nd:YAG laser annealed GaAs/AlGaAs quantum well microstructures. JLMN. 1, 17-21 (2006).
  33. Westwater, J. W., Santangelo, J. G. Photographic Study of Boiling. Ind. Eng. Chem. 47, 1605-1610 (1955).
  34. Kim, J. W., Kim, H. B., Hwang, C. S. Correlation Study on the Low-Dielectric Characteristics of a SiOC (-H) Thin Film from a BTMSM/O2 Precursor. J. Korean Phys. Soc. 56, 89-95 (2010).
  35. Ishizaki, T., Saito, N., Inoue, Y., Bekke, M., Takai, O. Fabrication and characterization of ultra-water-repellent alumina-silica composite films. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 40, 192(2006).
  36. Almásy, L., Borbély, S., Rosta, L. Memory of silica aggregates dispersed in smectic liquid crystals: Effect of the interface properties. EPJ B. 10, 509-513 (1999).
  37. Chen, L., Liberman, V., O'Neill, J. A., Wu, Z., Osgood, R. M. Ultraviolet laser-induced ion emission from silicon. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A. 6, 1426-1427 (1988).
  38. Rice, F., Reiff, O. The thermal decomposition of hydrogen peroxide. J. Phys. Chem. 31, 1352-1356 (1927).
  39. Quickenden, T. I., Irvin, J. A. The ultraviolet absorption spectrum of liquid water. J. Chem. Phys. 72, 4416-4428 (1980).
  40. Andre, T. Product pair correlation in CH3OH photodissociation at 157 nm: the OH+ CH3 channel. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 13, 2350-2355 (2011).
  41. Cheng, B. M., Bahou, M., Chen, W. C., Yui, C. H., Lee, Y. P., Lee, L. C. Experimental and theoretical studies on vacuum ultraviolet absorption cross sections and photodissociation of CH3OH, CH3OD, CD3OH, and CD3OD. J. Chem. Phys.. 117, 1633-1640 (2002).
  42. Schiffman, A., Nelson, D. D. Jr, Nesbitt, D. J. Quantum yields for OH production from 193 and 248 nm photolysis of HNO3 and H2O2. J. Chem. Phys.. 98, 6935-6946 (1993).
  43. Nishino, T., Meguro, M., Nakamae, K., Matsushita, M., Ueda, Y. The Lowest Surface Free Energy Based on -CF3 Alignment. Langmuir. 15, 4321-4323 (1999).

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Reprints and Permissions

Request permission to reuse the text or figures of this JoVE article

Request Permission

Tags

Silicon Surface WettabilityPulsed UV Laser IrradiationContact Angle ModificationHydrophilic Hydrophobic SurfacesX ray Photoelectron SpectroscopyAtomic Force MicroscopySelective Area BiofunctionalizationHydrogen Peroxide SolutionMethanol ImmersionNanosphere Immobilization

Related Articles