Method Article

Identification of MyoD Interactome Using Tandem Affinity Purification Coupled to Mass Spectrometry

DOI:

10.3791/53924

⸱

May 17th, 2016

 ,  ,  ,  , 
1Epigenetics and Cell Fate, UMR 7216 CNRS, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique CNRS - Université Paris Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cité

In This Article

Summary

$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

MyoD is a myogenic transcription factor with a strong capacity to induce myogenic transdifferentiation of many fully differentiated non-muscle cell lines. The epigenetic mechanisms involved in this transdifferentiation are largely unknown. Here we describe a double-affinity purification method followed by mass spectrometry to exhaustively characterize MyoD partners.

Abstract

$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

Skeletal muscle terminal differentiation starts with the commitment of pluripotent mesodermal precursor cells to myoblasts. These cells have still the ability to proliferate or they can differentiate and fuse into multinucleated myotubes, which maturate further to form myofibers. Skeletal muscle terminal differentiation is orchestrated by the coordinated action of various transcription factors, in particular the members of the Muscle Regulatory Factors or MRFs (MyoD, Myogenin, Myf5, and MRF4), also called the myogenic bHLH transcription factors family. These factors cooperate with chromatin-remodeling complexes within elaborate transcriptional regulatory network to achieve skeletal myogenesis. In this, MyoD is considered the master myogenic transcription factor in triggering muscle terminal differentiation. This notion is strengthened by the ability of MyoD to convert non-muscle cells into skeletal muscle cells. Here we describe an approach used to identify MyoD protein partners in an exhaustive manner in order to elucidate the different factors involved in skeletal muscle terminal differentiation. The long-term aim is to understand the epigenetic mechanisms involved in the regulation of skeletal muscle genes, i.e., MyoD targets. MyoD partners are identified by using Tandem Affinity Purification (TAP-Tag) from a heterologous system coupled to mass spectrometry (MS) characterization, followed by validation of the role of relevant partners during skeletal muscle terminal differentiation. Aberrant forms of myogenic factors, or their aberrant regulation, are associated with a number of muscle disorders: congenital myasthenia, myotonic dystrophy, rhabdomyosarcoma and defects in muscle regeneration. As such, myogenic factors provide a pool of potential therapeutic targets in muscle disorders, both with regard to mechanisms that cause disease itself and regenerative mechanisms that can improve disease treatment. Thus, the detailed understanding of the intermolecular interactions and the genetic programs controlled by the myogenic factors is essential for the rational design of efficient therapies.

Introduction

$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

Eukaryotic multi-cellular organisms are composed of different organs and tissues. Each functional tissue has a specific gene pattern expression, which is determined at each differentiation step. Cellular differentiation involves activation of specific genes, maintenance of their expression and, generally, silencing of a set of genes such those involved in cell proliferation. Skeletal muscle differentiation, or myogenesis, is thus a multi-step process, that begins with the determination of mesodermal stem cells into myoblasts, and then leads to the terminal differentiation of these myoblasts into first mono-nucleated, and then multi-nucleated, myotubes. Thus, myoblasts are "determined" cells, that are still able to proliferate, but they are committed to the skeletal muscle lineage, and thus can differentiate solely into skeletal muscle cells either during embryonic development or in adult muscle regeneration. The process of skeletal muscle terminal differentiation is orchestrated by a specific genetic program that begins with the permanent exit from the cell cycle of myoblast precursor cells that leads to a definitive silencing of proliferation associated genes, such as E2F target genes1. Indeed, during the process of terminal differentiation, myoblast proliferation arrest is a crucial step that precedes the expression of skeletal muscle specific genes and the fusion of myoblasts into myotubes2. Such a program permits adult muscle stem cells, also called satellite cells, to differentiate during the regeneration process following skeletal muscle injury.

Mammalian myogenesis is critically dependent on a family of myogenic basic helix-loop-helix (bHLH) transcription factors MyoD, Myf5, MRF4 and Myogenin, frequently referred to as the family of skeletal muscle determination factors or MRFs (Muscle Regulatory Factors)3. Each of them plays an essential role in specification and differentiation of skeletal muscle cells and has a specific expression pattern45-7. The activation of Myf5 and MyoD constitutes the determinative step that commits cells to the myogenic lineage, and subsequent expression of Myogenin triggers myogenesis with activation of skeletal muscle specific genes, such as MCK (Muscle Creatine Kinase). Myogenic bHLH transcription factors cooperate with members of the MEF2 family in the activation of muscle genes from previously silent loci8. They also stimulate skeletal muscle gene transcription as heterodimers with ubiquitous bHLH proteins, E12 and E47, known as E proteins, which bind so-called E-boxes in various gene-regulatory regions8. Twist, Id (inhibitor of differentiation) and other factors negatively regulate this process, by competing with MyoD for E proteins binding8.

MyoD is considered as the major player in triggering muscle terminal differentiation9 since it has the capacity to induce a myogenic determination/differentiation (trans-differentiation) program in many fully differentiated non-muscle systems10-13. Indeed, forced expression of MyoD induces the trans-differentiation of different cellular types even those derived from another embryologic origin12. For example, MyoD can convert hepatocytes, fibroblasts, melanocytes, neuroblasts, and adipocytes into muscle-like cells. The trans-differentiative action of MyoD involves an abnormal activation of the myogenic genetic program (notably its target genes) in a non-muscular environment, concomitant to the silencing of the original genetic program (notably, proliferation genes).

In proliferating myoblasts, MyoD is expressed but is unable to activate its target genes even when it binds to their promoters14-16. Therefore, the requirement for MyoD to be continuously expressed in undifferentiated myoblasts remains quite elusive. MyoD could repress its target genes due to recruitment of repressive chromatin-modifying enzymes in proliferating myoblasts prior to loading of activating chromatin remodeling enzymes14,17. For example, in proliferating myoblasts, MyoD is associated with transcriptional co-repressor KAP-1, histone deacetylases (HDACs) and repressive lysine methyltransferases (KMTs), including histone H3 lysine 9 or H3K9 and H3K27 KMTs, and actively suppress its target genes expression by establishing a locally repressive chromatin structure14,17. Importantly, a recent report indicated that MyoD is itself directly methylated by the H3K9 KMT G9a resulting in inhibition of its transactivating activity16.

The epigenetic mechanisms involved in this trans-differentiation of non-muscle cells by MyoD are largely unknown. Notably, some cell lines are resistant to MyoD-induced trans-differentiation. Thus, in HeLa cells, MyoD is either inactive or even might function as repressor rather than activator of transcription due to lack of expression of the BAF60C subunit of the chromatin remodeling complex SWI/SNF18. This model can thus be of choice to better characterize the mechanisms of MyoD-induced gene repression. It is also suitable to assay the ability of MyoD to induce repressive chromatin environment at its target loci with its associated partners and therefore uncover the MyoD-dependent repressive mechanisms in proliferating myoblasts to fine-tune terminal differentiation.

Here we describe the protocol for the identification of MyoD partners by using Tandem Affinity Purification (TAP-Tag) coupled to mass spectrometry (MS) characterization. The use of HeLa-S3 cells stably expressing Flag-HA-MyoD permitted to get enough material to purify the MyoD complexes from fractionated nuclear extracts. The identification of MyoD partners in the heterologous system was followed by validation in a relevant system.

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Protocol

$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

1. Preparation of HeLa-S3 Nuclear Salt-extractable and Chromatin-bound Fractions

  1. Collection of the Cells
    1. Grow HeLa-S3 Flag-HA-MyoD and HeLa-S3 Flag-HA (control cell line) in Dulbecco's Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM) supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum, 100 U/ml penicillin and 100 µg/ml streptomycin (growth medium) at 37 °C and 5% CO2 in a humid incubator.
      Note: HeLa-S3 cells stably expressing Flag-HA-MyoD and HeLa-S3 cells transduced with the empty vector (HeLa-S3 Flag-HA) could be either established using protocol described in:19,20, or provided by the authors.
    2. Amplify cells up to 10 fully confluent 150 mm dishes of each cell line (HeLa-S3 Flag-HA-MyoD and HeLa-S3 Flag-HA cells).
    3. Collect the supernatant (contain non-adherent subpopulation) into 5 L spinner.
    4. Wash the adherent subpopulation with 10 ml of PBS per 150 mm dish, trypsinize cells for 1 min at room temperature (0.05% trypsin-EDTA solution, 2 ml for a 15 cm dish).
    5. Add 4 ml of the medium per 150 mm dish and collect the cells into 50 ml tubes.
    6. Combine the supernatant from step 1.1.3 (in the 5 L spinner) and the cells from step 1.1.5, add 500 ml of fresh pre-warmed growth medium for each cell line.
    7. Transfer cell suspension into 5 L spinner and grow cells for at least 60 hr at 37 °C and 5% CO2 in a humid incubator.
    8. Add 500 ml of fresh growth medium and grow cells for 24 hr.
    9. Add 1 L of fresh growth medium and grow cells for 24 hr.
    10. Take out 1 ml of the cell suspension to count the cells and check cell viability. Color 30 µl of cell suspension with 30 µl of 0.4% trypan blue and count alive (not blue) cells under microscope using hemocytometer.
    11. Keep the cell density at 2 - 6 x 105 cells/ml by adding fresh growth medium daily; do not exceed 1 x 106 cells/ml. The maximum volume for one 5 L spinner is 2.5 L.
      Note: For the following steps, proceed by batches of 2 - 2.5 L of culture at a density 1 x 106 cells/ml. Repeat steps 1.1.12 - 1.1.14 to collect about 20 L (≈ 20 g of dry pellet) of each cell line before proceeding to next step.
    12. Pellet cells by centrifugation at 500 x g for 5 min at 4 °C and discard the supernatant.
    13. Resuspend cells in 100 ml of ice-cold PBS by pipetting and centrifuge at 500 x g for 5 min at 4 °C to wash the pellet.
    14. Repeat the wash by resuspending the cells with 25 ml of ice-cold PBS, transferring the suspension into 50 ml tube and centrifuging at 500 x g for 5 min at 4 °C.
      Note: Cell pellets can be either used immediately or frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at -80 °C for several days.
  2. Isolation of the Nuclei
    Note: Perform steps 1.2.1 - 1.4.3 in the cold room.
    1. Pre-chill buffers and homogenizers.
    2. If using frozen material, quickly thaw the cell pellets in water bath at 37 °C.
    3. Resuspend 20 g (≈ 20 ml) of cells in 20 ml (a volume equal to the size of the cell pellet) of hypotonic buffer A (Table 3) by using 10 ml of the buffer at first, then adding 5 ml, then adding another 5 ml. Wash the pipettes well with fresh buffer to get the maximum of cells.
    4. Transfer 40 ml cell suspension into the pre-chilled homogenizer with a tight-fitting pestle.
    5. Homogenize cells with 20 strokes in a homogenizer (20 in and out movements) and transfer cell suspension into 50 ml tube.
    6. Wash the homogenizer with 7 ml of sucrose buffer (1/3 of the initial cell volume, Table 3) to recover the maximum of cells. Transfer this suspension quickly into the 50 ml tube from step 1.2.5 to preserve the nuclei and limit the leakage.
    7. Stain a 30 µl aliquot with 30 µl of 0.4% trypan blue, analyze under the microscope to control the lysis efficiency (if the lysis is successful, all nuclei should be blue). If necessary, repeat homogenization step.
    8. Centrifuge for 7 min at 10,000 x g and 4 °C to pellet the nuclei. Save the supernatant as the cytoplasmic fraction.
  3. Preparation of Nuclear Salt-extractable (SE) Fraction
    1. Resuspend the nuclei pellet in 8 ml of sucrose buffer (a volume equal to the size of the nuclei pellet). Add drop by drop while mixing thoroughly on a vortex 8 ml of high salt buffer (1 nuclei pellet volume, Table 3) to get a final concentration of 300 mM NaCl. Incubate for 30 min on ice and mix every 5 min.
    2. Decrease NaCl concentration to 150 mM by adding 8 ml (1/3 of total volume) of sucrose buffer. Centrifuge for 10 min at 13,000 x g and 4 °C. Collect the supernatant (nuclear salt-extractable fraction, SE).
      Note: Either proceed to step 1.3.3 or leave the SE fraction on ice during preparation of chromatin-bound fraction and then ultra-centrifuge both fractions simultaneously.
    3. Ultra-centrifuge SE for 30 min at 85,000 x g at 4 °C. Take supernatant (≈ 26 ml).
    4. Freeze 100 µl aliquot in liquid nitrogen. Proceed to step 2 "Protein complex purification", using the rest of the extract.
      Note: The aliquot is to be used as an input control during step 5.1.1.
  4. Preparation of Chromatin-bound Fraction
    1. Resuspend the pellet (from step 1.3.5.) meticulously in 7 ml (a volume equal to the size of the pellet) of sucrose buffer.
    2. Add CaCl2 to a final concentration of 1 mM (28 µl of 0.5 M CaCl2 for 14 ml of suspension) to activate MNase (step 1.4.4) and mix.
    3. Pre-heat suspension for 1 min at 37 °C.
    4. Add 70 µl micrococcal nuclease (MNase) to get final concentration of 0.0025 U/µl (1/200 dilution from 0.5 U/µl stock) and mix.
    5. Incubate exactly 12 min at 37 °C. Mix every 4 min.
    6. Immediately place the reaction on ice.
    7. To stop MNase activity, add 112 µl of 0.5 M EDTA pH 8.0 (1/125 dilution) to a final concentration of 4 mM. Incubate for 5 min on ice.
    8. Sonicate 5 times for 1 min at high amplitude, between two sonications allow a break of 1 min (10 min in total).
    9. Ultracentrifuge for 30 min at 85,000 x g and 4 °C.
    10. Collect the supernatant (nucleosome enriched fraction, NE, ≈ 12 ml).
    11. Freeze 50 µl aliquot in liquid nitrogen. Proceed to step 2 "Protein complex purification", using the rest of the extract.
      Note: The aliquot is to be used as an input control during step 5.1.1.

2. Protein Complexes Purification

Note: Proceed in parallel extracts from each cell line (HeLa-S3 Flag-HA-MyoD and the control, HeLa-S3 Flag-HA).

  1. Flag- based Purification
    1. Pre-wash Flag resin. Use 600 µl of Flag resin (from the commercial 50% stock) for each experimental point (SE and NE fractions for each cell line).
    2. Transfer resin into 15 ml tube, resuspend in 13 ml of cold TEGN (Table 3), centrifuge for 2 min at 1,000 x g and remove supernatant. Repeat 5 times. After the last wash resuspend Flag resin into equal volume of TEGN (300 µl for each experimental point).
    3. For each experimental point, mix 600 µl of washed Flag resin and the corresponding protein extracts (in a 15 ml tube for the 12 ml NE and in a 50 ml tube for the 26 ml SE fractions, respectively). Incubate on a rotating wheel overnight at 4 °C.
    4. Centrifuge for 2 min at 1,000 x g at 4 °C, put aside the supernatant and keep at 4 °C until the result of the purification efficiency test (2.2).
    5. For the SE samples, resuspend the Flag resin in 4 ml of TEGN and transfer to a 15 ml tube. Repeat this step 3 times, each time transferring to the same 15 ml tube to avoid losing beads. Centrifuge 2 min at 1,000 x g and 4 °C and remove supernatant.
    6. Wash Flag resin 7 times in a 15 ml tube using 13 ml of TEGN and centrifuging 2 min at 1,000 x g and 4 °C.
    7. After the last wash, resuspend in 1 ml TEGN and transfer into a 1.5 ml low-binding tube. Centrifuge 2 min at 1,000 x g and 4 °C and remove the supernatant.
    8. Resuspend in 200 µl of Flag peptide solution at 4 mg/ml at pH 7.8 for each experimental point. Mix the beads and peptide. Add 200 µl of TEGN buffer and incubate at 4 °C for at least 4 hr or overnight to elute bound proteins.
    9. Centrifuge for 2 min at 1,000 x g at 4 °C and transfer the resin and supernatant (Flag eluate) to an empty spin column placed in a 2 ml tube.
    10. Centrifuge the column, collect the left-over supernatant in the 2 ml tube.
    11. Collect the Flag resin by adding TEGN buffer to the column and proceed to the second Flag elution with 200 µl of Flag peptide solution (4 mg/ml) overnight at 4 °C for each experimental point.
    12. Repeat steps 2.1.9 - 2.1.10 to collect second elution. Combine first and second eluates.
  2. Test of Purification Efficiency
    Note: During step 2.1.11 - 2.1.12, perform SDS-PAGE and silver staining (2.2.1 - 2.2.2).
    1. Take 15 µl of the eluates, add 5 µl of 4x loading buffer and 2 µl of 10x reducing agent, boil for 5 min at 96 °C and run a SDS-polyacrylamide 4 - 12% gel according to the manufacturer's instructions.
    2. Stain the gel using silver staining kit (follow the manufacturer's instructions). If there is clear differences in protein patterns between Flag-HA-MyoD and Flag-HA mock eluates, in particular the band of Flag-HA MyoD (around 50 kDa, Figure 1A), proceed to the next step.
  3. Hemagglutinin (HA)-based Purification
    1. Wash HA resin by transferring into 15 ml tube, resuspending in 13 ml of TEGN and centrifuging 2 min at 1,000 x g at 4 °C. Repeat washing step 5 times. After last wash resuspend beads in equal volume of TEGN buffer.
      Note: The volume must be adjusted according to the efficiency of Flag-based purification. Start with 300 µl from the commercial 50% stock for each experimental point.
    2. Transfer HA resin for each experimental point into a 1.5 ml low binding tube. Centrifuge 2 min at 1,000 x g at 4 °C, eliminate the maximum of the wash buffer (Table 3) and add the eluates from Flag-based purification to the HA resin.
    3. Incubate tubes on the rotating wheel overnight at 4 °C.
    4. Centrifuge for 2 min at 1,000 x g at 4 °C, put aside the supernatant and keep at 4 °C until the result of the purification efficiency test (2.3.12.).
    5. Resuspend the HA resin in 0.5 ml of TEGN, transfer to a new low binding 1.5 ml tube. Repeat resuspension once adding to the same 1.5 ml tube to avoid losing beads and centrifuge 2 min at 1,000 x g and 4 °C. Remove supernatant.
    6. Wash beads 8 times by using 1 ml of TEGN each time, centrifuging 2 min at 1,000 x g and 4 °C and removing supernatant (avoid losing beads). After the last wash, transfer the beads into 0.5 ml tubes.
    7. Remove as much supernatant as possible. Add 100 µl of HA free peptide solution (4 mg/ml) at pH 7.8 on beads to elute bound proteins. Incubate on the rotating wheel over night at 4 °C.
      Note: The amount of HA-peptide needs to be adjusted depending on the abundance of the complexes.
    8. Centrifuge for 2 min at 1,000 x g at 4 °C and transfer the resin and supernatant (HA eluate) to an empty spin column placed in a 2 ml tube.
    9. Centrifuge the column to collect the left-over supernatant in the 2 ml tube.
    10. Perform a second elution with 100 µl of HA peptide (4 mg/ml) for each experimental point. Incubate on the rotating wheel over night at 4 °C. Repeat step 2.3.8 - 2.3.9 to collect second elution.
    11. Combine first and second eluates.
    12. Test purification efficiency by SDS-PAGE and silver staining (see steps 2.2.) (Figure 1A).
    13. Concentrate the HA eluate to 30 µl using centrifugal filter units with a 10 kDa cut-off (nominal molecular weight limit, NMWL) according to the manufacturer's instructions.
    14. Divide the concentrated samples into two parts: 22.5 (3/4) and 7.5 (1/4) µl. Snap freeze 1/4 of samples in liquid nitrogen and store at -80 °C. Use the 3/4 part for step 3.
      Note: The 1/4 frozen part is to be used for the confirmation of mass spectrometry results by western blot (see step 5.1).

3. Mass Spectrometry Analysis

Note: The following steps should be discussed with the Mass Spectrometry facility that will perform the analysis.

  1. Supplement 3/4 (22.5 µl) of the samples with 7.5 µl of 4x loading buffer and 3.3 µl of 10x reducing agent and boil for 5 min at 96 °C.
  2. Load samples on a SDS-polyacrylamide 4 - 12% gel. Run gel at 150 V constant for 5 min to allow all the proteins to enter the gel without separation.
  3. Wash the gel with water; fix for 20 - 30 min with fixative solution (10% acetic acid, 50% methanol, 40% ultra-clean water) then wash the fixed gel 5 times in ultra-clean water.
  4. Cut the bands containing the proteins, store in 1 ml of water in a 1.5 ml tube and send to mass spectrometry facility.

4. Data Analysis

Note: This is a general guidance for the analysis. The exact steps will depend on the particular mode of the data given by MS facility used to perform the analysis (e.g., 21,22).

  1. Compare the list of the identified proteins in "MyoD" eluates with the list obtained from corresponding negative control preparation. Exclude from the analysis the proteins found in both lists.
  2. Remove proteins that have ≤2 total number of identified peptides from remaining list.
  3. Access functional annotation and functional classification of the obtained list of proteins using DAVID Bioinformatics Resources (http://david.abcc.ncifcrf.gov/home.jsp) and classify the list of the proteins23,24.
  4. (Optional) Remove from the list "hitchhikers", charged non-nuclear proteins with strong adventitious binding to negatively charged DNA25. These contain cytoskeletal, cytoplasmic, mitochondrial, membrane and receptor proteins (Protein folding, Cytoskeleton and Miscellaneous group proteins in Tables 1 and 2).
  5. Compare the obtained lists of the MyoD interactors from SE and NE fractions to identify common proteins and proteins specific for each fraction (Figure 2).

5. Confirmation of Identified Interactors by Western Blot

  1. Confirmation in HeLa-S3 Flag-HA-MyoD and HeLa-S3 Flag-HA
    1. Thaw eluate samples obtained at the step 2.3.14 (7.5 µl) on ice. Add 12 µl of TEGN buffer, 10 µl of 4x loading buffer and 3 µl of 10x reducing agent. Boil samples for 5 min at 96 °C.
    2. Prepare input samples for the western blotting.
      1. Thaw aliquots from the steps 1.3.9 and 1.4.11 and measure protein concentration, for example using BCA kit (follow manufacturer's instructions).
      2. Use 15 µg of the protein per lane. Measure the appropriate amount of the extract and adjust volume of the sample up to 15 µl with TEGN buffer.
      3. Add 5 µl 4x loading buffer and 1.5 µl 10x reducing agent. Boil samples for 5 min at 96 °C.
    3. Perform a western blot analysis with antibodies of interest (specific for partner candidate identified during MS analysis) using 15 µl of eluate samples. Use input extracts as a control of endogenous protein levels (Figure 3A).
  2. Confirmation in the Relevant Cellular System
    1. Preparation of total nuclear extract of C2C12 mouse myoblasts.
      1. Grow C2C12 mouse myoblasts in DMEM medium supplemented with 15% fetal calf serum, 100 U/ml penicillin and 100 µg/ml streptomycin at 37 °C and 5% CO2 in a humid incubator. Never exceed 80% cell confluence to maintain cells in proliferative state.
      2. Grow at least two 150 mm dishes of C2C12 for one point (one antibody) of immunoprecipitation (IP). Aspirate the medium, wash cells twice with 10 ml of PBS.
      3. Scrape the cells and collect into 15 ml tube. Centrifuge at 250 x g for 5 min at 4 °C. Discard supernatant.
      4. Estimate the volume of the cell pellet (= Vcell). Gently resuspend the pellet in 3 volumes Vcell of Hypotonic buffer B to disrupt cytoplasmic membrane (Table 3).
      5. Add 0.44 x Vcell volume of 10% NP-40 to reach final concentration of 1% (v/v). Gently invert the tube several times to mix.
      6. Add 0.89 x Vcell volume of SR (Table 3) to preserve the nuclei integrity. Gently invert the tube several times to homogenize the suspension, and centrifuge for 5 min at 2,000 x g to pellet nuclei.
      7. Remove the supernatant (cytosolic fraction). Estimate the volume of nuclei pellet (= Vnuc). Resuspend nuclei pellet in one volume Vnuc of sucrose buffer.
      8. Add drop by drop while mixing thoroughly on a vortex one volume Vnuc of high salt buffer to get a final concentration of 300 mM NaCl, and incubate for 30 min on ice. Mix every 5 min.
      9. Add one volume Vnuc of sucrose buffer (to decrease NaCl concentration to 150 mM) and CaCl2 (final concentration 1 mM). Mix.
      10. Pre-heat suspension for 1 min at 37 °C, add micrococcal nuclease to get final of concentration 0.0025 U/µl (1/200 from stock of 0.5 U/µl). Mix.
      11. Incubate exactly 12 min at 37 °C. Mix every 3 min.
      12. Immediately place reaction on ice and add EDTA (final concentration 4 mM) to stop MNase activity. Incubate for 5 min on ice.
      13. Sonicate 5 times for 0.5 min each at high amplitude. Between two sonications, allow a break of 0.5 min (5 min in total).
      14. Ultra-centrifuge for 30 min at 85,000 x g and 4 °C. Collect the supernatant (total nuclear extract).
      15. Measure protein concentration of the total nuclear extract, for example using BCA kit (follow manufacturer's instructions) and proceed immediately to step 5.2.2.
    2. Immunoprecipitation (IP) of endogenous MyoD.
      1. To pre-clear the extracts, wash 10 µl of protein G agarose beads for each IP point.
        1. Transfer the needed volume of protein G agarose beads into a 1.5 ml tube, resuspend in 1.4 ml of cold TEGN, centrifuge for 2 min at 1,800 x g and remove supernatant. Repeat 3 times.
      2. Mix pre-washed protein G agarose beads with the appropriate volume of total nuclear extract. Use 500 µg of total nuclear extract protein per IP point.
      3. Incubate on a rotating wheel at 4 °C for 2 hr to pre-clear the extracts.
      4. Centrifuge for 5 min at 1,800 x g at 4 °C. Keep supernatant.
      5. Mix 5 µg of MyoD Ab or 5 µg of rabbit IgG with 500 µg pre-cleared total nuclear extracts in 1.5 ml low binding tubes. Add TEGN buffer up to 1 ml. Incubate on a rotating wheel at 4 °C overnight.
        Note: Perform the following steps during step 5.2.2.3.
      6. Pre-wash 7.5 µl protein A/G stock beads solution per IP point.
        1. Transfer the needed volume of beads into a 1.5 ml tube, resuspend beads in 1 ml of TEGN and centrifuge at 1,800 x g at 4 °C for 2 min. Remove the supernatant. Repeat 3 times.
      7. Resuspend protein A/G beads in 1.5 ml blocking solution (Table 3) and incubate on a rotating wheel overnight at 4 °C.
      8. Centrifuge total nuclear extracts incubated with Abs (step 5.2.2.5) at 16,000 x g for 10 min at 4 °C. Keep supernatant.
      9. Centrifuge blocked protein A/G resin (step 5.2.2.7) at 1,800 x g for 2 min at 4 °C. Discard supernatant and resuspend in 1 ml of TEGN buffer. Re-centrifuge at 1,800 x g for 2 min at 4 °C to wash out blocking buffer.
      10. Resuspend blocked protein A/G resin in 1 ml of TEGN buffer and aliquot into new low protein-binding tubes to obtain 7.5 µl blocked protein A/G resin per IP point. Centrifuge at 1,800 x g at 4 °C for 2 min and remove as much as possible of the supernatant.
      11. Add the total nuclear extracts incubated with the Abs (or control IgG) to the A/G resin. Mix and incubate for 2 hr at room temperature (RT) on a rotating wheel.
      12. Centrifuge suspension 1,800 x g at RT for 2 min. Discard supernatant, resuspend in 1 ml of wash buffer and transfer suspension into new low binding tubes. Incubate at RT on a rotating wheel for 5 min.
      13. Centrifuge suspension at 1,800 x g at RT for 2 min, resuspend in 1 ml of wash buffer and incubate at RT on a rotating wheel for 5 min. Repeat 4 times. For the last wash transfer to a new low binding tube.
      14. Remove maximum of the supernatant. Add 7 µl of wash buffer, 7 µl of 4x loading buffer and 3 µl of 10x reducing agent to the beads, mix and boil for 5 min at 96 °C.
      15. Perform a western blot analysis with antibodies of interest (specific for partner candidate for the immune precipitated protein). Use 1% (5 μg) of input extracts as a control of endogenous protein levels (Figure 3B).

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Results

$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

To understand the regulation of MyoD activity, we undertook the exhaustive characterization of the MyoD complexes using biochemical purification, based on the immunopurification of a double tagged form of MyoD followed by mass spectrometry (MS). The use of HeLa-S3 cell line expressing Flag-HA-tagged MyoD and a control cell line expressing Flag-HA permits to get enough material to purify the MyoD complex by performing double-affinity purification of Flag-HA-MyoD.

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Discussion

$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

The presented method permits exhaustive identification of partners of a transcription factor, MyoD. It revealed MyoD partners in a heterologous system resistant to MyoD-induced differentiation, namely HeLa-S3 cells. Thus, by definition, identified MyoD partners are ubiquitously expressed. These include general and sequence-specific transcription factors, chromatin-modifying enzymes, RNA processing proteins, kinases (Tables 1 and 2). Since HeLa-S3 cells are resistant to MyoD-induced trans...

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Disclosures

$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

The authors have nothing to disclose.

Acknowledgements

$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

Work in the Ait-Si-Ali lab was supported by the Association Française contre les Myopathies Téléthon (AFM-Téléthon); Institut National du Cancer (INCa); Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR), Fondation Association pour la Recherche sur le Cancer (Fondation ARC); Groupement des Entreprises Françaises pour la Lutte contre le Cancer (GEFLUC); CNRS; Université Paris Diderot and the ''Who Am I?'' Laboratory of Excellence #ANR-11- LABX-0071 funded by the French Government through its ''Investments for the Future'' program operated by the ANR under grant #ANR-11-IDEX-0005-01. EB was supported by an INCa grant.

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Materials

List of materials used in this article
NameCompanyCatalog NumberComments
Cell lines
HeLa-S3ATCCCCL-2.2
C2C12ATCCCRL-1772
Equipment
SpinnerCorning778531
Homogenizer:  Dounce homogenizer Wheaton432-1273 and 432-1271
Agitating device for spinnersBellco778531
SonicatorDiagenodeUCD 200
HemocytometerMarienfeld Superior 640610
Low-binding tubesSorenson27210
Empty spin columnBio-Rad7326204
Reagents
SDS-polyacrylamide 4-12%  gelLife technologiesNP0336BOX
4x loading buffer Life technologiesNP0007
10x reducing agentLife technologiesNP0004
Silver staining kitLife technologiesA8592
Centrifugal filter units, 10KMilliporeUFC501024
Protein G agarose beadsSigma-AldrichP4691
Protein A/G  ResinThermo Scientific53132
Flag resin (anti-Flag M2-agarose affinity gel)Sigma-AldrichA2220
HA resin (monoclonal Anti-HA agarose)Sigma-AldrichA2095
MNaseSigma-AldrichN3755
Flag free peptide (DYKDDDDK)Ansynth Service BVCustom synthesisResuspend up to 4 mg/ml in 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.8
HA free peptide (YPYDVPDYA)Ansynth Service BVCustom synthesisResuspend up to 4 mg/ml in 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.8
Bicinchoninic acid based protein assay kit : BCA kitThermo Scientific23225
Protease inhibitorsSigma-AldrichS8830
Luminol-based enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL) HRP substrateLife technologies34075
BSASigma-AldrichA9647
Sheared salmon sperm DNA (Deoxyribonucleic acid sodium salt from salmon testes)Sigma-AldrichD1626
Spermine tetrahydrochlorideSigma-AldrichS1141
SpermidineSigma-AldrichS0266
GlycerolSigma-AldrichG5516
PBSSigma-AldrichD8537
MOPS running bufferLife technologiesNP0001
DMEM (high glucose)Sigma-AldrichD0822Pre-warm  at 37 °C before use
Trypsin-EDTA (0.05% phenol redLife technologies25300-054
SerumGE healthcare life sciences PAA A15-102Each lot of serum has to be first tested for your cells.
Penicillin and Streptomycin Life technologies15140-122
Trypan Blue Solution, 0.4%Life technologies15250-061
Water (sterile-filtered)Sigma-AldrichW3500
Antibodies
HA from rat (12CA5)Roche11583816001
FlagSigma-AldrichA8592
MyoDSanta Cruzsc-32758To use for western blotting
MyoDSanta CruzSC-760To use for immunoprecipitation and western blotting
CBFbetaSanta CruzFL-182 
HP1alphaEuromedex2HP2G9
HP1betaEuromedex1MOD1A9AS
HP1gammaEuromedex2MOD1GC
Suv39h1Cell Signaling Technology8729
BAF47BD Biosciences612111
Myf5Santa CruzSC-302
TubulinSigma-AldrichT9026
ActinSigma-AldrichA5441
IgG MouseSanta CruzSC-2025
IgG RabbitSanta CruzSC-2027
Goat anti-rat -HRPSigma-AldrichA9037
Goat anti-rabbit -HRPSigma-AldrichA6154 
Goat anti-mouse -HRPSigma-AldrichA4416

References

$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,
  1. Ait-Si-Ali, S., et al. A Suv39h-dependent mechanism for silencing S-phase genes in differentiating but not in cycling cells. Embo J. 23 (3), 605-615 (2004).
  2. Buckingham, M. Skeletal muscle development and the role of the myogenic regulatory factors. Biochem Soc Trans. 24 (2), 506-509 (1996).
  3. Arnold, H. H., Winter, B. Muscle differentiation: more complexity to the network of myogenic regulators. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 8 (5), 539-544 (1998).
  4. Buckingham, M. Skeletal muscle formation in vertebrates. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 11 (4), 440-448 (2001).
  5. Yun, K., Wold, B. Skeletal muscle determination and differentiation: story of a core regulatory network and its context. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 8 (6), 877-889 (1996).
  6. Molkentin, J. D., Olson, E. N. Defining the regulatory networks for muscle development. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 6 (4), 445-453 (1996).
  7. Arnold, H. H., Braun, T. Targeted inactivation of myogenic factor genes reveals their role during mouse myogenesis: a review. Int J Dev Biol. 40 (1), 345-353 (1996).
  8. Puri, P. L., Sartorelli, V. Regulation of muscle regulatory factors by DNA-binding, interacting proteins, and post-transcriptional modifications. J Cell Physiol. 185 (2), 155-173 (2000).
  9. Tapscott, S. J. The circuitry of a master switch: Myod and the regulation of skeletal muscle gene transcription. Development. 132 (12), 2685-2695 (2005).
  10. Lassar, A. B., Paterson, B. M., Weintraub, H. Transfection of a DNA locus that mediates the conversion of 10T1/2 fibroblasts to myoblasts. Cell. 47 (5), 649-656 (1986).
  11. Davis, R. L., Weintraub, H., Lassar, A. B. Expression of a single transfected cDNA converts fibroblasts to myoblasts. Cell. 51, 987-1000 (1987).
  12. Tapscott, S. J., et al. MyoD1: a nuclear phosphoprotein requiring a myc homology region to convert fibroblasts to myoblasts. Science. 242, 405-411 (1988).
  13. Weintraub, H., et al. Activation of muscle-specific genes in pigment, nerve, fat, liver, and fibroblast cell lines by forced expression of MyoD. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 86 (14), 5434-5438 (1989).
  14. Mal, A., Harter, M. L. MyoD is functionally linked to the silencing of a muscle-specific regulatory gene prior to skeletal myogenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 100 (4), 1735-1739 (2003).
  15. Ohkawa, Y., Marfella, C. G., Imbalzano, A. N. Skeletal muscle specification by myogenin and Mef2D via the SWI/SNF ATPase Brg1. Embo J. 25 (3), 490-501 (2006).
  16. Ling, B. M., et al. Lysine methyltransferase G9a methylates the transcription factor MyoD and regulates skeletal muscle differentiation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 109 (3), 841-846 (2012).
  17. Zhang, C. L., McKinsey, T. A., Olson, E. N. Association of class II histone deacetylases with heterochromatin protein 1: potential role for histone methylation in control of muscle differentiation. Mol Cell Biol. 22 (20), 7302-7312 (2002).
  18. Forcales, S. V., et al. Signal-dependent incorporation of MyoD-BAF60c into Brg1-based SWI/SNF chromatin-remodelling complex. The EMBO journal. 31 (2), 301-316 (2011).
  19. Nakatani, Y., Ogryzko, V. Immunoaffinity purification of mammalian protein complexes. Methods Enzymol. 370, 430-444 (2003).
  20. Ouararhni, K., et al. The histone variant mH2A1.1 interferes with transcription by down-regulating PARP-1 enzymatic activity. Genes Dev. 20 (23), 3324-3336 (2006).
  21. Fritsch, L., et al. A subset of the histone H3 lysine 9 methyltransferases Suv39h1, G9a, GLP, and SETDB1 participate in a multimeric complex. Mol Cell. 37 (1), 46-56 (2010).
  22. Robin, P., Fritsch, L., Philipot, O., Svinarchuk, F., Ait-Si-Ali, S. Post-translational modifications of histones H3 and H4 associated with the histone methyltransferases Suv39h1 and G9a. Genome Biol. 8 (12), R270(2007).
  23. Huang da, W., Sherman, B. T., Lempicki, R. A. Systematic and integrative analysis of large gene lists using DAVID bioinformatics resources. Nat Protoc. 4 (1), 44-57 (2009).
  24. Huang da, W., Sherman, B. T., Lempicki, R. A. Bioinformatics enrichment tools: paths toward the comprehensive functional analysis of large gene lists. Nucleic Acids Res. 37 (1), 1-13 (2009).
  25. Ohta, S., et al. The protein composition of mitotic chromosomes determined using multiclassifier combinatorial proteomics. Cell. 142 (5), 810-821 (2010).
  26. Yahi, H., et al. Differential cooperation between heterochromatin protein HP1 isoforms and MyoD in myoblasts. J Biol Chem. 283 (35), 23692-23700 (2008).
  27. Philipot, O., et al. The core binding factor CBF negatively regulates skeletal muscle terminal differentiation. PloS one. 5 (2), (2010).
  28. Joliot, V., et al. The SWI/SNF subunit/tumor suppressor BAF47/INI1 is essential in cell cycle arrest upon skeletal muscle terminal differentiation. PloS one. 9 (10), e108858(2014).
  29. Tanese, N. Small-scale density gradient sedimentation to separate and analyze multiprotein complexes. Methods. 12 (3), 224-234 (1997).
  30. Singh, K., et al. A KAP1 phosphorylation switch controls MyoD function during skeletal muscle differentiation. Genes Dev. 29 (5), 513-525 (2015).
  31. Cong, L., et al. Multiplex genome engineering using CRISPR/Cas systems. Science. 339 (6121), 819-823 (2013).
  32. Yahi, H., Philipot, O., Guasconi, V., Fritsch, L., Ait-Si-Ali, S. Chromatin modification and muscle differentiation. Expert Opin Ther Targets. 10 (6), 923-934 (2006).
  33. Sun, L., Liu, L., Yang, X. J., Wu, Z. Akt binds prohibitin 2 and relieves its repression of MyoD and muscle differentiation. J Cell Sci. 117. 117 (Pt 14), 3021-3029 (2004).
  34. Caretti, G., et al. The RNA helicases p68/p72 and the noncoding RNA SRA are coregulators of MyoD and skeletal muscle differentiation. Dev Cell. 11 (4), 547-560 (2006).
  35. Knoepfler, P. S., et al. A conserved motif N-terminal to the DNA-binding domains of myogenic bHLH transcription factors mediates cooperative DNA binding with pbx-Meis1/Prep1. Nucleic Acids Res. 27 (18), 3752-3761 (1999).
  36. Albini, S., Puri, P. L. SWI/SNF complexes, chromatin remodeling and skeletal myogenesis: it's time to exchange! Exp Cell Res. 316 (18), 3073-3080 (2010).
  37. Yahi, H., Fritsch, L., Philipot, O., Guasconi, V., Souidi, M., Robin, P., Polesskaya, A., Losson, R., Harel-Bellan, A., Ait-Si-Ali, S. Differential Cooperation between Heterochromatin Protein HP1 Isoforms and MyoD in Myoblasts. J Biol Chem. 283 (35), 23692-23700 (2008).

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Reprints and Permissions

Request permission to reuse the text or figures of this JoVE article

Request Permission

Tags

MyoD InteractomeTandem Affinity PurificationMass SpectrometrySkeletal Muscle DifferentiationTranscription Factor PartnersCell FractionationFLAG Tag PurificationNuclear Extract AnalysisWestern Blot ValidationProtein Complex Isolation

Related Articles