$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$
$$\longleftharp{xx}$$,
$$\longrightharp{xx}$$,
DNA damage leads to the appearance of DNA lesions consisting of cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers (CPDs), 8-oxo-7,8-dihydro-2'-deoxyguanosine, and single-strand or double-strand breaks1,2. γ-rays are the form of ionizing radiation with the highest energy and high penetrance, thus this source of radiation is widely used in radiotherapy3. On the other hand, experimentally induced DNA damage caused by UV lasers mimics natural exposure to UV light. UVA microirradiation, as a microscopic method, represents an experimental tool for studying DNA damage in individual living cells. Microirradiation was used for the first time 40 years ago in order to reveal the organization of chromosome regions4,5. This technique is highly dependent on either the functional properties of confocal microscopes or the technical limits of modern nanoscopy. To induce DNA lesions, cells can be presensitized by 5' bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU) or Hoechst 33342 prior to UV irradiation. Bártová et al.6 previously described the presensitization step, and recently we optimized this microirradiation technique in order to avoid cell death, or apoptosis. For example, the use of a 405-nm UV laser (without Hoechst 33342 presensitization) leads to the induction of 53BP1-positive double-strand breaks (DSBs) at the expense of cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers (CPDs). On the other hand, presensitization steps combined with UV microirradiation induce very high levels of CPDs and DSBs simultaneously7,8. This methodology is difficult to apply to the study of a single DNA repair pathway.
With microirradiation, it is possible to analyze protein recruitment, kinetics, and interaction at DNA lesions in living cells. An example of this method was published by Luijsterburg et al.9 for heterochromatin protein 1β, and we recently showed for the first time that the pluripotency factor Oct4 and a protein associated with Cajal bodies, coilin, are recruited to UV-induced DNA lesions6,10. Protein kinetics at these DNA lesions can also be studied using the FRAP (Fluorescence Recovery After Photobleaching)11,12,13 or FRET (Fluorescence Resonance Energy Transfer) techniques14,15. These methods have the potential to reveal simple diffusion of proteins at DNA lesions or protein-protein interactions. A useful tool for additional characterization of proteins is FLIM (Fluorescence Lifetime Imaging Microscopy) or its combination with FRET technology (FRET-FLIM)16. These methods enable the study of processes in living cells that are stably or transiently expressing the protein of interest tagged by a fluorescent molecule17. Here, an example of exponential decay time (τ) for GFP-tagged p53 protein and its interaction partner, mCherry-tagged 53BP1, playing an important role in DNA damage response18,19 is shown. The parameter τ, the lifetime of the fluorochrome provided by FLIM calculations, is specific for a given fluorescence dye, its binding abilities, and its cellular environment. Therefore, this method can show us distinctions between protein subpopulations, their binding abilities, and their functional properties after, for example, DNA damage.
Here, an outline of the methodological approaches of the advanced microscopy techniques that is used in our laboratory to study time-specific protein recruitment, kinetics, diffusion, and protein-protein interactions at the site of microirradiated chromatin is presented. The step-by-step methodology for the induction of local DNA lesions in living cells, and a description of methodologies useful for studies of DNA-damage-related events at locally induced DNA lesions caused by UV lasers are provided.