One of the most crucial aspects to obtaining useful iSCAT data is the ability to find the correct focal position at the coverslip surface, and, furthermore, to hold this position for long periods of time. Failing to do so will result in broadened PSFs, weak iSCAT signals, and drift-associated artifacts in dynamics analyses. It turns out that finding the focal plane on a clean, bare coverslip surface is not an easy task as surface features are not visible against the large reference beam background (see Figure 4d).
Raw iSCAT images are often obscured by background signals that arise from wavefront impurities in the excitation source, and can hinder one's ability to find the correct imaging plane. Active wavefront subtraction is a useful way to circumvent this issue and subsequently monitor the iSCAT focus during a measurement16. One way to accomplish this is through spatial sample modulation. In brief, a function generator applies a 50 Hz square wave to the external control port of the piezo stage, resulting in a spatial sample modulation at the applied frequency (290 nm amplitude). Synchronous camera acquisitions are triggered from the same source, and, when combined through lock-in principles, result in a wavefront-compensated image14,16. The resulting image typically shows the surface roughness of the coverslip (Figure 4e). Small features remaining on the glass after cleaning can be used to bring the microscope into focus. Parameters used for this active background subtraction step may be changed according to the frame rate, exposure time, or hardware.
As mentioned above, the use of a high-quality beam splitter in the iSCAT setup (step 1.2.1.) is recommended, as imaging artefacts like ghosting or interference arising from thin planar beam splitters will influence the image and disturb the measurement. Figure 7 shows a comparison between a high-quality and low-quality beam splitter. Both raw iSCAT images show the same area on the coverslip containing some residual particles. The same iSCAT setup was used to capture both images, only the beam splitter was exchanged. Figure 7a shows the image formed on the camera by use of a thicker (5 mm), AR-coated, and wedged beam splitter. Due to the wedged design, the reflected beam from the back surface of the beam splitter is anti-parallel to the reflection arising from the front surface and is not entering the objective. No interference artefacts occur. Figure 7b shows the same field of view on the sample but this time a thinner (1 mm) planar beam splitter was used. The two reflections from front and back surfaces of the beam splitter are parallel and propagate to the camera. Interference artefacts are clearly visible.

Figure 7: Comparison of iSCAT images produced with high- and low-quality beam splitters. (a) Resulting raw iSCAT image by use of a 5 mm thick, AR-coated, and wedged beam splitter. (b) Resulting raw iSCAT image of the same area by use of a 1 mm thick planar beam splitter. Both beam splitters have the same splitting ratio (50% reflection, 50% transmission). Interference artefacts arising from Fresnel reflections are clearly observed in the image produced with the 1 mm thick planar beam splitter. Scale bars: 2 µm. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
In this protocol we describe a wide-field illumination scheme for iSCAT as it is fast, easy to realize and allows for parallel sensing over a large area14. Another common approach is to use acousto-optic deflectors (AODs) and scan a confocal beam across the sample12,17. This approach avoids the need for high-quality wavefronts but is more experimentally complex than conventional wide-field imaging. Furthermore, the speed of confocal illumination is limited by that of AODs. Depending on the desired experimental parameters, either confocal or wide-field illumination schemes can, in principle, be utilized to detect single proteins secreted from living cells.
As discussed throughout the protocol, it is imperative to minimize lateral mechanical fluctuations in the sample stage of the microscope. Even nanometer deviations in the position of the sample can lead to variations in consecutive camera frames and induce significant extraneous noise in the differential image. It is therefore recommended to use a mechanically stable microscope stage and a damped optical table (step 1.1.1.) and to cover the setup with optical curtains or panels during an experiment (step 3.5.).
An active focus stabilization scheme could also be considered for long-term measurements. In this approach, a second laser is incorporated into the microscope in a total internal reflection (TIR) arrangement, and subsequently imaged onto a quadrant photodiode. Changes in the system's focus translate into lateral displacements of the TIR laser spot on the quadrant diode, which can then be used in an active feedback loop to control the z-axis of the piezo stage26. Long-term vertical drift effects are thus eliminated.
Several modifications and extensions can be applied to the presented technique to address specific experimental needs. For example, commercial microscope stage incubators are available that could readily be incorporated into the iSCAT microscope for long-term imaging of cells. Other techniques can also be implemented to complement iSCAT imaging, such as confocal or TIR fluorescence microscopies17. To adapt on the system under study, iSCAT secretion measurements can be carried out in other cell media such as DMEM or DPBS, however, the pH indicator phenol red should be avoided as it can disturb the experiment due to absorption of the laser light. Additionally, supplements like fetal calf serum (FCS) or human platelet lysate (hPL) contain proteins that may interfere with iSCAT detection. Depending on the desired sensitivity of the experiment, these supplements should be excluded from the microscopy medium.
iSCAT relies on an analyte's ability to scatter light—a property that is intrinsic to all proteins—and is thus inherently nonspecific. Nevertheless, some degree of specificity is possible as iSCAT signals scale linearly with protein mass14,27,28. This allows for the calibration of an iSCAT system using standard protein samples, such as bovine serum albumin (BSA) and fibrinogen14,27,28. In fact, very recently, Young et al.28 have extended on the work of Piliarik & Sandoghdar14 and have shown that iSCAT can be used to determine the molecular weight of proteins as small as streptavidin (53 kDa) with a mass resolution of 19 kDa and an accuracy of about 5 kDa. Several conventional approaches can further complement iSCAT by providing an extra level of specificity. As an example, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA), and/or other surface modifications, restrict protein binding events so that only the target protein is detected16.
In this protocol, we described how iSCAT microscopy can be used to investigate cellular secretions at the single protein level with subsecond temporal resolution16. The technique is general and can be implemented on any commercial or home-built microscope. In contrast to single-molecule fluorescence approaches, the method does not suffer from photobleaching or blinking effects but it still achieves single-protein sensitivity. These features make iSCAT a powerful tool in the field of biosensing and microscopy. Future applications will focus on elucidating complex cellular interactions such as immunological response to a stimulus or cellular communication.