$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$
$$\longleftharp{xx}$$,
$$\longrightharp{xx}$$,
Both multiplex PCRs presented here have appeared relatively robust in the face of poor template DNA quality, but lack of PCR amplification was nevertheless occasionally observed when using templates with extremely high DNA concentrations. These issues were readily resolved by diluting the templates prior to PCR. Other methods for DNA extraction than the one employed here may also be used (e.g., commercial kits).
Although five amplicons are expected from each multiplex PCR reaction, five visually distinguishable bands should not always be expected from GE, as some (differently labelled) VNTR loci within the same reaction have overlapping size ranges. The final PCR extension time of 60 min may be shortened if required, but will likely result in the increased occurrence of split peaks in subsequent CE electropherograms (see below). Notably, as the purpose of the GE step is purely for qualitative verification of PCR amplicons, the run time, voltage and/or gel recipe may be adjusted as preferred. If particularly weak bands are observed by GE, it may be advisable to reduce the dilution factor of those samples prior to CE.
While the CE protocol described here was run on a specific commercial capillary electrophoresis apparatus (see Table of Materials), different CE systems may have different sample requirements, which may in turn prompt some modifications to the protocol. Refer to the manual of the respective CE system manufacturer for instructions on appropriate reagents/equipment, calibration etc. for fragment analysis. There is also a possibility that the biased amplicon mobility patterns observed during CE may differ, relatively, across CE systems and/or machines, as has previously been documented for other MLVA protocols15,16. If occurring to an extent where final (rounded) VNTR repeat counts become affected, this means the locus-specific variables s and i (Table 1), used to determine VNTR repeat counts, must be re-calibrated. This involves linear regression on plots comparing accurate sequence sizes versus CE size calls, as described by Gulla et al. 201814.
Split peaks and stutter peaks, both well-known artefacts in CE based MLVA typing17, may be observed in electropherograms during size calling (Figure 4). While stutter peaks should be disregarded, the longer peak should consistently be selected for downstream applications in the case of split peaks separated by a single base pair. Moreover, absent peaks indicating lack of particular VNTR loci are rare, but may occur, in which case a repeat count of '0' should be assigned. If the starting culture from which DNA is extracted is not pure (i.e., contains more than one Y. ruckeri sub-type), multiple tall peaks corresponding to different alleles of the same locus/loci may be observed following CE. Secondary cultivations must then be performed from single colonies prior to new DNA extraction for re-typing.
As stated in the protocol, template DNA for PCR should by default be extracted from pure cultures of Y. ruckeri. In a few cases, however, egg-fluid samples testing positive for Y. ruckeri by qPCR (Ct-values < 27) were successfully MLVA typed directly, without prior culturing, using an increased amount of genomic DNA (extracted with commercial kit) as template. Although this approach has not been extensively tested nor verified, it does indicate the potential of this MLVA assay for examination of complex biological matrices containing DNA from a range of different organisms in addition to Y. ruckeri.
The entire MLVA typing procedure presented here, from DNA extraction to epizootiological evaluation, may be completed in a single working day. However, the number of samples examined is in a sublinear relationship with the time required for DNA extraction, PCR and CE, and the method is therefore much more time efficient when running multiple samples simultaneously. This is nevertheless the case for most lab-based methods, and as a tool for epidemiological subtyping of Y. ruckeri, the combination of high resolution, simplicity and portability makes this MLVA assay superior to previously published protocols4,5. It has also been used to verify the limited epidemiological relevance of Y. ruckeri serotyping14.
Through a comprehensive MLVA based population study involving 484 Y. ruckeri isolates recovered from a range of spatiotemporal origins and habitats (host fish, environment, etc.), our understanding regarding the epizootiology and population structure of this important fish pathogen was substantially increased14. MLVA typing enabled the tracing of clones disseminated anthropogenically over decades, presumably through transport of fish, as well as identification of locally confined strains. Moreover, while some clonal complexes of the bacterium could clearly be associated with disease in particular fish hosts (rainbow trout and Atlantic salmon, respectively), others were only recovered from environmental sources and/or clinically unaffected fish specimens. The applicability of the method is thus not only limited to infection tracing, as it may also provide information of potential relevance e.g. for vaccine development, risk assessment, and maintenance of national biosecurity. It is currently in active use at the Norwegian Veterinary Institute as a tool for investigating Y. ruckeri diagnoses in Norwegian aquaculture.