There is increased interest in the magnetic features of iron oxide nanoparticles for a wide range of biomedical applications. Their response to magnetic resonance makes them reliable contrast agents for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), an advantage in regenerative medicine where cells labeled with magnetic nanoparticles can be tracked in vivo following implantation1. Using magnetic fields, cells can also be guided at a distance; this way, cellular spheroids2,3, rings4, or sheets5 can be engineered magnetically and also remotely stimulated6, an asset in the development of scaffold-free tissues. The range of possibilities for these nanoparticles also includes drug delivery systems7,8 and magnetic and photoinduced hyperthermal treatment to kill cancerous cells9,10,11. For all these applications, the nanoparticles are integrated in the biological environment either by intravenous injection or via direct internalization in cells and are then left within, which brings into question their intracellular fate.
In vivo analyses conveyed a general understanding of the nanoparticles’ fate in the organism: upon injection in the blood stream, they are first captured mostly by the macrophages of the liver (Kupffer cells), spleen and bone marrow, are progressively degraded, and join the iron pool of the organism12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19. Qualitative observations are only possible due to the circulation of the nanoparticles throughout the organism. Typically, transmission electronic microscopy (TEM) can be used to directly observe the nanoparticles and the presence of iron in the organs can be determined via dosage. More recently, their fate has been assessed directly on a pool of cells, meaning in close circuit with no iron escape, allowing a quantitative measurement of their biotransformations at the cell-level20,21,22. Such measurements are possible via the analysis of the magnetic properties of the nanoparticles that are tightly linked to their structural integrity. Vibrating sample magnetometry (VSM) is a technique where the sample is vibrated periodically so that the coil-measurement of the flux induced provides the magnetic moment of the sample at the applied magnetic field. Such synchronous detection allows for a rapid measurement, which is an asset for determining the magnetic moments of a large number of samples20,21,22,23. The macroscopic magnetic signature retrieved by VSM then gives a quantitative overview of the entire biological sample directly correlated to the nanoparticles' size and structure. In particular, it provides the magnetic moment at saturation (expressed in emu) of the samples, which is a direct quantification of the number of magnetic nanoparticles present in the sample, respectively to their specific magnetic properties.
It has been shown that the intracellular processing of magnetic nanoparticles is tightly linked to their structural features20. These features can be controlled via optimal synthesis protocols. Each protocol presents advantages and limitations. Iron oxide nanoparticles are commonly synthesized in aqueous solutions via coprecipitation of iron ions24. To overcome the limitations of nanoparticles size polydispersity, other synthesis methods such as polyol-mediated sol-gel methods have been developed25. Nonaqueous approaches by thermal decomposition leads to the production of very well-calibrated iron oxide nanoparticles26. However, the use of massive amounts of surfactants like oleylamine or oleic acid complicates their functionalization and water transfer for biomedical applications. For this reason, we synthesize such magnetic nanoparticles through a nonaqueous sol gel route leading to high crystallinity, purity and reproducibility27. This protocol produces well-controlled size nanoparticles that can be tuned through temperature variation28. Nevertheless, the microwave-assisted non-aqueous sol-gel route has an upper size limit of the obtained nanoparticles of around 12 nm. This procedure would not be adapted for applications using ferromagnetic particles at room temperature. In addition to the core synthesis, another main feature to be considered is the coating. Lying at the surface of the nanoparticle, the coating acts as an anchoring molecule, helping the targeted internalization of the nanoparticles, or it can protect the nanoparticle from degradation. Since benzyl alcohol acts as an oxygen source and a ligand at the same time, bare nanoparticles are produced without the need for additional surfactants or ligands. The nanoparticles are then easily surface functionalized after synthesis without a surfactant exchange process.
Herein, two types of nanoparticles are assessed that possess the same core and differ in the coating. The core is synthesized using a fast and highly efficient microwave based technique. The two coatings compared consist of citric acid, one of the most used as coating agent in biomedical applications29,30, and polyacrylic acid (PAA), a polymeric coating with a high number of chelating functions. VSM magnetometry measurements are then used first to quantify the nanoparticle uptake by the cells, and then as a direct assessment of the nanoparticle structural integrity upon internalization in stem cells. Results demonstrate that the incubation concentration impacts nanoparticle uptake and that the coating influences their degradation, with the large number of anchoring molecules of PAA protecting the core from degradation.