The goal of the presented protocol was to establish a detrusor underactivity (DU) model in the rat through conus medullaris transection. Laminectomy was performed in a total of 40 female Wistar rats (control group: 10 rats; test group: 30 rats) weighing 200–220 g, and the conus medullaris was transected at the L4‒L5 level in the test group. All the rats were housed and fed under the same environmental conditions for six weeks. In the test group, urine voiding was performed twice daily for six weeks, and mean residual urine volume was recorded. A cystometrogram was performed in both groups. Maximum cystometric capacity (MCC), detrusor opening pressure (DOP), and compliance of the bladder were recorded and calculated. The test group showed significant urinary retention after the surgery, both during and after the spinal shock. However, no abnormality was observed in the control group. When compared to the control group, the MCC and compliance of bladder in the test group was significantly higher than that of the test group (3.24 ± 2.261 mL versus 1.04 ± 0.571 mL; 0.43 ± 0.578 mL/cmH2O versus 0.032 ± 0.016 mL/cmH2O), whereas DOP in the test group was lower than control (20.28 ± 14.022 cmH2O versus 35 ± 13.258 cmH2O). This method of establishing an animal model of DU by the conus medullaris transection offers an excellent opportunity to understand DU’s pathophysiology in a better manner.
Detrusor underactivity (DU) is a typical lower urinary tract dysfunction that has remained under studied. Even though DU has been defined by the International Continence Society (ICS)1, numerous different terminologies are used to refer to this disease, e.g., “detrusor failure,” “acontractile bladder,” “detrusor areflexia”2. DU, as defined by the International Continence Society (ICS) in 2002, is a contraction of reduced strength and duration, which results in prolonged increase in time for bladder emptying, thereby resulting in failure to achieve complete bladder emptying within a normal period.
DU may affect 48% of men and 12% of women (aged >70 years)3 with lower urinary tract symptoms. It seems to be multifactorial, and no effective treatment exists. It is reported that DU is ubiquitous in patients with neurogenic bladder dysfunction, such as multiple sclerosis4, diabetes mellitus5, Parkinson’s disease6, or cerebral stroke7. DU can also be caused by iatrogenic nerve damage, such as laparoscopic hysterectomy, prostatectomy, or other surgical interventions in the small pelvis8. The pathophysiology changes and available treatments of DU are still confusing because of the lack of an appropriate animal model for study.
The micturition reflex is controlled by spino-bulbospinal pathways that combines the pontine micturition center, sacral parasympathetic nucleus, and more senior cortex centers9. Activation and maintenance of the micturition reflex mainly depend on the regular transport of sensory signals from the bladder to more senior cortex centers. It may be postulated that sensory dysfunction contributes to DU.
Most experimental animal studies related to lower urinary tract dysfunctions have focused on overactive bladder (OAB) models10. These models provide a reasonable understanding of OAB pathophysiology and prognosis. However, only a few DU models have been reported, e.g., supraspinal injury (local lesions, decerebration, and middle cerebral artery occlusion), spinal cord transection or contusion injury, systemic (e.g., cyclophosphamide) or intravesical administration of irritant or inﬂammatory agents (e.g., acid, acrolein, and lipopolysaccharide)11,12,13,14. Among these methods, only the spinal cord transection or contusion injury method can be used in establishing an animal model of DU13. Attempts involving the injury of the pontine micturition center and higher cortex centers were abandoned because of the severe trauma. So, increased attention is being paid to find an accurate location in the micturition reflex center to induce the DU with minimum side effects.
As mentioned previously, one of the mechanisms of inducing DU is to injure the spinal cord to damage the signaling pathway of the micturition reflex. Allen’s weight-drop method was developed to establish laboratory animals with injured spinal cords15. However, there are no further experimental data available on this method. Moreover, since parts of the animals recovered spinal function after stroke without DU, it cannot be considered as a perfect method for generating a DU animal model16.
In 1987, Bregman excogitated a process of transecting the spinal cord for generating the DU animal model and acquired experimental data17. Nevertheless, this method was not applied to establish the DU animal model. At that time, researchers were still confused about the pathogenesis of DU. As locations in the spinal cord associated with the induction of OAB or DU are adjacent to each other, they were unable to find the accurate site of damage to the spinal cord to induce DU17. OAB and DU were introduced either together or separately by this method. So, although this method introduced DU, it was imprecise and could not be used for the understanding of DU’s occurrence and processing.
As stated above, the lack of a suitable animal model of DU is one of the main obstacles for the study of DU. Researchers are continuously looking for an accurate and manageable model that can simulate the pathology of DU. Even the treatment options for DU have not significantly improved during the last 20 years. Collectively, there is a great need to describe a standard protocol for establishing an animal model of DU.
So, in this paper, we describe a method to successfully establish a rat model of DU by conus medullaris transection. Transection was performed at the L4‒L5 level to separate the conus medullaris. The maximum cystometric capacity (MCC), detrusor opening pressure (DOP), and compliance of the bladder were recorded and analyzed to validate the protocol. The protocol stated below combines both feasibility and reliability in a standardized manner to establish the DU animal model, simulating the occurrence and processing of DU. The protocol can be used as a technique for further study of DU.
All rats were used according to protocols approved by the Animal Experimental Committee of Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University.
1. Surgical preparation, anesthetization, and surgical techniques
NOTE: A total of 40 female Wistar rats, weighing 200–220 g, were commercially obtained for the present study. Of the 40 rats, 10 were randomly selected as the control group, and the rest were treated as the test group. All animals were housed in a sterile environment in the animal facilities of Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University.
- Perform general anesthesia by administering sodium pentobarbital intraperitoneally (40 mg/kg). Then, place the rat on the surgical platform.
- Check for the depth of anesthesia by the lack of response to the toe pinch. Shave the fur from the whole back area with a razor.
- Sterilize the back with an alcohol prep pad twice. Secure the limbs with surgical tape and make a median incision of about 3 cm on the back with surgical scissors.
- Deepen the incision through the subcutaneous tissues using the #15 surgical scalpel blade and cut off the muscles attached to the spine.
- Visually identify and expose the 13th rib (the intervertebral space connected to that rib is interval T13‒L1). Mark the 13th rib using a suture.
- After identification, carefully resect the muscles attached to the spine and expose the vertebral column. Resect the supraspinous ligament and interspinous ligament for an accurate identification of the vertebral column. Expose the level of L4‒L5 with a #15 surgical scalpel blade and mini-blades.
NOTE: The supraspinous ligament can be identified easily because of the presence of thin subcutaneous tissue. After the resection of supraspinous ligament, the ligament between spinous process is interspinous ligament.
- Carefully dissect away the L4‒L5 vertebral spinous process and parts of the transverse process by rongeur to expose the spinal cord (Figure 1).
- Completely expose the conus medullaris at the L4‒L5 level and transect the conus medullaris totally with iridectomy scissors. Insert some tissue packing to block the recovery of the spinal cord.
- Close the overlying muscle and skin on the outer skin layer using 4-0 non-absorbable suture.
- For the control group, perform steps 1.1‒1.7, and leave the conus medullaris intact. Close the incision according to step 1.9.
2. Animal recovery
- Keep the rats in a temperature-controlled incubator (30 °C) during the first hour post-operation and monitor it until it has regained consciousness.
NOTE: It takes about half an hour for total recovery.
- Transfer the animal to a clean cage with sufficient food and water. Keep the rats in separate cages.
NOTE: The transection's success is indicated when the rats in the test group move only with the help of forelegs, whereas the rats in the control group could walk normally.
3. Post-operation management
- Inject Penicillin G, an antibiotic (50,000 U/mL per animal) intraperitoneal and inject buprenorphine (0.05 mg/kg) subcutaneously at 24 h and 48 h time points post-operation.
- Compress the urinary bladder at the hypogastrium to help with the voiding. Perform this twice daily at the same time (8 am and 8 pm) for six weeks.
NOTE: The loss of normal constriction of detrusor is the symbol of DU.
- House all rats in metabolic cages, each containing a urine collection funnel placed over a previously weighed absorbent paper to monitor the micturition and incontinence.
- Collect and note the weight change of absorbent paper, which indicates the voided volume (VV), and the residual urine volume separately.
4. Urodynamic testing
- At six-weeks post-operation, perform a cystometrogram, using urodynamic measurement equipment as follows.
- Anesthetize rats by injecting 10% chloral hydrate into the peritoneal cavity (3 mL/kg).
- Compress the bladder for voiding, then fix the rat to the surgical platform using a tape.
- Insert the epidural catheter (3F) into the bladder and connect the urodynamic measurement equipment, epidural catheter, and infusion pump by the three-limb tube.
- Pump physiological saline at a speed of 0.2 mL/min for urodynamic measurement (see Table of Materials). Record the MCC and DOP, and compliance of the bladder (calculated by dividing δ bladder volume with δ pressure of the detrusor).
5. Statistical analysis
- Perform statistical analysis using commercially available software.
- Use Kolmogorov-Smirnov test to test the normality of data.
- Express the normally distributed variables as mean values with standard deviations. Use the two-tailed paired Student’s t-tests to compare the parameters of cystometrogram in both groups.
NOTE: p < 0.05 indicates that the difference had statistical significance.
The entire procedure of the conus medullaris transection can be completed within 45 min by experienced surgeons. Our laboratory has performed over 100 cases of conus medullaris transection surgeries. The success rate is over 95%, as defined by the rats’ survival and successful induction of DU. The urodynamic test confirmed the induction of DU.
Based on our experience, the induction of DU can be preliminarily evaluated by the residual urine volume. The retention of urine was observed immediately after the surgery. In the test group, the peak point of volume appeared on the second-day post-operation, and the decrease in the volume gradually sustained for about ten days. Ten days after surgery, the volume reached a steady level (Figure 2). It was observed that during the first ten days after surgery, the mean residual urine volume was 2.09 ± 1.05 mL, which was reduced to 0.67 ± 0.21 mL on the 10th day after surgery. However, no abnormality was observed in the control group.
To confirm the induction of DU, the urodynamic test needs to be performed. The representative pressure-volume profile of the test group and the control group are shown in Figure 3 and Figure 4. When compared with the control group, the MCC and compliance of bladder in the test group significantly higher in the test group (1.04 ± 0.571 mL vs. 3.24 ± 2.261 mL, p < 0.001 and 0.032 ± 0.016 mL/cmH2O vs. 0.43 ± 0.578 mL/cmH2O, p < 0.05, respectively) whereas DOP in test group decreased significantly (35 ± 13.258 cmH2O vs 20.28 ± 14.022 cmH2O; p < 0.01). See Table 1.
Figure 1: Method for conus medullaris transection. (a) Exposing the 13th rib (black arrow). (b) Exposing L4 and L5 vertebral arches. The vertebral plate was destroyed by rongeur to unmask the spinal cord (black arrow). Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 2: Time course of the changes in voiding behavior parameters in the test group. Values are represented as mean ± SD. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 3: Representative cystometric traces in the test group. (a) Representative tracings from a rat exhibiting significantly elevated bladder volume and low detrusor pressure. (b) Representative tracing from a second rat exhibiting elevated bladder volume and slightly lower detrusor pressure than usual. With the fixed infusion speed, the infusion time in the test group is quite different. However, the infusion time of all the rats in the test group increased significantly, which means an enlarged bladder. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 4: Representative cystometric traces in the control group. (a) A rat with normal bladder volume and gradually elevating bladder pressure with the infusion. (b) A rat with normal bladder volume and gradually elevating bladder pressure with the infusion. With a fixed infusion speed, the infusion time in the control group for nearly 6 min means indicates the same bladder volume across the control group. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
|Group||Case||Maximum Cystometric capacity (ml)||Detrusor opening pressure (cmH2O)||Compliance of bladder (ml/H2O)|
|Statistical analysis was employed using the t test. Data presented as mean ± SD.|
|A p<0.05 was considered statistically significant.|
Table 1: The representative pressure-volume profiles of two groups.
DU is a common cause of lower urinary tract symptoms in both men and women. It is a complex constellation of symptoms with few treatment options that can significantly diminish the quality-of-life (Qol) of those affected18. Although it is believed that DU is multifactorial, the understanding of its pathogenesis remains rudimentary. Studies have shown that the pathogenesis of DU might be related to myogenic and neurogenic factors.
In the myogenic hypotheses, it was observed that individuals with DU might experience a more significant decline in detrusor contractility than those with healthy aging. It was found that detrusor contractility diminishes with age and is probably affected by other factors like metabolic or neurogenic diseases. Data from urodynamic assessment showed that DU and post-void residuals were associated with aging19. A study showed that 22.1% of men and 10.8% of women (all aged > 60 years) reported difficulties with bladder emptying3. Furthermore, the leading cause behind this was decreased detrusor contractility. Studies in diabetic bladders have displayed similar changes like those found in DU20. The decrease of the muscle to collagen ratio leading to widened spaces between muscle cells may cause the diminishing detrusor contractility. Age-related increase in circulating norepinephrine has also been found in most neurogenic bladders21,22. Therefore, there have been attempts to induce DU by establishing diabetes mellitus in the animal model. But these failed because of the lack of accurate control of the blood sugar levels and other complications of diabetes mellitus. However, in the neurogenic hypotheses, DU was classified into three groups: obstacle in the efferent signals of the micturition reﬂex, obstacle of afferent signals initiating the reﬂex, and defective integrative control23. So, many researchers paid attention to establishing the animal model by an accurate injury of the neurogenic system components. Because of the neurogenic system’s complicated function, it is difficult to pinpoint the position inducing DU. Unfortunately, numerous attempts to use neurogenic system injury to induce DU have failed.
Our protocol is the first report of establishing the DU animal model by transection of the conus medullaris. In the present study, the spinal cord was transected at the level of L4‒L5 to induce damage of the lower sacral nerves.
The most critical step of the surgery is identifying the spinal cord at the level of L4‒L5 because the conus medullaris of the rat is long and thin, and ranges from the upper side of L1 to the lower side of the L4. If the spinal cord is transected above the L4, it is possible to induce damage to higher sacral nerves. On the contrary, if transection occurs below L5, it may not eradicate the micturition center. So, performing transection surgery at the level of L4‒L5 can make sure that both the afferent and efferent pathways of the micturition center are destroyed, which makes this method unique.
In the test group, urine retention emerged immediately after the surgery, and the variation profile of the residual urine volume corresponded to the change in micturition function during or after the shock stage of spinal cord injury. Simultaneously, the classic reflex incontinence aftershock stage was not observed, which indicated that the efferent nerve to bladder had been damaged.
We also found an increase in residual urine in the first week after surgery and a significant decrease after the first week. The change of residual urine is likely caused by the impaired coordination of outlet/sphincter/pelvic floor function. So, in the first week after surgery, the sudden disruption leads to an increase in residual urine, and when the compromise of outlet/sphincter/pelvic floor function is rebuilt to some extent, the residual urine decreased to a stable level.
As per the meaning of DU conceived by ICS: (1) too feeble detrusor contraction power and (2) too short detrusor contraction span, it is connected to deficient bladder emptying (diminished voiding effectiveness), diminished sensation, and lower urinary tract symptoms. Upon comparing the urodynamic data of the two groups, we found that the maximum cystometric capacity and the compliance of the test group’s bladder increased dramatically by six weeks post-operation, while the detrusor opening pressure decreased. With the help of these data, it is clear that the contractility of detrusor decreased after six weeks, causing the bladder’s inability to contract to induce micturition.
As shown in the bladder pressure-volume profile, with the increased maximum cystometric capacity, the micturition did not emerge, although the detrusor's pressure was also exaggerated. The absence of micturition indicated that the surgery blocked afferent signals, which induce micturition, by causing bladder afferent nerve dysuria. Furthermore, these profiles correspond with the pathophysiological change of DU.
There are also limitations to this research. For example, intensive care should be taken to prevent infection after the surgery. From our experience, the conus medullaris transection might lead to impaired motivation of the lower hindlimbs. Moreover, the leakage of retained urine (due to incontinence) may be challenging to be found quickly resulting the constant contact between a moist cage bed wetted by urine and animal lower body. This can lead to severe cutaneous or urinary tract infection, which might be fatal. This protocol demand that surgeons with limited microsurgical experience undergo extensive surgical training to master the technique, especially the accurate identification of conus medullaris.
As the clinical highlights of impeded bladder emptying (e.g., decreased urinary flow rate, elevated postvoid residual [PVR]) may emerge because of DU yet may likewise happen because of bladder outflow obstruction (BOO) (e.g., benign prostatic hyperplasia, urethral stricture). As such, regularly testing to recognize DU and BOO without invasive pressure-flow studies24 is required. However, in our model, no micturition is observed in the urodynamic test caused by the impaired detrusor constriction ability. It is challenging to analyze the BOO factor simultaneously, which is also a limitation of the model.
In conclusion, setting up the animal model of DU by transecting the conus medullaris provides a desirable animal model for further understanding of DU. With proper training and practice, this surgery can be performed with a success rate greater than 95%.
The authors have nothing to disclose.
|0.9% saline||Wuhan Prosai Company||EY-C1178||pump for urodynamic measurement|
|10% chloral hydrate||Shandong Yulong Co., Ltd||H37022673||3mL/kg, administered intraperitoneally|
|Buprenorphine Hydrochloride Injection||Tianjin Pharmaceutical Research Institute Pharmaceutical Co. LTD||H12020275||0.05mg/kg subcutaneously 24h and 48h postoperation|
|Epidural Catheter||Shandong Xinghua Co, Ltd||VABR3L||for urodynamic measurement|
|Penicillin G||Alta Technology Co., Ltd||1ST5637||50,000 unit/ml per animal|
|pentobarbital||Beijing solabo Technology Co., Ltd||NK-WF0001||40 mg/kg, administered intraperitoneally|
|Suture line(4-0)||ETHICON||VCP422H||suture the injury|
|Three-limb tube||Shandong Xinghua Co, Ltd||VAB3T||for urodynamic measurement|
|Trace infusion pump||Zhejiang Smith Medical Instrument Co., Ltd||20162540335||Pump the saline at a speed of 0.2ml/min for urodynamic measurement|
|Urodynamic measurement equipment||Medical Measurement SystemsB.V.||08-0467||urodynamic measurement equipment can not only help the diagnosis of dysuria, but also provide objective materials for treatment and therapeutic effect. It is the most commonly used examination method in clinical diagnosis and treatment of lower urinary tract functional diseases|
|Wistar Rats||HFK Biotechnology Co.Ltd,Beijing ,China||SCXK2012-0023||200-220g|
- van Koeveeringe, G. A., et al. Detrusor underactivity: Pathophysiological considerations, models and proposals for future research. Neurourology and Urodynamics. 33, (5), ICI-RS 2013 591-596 (2014).
- Osman, N. I., Esperto, F., Chapple, C. R. Detrusor Underactivity and the Underactive Bladder: A Systematic Review of Preclinical and Clinical Studies. European Urology. 74, (5), 633-643 (2018).
- Osman, N. I., Chapple, C. R. Contemporary concepts in the aetiopathogenesis of detrusor underactivity. Nature Reviews. Urology. 11, (11), 639-648 (2014).
- Panicker, J. N., Nagaraja, D., Kovoor, J. M. E., Nair, K. P. S., Subbakrishna, D. K. Lower urinary tract dysfunction in acute disseminated encephalomyelitis. Multiple Sclerosis. 15, (9), Houndmills, Basingstoke, England. 1118-1122 (2009).
- Lee, W. C., Wu, H. P., Tai, T. Y., Yu, H. J., Chiang, P. H. Investigation of urodynamic characteristics and bladder sensory function in the early stages of diabetic bladder dysfunction in women with type 2 diabetes. The Journal of Urology. 181, (1), 198-203 (2009).
- Araki, I., Kitachara, M., Oida, T., Kuno, S. Voiding dysfunction and Parkinson’s disease: urodynamic abnormalities and urinary symptoms. The Journal of Urology. 164, (5), 1640-1643 (2000).
- Meng, N. H., et al. Incomplete bladder emptying in patients with stroke: is detrusor external sphincter dyssynergia a potential cause. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 91, (7), 1105-1109 (2010).
- FitzGerald, M. P., Brubaker, L. The etiology of urinary retention after surgery for genuine stress incontinence. Neurourology and Urodynamics. 20, (1), 13-21 (2001).
- Rahman, M., Siddik, A. B. Neuroanatomy, Pontine Micturition Center. StatPearls. (2020).
- Wrobel, A., Lancut, M., Rechberger, T. A. A new model of detrusor overactivity in conscious rats induced by retinyl acetate instillation. Journal of Pharmacological and Toxicological Methods. 74, (7), 16 (2015).
- Rosenzweig, E. S., McDonald, J. W. Rodent models for treatment of spinal cord injury: research trends and progress toward useful repair. Current Opinion in Neurology. 17, (2), 121-131 (2004).
- Yoo, K. H., Lee, S. J. Experimental animal models of neurogenic bladder dysfunction. International Neurourology Journal. 14, (1), 1-6 (2010).
- Kanai, A., et al. Sophisticated models and methods for studying neurogenic bladder dysfunction. Neurourology and Urodynamics. 30, (5), 658-667 (2011).
- Nomiya, M., et al. Progressive vascular damage may lead to bladder underactivity in rats. The Journal of Urology. 191, (5), 1462-1469 (2014).
- Seki, T., Hida, K., Tada, M., Koyanagi, I., Iwasaki, Y. Graded contusion model of the mouse spinal cord using a pneumatic impact device. Neurosurgery. 50, (5), discussion 1081-1082 1075-1081 (2002).
- Yeo, S. J., et al. Development of a rat model of graded contusive spinal cord injury using a pneumatic impact device. Journal of Korean Medical Science. 19, (4), 574-580 (2004).
- Bergman, B. S. Spinal cord transplants permit the growth of serotonergic axons across the site of neonatal spinal cord transection. Brain Research. 431, (2), 265-279 (1987).
- Chancellor, M. B., et al. Underactive bladder; Review of progress and impact from the International CURE-UAB Initiative. International Neurourology Journal. 24, (1), 3-11 (2020).
- Pfisterer, M. H. D., Griffiths, D. J., Schaefer, W., Resnick, N. M. The effect of age on lower urinary tract function: a study in women. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. 54, (3), 405-412 (2006).
- Duchen, L. W., Anjorin, A., Watkins, P. J., Mackay, J. D. Pathology of autonomic neuropathy in diabetes mellitus. Annals of Internal Medicine. 92, (2), 301-303 (1980).
- Schneider, T., Hein, P., Bai, J., Michel, M. C. A role for muscarinic receptors or rho-kinase in hypertension associated rat bladder dysfunction. The Journal of Urologoy. 173, (6), 2178-2181 (2005).
- Drake, M. J., Harvey, I. J., Gillespie, J. I., Van Duyl, W. A. Localized contractions in the normal human bladder and in urinary urgency. BJU International. 95, (7), 1002-1005 (2005).
- Suskind, A. M., Smith, P. P. A new look at detrusor underactivity: impaired contractility versus afferent dysfunction. Current Urology Reports. 10, (5), 347-351 (2009).
- Osman, N. I., et al. Detrusor underactivity and the underactive bladder: A new clinical entity? A review of current terminology, definitions, epidemiology, aetiology, and diagnosis. European Urology. 65, (2), 389-398 (2014).