Login processing...

Trial ends in Request Full Access Tell Your Colleague About Jove

Biology

Histological-Based Stainings using Free-Floating Tissue Sections

doi: 10.3791/61622 Published: August 25, 2020
Emily M. Potts1, Giuseppe Coppotelli1, Jaime M. Ross1,2

Abstract

Immunohistochemistry is a widely used technique to visualize specific tissue structures as well as protein expression and localization. Two alternative approaches are widely used to handle the tissue sections during the staining procedure, one approach consists of mounting the sections directly on glass slides, while a second approach, the free-floating, allows for fixed sections to be maintained and stained while suspended in solution. Although slide-mounted and free-floating approaches may yield similar results, the free-floating technique allows for better antibody penetration and thus should be the method of choice when thicker sections are to be used for 3D reconstruction of the tissues, for example when the focus of the experiment is to gain information on dendritic and axonal projections in brain regions. In addition, since the sections are kept in solution, a single aliquot can easily accommodate 30 to 40 sections, handling of which is less laborious, particularly in large-scale biomedical studies. Here, we illustrate how to apply the free-floating method to fluorescent immunohistochemistry staining, with a major focus on brain sections. We will also discuss how the free-floating technique can easily be modified to fit the individual needs of researchers and adapted to other tissues as well as other histochemical-based stainings, such as hematoxylin and eosin and cresyl violet, as long as tissue samples are properly fixed, typically with paraformaldehyde or formalin.

Introduction

Immunostaining is a popular research practice that began 130 years ago with the discovery of serum antibodies in 1890 by Von Behring1. During the early 20th century, dyes were attached to antigens and later to antibodies as a way to quantify and visualize reactions1, and in 1941 Albert Coons developed the first fluorescent antibody labels, a discovery that revolutionized light microscopy2,3. The term “immunostaining” encompasses many techniques that have been developed using this principle, including Western blot, flow cytometry, ELISA, immunocytochemistry, and immunohistochemistry3,4. Western blot detects the presence of specific proteins from tissue or cell extracts5. Proteins are separated by size using gel electrophoresis, transferred to a membrane, and probed using antibodies. This technique indicates the presence of protein and how much protein is present; however, it does not reveal any information on the localization of the protein within cells or tissues. Another method, immunocytochemistry (ICC), labels proteins within cells, typically cells cultivated in vitro. ICC shows both protein expression and localization within cellular compartments6. To detect and visualize a specific protein at the tissue level, immunohistochemistry (IHC) is utilized.

IHC is a method that researchers use to target specific antigens within tissue, taking advantage of chemical properties of the immune system7,8. By generating specific primary and secondary antibodies linked to either an enzyme or a fluorescent dye, antigens of interest can be labelled and revealed in most tissues (as reviewed in Mepham and Britten)9. The term “immunohistochemistry" by itself does not specify the labeling method that is used to reveal the antigen of interest; thus, this terminology is often combined with the detection technique to clearly delineate the labeling method: chromogenic immunohistochemistry (CIH) to indicate when the secondary antibody is conjugated to an enzyme, such as peroxidase; or fluorescent IHC to indicate when the secondary antibody is conjugated to a fluorophore, such as fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC) or tetramethylrhodamine (TRITC). The selectivity of IHC allows clinicians and researchers to visualize protein expression and distribution throughout tissues, across various states of health and disease10. In the clinical realm, IHC is commonly used to diagnose cancer, as well as to determine differences in various types of cancer. IHC has also been used to confirm different types of microbial infections within the body, such as Hepatitis B or C11. In biomedical research, IHC is often used to map protein expression in tissues and is important in identifying abnormal proteins seen in disease states. For example, neurodegeneration is often accompanied by accumulation of abnormal proteins in the brain, such as Αβ plaques and neurofibrillary tangles in Alzheimer’s disease. Animal models are often then developed to mimic these pathological states, and IHC is one method that researchers use to locate and quantify the proteins of interest10,12,13. In turn, we can learn more about the causes of these diseases, and the complications that arise with them.

There are many steps involved in performing IHC. First, the tissue of interest is collected and prepared for staining. Arguably most researchers prepare fixed tissue samples, with perfusion of the fixative via the circulatory system being optimal as it preserves morphology14,15. Post-fixation of tissue samples may also be used but may yield less than ideal results16. Crosslinking fixatives, such as formaldehyde, act by creating chemical bonds between proteins in the tissue17. Fixed tissue is then sliced into very thin layers or sections using a microtome, with many researchers preferring to collect frozen sections using a cryostat. From there the tissue is collected and either mounted directly onto a microscope slide (slide-mounted method), or suspended in a solution (free-floating method), such as phosphate buffered saline (PBS)18. The method of collection used is predetermined based on the needs of the researcher, with each of these two methods presenting its own advantages and disadvantages.

The slide-mounted method is by far the most commonly used, with an important benefit being that very thin sections (10-14 μm) can be prepared, which is important, for example, to investigate protein-protein interactions. There is also minimal handling of the specimen, which decreases potential damage to the structural integrity of the tissue19. Researchers often use this technique with fresh frozen tissue (tissue that is immediately frozen using dry ice, isopentane, etc.), which is very delicate as compared to fixed tissue and much care to prevent thawing of the sample needs to be taken. Another advantage of using slide-mounted sections is that large volumes of solutions for staining are usually not required4. Thus, researchers can use a smaller amount of expensive antibodies or other chemicals to complete the stain. Additionally, it is possible to mount sections from several different experimental groups on the same slide, which can be advantageous, especially during image acquisition. On the other hand, there are some disadvantages of using slide-mounted sections, most notably that the tissue section is adhered to the slide thus restricting antibody penetration to one side of the section, which limits the section thickness and the 3D representation of the tissue. It can also happen that during washings, the edges of the tissue and entire sections may detach from the slide, rendering useless the whole experiment. Moreover, IHC usually has to be performed relatively quickly when using the slide-mounted approach to avoid degradation of the antigen epitope20,21 with unprocessed slides typically stored at -20 or -80 °C, often coverslipped and stored horizontally or in slide boxes, resulting in a relatively large storage footprint. Lastly, the slide-mounted technique can also be time consuming if researchers must handle large numbers of slides to process large numbers of tissue sections.

Due to some of these challenges using the slide-mounted method, a modification called the free-floating method has become a popular alternative. This technique came into the literature in the 1960-70s22,23,24, gaining popularity in the 1980s25,26,27,28,29, and is now a well-established method that involves performing the stain on the collected sections in suspension rather than adhered to a slide12,30,31. The free-floating method is not recommended when tissue sections are less than 20 μm; however, in our experience it is the approach of choice when thicker (40-50 μm) sections are to be stained. One distinct benefit is that antibodies can penetrate free-floating sections from all angles and generate less background staining due to more effective washing, all resulting in better signaling when imaging. Additionally, the sections are mounted onto the slides after processing, thus eliminating the possibility of tissue detachment as well as decreasing the time occupying the cryostat. The free-floating method can also be much less labor intensive, especially for large-scale biomedical studies. For instance, it is possible to stain many (18-40) sections from the same sample together in the same well, which saves time in performing both the wash and antibody incubation steps. Moreover, since a larger number (12-16) of sections can be mounted per slide using this approach, it is often more convenient and quicker for the researcher to view and image sections. Notably, during the mounting of tissue slices on the slides, sections can be attached and detached until the desired orientation is obtained. Researchers also often use slightly lower concentrations of antibodies using the free-floating method, and since the incubations are performed in microcentrifuge tubes, the antibodies can be easily collected and preserved with sodium azide for reusage (see Step 5.1). Another advantage is that the sections can be directly stored at -80 °C in small microcentrifuge tubes with cryoprotectant solution32, thereby minimizing storage space and maximizing longevity of the samples33. A down-side of using this technique is that the sections are handled a lot, and thus are apt to damage. This, however, can be mitigated by using low shaking and rotating speeds as well as properly training researchers how to transfer the samples and mount the sections onto the slides.

Taken together, IHC is an established, essential tool for visualizing and localizing protein expression in both the clinical and biomedical research fields. Free-floating IHC is an efficient, flexible, as well as economic method, especially when performing large-scale histological studies. Here, we present a reliable free-floating fluorescent IHC protocol for the scientific community that can be adapted accordingly for chromogenic IHC and other stainings such as hematoxylin and eosin or cresyl violet staining.

Subscription Required. Please recommend JoVE to your librarian.

Protocol

1. Tissue preparation for cryosectioning

  1. Embed fixed tissues in an appropriate embedding mold (see Table of Materials) to create a specimen block using an appropriate specimen matrix (see Table of Materials) and freeze on dry ice. Store specimen blocks at -80 °C until ready to section.
    NOTE: Fixed tissues are typically prepared by perfusing adult (approx. 2.5 – 30 months old) male or female rodents (mouse or rat)34, in accordance with available ethical permit, with an appropriate fixative (e.g. 10% formalin), followed by post-fixing tissues in the same fixative for 12 h at 4 °C, washing tissues three times with 1x PBS, and placing tissues in 15% and then 30% sucrose in 1x PBS for overnight or until tissues sink35. Researchers may try to adapt this general protocol to different development stages.

2. Cryosectioning

  1. When ready to section, acclimatize samples in the cryostat for at least 1-2 h prior to sectioning to prevent shattering of tissue.
  2. Using a cryostat, cut tissue into sections (20-50 μm) and collect in 6 or 12-well inserts (see Table of Materials) filled with 1x PBS solution.
    NOTE: Depending on the section thickness, how much tissue is to be collected, and the number of well inserts used, each well will contain a variable number of sections spanning from approximately 10 to 40 slices for well. For example, if an entire brain is sectioned at 40 μm, approximately 18-24 sections will be collected in each well using 12-well inserts. Also, 20 μm sections can be somewhat challenging to handle, thus 40 μm is recommended for bulk staining (see Discussion).

3. Storing sections

  1. Once collected, wash the sections with freshly prepared 1x PBS for 5 min. Repeat 3 times.
  2. Transfer the sections into 2 mL microcentrifuge tubes filled with 1-1.5 mL of storage solution (for 250 mL, mix 70 g of sucrose, 75 mL of ethylene glycol, and bring to volume with 0.1 M phosphate buffer).
  3. Store at -80 °C until ready for staining.

4. Staining Day I

  1. Remove samples from freezer and equilibrate at room temperature (RT) for 10 - 20 min.
  2. Pour sections into a well insert in a 6-well plate to separate storage solution from sections.
  3. Move the well insert to another well containing approximately 6 mL of 1x TBS. Wash 3 times with 1x TBS for 5 min each on an orbital shaker using low speed at RT.
  4. While sections are washing, prepare 7 mL (per sample) of a blocking-permeabilizing solution consisting of 1x TBS with 0.3% Triton X-100 and 3% normal serum (e.g., normal horse serum). Block sections for 30 min at RT on orbital shaker, using low speed.
    NOTE: Blocking with sera prevents non-specific binding of antibodies to tissue or non-specific Fc-receptors – a serum matching the species of the secondary antibody is recommended, but if not available, any normal serum from a species different from the primary antibody host animal can be used. The detergent Triton X-100 allows for better antibody penetration by permeabilizing the tissue.
  5. Prepare 1 mL per sample of primary antibody solution consisting of selected primary antibody (diluted appropriately) in 1x TBS with 0.3% Triton X-100 and 1% normal serum (see Step 4.4 Note). Transfer sections from well insert into a 2 mL microcentrifuge tube containing primary antibody solution to bind to the antigen(s) of interest.
    NOTE: Multiple primary antibodies may be used (generated in different host species).
  6. Place 2 mL microcentrifuge tube with sections on a rotating mixer using low speed (e.g., speed 7 rpm) and incubate overnight for 12-16 h at 4 °C.

5. Staining Day II

  1. The following day, pour sections into a well insert in a 6-well plate to separate sections from primary antibody solution.
    NOTE: Antibody solution can be collected and reused; add 0.02% (w/v) sodium azide to inhibit microbial growth.
  2. Wash sections 3 times with 1x TBS at RT (30 s for the first 2 washes and 10 min for the final wash).
  3. Prepare 1 mL per sample of secondary antibody solution consisting of appropriate secondary antibody (diluted accordingly) in 1x TBS with 0.3% Triton X-100 and 1% normal serum (shield solution from light).
    NOTE: Indirect labelling with a conjugated secondary antibody amplifies the signal and allows for colorimetric or fluorescent visualization of the protein target.
  4. Transfer sections into a 2 mL microcentrifuge tube containing secondary antibody solution. Incubate for 2 h at RT on orbital shaker using low speed (shield solution from light).
  5. Pour sections into a well insert in a 6-well plate to separate sections from secondary antibody solution.
  6. Continuing to shield samples from light, wash 2 times with 1x TBS for 30 s at RT. Then wash for 15 min in 1x TBS, add DAPI (1-0.1 μg/ml) if desired.

6. Mounting

  1. Pour sections into a glass, rectangular histological chamber filled three-quarters with 1x TBS.
  2. Submerge a glass slide into the 1x TBS and use a fine paintbrush to coax the sections towards the slide.
  3. Gently tap the sections onto the slide, making sure there are no wrinkles or folds.
  4. Repeat until all sections are mounted onto the slide(s).
    NOTE: When an entire brain, for example, is sectioned at 40 μm, collected in 12-well inserts with one aliquot containing 18-24 sections; slices are typically mounted on 1-2 slides, but fewer sections can also be mounted per slide depending on the researcher’s preference.

7. Coverslipping

  1. After sections are dried onto the slide(s), about 10-15 minutes at RT or until sections look opaque (remember to shield slides from light), apply an appropriate aqueous mounting medium (hardening or non-hardening). Antifading is preferred if using a fluorescent conjugated secondary antibody.
    NOTE: Fluorescence quality may be lesser when using a hardening mounting medium, but slides should last longer.
  2. Using tweezers, place a coverslip on top of the medium. Cover with filter paper and press down firmly to remove excess mounting medium.
    NOTE: If using a non-hardening mount, paint the edges of the coverslipped slide with clear nail polish to seal.
  3. Image sections using an appropriate microscope. Store in a dark slide box at 4 °C.
    NOTE: Sections can be imaged using a variety of microscopes, such as laser scanning confocal and inverted or upright widefield fluorescence, at magnifications (e.g., 10x, 20x, 40x) based on researcher’s needs.

Subscription Required. Please recommend JoVE to your librarian.

Representative Results

The overall scheme of the using the free-floating method to perform a fluorescent immunohistochemical assay is illustrated in Figure 1. Representative example of fluorescent IHC using the free-floating method in mouse brain examining glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) expression is shown in Figure 2 at both lower and higher magnification to illustrate the overall quality of the staining. This approach is also appropriate for revealing low-expressing proteins, with an example from a GFP low-expressing transgenic mouse brain shown in Figure 3. The free-floating method can also be used in other histochemical staining protocols, such as cresyl violet, as shown in Figure 4, by following Steps 1 through 4.3 of the protocol and then mounting the sections as indicated in Step 6. Thereafter, sections can be processed using any staining that requires slide-mounted sections. When using this protocol for chromogenic IHC, follow the protocol from Steps 1 through 5.6 (do not add DAPI to the last wash), adjusting accordingly if using an amplification step (e.g., avidin-biotin complex). Replace the buffer with chromagen/substrate reagent, incubating 5-20 min until tissue turns the desired color. The reaction can be monitored by checking the tissue periodically with a low-power microscope. Terminate the reaction by moving the well insert with the sections to fresh buffer, washing them three times, at least 5 min each. Proceed with Step 6 to mount the sections onto glass slides, allowing the sections to dry on a slide warmer for at least 3-4 h. Dehydrate the slides with increasing ethanol concentrations (i.e., 70%, 90%, 95%, 99.5%, 2-5 min each) followed by xylene (5-10 min) and then coverslip with a hard-mounting medium (e.g., Entellan), allowing slides to dry at least 1-2 h in a ventilated area. If the background is too high, quench the endogenous peroxidase activity for 15 min at RT with 3% H2O2 in 1x TBS followed by three buffer washes, 15-20 min each, before blocking (Step 4.4). Several peripheral tissues are also amenable to using this technique with no modifications of the protocol required, with an example of liver sections from a GFP-expressing mouse shown in Figure 5.

Figure 1
Figure 1: Flow chart of the free-floating fluorescent immunohistochemical assay. Dissect the organ of interest (preferably fixed tissue) and embed tissue in embedding molds (see Table of Materials) using a specimen matrix (see Table of Materials), and then freeze on dry ice and store at -80 °C. Section tissue using a cryostat at 20-50 μm and collect slices in well inserts (see Table of Materials) filled with 1x PBS. Using an orbital shaker on low speed, wash sections 3x for 5 min each in 1x PBS. At this point, store extra sections in storage buffer at -80 °C until needed. Wash remaining sections 3x for 5 min with 1x TBS. Block sections for 30 min at RT shaking at low speed. Prepare primary antibody solution and incubate sections overnight in microcentrifuge tube(s) at 4 °C (12-14 h). The following day, wash sections with 1x TBS 3x, first two washes for 30 s, with the third wash for 10 min. Incubate sections in secondary antibody solution in microcentrifuge tube(s) for 2h at RT, making sure to shield sections from light when possible from this step forward. Then wash 3x with 1x TBS, first two washes for 30 s, and third wash for 15 min. Add DAPI to last wash if desired and if not present in mounting medium. Pour sections into a chamber box, three-quarters full of 1x TBS, and use a paintbrush to adhere sections onto the slide(s). Allow slides to dry (~10-15 min) before coverslipping with mounting medium of choice. Image sections using an appropriate microscope. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 2
Figure 2: Fluorescent immunohistochemistry using free-floating brain sections. Hippocampal brain regions examining GFAP expression in adult mouse are shown and were labeled using an anti-GFAP primary antibody raised in rabbit and an anti-rabbit Alexa568 secondary antibody raised in donkey. DAPI was used in the last wash to label nuclei. Tissue was sectioned at 40 μm using a cryostat. Images were taken at 10x (upper) and 40x (lower) magnification using a laser point scanning confocal microscope. 10x image scale bar = 400 μm. 40x image scale bar = 100 μm. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 3
Figure 3: Fluorescent immunohistochemistry on lower-expressed proteins using the free-floating method. Hippocampal brain regions from a low expressing GFP transgenic adult mouse are shown. Neurons expressing GFP were labeled using an anti-GFP primary antibody raised in goat and an anti-goat Alexa488 secondary antibody raised in donkey. DAPI was used in the last wash to label nuclei. Tissue was sectioned at 40 μm using a cryostat. Images were taken at 40x magnification using a laser point scanning confocal microscope. Scale bar = 100 μm. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 4
Figure 4: Cresyl violet staining using free-floating brain sections. Using a cryostat, 40 μm sections from adult mouse olfactory bulb to cerebellum were collected, washed, mounted onto slides, stained with cresyl violet, and coverslipped. Images were taken at 10x magnification using an inverted widefield microscope. Scale bar = 1 mm. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 5
Figure 5: Fluorescent immunohistochemistry using free-floating liver sections. Sections of liver taken at 40 μm using a cryostat from a transgenic adult mouse expressing low levels of GFP are shown. An anti-GFP primary antibody raised in goat with an anti-goat Alexa488 secondary antibody raised in donkey were used to label cells expressing GFP. DAPI was added to the last wash to label nuclei. Images were collected using a laser point scanning confocal microscope at 40x magnification. Scale bar = 100 μm. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Subscription Required. Please recommend JoVE to your librarian.

Discussion

Immunohistochemistry (IHC) is a versatile technique that has become crucial in identifying protein expression and localization within tissue sections. This assay is used throughout the scientific community to further understand characteristics of tissue across stages of normal function to disease-states. IHC is employed across a variety of fields from clinical diagnosis of diseases such as cancer to initial discoveries in preclinical research10,36.

The technique most commonly used to perform IHC is the slide-mounted method in which the sections are immediately adhered to the slide after being sliced. Some advantages of using this technique is that researchers can handle very thin sections needed for protein colocalization studies and use little solution to stain the sections per slide. Antibodies are often expensive; therefore, this approach can be an economic option if few sections are to be processed. This is also the method of choice for researchers using fresh-frozen specimens because the handling of the tissue is minimal, thus the structural integrity of the tissue will be protected. Using the slide-mounted approach would also be appropriate if only a few sections are to be collected and immediately stained, as is the case in clinical pathology. On the other hand, there are some disadvantages, such as only the exposed side of the tissue is accessed during staining, thus limiting section thickness due to poor antibody penetration and effective washing. Another drawback is that once the tissue is sectioned and collected onto slides, IHC normally must be completed rather quickly with storage of unprocessed slides taking up much freezer space. Furthermore, when processing larger experiments (e.g., several brain regions with multiple, representative levels to be stained), this approach may actually use more reagents, be rather time consuming, and can often limit the number of slides to be processed per experiment.

Some limitations associated with the slide-mounted method can be overcome by the free-floating staining technique that has become an increasingly popular alternative when working with thicker sections. Although this method is not a novel approach, in our experience, it has been a reliable, reproducible, and flexible approach, especially for staining tissue samples in bulk, thus permitting the processing of larger-scale studies in an efficient manner. Researchers can also effectively run multiple, large IHC experiments at the same time with this method. Moreover, samples are stained in suspension, thus the solutions can penetrate the sections from all angles, particularly important for thicker sections, often leading to a higher quality stain (Figure 2, Figure 3, and Figure 5). Free-floating sections can be sliced anywhere from 20-50 μm in thickness37, with thicker sections useful for researchers to see structures or cells in different plains of view. For example, in brain tissue, thicker sections allow researchers to see the structure of dendrites and axons throughout their samples. The ability to collect thinner slices (20 μm) broadens even more the spectrum of applications; however, thinner slices can be difficult to handle and often require more time and effort to minimize damage, thus sections should not be thinner than 40 μm for bulk staining. One key benefit of the free-floating method is that researchers can quickly section entire brains (or other tissue), collecting all sections in small tubes with each aliquot having a representative slice for all different brain regions, thus allowing researchers to quickly stain the entire brain. Tubes containing slices can be stored in cryoprotectant at -80 °C for several years33, with aliquots not taking up much freezer space, effectively allowing researchers to generate a “tissue library”. This method also reduces the amount of wasted materials, including slides, coverslips, and especially antibodies, which can easily be recovered and preserved for reusage, as well as precious animal tissues since sections can be stored and saved for as long as users choose.

The free-floating approach and the protocol presented here also gives researchers the option to easily modify the protocol or repurpose resources. For example, the collected sections can be used for many different histochemical stains in addition to immunofluorescence with simple protocol modifications, such as chromogenic IHC, hematoxylin and eosin (H&E), cresyl violet (Figure 4), and RNAscope38. Chromogenic IHC allows the visualization of antigen expression when a soluble substrate is converted by an enzyme conjugated to a secondary antibody to an insoluble chromogenic product. The two enzymes most commonly used are the horseradish peroxidase (HRP), which converts the 3,3' diaminobenzidine (DAB) to a dark brown end-product, and the alkaline phosphatase (AP), which converts the 3-amino-9-ethylcarbazole (AEC) substrate to a red product39. We routinely perform cresyl violet staining and use free-floating sections in order to examine gross brain organization and morphology40. We have also successfully applied this protocol to many different tissues, including brain, liver, heart, kidney, and spleen (Figure 5). Other researchers have also successfully used this technique for peripheral tissues including liver, kidney, and ovary22,23,24.

A major concern when using free-floating technique is the potential for structural damage to the tissue sections, especially to brain slices, because throughout the protocol, samples are on shakers and rotators during almost every step to ensure that they are evenly washed, blocked, and stained. Occasionally, specific brain regions can become detached, especially at the cerebellar levels; however, using a brain atlas and a form of magnification, such as a jeweler’s lamp, during the mounting process can be helpful for piecing together sections. This challenge can usually be prevented through gentle handling of the samples and by keeping rotating machines on the correct, low setting.

In conclusion, we present an established free-floating IHC technique that has proven to be an indispensable, dependable, flexible, and efficient modality that we regularly use to visualize protein expression and localization as well as tissue structure in a variety of tissues. The protocol herein can easily be modified to fit individual research needs making it valuable for the scientific community.

Subscription Required. Please recommend JoVE to your librarian.

Disclosures

Nothing to disclose

Acknowledgments

We would like to acknowledge the National Institute on Aging (K99/R00 AG055683 to JMR), the George and Anne Ryan Institute for Neuroscience (EP, GC, JMR), the College of Pharmacy at the University of Rhode Island (EP, GC, JMR), and Konung Gustaf V:s och Drottning Victorias Frimurarestiftelse (JMR). We thank doctoral student Rebecca Senft, training with Professor Susan Dymecki, Department of Genetics, Harvard Medical School, for introducing us to the free-floating method. Some images used in Figure 1 were obtained from "free to use, share, or modify, even commercially” sources: mouse and microcentrifuge tube (Pixabay), mouse brain (Jonas Töle, Wikimedia Commons), cryostat and mouse brain section (DataBase Center for Life Science, Wikimedia Commons), glass container (OpenClipart, FreeSvg.org), and microscope (Theresa Knott, Open Clip Art Library).

Materials

Name Company Catalog Number Comments
12-well plates Corning 3513
6-well plates Corning 3516
Clear nail polish User preference N/A
DAPI Sigma-Aldrich D9542
Embedding molds Thermo Scientific 1841
Ethylene glycol User preference N/A
Formalin solution Fisher Scientific SF98-4
Horse serum, heat inactivated Gibco 26050088
Microscope slide boxes Electron Microscopy Services 71370
PBS User preference N/A
Primary antibody User preference N/A
Rectangular Coverslips VWR 48393-081 24 x 50 mm
Rectangular staining dish Electron Microscopy Services 70312
Round artist paintbrush #2 Princeton Select Series 3750R Brand not important
Secondary antibody User preference N/A
Specimen matrix for embedding OCT Tissue-Tek, Sakura 4583
Stain tray – slide staining system Electron Microscopy Services 71396-B Use dark lid
Sucrose User preference N/A
Superfrost Plus Micro Slides VWR 48311-703
TBS User preference N/A
Triton X-100 Sigma-Aldrich X100
Vectashield antifade mounting medium Vector Laboratories H-1000 Non-hardening
Well inserts for 12-well plates Corning Netwells 3477
Well inserts for 6-well plates Corning Netwells 3479
Whatman filter paper Millapore-Sigma WHA1440042

DOWNLOAD MATERIALS LIST

References

  1. Childs, G. V. Pathobiology of Human Disease. Part IV: Techniques in Experimental Pathology. Journal of Experimental Medicine. 381923, 3775-3796 (2014).
  2. Coons, A. H., Creech, H. J., Jones, R. N. Immunological Properties of an Antibody Containing a Fluorescent Group. Experimental Biology and Medicine. 47, (2), 200-202 (1941).
  3. Goldman, R. Antibodies: indispensable tools for biomedical research. Trends in Biochemical Sciences. 25, (12), 593-595 (2000).
  4. Taylor, S. N. Using Antibodies: A Laboratory Manual. The Quarterly Review of Biology. Harlow, E. D., Lane, D. 74, (3), 374 (1999).
  5. Towbin, H., Staehelin, T., Gordon, J. Electrophoretic transfer of proteins from polyacrylamide gels to nitrocellulose sheets: procedure and some applications. Proceedings of the NationalAcademy of Sciences. 76, (9), 4350-4354 (1979).
  6. Hermersdörfer, H. Immunocytochemistry. A Practical Approach. Beesley, J. E. 38, (3), IRL Press at Oxford University Press. Oxford, New York, Tokyo. 348-348 (1994).
  7. Schacht, V., Kern, J. S. Basics of Immunohistochemistry. Journal of Investigative Dermatology. 135, (3), 1-4 (2015).
  8. Coons, A. H. International Review of Cytology. International Review of Cytology. 5, 1-23 (1956).
  9. Mepham, B. L., Britten, K. J. M. Immunostaining Methods for Frozen and Paraffin Sections. Lymphoproliferative Diseases. 187-211 (1990).
  10. Duraiyan, J., Govindarajan, R., Kaliyappan, K., Palanisamy, M. Applications of immunohistochemistry. Journal of Pharmacy & Bioallied Sciences. 4, Suppl 2 307-309 (2012).
  11. Li, A., Yang, D. H. Methods in Molecular Biology. Methods in Molecular Biology. 2108, Clifton, N.J. 43-55 (2020).
  12. Hökfelt, T., Fuxe, K., Goldstein, M. Applications of Immunohistochemistry to Studies on Monoamine Cell Systems with Special Reference To Nervous Tissues. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 254, 407-432 (1975).
  13. Okaty, B. W., et al. A single-cell transcriptomic and anatomic atlas of mouse dorsal raphe Pet1 neurons. bioRxiv. (2020).
  14. Koenig, H., Groat, R. A., Windle, W. F. A Physiological Approach to Perfusion-Flxation of Tissues with Formalin. Stain Technology. 20, (1), 13-22 (1945).
  15. Jamur, M. C., Oliver, C. Cell fixatives for immunostaining. Methods in Molecular Biology. 588, Clifton, N.J. 55-61 (2010).
  16. van der Loos, C. A focus on fixation. Biotechnic & Histochemistry. 82, (3), 141-154 (2007).
  17. Canene-Adams, K. Preparation of formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue for immunohistochemistry. Methods in Enzymology. 533, 225-233 (2013).
  18. Bachman, J. Immunohistochemistry on freely floating fixed tissue sections. Methods in Enzymology. 533, 207-215 (2013).
  19. Sundquist, S. J., Nisenbaum, L. K. Fast Fos: rapid protocols for single- and double-labeling c-Fos immunohistochemistry in fresh frozen brain sections. Journal of Neuroscience Methods. 141, (1), 9-20 (2005).
  20. Bertheau, P., et al. Variability of immunohistochemical reactivity on stored paraffin slides. Journal of Clinical Pathology. 51, (5), 370-374 (1998).
  21. Blind, C., et al. Antigenicity testing by immunohistochemistry after tissue oxidation. Journal ofClinical Pathology. 61, (1), 79-83 (2007).
  22. Desmet, V. J., Krstulović, B., Damme, B. V. Histochemical study of rat liver in alpha-naphthyl isothiocyanate (ANIT) induced cholestasis. The American Journal of Pathology. 52, (2), 401-421 (1968).
  23. Bulmer, D. The Histochemistry of Ovarian Macrophages in the Rat. Journal of Anatomy. 98, 313-319 (1964).
  24. Lönnerholm, G. Histochemical Demonstration of Carbonic Anhydrase Activity in the Human Kidney. Acta Physiologica Scandinavica. 88, (4), 455-468 (1973).
  25. Ronnekleiv, O. K., Naylor, B. R., Bond, C. T., Adelman, J. P. Combined Immunohistochemistry for Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone (GnRH) and Pro-GnRH, and in Situ Hybridization for GnRH Messenger Ribonucleic Acid in Rat Brain. Molecular Endocrinology. 3, (2), 363-371 (1989).
  26. Nadelhaft, I. The sessile drop method for immunohistochemical processing of unmounted sections of nervous tissue. Journal of Histochemistry & Cytochemistry. 32, (12), 1344-1346 (1984).
  27. Wainer, B. H., Rye, D. B. Retrograde horseradish peroxidase tracing combined with localization of choline acetyltransferase immunoreactivity. Journal of Histochemistry & Cytochemistry. 32, (4), 439-443 (1984).
  28. Piekut, D. T., Casey, S. M. Penetration of immunoreagents in Vibratome-sectioned brain: a light and electron microscopic study. Journal of Histochemistry & Cytochemistry. 31, (5), 669-674 (1983).
  29. Cowan, R. L., Wilson, C. J., Emson, P. C., Heizmann, C. W. Parvalbumin-containing gabaergic interneurons in the rat neostriatum. The Journal of Comparative Neurology. 302, (2), 197-205 (1990).
  30. Kjell, J., et al. Delayed Imatinib Treatment for Acute Spinal Cord Injury: Functional Recovery and Serum Biomarkers. Journal of Neurotrauma. 32, (21), 1645-1657 (2015).
  31. Sterky, F. H., Lee, S., Wibom, R., Olson, L., Larsson, N. G. Impaired mitochondrial transport and Parkin-independent degeneration of respiratory chain-deficient dopamine neurons in vivo. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 108, (31), 12937-12942 (2011).
  32. Watson, R. E., Wiegand, S. J., Clough, R. W., Hoffman, G. E. Use of cryoprotectant to maintain long-term peptide immunoreactivity and tissue morphology. Peptides. 7, (1), 155-159 (1986).
  33. Estrada, L. I., et al. Evaluation of Long-Term Cryostorage of Brain Tissue Sections for Quantitative Histochemistry. The Journal of Histochemistry and Cytochemistry. 65, (3), 153-171 (2017).
  34. Gage, G. J., Kipke, D. R., Shain, W. Whole animal perfusion fixation for rodents. Journal of Visualized Experiments. (65), e3564 (2012).
  35. Griffiths, G., McDowall, A., Back, R., Dubochet, J. On the preparation of cryosections for immunocytochemistry. Journal of Ultrastructure Research. 89, (1), 65-78 (1984).
  36. Capelozzi, V. L. Papel da imuno-histoquímica no diagnóstico do câncer de pulmão. Jornal Brasileiro de Pneumologia. 35, (4), 375-382 (2009).
  37. Burry, R. W. Immunocytochemistry. 65-77 (2009).
  38. Grabinski, T. M., Kneynsberg, A., Manfredsson, F. P., Kanaan, N. M. A method for combining RNAscope in situ hybridization with immunohistochemistry in thick free-floating brain sections and primary neuronal cultures. PloS one. 10, (3), 0120120 (2015).
  39. Warr, W. B., de Olmos, J. S., Heimer, L. Neuroanatomical Tract-Tracing Methods. Springer. 207-262 (1981).
  40. Alvarez-Buylla, A., Ling, C. Y., Kirn, J. R. Cresyl violet: A red fluorescent Nissl stain. Journal of Neuroscience Methods. 33, (23), 129-133 (1990).
This article has been published
Video Coming Soon
PDF DOI DOWNLOAD MATERIALS LIST

Cite this Article

Potts, E. M., Coppotelli, G., Ross, J. M. Histological-Based Stainings using Free-Floating Tissue Sections. J. Vis. Exp. (162), e61622, doi:10.3791/61622 (2020).More

Potts, E. M., Coppotelli, G., Ross, J. M. Histological-Based Stainings using Free-Floating Tissue Sections. J. Vis. Exp. (162), e61622, doi:10.3791/61622 (2020).

Less
Copy Citation Download Citation Reprints and Permissions
View Video

Get cutting-edge science videos from JoVE sent straight to your inbox every month.

Waiting X
simple hit counter