Login processing...

Trial ends in Request Full Access Tell Your Colleague About Jove


Heterologous Expression and Functional Analysis of Aedes aegypti Odorant Receptors to Human Odors in Xenopus Oocytes

doi: 10.3791/61813 Published: June 8, 2021
Xin Wang*1, Zhou Chen*1,2, Yifan Wang1, Feng Liu1,3, Shanshan Jiang1, Nannan Liu1
* These authors contributed equally


The mosquito Aedes aegypti (Linnaeus), a vector of many important human diseases including yellow fever, dengue fever and Zika fever, shows a strong preference for human hosts over other warm-blooded animals for blood meals. Olfactory cues play a critical role for mosquitoes as they explore their environment and seek a human host to obtain blood meals, thus transmitting human diseases. Odorant receptors (ORs) expressed in the olfactory sensory neurons are known to be responsible for the interaction of mosquito vectors with human odors. To gain deeper insights into Ae. aegypti’s olfactory physiology and investigate their interactions with humans at the molecular level, we used an optimized protocol of Xenopus Oocytes heterologous expression to functionally analyze Ae. aegypti odorant receptors in response to human odors. Three example experiments are presented: 1) Cloning and synthesizing cRNAs of ORs and odorant receptor co-receptor (Orco) from four to six days old Ae. aegypti antennae; 2) Microinjection and expression of ORs and Orco in Xenopus oocytes; and 3) Whole-cell current recording from Xenopus oocytes expressing mosquito ORs/Orco with a two-electrode voltage-clamp. These optimized procedures provide a new way for researchers to investigate human odor reception in Aedes mosquitoes and reveal the underlying mechanisms governing their host-seeking activity at a molecular level.


The yellow fever mosquito Ae. aegypti can transmit many deadly diseases including yellow fever, dengue fever and Zika fever, causing tremendous distress and loss of life. Mosquitoes make use of multiple cues such as CO2, skin odor, and body heat to locate their hosts1. Given that both humans and other warm-blooded animals produce CO2 and have similar body temperatures, it seems likely that female Ae. aegypti rely primarily on skin odor for host discrimination2. This creates a complex picture, however, with one early study isolating more than 300 compounds from human skin emanations3. Further behavioral assays have indicated that a number of these compounds evoke behavioral responses in Ae. aegypti4,5,6,7, but precisely how these compounds are detected by the mosquito remains largely unknown. Recent research by our group has identified several human odorants that may be involved in Ae. aegypti host-seeking activity, though their roles have yet to be confirmed by further behavioral assays8. How these essential human odorants are decoded in the peripheral sensory system of Ae. aegypti has yet to be established.

Insects detect odorants through the chemosensory sensilla on their olfactory appendages. Inside each of the sensilla, different olfactory receptors, including odorant receptors (ORs), ionotropic receptors (IRs) and gustatory receptors (GRs), are expressed on the membrane of olfactory sensory neurons9. These ORs are responsible for sensing many odorants encountered by insects, especially the odors associated with food, hosts and mating partners10,11,12,13. A previous study focusing on deorphanizing the function of ORs in Anopheles gambiae using the Xenopus expression system coupled with a two-electrode voltage clamp has found that Anopheles ORs are specifically tuned to the aromatics that are the major components in human emanations14. A recent genome study identified up to 117 OR genes in Ae. aegypti15. Consequently, a way to systematically address the functions of these Aedes ORs in response to biologically or ecologically important odorants such as human odors or oviposition stimuli would provide useful information for those seeking to further understand the chemical ecology or neuroethology of Ae. aegypti.

The two-electrode voltage clamp (TEVC) technique was originally developed to examine the function of membrane ion channels in the mid-1990s16,17. Since then, TEVC has been used to investigate ORs from a number of different insect species14,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34. This functional examination of ORs has substantially contributed to answering important ecological questions in insects, including: 1) How do insects locate food sources? 2) How are they attracted by the volatile sex pheromones released by their mating partners? 3) How do they find a perfect oviposition site for their offspring? and 4) Are there any compounds, plant-derived or synthetic, that can efficiently protect humans from biting bugs? Answers to these questions are crucial for controlling important disease vectors such as mosquitoes.

A number of other approaches, including those based on the human embryonic kidney cell line 293 (HEK293), the Drosophila empty neuron system, zinc-finger nuclease, transcription activator-like effector nuclease, and the CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing system, have also been used in OR functional studies12,20,35,36,37. However, these techniques all require the skills of an experienced molecular biologist and involve multiple potentially confounding factors. TEVC/oocyte expression is capable of directly measuring odor-evoked receptor currents and ion conductance and has the added advantage of the speedy quick setup time required to express receptors from cRNA. In this study, we therefore used TEVC to examine the responses of one Ae. aegypti OR55 (AaegOR55) against several odorants with potential biological relevance, revealing that oocytes expressed with AaegOR55•AaegOrco showed a dose-dependent response to the human odorant benzaldehyde.

Subscription Required. Please recommend JoVE to your librarian.


The protocol for this procedure, the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals, is approved and monitored (Auburn University’s Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee: approved protocol # 2016-2987).

NOTE: Custom gene synthesis is a viable alternative to cloning for mosquito OR genes.

1. Mosquito and Olfactory Appendages (Antennae) Collection

  1. Maintain Ae. aegypti mosquitoes (obtained from Dr. James Becnel, USDA, ARS, Mosquito and Fly Research Unit) at 25 ± 2°C and a photoperiod of 12: 12 (L:D) h (lights on 8 am).
  2. Anesthetize ~800 4-6-day old female mosquitoes without blood feeding using CO2. Cut the mosquito antennae (olfactory tissues) under a microscope (40x) using a pair of scissors and collect in a 1.5 mL centrifuge tube kept on dry ice.
    NOTE: The collected antennae can be stored in a freezer at -80 °C or be used immediately.

2. OR Cloning from Antennae of Ae. aegypti

  1. Extract total RNA from the antennae using a commercially available total RNA kit following the manufacturer’s protocol.
  2. Digest the total RNA using the commercial DNA-free kit in order to remove DNase and other ions following the manufacturer’s protocol.
  3. Synthesize cDNA from 1.5 µg of DNA-free RNA using the Oligo d(T)20-primed SuperScript IV First-Strand Synthesis System13,30.
  4. Design PCR primers for the OR genes according to the sequences available at VectorBase (https://www.vectorbase.org/) and the special requirements of the enzyme cutting site. Add a Kozak sequence (GCCACC), which initiates translation in most eukaryotic organisms, between the cutting site and the start codon in each forward primer30.
  5. Clone the coding sequences of the OR genes by PCR using gene-specific primers containing restriction endonuclease sites and the Kozak sequence following the manufacturer’s protocol.
  6. Detect PCR products through a 1% agarose gel and purify using a commercial gel extraction kit following the manufacturer’s protocol.
  7. Perform recombinant plasmid construction through cloning of PCR products into a pT7Ts vector after digestion by restriction enzymes following the manufacturer’s protocol.
  8. Verify the recombinant plasmids by Sanger sequencing and confirm using the VectorBase database.

3. cRNA Synthesis

  1. Linearize the constructed plasmids with specific restriction enzyme(s).
    NOTE: Plasmid DNA must be linearized with a restriction enzyme downstream of the gene to be transcribed.
  2. Use the linearized plasmids to synthesize cRNAs with a commercial T7 kit following a previous description13,30.
  3. Premix cRNA of OR and Orco (1:1) in a centrifuge tube and aliquot the mixed cRNA into a 2 μL volume (250 ng/µL/each) for each PCR tube. Store the aliquoted cRNA at -80 °C before use.

4. Xenopus Oocyte Collection

NOTE: The procedure is following the instruction of Schneider et al.38.

  1. Anesthetize Xenopus laevis for 20-30 min in 1 L of ultra-purified water with 1 g of ethyl m-aminobenzoate methanesulfonate salt (Figure 1A). Pinch one of the frog’s toes using fingers; if there is no response, the frog is sufficiently anesthetized and ready for surgery. Transfer the anesthetized frog on the ice bed.
  2. The surgery
    1. Rub the frog ventral area with 10% povidone-iodine solution and wipe the solution with clean cotton balls. Repeat this step 2 times.
    2. Make a small abdominal incision (10-15 mm, Figure 1B) with a disposable scalpel. Penetrate skin, fascia-muscle layer separately. The incision is in the lower part of the abdomen, lateral to the midline.
      NOTE: Do not injury internal organs.
    3. Grasp parts of ovarian lobes with forceps and pull to the exterior gently. Lift the ovary and cut it off at the body wall level with scissors. Repeat several times until get enough ovarian materials (~200 eggs, Figure 1C). Transfer the ovarian materials into washing buffer (96 mM NaCl, 2 mM KCl, 5 mM MgCl2•6H2O, 5 mM HEPES sodium salt, 10 µg/mL gentamycin, pH 7.6).
    4. Close the surgery wounds (both muscle and skin) with absorbable sutures that typically degrade and fall out naturally in 10-14 days.
    5. After each surgery, place the frog in 1 L of recovery solution (containing 3.4 g of canning & pickling salt and 2 g of instant ocean sea salt) until it wakes up and then return it back to the frog facility.
      NOTE: Up to 4 surgeries can be performed on each frog. The operation interval of each frog should be more than 2 months.
  3. Enzymatic defolliculated digestion and oocytes culturing
    1. Separate the oocytes (~200 eggs, Figure 1C) into small pieces.
    2. Transfer all oocytes into a digestion solution, including 10 mL of washing buffer (Section 4.2.3) and 2 mg/mL collagenase B for 40-60 min at ambient temperature in order to remove follicular cell layers. Examine the samples under a microscope to determine whether 80% of the oocytes have been fully defolliculated; if not, check every 10 min till most of the oocytes are ready.
    3. Rinse the oocytes with 1x Ringer’s solution (96 mM NaCl, 2 mM KCl, 5 mM MgCl2·6H2O, 5 mM HEPES sodium salt, pH 7.6), washing buffer (Section 4.2.3), modified Barth’s saline (78 mM NaCl, 1 mM KCl, 0.33 mM Ca(NO3)2·4H2O, 0.41 mM CaCl2·2H2O, 0.82 mM MgSO4·7H2O, 2.4 mM NaHCO3, 10 mM HEPES sodium salt, 1.8 mM sodium pyruvate, 10 µg/mL gentamycin, 10 µg/mL streptomycin, pH 7.6) in sequence (5 times for each buffer, using 10 mL each time). Rinsing the oocytes extensively with buffers to remove immature and poor-quality oocytes.
    4. Harvest oocytes at stage V-VI according to Dumont’s classification. Transfer health/good quality oocytes at stage V-VI with a clear white/dark division and no visually obvious damage (Figure 1D) into a 100 mm x 15 mm Petri dish containing modified Barth’s saline (Section 4.3.3). Discard the bad quality oocytes (Figure 1E). Maintain digested oocytes in insect growth chambers at 18 °C for about 24 hours before microinjection.

5. cRNA Microinjection and Expression of Odorant Receptors (ORs) and OR Co-receptors (Orco) in Xenopus Oocytes

  1. Put a metal matrix into the 100 mm x 15 mm Petri dish, adding modified Barth’s saline (Section 4.3.3) until the matrix is submerged. Transfer oocytes on the matrix, and discard the oocytes that do not meet the size. Arrange the oocytes with the vegetal poles on the upper side (Figure 1F).
  2. Pull a fresh glass capillary (1.0 mm OD x 0.5 mm ID, length = 100 mm) for each sample using a micropipe puller (Heat = 525, Pull = 50, Velocity = 50, Time = 250) and sharpen with a micropipette beveler at an angle of 25°. Mount the capillary tube on the nanoliter injector.
  3. Before injection, remove one tube of premixed cRNAs of OR and Orco (Section 3.3) from the freezer and place it on ice until completely dissolved. Fill the capillary tube with the OR/Orco mixture by pressing the Fill button of nanoliter injector.
  4. Inject 10 ng (5ng OR + 5ng Orco; ~20 nL) of the premixed cRNA for each oocyte with a nanoliter injector at a RNAse-free station. (Figure 1F).
    NOTE: Before injection, we press the EMPTY button to discharge little mixture to ensure the capillary tube is not blocked. Waiting for about 5 seconds to let the cRNAs enter the oocyte entirely.
  5. After injection, store oocytes on a sterile 24-well cell culture plate with modified Barth’s saline at 18°C for 3-7 days before whole-cell recording.

6. Whole-cell Current Recording using a Two-electrode Voltage-clamp system (Figure 2)

  1. Before the two-electrode Voltage-clamp recording, dissolve the individual odorant compounds in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) to obtain a series of stock solutions (100 μg/μL). Dilute these stock solutions with 1x ND96 buffer (91 mM NaCl, 2 mM KCl, 1.8 mM CaCl2·2H2O, 2 mM MgCl2·6H2O, 5 mM HEPES sodium salt, pH 7.6) 1000-fold to obtain a set of working solutions (0.1 μg/μL).
  2. Ensure that everything on the TMC vibration isolation table, including the metal shield, microscope, light source, and waste pump, is carefully grounded to reduce the effect of external electrical noise on the whole-cell signal recording.
  3. Prepare microelectrodes by pulling a glass capillary (1.20 mm OD x 0.94 mm ID, length = 750 mm) using a micropipe puller (Heat = 525, Pull = 50, Velocity = 50, Time = 250). Fill the capillaries with 3 M KCl. Chloridize the Ag/AgCl wires for 2-5 min in 10% chlorine bleach until they turn a dark grey color (pale grey Ag/AgCl wires need to be chloridized).
  4. Turn on the machine by switching on the Oocyte Clamp and Digidata Digitizer (Figure 3A). Open the software (e.g., Clampex 10.3) and click the Record button. Turn on the switch for the 1x ND96 buffer (Section 6.1) and the pump for the waste buffer.
  5. Conduct a pre-test by inserting microelectrodes into the flowing buffer and then pressing the Vm Electrode Test button and the Ve Electrode Test button to check the resistance of the microelectrodes. Vm should be < 40 mV and Ve should be < 40 μA. Switch off the 1x ND96 buffer (Section 6.1) flow and the waste pump after the pretest.
  6. Place each oocyte in the perfusion chamber (Figure 2) filled with 1x ND96 buffer (Section 6.1) and gently position the oocytes with the vegetal poles facing up by the glass caterpillar. Insert the electrodes slowly into the oocyte (Figure 3B). Adjust the Vm parameter to 0 and then the Ve parameter to 0. Change the Clamp button from OFF to FAST. Adjust the Gain button to ~ -80 mV.
  7. Check the value of Ve, which should be constant. If not, there is a leak in at least one of the two microelectrodes. If this happens, replace any faulty components with new capillaries.
  8. Record whole-cell currents from the injected oocytes with an oocyte clamp at a holding potential of ~−80 mV (Figure 2).
  9. Perform data acquisition and analysis.
    1. Resume the flow of the 1x ND96 buffer (Section 6.1) and turn on the waste pump.
    2. Odorant solution application via the perfusion system: switch off the 1x ND96 buffer (Section 6.1) and flow the odorant solution for 10 seconds. Then record the peak value. To obtain the response of the OR to the test odorant, subtract the baseline value from the peak value.
    3. Stop the flow of odorant solution and switch to the 1x ND96 buffer (Section 6.1). Wash the oocyte using the buffer until the current trace recovers from the previous odorant stimulation. The oocyte is then ready for stimulation by another odorant solution. Generally, one oocyte can be used to detect 20-30 chemical stimulations.
      NOTE: When testing the concentration-dependent response, the lowest concentration should always be applied first before moving on to the higher concentrations.

Subscription Required. Please recommend JoVE to your librarian.

Representative Results

Using the single sensillum recording (SSR) technique, we recently pinpointed human odorants thought to be important for Ae. aegypti host-seeking behavior8. However, the molecular mechanism driving the process of sensing human odorants in the peripheral sensory system of Ae. aegypti remains unknown. ORs play an important role in odorant ligand detection in most insects10,11,12. To perform their function, each OR needs to be co-expressed with Orco to form heteromeric ligand-gated ion channels (Figure 4). Once bound by specific ligands, the heteromeric ion channels expressed on the cell membranes are activated and open, allowing an influx of cations such as Ca2+ into the cells20,35 (Figure 4). This produces an inward, or occasionally outward current30,34 that can be detected by recording electrodes inserted into the cell. These recording electrodes are connected to an amplifier designed for oocyte voltage clamping and the electrical signal acquired is then processed using a digitizer and recorded on the computer. The response of an OR to the ligand perfused can be calculated by subtracting the baseline value from the peak value.

In this study, we examined the function of AaegOR55•AaegOrco from Ae. aegypti using TEVC. Healthy oocytes were harvested at stage V-VI from a Xenopus frog and after digestion with Collagenase B, each was injected with 10 ng cRNA of AaegOR55, AaegOrco, or the premixed AaegOR55•AaegOrco (1:1). We found that raw cells, cells injected with only AaegOR55, and cells injected with only AaegOrco showed no response to either two plant-derived chemical compounds (α-terpinene and citronellal, used as control ligands) or the human odorant (benzaldehyde) (Figure 5). However, oocytes injected with both AaegOR55 and AaegOrco displayed a dose-dependent response to the human odorant benzaldehyde (Figure 5), which suggests AaegOR55 is at least one of the molecular targets for benzaldehyde in Ae. aegypti. This is also consistent with the observation that ORs and Orco need to be co-expressed to form a functional channel14,20,30,34,35. Oocytes expressing AaegOR55•AaegOrco that were bathed in higher concentrations of benzaldehyde elicited stronger responses (Figure 5), which indicates more heteromeric ion channels are activated.

The combined AaegOR55•AaegOrco showed no responses to the two botanical compounds (Figure 5), suggesting the distinctive tuning property of each OR/Orco complex12. On the other hand, Orco has been reported to respond to a limited number of compounds independent of ORs. For example, the Orco of many Pterygota insect species (including the mosquito Anopheles gambiae, and Culex quinquefasciatus, the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster, the tobacco budworm Heliothis virescens, the Indian jumping ant Harpegnathos saltator, and the parasitic fig wasp Apocrypta bakeri) can be activated by the agonist VUAA134,40,41. Evidence from evolutionary studies suggests that insect Orco first evolved in the wingless Zygentoma silverfish and the complex ORs/Orco evolved subsequently in the winged Pterygota insects42, which may explain the conserved role of Orco across different insect species.

Figure 1
Figure 1: A schematic diagram showing the processes involved in isolating oocytes from Xenopus laevis and the microinjection of odorant receptors (ORs) and OR Co-receptors (Orco) in Xenopus oocytes. A. Xenopus laevis; B. Aseptic surgery; C. Oocytes harvested at stage V-VI with good quality; D. Oocytes after the digestion with 2 mg/mL Collagenase B; E. Oocytes in bad quality that could not be used for study; F. Xenopus oocyte arrangement on a matrix and microinjection of OR and Orco in Xenopus oocytes with a glass capillary. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 2
Figure 2: A diagram illustrates perfusion chamber, wiring, and connection of whole-cell current recording by two-electrode voltage-clamp system. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 3
Figure 3: Two-electrode voltage clamp set up. A. Oocyte clamp system, Digidata digitizer, and monitor; B. Microscope, perfusion chamber, microelectrodes, magnetic stands, and micromanipulators installed on a TMC vibration isolation table. The perfusion system is suspended on the left of the table. Two microelectrodes are inserted into an oocyte. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 4
Figure 4: A diagram illustrates the whole-cell current recording for OR (e.g., AaegOR55) and Orco in Xenopus oocytes. The red bar above each trace indicates a 10-second stimulant application. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 5
Figure 5: Responses of Xenopus oocytes to human odorants. Xenopus oocytes are injected with deionized distilled water (raw cell), AaegOR55 alone, AaegOrco alone, or AaegOR55/AaegOrco. α-terpinene and citronellal are both tested at a concentration of 10-4 v/v; Benzaldehyde is tested at serial concentrations, as indicated. The red bar above each trace indicates a 10 second stimulant application. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Subscription Required. Please recommend JoVE to your librarian.


TEVC is a classic technique that is widely used to examine the function of membrane receptors. Although a detailed protocol has already been published43 that shares considerable similarity with the procedure presented here, the proposed method here introduces some important modifications. For example, here, the cRNA of both OR and Orco are premixed and aliquoted into small volume samples immediately after synthesis and stored at -80 °C until use rather than mixing them separately on the parafilm immediately before the injection43. Moreover, after harvesting the oocytes, we choose to use absorbable sutures to close the wound for both muscle and skin, which is especially useful for closing the muscle because the suture can be absorbed by the frog and does not need to be removed later. In addition, the volume of ovary harvested from each frog is flexible, depending on the needs of each experiment. The protocol in Nakagawa and Touhara (2013) specifically states that one third of the ovary should be removed, which usually results in considerable waste. Our experience suggests that one fifth of the ovary should be sufficient for a single experiment.

The insect ORs, one of the three classes of olfactory receptors responsible for odor sensation, have been extensively tested against different compounds using the TEVC technique14,18,19,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34. Compounds with ecological significance should always be prioritized in functional studies of ORs, including those compounds used by insects to locate food sources, mating partners, and oviposition sites. More than 300 compounds have been isolated from human skin emanations3, making them a useful reference for chemical panels such as those used for functionally characterizing Aedes ORs using TEVC as part of the effort to uncover the molecular basis of mosquito host-seeking behavior.

The successful expression of ORs in oocytes is essential when investigating their function using TEVC. As indicated in previous work in An. gambiae and Cimex lectularius, 37 out of the 72 ORs in An. gambiae and 15 out of the 47 ORs in C. lectularius have been successfully expressed in Xenopus oocytes14,30. Several factors could affect the expression of ORs in Xenopus oocytes. For example, the quality of oocytes may vary from one frog to another. In this study, we harvested oocytes from Xenopus frogs, but it is possible to purchase oocytes with a quality guarantee directly (e.g., Nasco). We were therefore carefully check the oocyte quality after the first 40 min of digestion and continue to check their quality every 10 min until ~80% have been fully defolliculated. Finally, it is important to bear in mind is that some OR genes may be expressed more slowly than others. So the expression should be checked every 24 hours after three days of incubation at 18 °C, with bad oocytes being removed and the buffer changed with fresh modified Barth’s saline daily.

The function of ORs can be examined using other experimental methods. The HEK293 cell line, for example, is another in vitro expression system used in insect OR functional studies35. Unlike the Xenopus oocyte expression system used in the current study, the target OR gene needs to be transfected into the HEK293 cells for expression, after which the ion currents are recorded with patch-clamp technology. The Drosophila empty neuron system is another in vivo expression system that can be used to investigate insect OR function in a neuron environment2,11,12, while the empty neuron system is a mutant antennal neuron that lacks any Drosophila endogenous OR genes44. Exogenous OR genes from other insect species can then be engineered into the mutant antennal neuron using transgenic methods and functionally studied using SSR. Compared to TEVC, these two methods are more complicated and require experienced operators who have completed a lengthy training process. The Drosophila empty neuron system is particularly labor and time-consuming for establishing a stable transgenic UAS line.

A recent study utilized cryo-electron microscopy to identify the structure of Orco in the parasitic fig wasp A. bakeri41. Future studies that focus specifically on the cryo-EM structure of an insect OR•Orco heterotetramer could help predict the EM structures of other undefined OR•Orco heterotetramers and screen ligands for specific ORs from among the thousands of candidate compounds in a relatively short time via computer modeling. The function of the predicted ligands or ORs could then be confirmed using TEVC.

Subscription Required. Please recommend JoVE to your librarian.




This project was supported by an award from the Alabama Agricultural Experiment Station (AAES) Multistate/Hatch Grants ALA08-045, ALA015-1-10026, and ALA015-1-16009 to N.L.


Name Company Catalog Number Comments
24-well cell culture plate CytoOne CC7682-7524 Used for oocyte culture
African clawed frog Nasco LM00535 Used to harvest Xenopus oocytes
Ag/AgCl wire electrode Warner Instruments 64-1282 Used for microelectrodes
Clampex 10.3 Axon N.A. Used for signal recording
Clampfit 10.3 Axon Instruments Inc. N.A. Used for data analysis
Collagenase B Sigma 11088815001 Used for oocyte digestion
Digidata Digitizer Axon CNS Digidata 1440A Used for data acquisition
E.Z.N.A. Plasmid DNA Mini kit Omega D6942-01 Used for plasmid preparation
Ethyl-M-aminobenzoate methanesulfonate salt Sigma 886-86-2 Used for anesthetizing frogs
Glass capillary FHC 30-30-1 Used for microinjection
Glass capillary Warner Instruments 64-0801 Used for preparing microelectrodes
GyroMini Nutating Mixer Labnet S0500 Used for oocyte digestion
Insect Growth Chambers Caron Products model 6025 Used for oocyte incubation
Leica Microscope Leica S6 D Used for cutting mosquito antennae
Light Source Schott A20500 Providing light sources for observation
Magnetic stand Narishige GJ-1 Used to hold the reference electrode
Micromanipulator Leica 115378 Used for minor movement of electrode
Micropipe puller Sutter model P-97 Used to pull capillaries
Micropipette beveler Sutter model BV-10 Used to sharpen capillaries
mMESSAGE mMACHINE T7 kit Invitrogen AM1344 Used for synthesizing cRNA
Nanoject II Auto-Nanoliter Injector Drummond 3-000-204 Used for microinjection
Oligo d(T)20-primed SuperScript IV First-Strand Synthesis System Invitrogen 18091050 Used for synthesizing cDNA
Olympus Microscope Olympus SZ61 Used for microinjection
One Shot TOP10 Chemically Competent E. coli cells Invitrogen C404003 Used for transformation
Oocyte clamp amplifier Warner Instruments model OC-725C Used for TEVC recording
QIAquick gel extraction kit Qiagen 28704 Used for gel purification
TMC Vibration Isolation Table TMC 63-500 Used for isolating the vibration from the equipment
TURBO DNA-free kit Invitrogen AM1907 Used to remove DNase and other ions in RNA



  1. Cardé, R. T. Multi-cue integration: how female mosquitoes locate a human host. Current Biology. 25, (18), 793-795 (2015).
  2. McBride, C. S., et al. Evolution of mosquito preference for humans linked to an odorant receptor. Nature. 515, (7526), 222-227 (2014).
  3. Bernier, U. R., Kline, D. L., Barnard, D. R., Schreck, C. E., Yost, R. A. Analysis of human skin emanations by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry. 2. Identification of volatile compounds that are candidate attractants for the yellow fever mosquito (Aedes aegypti). Analytical Chemistry. 72, (4), 747-756 (2000).
  4. Bernier, U. R., Kline, D. L., Schreck, C. E., Yost, R. A., Barnard, D. R. Chemical analysis of human skin emanations: comparison of volatiles from humans that differ in attraction of Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae). Journal of the American Mosquito Control Association. 18, (3), 186-195 (2002).
  5. Bernier, U. R., et al. Synergistic attraction of Aedes aegypti (L.) to binary blends of L-lactic acid and acetone, dichloromethane, or dimethyl disulfide. Journal of Medical Entomology. 40, (5), 653-656 (2003).
  6. Bernier, U. R., Kline, D. L., Allan, S. A., Barnard, D. R. Laboratory studies of Aedes aegypti attraction to ketones, sulfides, and primary chloroalkanes tested alone and in combination with L-lactic acid. Journal of the American Mosquito Control Association. 31, (1), 63-70 (2015).
  7. Okumu, F. O., et al. Development and field evaluation of a synthetic mosquito lure that is more attractive than humans. PloS one. 5, (1), 8951 (2010).
  8. Chen, Z., Liu, F., Liu, N. Human odour coding in the yellow fever mosquito, Aedes aegypti. Scientific Reports. 9, (1), 1-12 (2019).
  9. Hansson, B. S., Stensmyr, M. C. Evolution of insect olfaction. Neuron. 72, (5), 698-711 (2011).
  10. Nakagawa, T., Sakurai, T., Nishioka, T., Touhara, K. Insect sex-pheromone signals mediated by specific combinations of olfactory receptors. Science. 307, (5715), 1638-1642 (2005).
  11. Hallem, E. A., Carlson, J. R. Coding of odors by a receptor repertoire. Cell. 125, (1), 143-160 (2006).
  12. Carey, A. F., Wang, G., Su, C. Y., Zwiebel, L. J., Carlson, J. R. Odorant reception in the malaria mosquito Anopheles gambiae. Nature. 464, (7285), 66-71 (2010).
  13. Liu, F., Xiong, C., Liu, N. Chemoreception to aggregation pheromones in the common bed bug, Cimex lectularius. Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology. 82, 62-73 (2017).
  14. Wang, G., Carey, A. F., Carlson, J. R., Zwiebel, L. J. Molecular basis of odor coding in the malaria vector mosquito Anopheles gambiae. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 107, (9), 4418-4423 (2010).
  15. Matthews, B. J., et al. Improved reference genome of Aedes aegypti informs arbovirus vector control. Nature. 563, (7732), 501-507 (2018).
  16. Costa, A. C., Patrick, J. W., Dani, J. A. Improved technique for studying ion channels expressed in Xenopus oocytes, including fast superfusion. Biophysical Journal. 67, (1), 395-401 (1994).
  17. Schreibmayer, W., Lester, H. A., Dascal, N. Voltage clamping of Xenopus laevis oocytes utilizing agarose-cushion electrodes. Pflügers Archiv. 426, (5), 453-458 (1994).
  18. Lu, T., et al. Odor coding in the maxillary palp of the malaria vector mosquito Anopheles gambiae. Current Biology. 17, (18), 1533-1544 (2007).
  19. Ditzen, M., Pellegrino, M., Vosshall, L. B. Insect odorant receptors are molecular targets of the insect repellent DEET. Science. 319, (5871), 1838-1842 (2008).
  20. Sato, K., et al. Insect olfactory receptors are heteromeric ligand-gated ion channels. Nature. 452, (7190), 1002-1006 (2008).
  21. Xia, Y., et al. The molecular and cellular basis of olfactory-driven behavior in Anopheles gambiae larvae. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 105, (17), 6433-6438 (2008).
  22. Bohbot, J. D., Dickens, J. C. Characterization of an enantioselective odorant receptor in the yellow fever mosquito Aedes aegypti. PLoS One. 4, (9), 7032 (2009).
  23. Bohbot, J. D., Dickens, J. C. Insect repellents: modulators of mosquito odorant receptor activity. PLoS One. 5, (8), 12138 (2010).
  24. Bohbot, J. D., Dickens, J. C. Odorant receptor modulation: ternary paradigm for mode of action of insect repellents. Neuropharmacology. 62, (5-6), 2086-2095 (2012).
  25. Hughes, D. T., Pelletier, J., Luetje, C. W., Leal, W. S. Odorant receptor from the southern house mosquito narrowly tuned to the oviposition attractant skatole. Journal of Chemical Ecology. 36, (8), 797-800 (2010).
  26. Pelletier, J., Hughes, D. T., Luetje, C. W., Leal, W. S. An odorant receptor from the southern house mosquito Culex pipiens quinquefasciatus sensitive to oviposition attractants. PloS one. 5, (4), 10090 (2010).
  27. Bohbot, J. D., et al. Multiple activities of insect repellents on odorant receptors in mosquitoes. Medical and Veterinary Entomology. 25, (4), 436-444 (2011).
  28. Bohbot, J. D., et al. Conservation of indole responsive odorant receptors in mosquitoes reveals an ancient olfactory trait. Chemical Senses. 36, (2), 149-160 (2011).
  29. Leal, W. S., Choo, Y. M., Xu, P., da Silva, C. S., Ueira-Vieira, C. Differential expression of olfactory genes in the southern house mosquito and insights into unique odorant receptor gene isoforms. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 110, (46), 18704-18709 (2013).
  30. Liu, F., Chen, Z., Liu, N. Molecular basis of olfactory chemoreception in the common bed bug, Cimex lectularius. Scientific Reports. 7, 45531 (2017).
  31. Choo, Y. M., et al. Reverse chemical ecology approach for the identification of an oviposition attractant for Culex quinquefasciatus. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 115, (4), 714-719 (2018).
  32. Ruel, D. M., Yakir, E., Bohbot, J. D. Supersensitive odorant receptor underscores pleiotropic roles of indoles in mosquito ecology. Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience. 12, 533 (2019).
  33. Xu, P., Choo, Y. M., De La Rosa, A., Leal, W. S. Mosquito odorant receptor for DEET and methyl jasmonate. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 111, (46), 16592-16597 (2014).
  34. Xu, P., et al. Odorant inhibition in mosquito olfaction. iScience. 19, 25-38 (2019).
  35. Wicher, D., et al. Drosophila odorant receptors are both ligand-gated and cyclic-nucleotide-activated cation channels. Nature. 452, (7190), 1007-1011 (2008).
  36. DeGennaro, M., et al. orco mutant mosquitoes lose strong preference for humans and are not repelled by volatile DEET. Nature. 498, (7455), 487-491 (2013).
  37. Koutroumpa, F. A., et al. Heritable genome editing with CRISPR/Cas9 induces anosmia in a crop pest moth. Scientific Reports. 6, 29620 (2016).
  38. Schneider, P. N., Hulstrand, A. M., Houston, D. W. Fertilization of Xenopus oocytes using the Host Transfer Method. Journal of Visualized Experiments. (45), e1864 (2010).
  39. Missbach, C., et al. Evolution of insect olfactory receptors. ELife. 3, 02115 (2014).
  40. Jones, P. L., Pask, G. M., Rinker, D. C., Zwiebel, L. J. Functional agonism of insect odorant receptor ion channels. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 108, (21), 8821-8825 (2011).
  41. Butterwick, J. A., et al. Cryo-EM structure of the insect olfactory receptor Orco. Nature. 560, (7719), 447-452 (2018).
  42. Missbach, C., et al. Evolution of insect olfactory receptors. ELife. 3, 02115 (2014).
  43. Nakagawa, T., Touhara, K. Functional assays for insect olfactory receptors in Xenopus oocytes. Pheromone signaling. Humana Press. Totowa, NJ. 107-119 (2013).
  44. Dobritsa, A. A., Van Naters, W., Warr, C. G., Steinbrecht, R. A., Carlson, J. R. Integrating the molecular and cellular basis of odor coding in the Drosophila antenna. Neuron. 37, (5), 827-841 (2003).
This article has been published
Video Coming Soon

Cite this Article

Wang, X., Chen, Z., Wang, Y., Liu, F., Jiang, S., Liu, N. Heterologous Expression and Functional Analysis of Aedes aegypti Odorant Receptors to Human Odors in Xenopus Oocytes. J. Vis. Exp. (172), e61813, doi:10.3791/61813 (2021).More

Wang, X., Chen, Z., Wang, Y., Liu, F., Jiang, S., Liu, N. Heterologous Expression and Functional Analysis of Aedes aegypti Odorant Receptors to Human Odors in Xenopus Oocytes. J. Vis. Exp. (172), e61813, doi:10.3791/61813 (2021).

Copy Citation Download Citation Reprints and Permissions
View Video

Get cutting-edge science videos from JoVE sent straight to your inbox every month.

Waiting X
simple hit counter