Waiting
Login processing...

Trial ends in Request Full Access Tell Your Colleague About Jove

Medicine

C-arm-Free Simultaneous OLIF51 and Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Fixation in a Single Lateral Position

Published: September 16, 2022 doi: 10.3791/63572

Summary

C-arm-free oblique lumbar interbody fusion at the L5-S1 level (OLIF51) and simultaneous pedicle screw fixation are performed in a lateral position under navigation guidance. This technique does not expose the surgeon or operating staff to radiation hazards.

Abstract

Oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF) is an established technique for the indirect decompression of lumbar canal stenosis. However, OLIF at the L5-S1 level (OLIF51) is technically difficult because of the anatomical structures. We present a novel simultaneous technique of OLIF51 with percutaneous pedicle screw fixation without fluoroscopy. The patient is placed in a right lateral decubitus position. A percutaneous reference pin is inserted into the right sacroiliac joint. An O-arm scan is performed, and 3D reconstructed images are transmitted to the spinal navigation system. A 4 cm oblique skin incision is made under navigation guidance along the pelvis. The internal/external and transverse abdominal muscles are divided along the muscle fibers, protecting the iliohypogastric and ilioinguinal nerves. Using a retroperitoneal approach, the left common iliac vessels are identified. Special muscle retractors with illumination are used to expose the L5-S1 intervertebral disc. After disc preparation with navigated instruments, the disc space is distracted with navigated trials. Autogenous bone and demineralized bone material are then inserted into the cage hole. The OLIF51 cage is inserted into the disc space with the help of a mallet. Simultaneously, percutaneous pedicle screws are inserted by another surgeon without changing the lateral decubitus position of the patient.

In conclusion, C-arm-free OLIF51 and simultaneous percutaneous pedicle screw fixation are performed in a lateral position under navigation guidance. This novel technique reduces surgical time and radiation hazards.

Introduction

Spondylosis is regarded as a stress fracture1 and occurs in about 5% of the young adult population2. The most common level of occurrence is at the L5 level due to the unique shearing force applied at the L5-S1 area. The main symptoms of spondylosis and spondylolisthesis are low back pain, leg pain, and numbness. If conservative treatment proves ineffective, surgical treatment is recommended3. Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) is an effective and established technique4, but the nonunion rate of this procedure is relatively higher at the L5-S1 level5. Furthermore, with TLIF, it is difficult to create adequate lordosis compared to oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF) or anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF)6.

Indirect decompressions such as ALIF or OLIF are currently common methods for treating lumbar stenosis7. However, the conventional ALIF technique causes a large amount of muscle damage. Oblique lateral interbody fusion at the L5-S1 level (OLIF51) was first reported in 20178. Posterior instrument augmentation is usually necessary to ensure solid fusion, but the conventional OLIF technique uses a C-arm, and the patient position is changed from lateral to prone. To overcome these problems, we report herein a novel technique of C-arm-free simultaneous OLIF51 and percutaneous pedicle screws (PPSs) in a single lateral position.

We introduce the case of a 75-year-old woman with symptomatic L5 spondylolisthesis (grade 2).

Subscription Required. Please recommend JoVE to your librarian.

Protocol

This study was approved by the ethics committee at Okayama Rosai Hospital (No. 201-3).

1. Patient examination

  1. History taking
    1. Evaluate a patient with a suspected herniated disc or stenosis by taking their history. Usually, the patient presents with a history of prodromal low back pain. The patient may correlate their symptoms with an episode of trauma.
    2. Ask the patient to describe the radiating leg pain, its location, and aggravating and relieving activities.
  2. Physical examination
    1. To determine the level of the affected nerve, look for signs of motor weakness or loss of sensation in the leg. Check the lumbar range of motion, the straight leg raise (SLR) test, deep tendon reflexes, and muscle weakness.
    2. Perform the Kemp test to check the location of the herniated discs. If the Kemp test yields a positive result, local pain suggests a facet pathology, while radiating pain into the leg is more suggestive of nerve root irritation, which frequently accompanies foraminal disc herniation or stenosis.
      NOTE: Usually, the SLR test is negative for patients with lumbar canal stenosis and positive for patients with lumbar disc herniation.

2. Evaluation of images

  1. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)
    1. Perform an MRI. This is the most accurate diagnostic modality for assessing lumbar disc herniation, showing the site of herniation and the nerve roots affected. The L5 nerve root can be compressed by fibrocartilage at the pars interarticularis of L5.
  2. Computed tomography (CT)
    1. Use CT to check whether the herniated disc is calcified and to rule out nerve compression by any osteophyte.
  3. CT-MRI fusion imaging
    1. Use the fusion image to evaluate the feasibility of performing OLIF51. The vascular window, made by the common iliac vessels at the L5-S1 disc level, is clearly visualized. A vascular window of less than 20 mm makes OLIF technically difficult (Figure 1).

Figure 1
Figure 1: Preoperative image. (A) Midsagittal reconstruction CT, (B) T2 weighted midsagittal image, (C) CT MRI fusion image. CT and MRI show grade 2 isthmic spondylolisthesis. The vascular window is 37 mm. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

3. Patient positioning and neuromonitoring

  1. Patient positioning
    1. Place the patient in a right lateral decubitus position on a carbon table. Use an O-arm to obtain 3D images of the lumbar spine of the patient (Figure 2).
    2. To protect the neurovascular structures, place an axillary roll underneath the patient's right axilla.
    3. Flex the hip and knee to 20° to relax the psoas muscle and the lumbar nerve. Secure the patient to the table with tape.
    4. Insert a percutaneous reference pin into the left sacroiliac joint.
    5. Obtain 3D images of the O-arm and transmit them to the navigation system.
  2. Neuromonitoring
    1. Whenever possible, neuromonitor the patient to prevent neurological complications (Figure 3).

Figure 2
Figure 2: Patient positioning. Right lateral decubitus position secured with tape. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 3
Figure 3: Neuromonitoring. Neuromonitoring is preferable for this technique. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

4. Intraoperative CT and spinal navigation

  1. Intraoperative CT
    1. Place a navigation reference frame (RF) percutaneously into the contralateral sacroiliac joint or L5 spinous process, and obtain intraoperative CT images (Figure 4).
  2. Navigation
    1. The navigation system is necessary for this technique. Transmit the CT 3D reconstructed images to the navigation system (Figure 5).

Figure 4
Figure 4: O-arm. One O-arm scan is just 23 s. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 5
Figure 5: Navigation system. Every instrument is navigated with this system. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

5. Navigated instrument registration

  1. Register every navigated instrument and perform an accuracy check.

6. Incision and muscle dissection

  1. Skin incision
    1. Mark the skin incision using a navigated pointer. Direct the entry point to the center and parallel to the L5-S1 disc space.
    2. Make a 4 cm long oblique incision on the skin, 4 cm medial to the anterior superior iliac spine and parallel to the pelvis (Figure 6).
  2. Muscle dissection
    1. Divide the abdominal muscles and dissect along the line of the skin incision. A monopolar cautery is contraindicated due to the risk of injury to the iliohypogastric and ilioinguinal nerves.
    2. With a retroperitoneal approach, use both index fingers to dissect the retroperitoneal space, following the internal abdominal wall posteriorly down to the psoas muscle, which can then be visualized (Figure 7).
      CAUTION: If the iliohypogastric nerve is injured, abdominal herniation may occur.

Figure 6
Figure 6: Skin incision. The skin is marked using a navigated pointer, which is directed to the center and parallel to the L5-S1 Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 7
Figure 7: Navigated pointer. The white arrow indicates a navigated pointer. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

7. Disc preparation and trialing

  1. Disc preparation
    1. After exposing the promontorium, identify the left common iliac vessels and retract laterally (upward) using a special self-retaining retractor under illumination. Take great care to preserve the left ureter. The L5/S1 intervertebral disc is exposed (Figure 8).
    2. Retract both common iliac vessels and the bifurcation with three self-retaining retractors. A blunt dissection of the adventitial layers on the L5/S1 disc is necessary to not injure the sympathetic chain. Retrograde ejaculation may occur in male patients if the sympathetic chain is injured.
    3. After the center of the disc is marked with a navigated pointer, incise the annulus with a knife, and perform a discectomy using Kerrison rongeurs, pituitary forceps, a navigated Cobb elevator, a navigated shaver (Figure 10), a navigated combo tool (periosteum elevator), and a navigated curved curette (Figure 11).
    4. Use the navigated curved curette to remove the posterior part of the disc.
      NOTE: Since all the instruments are navigated, the use of an intraoperative C-arm is not required.
  2. Trialing
    1. After disc preparation, sequentially distract the disc space using navigated trials. Determine the size of the cage on a preoperative lateral radiogram. For Asian patients, a disc height of 10-14 mm and an angulation of 12°-18° is advisable.
    2. At this step, perform intraoperative radiography to check the implant position and the size of the cage. If the cage protrudes beyond the disc space, choose another adequately sized cage (Figure 12).
      CAUTION: The surgeon should check the accuracy of the navigation system before using the navigation instruments, as the reference frame may sometimes be accidentally altered. Unlike the C-arm, the disc space in the navigation image does not open on insertion of a trial with an adequate height.

Figure 8
Figure 8: Approach to the promontorium. (A) Navigated pedicle probe, (B) navigation monitor. A navigated pedicle probe (white arrow) is used to check the L5-S1 disc level. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 9
Figure 9: Self-retaining retractors. These three retractors retract both common iliac vessels and the bifurcation. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 10
Figure 10: Navigated shaving. (A) Navigated shaver, (B) navigation monitor. Navigated shavers are from 6 mm to 12 mm. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 11
Figure 11: Navigated curved curette. (A) Navigated curved curette, (B) navigation monitor. A navigated curved curette is very useful to completely remove the posterior part of the disc. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 12
Figure 12: Trialing. After disc preparation, the disc space is sequentially distracted with navigated trials (white arrow). Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

8. Cage placement and screwing

  1. Cage placement
    1. Insert a mixture of autogenous bone and demineralized bone material into the cage hole. Confirm the angle of insertion for the cage with a navigation pointer to insert the OLIF51 cage accurately.
    2. Use a mallet to gently insert the OLIF51 cage. After the implant is positioned, take anteroposterior and lateral radiographs to confirm the position of the cage (Figure 13A).
  2. Screwing
    1. After cage insertion, insert one or two supplemental screws to prevent cage back-out (Figure 13B).

Figure 13
Figure 13: Cage placement and screwing. (A) OLIF51 cage at the L5-S1 disc, (B) cage with screw. A mixture of autogenous bone and demineralized bone material is inserted into the cage hole. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

9. Simultaneous percutaneous pedicle screw (PPS) fixation

  1. Have another surgeon insert the PPSs in the same lateral decubitus position of the patient under navigation guidance.
  2. Make the screw hole with a navigated high-speed burr, navigated pedicle probe, and navigated tap. Measure the length and diameter of the screws by navigation.
  3. Insert the S1 PPS in a transdiscal manner to enhance the screw pullout strength.
  4. Take radiograms after the insertion of the screws (Figure 14).

Figure 14
Figure 14: Simultaneous PPS fixation. PPSs are inserted in the same single lateral position by another surgeon under navigation guidance. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

10. Postoperative procedure

  1. Ambulate the patient 1 day after the surgery. The use of a soft brace is recommended for 3 months. Follow-up at 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months after the surgery to assess for solid bony fusion.

Subscription Required. Please recommend JoVE to your librarian.

Representative Results

Fourteen cases (average age: 71.5 years) were treated using this new technique. They were compared to 40 cases (average age: 74.0 years) of L5-S1 TLIF. L5-S1 lordosis angle and disc height were measured in both groups. The OLIF51 group obtained a better L5-S1 lordosis than the TLIF 51 group (Figure 15).

Figure 15
Figure 15: Radiological measurement. (A) Antero-inferior corner, (B): postero-inferior of the upper vertebra, (C) antero-superior corner, (D) postero-superior corner of the lower vertebra. Disc height = EF, segmental lordosis = angle AGC. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Preoperative L5/S1 angle Postoperative L5/S1 angle Preoperative L5/S1 disc height Postoperative L5/S1 disc height
OLIF 51 (N=14) 11.4+-4.1° 21.3+-3.3° 7.2 +-2.1mm 10.9+-1.8 mm
TLIF 51  (N=40) 10.1+-4.4° 12.1+-4.7° 8.6+-2.7 mm 9.4+-1.8 mm
not significant p<0.05 not significant p<0.05

Table 1: L5-S1 disc angle and height for OLIF51 versus TLIF51.

Subscription Required. Please recommend JoVE to your librarian.

Discussion

Recently, the lateral lumbar approach for interbody fusion has been gaining popularity due to its minimal invasiveness9. Among these approaches, the direct lateral psoas splitting approach has several disadvantages, such as lumbar nerve plexus injury and psoas muscle weakness10. To reduce these complications, prepsoas or OLIF was introduced by Davis et al. in 201411. However, it is difficult to operate at the L5-S1 disc due to its anatomical features. In 2017, a novel technique was devised to approach the L5-S1 disc in a lateral position (OLIF51), enabling interbody fusion from the lower thoracic spine to L5-S1 8. The advantages of OLIF51 are good anterior release, a greater bone graft, greater stability that is suitable for osteoporosis, and a high fusion rate12. The applicability of OILF51, however, is restricted due to the location of the blood vessels, which may restrict the access.

Strict criteria for patient selection and careful preoperative planning are necessary for this technique. This procedure is carried out with the patient in a lateral decubitus position, offering the advantage of inserting the PPSs in the same position, thus reducing both operating time and blood loss13. The conventional OLIF51 technique with PPS insertion entails radiation exposure. Occupational radiation exposure is one of the main issues of concern for minimally invasive spinal surgeons14. Repeated multiplanar images are necessary for accurate screw and cage insertion, increasing both radiation exposure and operating time. With O-arm guided navigation, the radiation exposure to the patient is reduced due to the use of low-resolution mode and the small FOV of the O-arm. The time required for an O-arm scan is less than 24 s, which is an equivalent dose to that of 90 s of fluoroscopy. This has been shown to eliminate the need for cumbersome lead protective gear, clear the surgical field of the C-arm, and reduce radiation exposure without compromising the accuracy15.

Another advantage of this technique is achieving OLIF from L1 to L5. Especially for adult spinal deformity, this technique is very useful because five level OLIF cages from the L1 to S1 level in a single lateral position can be inserted. Compared with the conventional technique, changing the patient position is not required for this technique, decreasing the surgical time and the total cost of the surgery. For future applications, robotic surgery can be combined with this novel technique.

The critical steps of our new technique are as follows. First, a preoperative evaluation of the location of common iliac vessels is done, and a vascular window less than 20 mm is a contraindication for OLIF51. CT-MRI fusion image is recommended for this purpose16. Second, the reference frame pin is firmly inserted into the left sacroiliac joint percutaneously17. If the reference frame is moved, the accuracy of this procedure decreases, risking screw or cage malpositioning. If any doubt exists regarding the navigation accuracy, an O-arm scan should be performed. Third, navigated instruments including a pointer, pedicle probe, shaver, Cobb elevator, curette, and trial should be used effectively. In particular, navigated curved curettes are useful for this C-arm-free procedure18. As an alternative, a C-arm technique is also available for this simultaneous method.

Certain limitations to this technique must be considered. Relatively expensive equipment (the O-arm and navigation system) is necessary, and there is a steep learning curve for this technique. A vascular window less than 20 mm poses a contraindication for this procedure. Further studies in the form of case series are required to further corroborate the effectiveness of this technique in managing isthmic spondylolisthesis.

C-arm-free OLIF51 and simultaneous percutaneous pedicle screw fixation are performed in a lateral position under navigation guidance. This novel technique reduces surgical time and radiation hazards to surgeons and operating staff.

Subscription Required. Please recommend JoVE to your librarian.

Disclosures

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by the Okayama Spine Group.

Materials

Name Company Catalog Number Comments
Adjustable hinged operating carbon table Mizuho OSI 6988A-PV-ACP OSI Axis Jackson table
CD Horizon Solera Voyager Medtronic 6.4317E+11 Percutaneous pedicle screw system
Navigated Cobb elevator Medtronic NAV2066
Navigated combo tool Medtronic NAV2068
Navigated curette Medtronic NAV2069
Navigated high speed bur Medtronic EM200N Stelth
Navigated passive pointer Medtronic 960-559
Navigated pedicle probe Medtronic 9734680
Navigated shaver Medtronic NAV2071
NIM Eclipse system Medtronic ECLC Neuromonitouring
O-arm Medtronic 224ABBZX00042000 Intraoperative CT
Radiolucent open spine cramp Medtronic 9731780
Self-retaining retractor Medtronic 29B2X10008MDT151
Sovereign Spinal System Medtronic 6.4317E+11 OLIF51 cage
Spine small passive frame Medtronic 9730605
Stealth station navigation system Spine 7R Medtronic 9733990 Navigation
U-NavLock Gray Medtronic 9734590
U-NavLock Green Medtronic 9734734
U-NavLock Orange Medtronic 9734683
U-NavLock Violet Medtronic 9734682

DOWNLOAD MATERIALS LIST

References

  1. Tawfik, S., Phan, K., Mobbs, R. J., Rao, P. J. The incidence of pars interarticularis defects in athletes. Global Spine Journal. 10 (1), 89-101 (2020).
  2. Sonne-Holm, S., Jacobsen, S., Rovsing, H. C., Monrad, H., Gebuhr, P. Lumbar spondylolysis: A life long dynamic condition? A cross sectional survey of 4.151 adults. European Spine Journal. 16 (6), 821-828 (2007).
  3. McAfee, P. C., et al. The indications for interbody fusion cages in the treatment of spondylolisthesis: Analysis of 120 cases. Spine. 30 (6), 60-65 (2005).
  4. Parajon, A., et al. Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: Meta-analysis of the fusion rates. What is the optimal graft material. Neurosurgery. 81 (6), 958-971 (2017).
  5. Lowe, T. G., Tahernia, A. D., O'Brien, M. F., Smith, D. A. Unilateral transforaminal posterior lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF): Indications, technique, and 2-year results. Journal of Spinal Disorders and Techniques. 15 (1), 31-38 (2002).
  6. Mayer, H. M. A new microsurgical technique for minimally invasive anterior lumbar interbody fusion. Spine. 22 (6), 691-699 (1997).
  7. Hodgson, A. R., Stock, F. E., Fang, H. S. Y., Ong, G. B. Anterior spinal fusion the operative approach and pathological findings in 412 patients with Pott's disease of the spine. The British Journal of Surgery. 48, 172-178 (1960).
  8. Woods, K., Billy, J. B., Hynes, R. Technical description of oblique lateral interbody fusion at L1-L5 (OLIF25) and at L5-S1 (OLIF51) and evaluation of complication and fusion rates. The Spine Journal. 17 (4), 545-553 (2017).
  9. Tan, Y., et al. Comparison of simultaneous single-position oblique lumbar interbody fusion and percutaneous pedicle screw fixation with posterior lumbar interbody fusion using O-arm navigated technique for lumbar degenerative diseases. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 10 (21), 4938 (2021).
  10. Phillips, F. M., et al. Adult degenerative scoliosis treated with XLIF: Clinical and radiographical results of a prospective multicenter study with 24-month follow-up. Spine. 38 (21), 1853-1861 (2013).
  11. Davis, T. T., et al. Retroperitoneal oblique corridor to the L2-S1 intervertebral discs in the lateral position: An anatomic study. Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine. 21 (5), 78 (2014).
  12. Houten, J. K., Alexandre, L. C., Nasser, R., Wollowick, A. L. Nerve injury during the transpsoas approach for lumbar fusion. Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine. 15 (3), 280-284 (2011).
  13. Tanaka, M., et al. C-arm free simultaneous OLIF51 and percutaneous pedicle screw fixation in a single lateral position: A technical note. Interdisciplinary Neurosurgery. 27, 101428 (2022).
  14. Hadelsberg, U. P., Harel, R. Hazards of ionizing radiation and its impact on spine surgery. World Neurosurgery. 92, 353-359 (2016).
  15. Kim, T. T., Drazin, D., Shweikeh, F., Pashman, R., Johnson, J. P. Clinical and radiographic outcomes of minimally invasive percutaneous pedicle screw placement with intraoperative CT (O-arm) image guidance navigation. Neurosurgical Focus. 36 (3), 1 (2014).
  16. Kakarla, U. K., Little, A. S., Chang, S. W., Sonntag, V. K., Theodore, N. Placement of percutaneous thoracic pedicle screws using neuronavigation. World Neurosurgery. 74 (6), 606-610 (2010).
  17. Nagamatsu, M., et al. Assessment of 3D lumbosacral vascular anatomy for OLIF51 by non-enhanced MRI and CT medical image fusion technique. Diagnostics. 11 (10), 1744 (2021).
  18. Tanaka, M., Fujiwara, Y., Uotani, K., Maste, P., Yamauchi, T. C-arm-free circumferential minimally invasive surgery for adult spinal deformity: Technical note. World Neurosurgery. 143, 235-246 (2020).

Tags

C-arm-Free Simultaneous OLIF51 Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Fixation Single Lateral Position Spondylosis Stress Fracture Young Population L5 Level Shearing Force Low Back Pain Leg Pain Numbness Conservative Treatment Surgical Treatment Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion TLIF Non-union Rate Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion ORIF Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion ALIF Interior Decompression Lumbar Stenosis Muscle Damage OLIF-51 Posterior Ligament Augmentation C-arm Free Technique Implanting Pedicle Screw Fixation 75 Year Old Woman
C-arm-Free Simultaneous OLIF51 and Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Fixation in a Single Lateral Position
Play Video
PDF DOI DOWNLOAD MATERIALS LIST

Cite this Article

Tanaka, M., Ruparel, S., Oda, Y.,More

Tanaka, M., Ruparel, S., Oda, Y., Fujiwara, Y., Shama, S., Uotani, K., Arataki, S., Yamauchi, T., Sake, N. C-arm-Free Simultaneous OLIF51 and Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Fixation in a Single Lateral Position. J. Vis. Exp. (187), e63572, doi:10.3791/63572 (2022).

Less
Copy Citation Download Citation Reprints and Permissions
View Video

Get cutting-edge science videos from JoVE sent straight to your inbox every month.

Waiting X
Simple Hit Counter