For those researchers who are not surgeons, unfamiliar with anatomy, or uncomfortable interpreting radiologic results, proper image analysis should be done by personnel with proper training. The success of an OLT in a mouse is demonstrated in the above protocol. Furthermore, to enhance study metrics and provide real-time feedback for the success of a transplant, as well as eliminate the need for necropsy, a microCT angiography scan can be used to provide accurate and clear images. Representative images are included in this manuscript (Figure 11). Representative images of in vivo failed anastomosis can be seen in Figure 12.
Those familiar with hepatic anatomy and vasculature can see patent venous anastomoses of the IVC. In some circumstances, the portal vein can be visualized as well, which is made easily in this model due to the portal vein cuff. The viewing of open anastomoses indicates the technical success of the operation. Additionally, 3D reconstruction of these images can provide additional information to researchers and a more detailed image of the vascular anatomy. Utilizing this above model, mortality in the OLT mice cohort is ~40-45%.

Figure 1: Overview of orthotopic liver transplant. (A) Graphical drawing depicting the four different anastomoses: i) suprahepatic IVC anastomosis, ii) infrahepatic IVC anastomosis, iii) portal vein anastomosis, iv) common bile duct anastomosis. Each arrow indicates a relative location for where the vessel or duct should be cut-supra-hepatic IVC (protocol step 2.13), infra-hepatic IVC (protocol step 2.11), portal vein (protocol step 2.10), and common bile duct (protocol step 2.7). (B) In vivo diagram of anastomoses. Scale bar = 2 mm. Abbreviation: IVC = inferior vena cava. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 2: Surgical tools used in surgery. (A) 45° fine forceps, (B-E) fine forceps, (F) curved needle holder/forceps, (G) straight forceps, (H) vascular clamp applier, (I) hemostat, (J) needle holder, (K) electro-cautery device, (L) #11 blade, (M) abdominal retractor, (N,O) micro-scissors, (P) fine scissors, (Q) surgical scissors, (R,S) Yasargil clamps, (T) bulldog vein clamp, (U) micro-vascular clamp. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 3: Portal vein cuff and bile duct stent. Ex vivo image of stents and cuffs prior to use. Scale bar = 3.5 mm. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 4: Common bile duct stenting during donor operation. (A) Bile duct stent being inserted into the common bile duct. (B) Bile duct stent secured within the bile duct. Scale bar = 2 mm. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 5: Placing portal vein cuff during back table preparation of the liver allograft. (A) Threading portal vein through the venous cuff. (B) Everted vein over the cuff. Scale bar = 2 mm. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 6: Portal vein anastomosis during recipient operation. (A) Inserting vein cuff into recipient portal vein. (B) Portal vein anastomosis secured with suture. Scale bar = 2 mm. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 7: Suprahepatic IVC anastomosis during recipient operation. (A) Posterior wall of the anastomosis is complete. (B) Completed SHIVC anastomosis. Scale bar = 2 mm. Abbreviations: IVC = inferior vena cava; SHIVC = suprahepatic IVC. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 8: Infrahepatic IVC anastomosis during recipient operation. (A) Posterior wall of the anastomosis is complete. (B) Completed IHIVC anastomosis. Scale bar = 2 mm. Abbreviations: IVC = inferior vena cava; IHIVC = infrahepatic IVC. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 9: Common bile duct anastomosis during recipient operation. (A) Placing bile duct stent within the recipient common bile duct. (B) Securing bile duct anastomosis. Scale bar = 1 mm. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 10: Mouse microCT angiography animal preparation. (A) Mouse tail vein injection to administer contrast. (B) Mouse being passed through microCT machine. Abbreviation: microCT = microcomputed tomography. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 11: Representative images showing microCT angiography of allograft patency. (A,B) Contrast can be seen throughout the IVC, demonstrating patency of the suprahepatic and infrahepatic anastomoses. (C) Contrast in the portal-vein, again demonstrating patency. (D) 3D reconstruction of the vasculature. Abbreviations: microCT = microcomputed tomography; IVC = inferior vena cava; PV = portal vein. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 12: Representative images showing failed in vivo anastomoses. (A) Failed portal vein anastomosis due to distortion of the vein resulting in lack of blood flow. (B) Failed suprahepatic IVC anastomosis due to excessive bleeding. Scale bar = 2 mm. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.