皮托静态管：测量气流速度的设备
English
Share
Overview
资料来源：郭大卫，工程、技术和航空学院（CETA），南新罕布什尔大学（SNHU），曼彻斯特，新罕布什尔州
皮托静态管广泛用于测量气流中的未知速度，例如，用于测量飞机空速。根据伯努利的原则，空速与压力的变化直接相关。因此，皮托静态管感应停滞压力和静态压力。它连接到压力计或压力传感器以获得压力读数，从而允许空速预测。
在这个实验中，利用风洞产生一定的气流，与皮托静态管预测进行比较。还研究了皮托-静态管由于与流动方向错位引起的灵敏度。本实验将演示如何使用皮托静态管测量气流速度。目标是根据获得的压力测量预测气流速度。
Principles
伯努利的原理指出，流体速度的增加与压力的降低同时发生，反之亦然。具体来说，如果流体的速度降至零，则流体的压力将增加到最大值。这称为停滞压力或总压力。伯努利方程的一种特殊形式如下：
停滞压力 = 静态压力 = 动态压力
其中停滞压力，Po，是流动速度降至零时的压力，静态压力Ps是周围流体对给定点施加的压力，而动态压力，Pd，也称为冲压压力，与给定点的流体密度、α 和流动速度V直接相关。 此方程仅适用于不可压缩的流量，如液体流量和低速气流（通常小于 100 m/s）。
从上述方程中，我们可以以压差和流体密度表示流量速度 V，如：
在18世纪，法国工程师亨利·皮托发明了皮托管[1]，在19世纪中叶，法国科学家亨利·达西将其修改为现代形式[2]。在20世纪初，德国空气动力学家路德维希·普朗特尔将静态压力测量和皮托管结合到皮托静态管中，今天被广泛应用。
图 1 显示了皮托静态管的示意图。管中有 2 个开口：一个开口直接面对流以感知停滞压力，另一个开口垂直于流量以测量静态压力。
图 1.皮托静态管的原理图。
需要压差来确定流量速度，流量通常由压力传感器测量。在本实验中，液体柱操纵计用于提供良好的视觉测量压力变化。压差确定如下：
其中 μh是压力计的高度差，μ L是压力计中液体的密度，g是重力引起的加速度。结合方程 2 和 3，流速通过以下公式预测：
Procedure
Results
Representative results are shown in Table 1 and Table 2. The results of the experiment are in good agreement with the actual wind speed. The Pitot-static tube accurately predicted the airspeed with a maximum percentage of error of approximately 4.2%. This can be attributed to errors in setting the wind tunnel airspeed, errors reading the manometer and instrument errors of the Pitot-static tube.
Table 1. Calculated airspeed and error based on manometer reading at various wind tunnel speeds.
| Wind tunnel airspeed (mph) | Manometer reading (in. water) | Calculated airspeed (mph) | Percent error (%) |
| 50 | 1.1 | 48.04 | -3.93 |
| 60 | 1.6 | 57.93 | -3.45 |
| 70 | 2.15 | 67.16 | -4.06 |
| 80 | 2.8 | 76.64 | -4.20 |
| 90 | 3.6 | 86.90 | -3.45 |
| 100 | 4.4 | 96.07 | -3.93 |
| 110 | 5.4 | 106.43 | -3.25 |
| 120 | 6.5 | 116.77 | -2.69 |
| 130 | 7.8 | 127.91 | -1.61 |
Table 2. Calculated airspeed and error based on manometer reading at various angles of attach.
| Pitot-Static Tube angle of attack (°) | Manometer readings (in water) | Calculated airspeed (mph) | Percent error (%) |
| 0 | 4.4 | 96.07 | 0.00 |
| 4 | 4.5 | 97.16 | 1.13 |
| 8 | 4.5 | 97.16 | 1.13 |
| 12 | 4.6 | 98.23 | 2.25 |
| 16 | 4.65 | 98.76 | 2.80 |
| 20 | 4.7 | 99.29 | 3.35 |
| 24 | 4.55 | 97.69 | 1.69 |
| 28 | 4.3 | 94.97 | -1.14 |
In Table 2, the percentage error is compared against the zero-angle case in Table 1. The results indicate that the Pitot-static tube is insensitive to misalignment with flow directions. The highest discrepancy occurred at an angle of attack of about 20°. A 3.35% error was obtained with respect to the zero angle reading. As the angle of attack increased, both the stagnation and static pressure measurements decreased. The two pressure readings tend to compensate each other so that the tube yields velocity readings that are accurate to 3 – 4% for angles of attack up to 30°. This is the chief advantage of the Prandtl design over other types of Pitot tubes.
Applications and Summary
Airspeed information is critical to aviation applications, such as for aircraft and drones. A Pitot-static tube is typically connected to a mechanical meter to show the airspeed at the front panel in the cockpit. For commercial aircraft, it is also connected to the onboard flight control system.
Errors in pitot-static system readings can be extremely dangerous. There are typically 1 or 2 redundant Pitot-static systems for commercial aircraft. To prevent ice buildup, the Pitot tube is heated during flight. Many commercial airline incidents and accidents have been traced to a failure of the Pitot-static system. For example, in 2008 Air Caraibes reported two incidents of Pitot tube icing malfunctions on its A330s [3].
In industry, the airspeed in duct and tubing can be measured with Pitot tubes where an anemometer or other flow meters would be difficult to install. The Pitot tube can be easily inserted through a small hole in the duct.
In this demonstration, the use of Pitot-static tubes was examined in a wind tunnel and the measurements were used to predict airspeed in the wind tunnel. The results predicted by the Pitot-static tube correlated well with the wind tunnel settings. The sensitivity of possible misalignment of the Pitot-static tube was also investigated and it was concluded that the Pitot-static tube is not particularly sensitive to misalignment up to and angle of attack of 28°.
References
- Pitot, Henri (1732). "Description d'une machine pour mesurer la vitesse des eaux courantes et le sillage des vaisseaux". Histoire de l'Académie royale des sciences avec les mémoires de mathématique et de physique tirés des registres de cette Académie: 363–376. Retrieved 2009-06-19.
- Darcy, Henry (1858). "Note relative à quelques modifications à introduire dans le tube de Pitot" (PDF). Annales des Ponts et Chaussées: 351–359. Retrieved 2009-07-31.
- Daly, Kieran (11 June 2009). "Air Caraibes Atlantique memo details pitot icing incidents". Flight International. Retrieved 19 February 2012.
Transcript
Unknown speeds in an airflow, for example, the air speed of an aircraft, are typically measured using a pitot-static tube. The pitot-static tube is based on Bernoulli’s principle, where the increase in speed of a fluid is directly related to pressure variations.
The fluid itself exerts pressure on the surroundings, called static pressure. If the speed of the fluid is zero, the static pressure is at its maximum. This pressure is defined as the stagnation pressure, or total pressure.
As the fluid speed increases, it exerts static pressure on the surroundings as well as forces due to the velocity and density of the fluid. These forces are measured as the dynamic pressure, which is directly related to the fluid density and fluid velocity.
According to Bernoulli’s principle, the stagnation pressure is equal to the sum of the static pressure and dynamic pressure. Thus, if we are interested in determining the fluid velocity, we can substitute the equation for dynamic pressure and solve for the velocity as shown. The difference between the stagnation pressure and the static pressure is called the pressure differential, delta P.
So how do we measure the stagnation and static pressures in order to determine delta P and therefore velocity? This is where the pitot-static tube comes in.
A pitot-static tube has two sets of openings. One opening is oriented directly into the airflow, while a second set of openings is perpendicular to the airflow. The opening facing the flow senses the stagnation pressure, and the openings perpendicular to the flow sense the static pressure. The pressure differential, delta P, is then measured using either a pressure transducer or a fluid manometer.
A fluid manometer is a U-shaped tube containing a liquid. At ambient pressure, where delta P equals zero, the fluid in the manometer is level at an initial height. When the manometer experiences a pressure differential, the manometer fluid height changes, and we can read the change in height as delta h.
We can then calculate the pressure differential, delta P, which is equal to the density of the liquid in the manometer, times gravitational acceleration, times delta h. Then, by substituting the calculated pressure differential into our earlier equation, we can calculate the fluid speed.
In this experiment, you will measure different wind speeds in a wind tunnel using a pitot-static tube and a fluid manometer. You will then calculate the percent error in the air speed measurements collected using a misaligned pitot-static tube.
For this experiment, you will need access to an aerodynamic wind tunnel with a test section of 1 ft by 1 ft and a maximum operating air speed of 140 mph. You will also need a pitot-static tube and a manometer filled with colored oil, but marked as water-inch graduations.
Begin by connecting the two leads of the pitot-static tube fitting to the tube ports of the manometer using soft tubing. Now, open the test section and insert the pitot-static tube into the front threaded fittings. Orient the pitot-static tube so that the sensing head is in the center of the test section, pointing upstream. Use a handheld inclinometer to measure the angle of attack, and adjust the pitot tube to reach an angle of zero.Then close the front and top of the test section.
Now, turn on the wind tunnel, set the velocity to 50 mph, and observe the height difference on the manometer. Record the height difference. Next, increase the wind speed to 60 mph and again record the height difference on the manometer.
Repeat this procedure, increasing the wind speed, in increments of 10 mph, until the wind speed reaches 130 mph. Record the height difference on the manometer for each wind speed. Then, stop the wind tunnel and open the test section.
Using the handheld inclinometer, adjust the angle of attack to positive 4°. Then, close the test section and run the wind tunnel at 100 mph. Record the manometer height difference in your notebook. Repeat this procedure for angles of attack up to 28° using 4° increments. Record the manometer height difference for each angle at 100 mph.
Now, let’s take a look at how to analyze the data. First, recall that the stagnation pressure, or the pressure with zero flow speed, is equal to the static pressure plus the dynamic pressure. The dynamic pressure is directly related to the fluid density and flow speed. We can rearrange the equation to express flow speed in terms of the pressure differential and the fluid density.
The pressure differential is measured using the manometer, where the pressure differential is equal to the density of the liquid times g times the height difference in the manometer. Thus, flow velocity is predicted by the equation shown.
The air density, water density, and gravitational acceleration are known. Using the manometer height difference for each wind tunnel air speed at zero angle of attack, calculate the air speed measured by the pitot-static tube. As you can see, the percent error is quite small, showing that the pitot-static tube can predict air speed accurately, with error introduced from wind tunnel air settings, manometer readings, and other instrument errors.
Now, calculate the air speed at various angles of attack when the wind tunnel was operated at 100 mph. As you can see, the calculated air speeds are quite close to what is expected.
The percent difference is calculated by comparing the calculated air speed to the air speed measured at zero angle of attack. All differences are below 4% for the angles measured, showing that the pitot-static tube is generally insensitive to misalignment with the flow direction.
In summary, we learned how pitot-static tubes use Bernoulli’s principle to determine the speed of a fluid. We then generated a range of air speeds in a wind tunnel and used a pitot-static tube to measure the different air speeds. This demonstrated the predictive sensitivity of the pitot-static tube.