A subscription to JoVE is required to view this content. Sign in or start your free trial.

Method Article

Measurement of Cellular Chemotaxis with ECIS/Taxis

14.6K views

DOI:

10.3791/3840

April 1st, 2012

In This Article

Summary

The ECIS/Taxis system is an automated, real-time assay that measures cellular chemotaxis. In this assay, cells move beneath a layer of agarose to arrive at a target electrode. Cellular movement is measured by the onset of resistance to AC current 0.

Abstract

Cellular movement in response to external stimuli is fundamental to many cellular processes including wound healing, inflammation and the response to infection. A common method to measure chemotaxis is the Boyden chamber assay, in which cells and chemoattractant are separated by a porous membrane. As cells migrate through the membrane toward the chemoattractant, they adhere to the underside of the membrane, or fall into the underlying media, and are subsequently stained and visually counted 1. In this method, cells are exposed to a steep and transient chemoattractant gradient, which is thought to be a poor representation of gradients found in tissues 2.

Another assay system, the under-agarose chemotaxis assay, 3, 4 measures cell movement across a solid substrate in a thin aqueous film that forms under the agarose layer. The gradient that develops in the agarose is shallow and is thought to be an appropriate representation of naturally occurring gradients. Chemotaxis can be evaluated by microscopic imaging of the distance traveled. Both the Boyden chamber assay and the under-agarose assay are usually configured as endpoint assays.

The automated ECIS/Taxis system combines the under-agarose approach with Electric Cell-substrate Impedance Sensing (ECIS) 5, 6. In this assay, target electrodes are located in each of 8 chambers. A large counter-electrode runs through each of the 8 chambers (Figure 2). Each chamber is filled with agarose and two small wells are the cut in the agarose on either side of the target electrode. One well is filled with the test cell population, while the other holds the sources of diffusing chemoattractant (Figure 3). Current passed through the system can be used to determine the change in resistance that occurs as cells pass over the target electrode. Cells on the target electrode increase the resistance of the system 6. In addition, rapid fluctuations in the resistance represent changes in the interactions of cells with the electrode surface and are indicative of ongoing cellular shape changes. The ECIS/Taxis system can measure movement of the cell population in real-time over extended periods of time, but is also sensitive enough to detect the arrival of a single cell at the target electrode.

Dictyostelium discoidium is known to migrate in the presence of a folate gradient 7, 8 and its chemotactic response can be accurately measured by ECIS/Taxis 9. Leukocyte chemotaxis, in response to SDF1α and to chemotaxis antagonists has also been measured with ECIS/Taxis 10, 11. An example of the leukocyte response to SDF1α is shown in Figure 1.

Protocol

1. ECIS/Taxis Electrode Preparation

  1. The gold surface of the ECIS/taxis electrode array (consisting of 8 chambers per slide) is first stabilized by pre-treatment with sterile 10 mM cysteine in deionized water (dH2O) for 15 min at room temperature under sterile conditions.
  2. Aspirate the cysteine solution from each electrode chamber, rinse 3 times with sterile dH2

Normalized resistance vs time graph; shows RPMI 1640 and SDF1a effects on cell behavior.

Microfluidic chip diagram; channels, inlets for lab-on-chip analysis, cell sorting, or diagnostics.

Chemotaxis diagram with cell migration, 2mm width, chemoattractant and cell wells, target electrode.

Drilling process for target electrode placement; diagram shows 4.08mm spacing for electrode setup.

Electrode design diagram with target electrode, gold dots for electrical conductivity analysis.

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Discussion

Novel characteristics of the ECIS/Taxis assay include its ability to automate the collection of real-time data as cells respond to chemoattractant. While the most commonplace application of this technology is to measure cellular responses to individual chemotactic gradients, or to gradients comprised of mixtures of chemotaxis agonists and antagonists, the ECIS/Taxis approach is also amenable to variations to these configurations that could be quite helpful in the assessment of cellular responsiveness. There is good evide...

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Disclosures

David A Knecht and Michael A Lynes have an issued patent for the ECIS/Taxis technology, which as been licensed by the University of Connecticut to Applied Biophysics, Inc.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by grants from the National Institutes of Health (ES07408 and EB00208).

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Materials

List of materials used in this article
NameCompanyCatalog NumberComments
ECIS ZθApplied Biophysicswww.biophysics.com/prodducts_Ecisz0.php
ECIS Electrode ArrayApplied Biophysics8W Chemotaxiswww.biophysics.com/cultureware.php
Seakem GTG agaroseBioWhittaker50070
RPMI1640Cellgro10-040
HyClone Fetal Bovine SerumThermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.SH300703
Penicillin/StreptomycinMP Biomedicals1670049Penicillin 5,000 IU/ml; Streptomycin 5 mg/ml
HEPES BufferMP Biomedicals16884491M solution, cell culture grade
14 Gauge stainless steel Cannula (2) 4 inchGeneral Supply5-8365-1Blunt point

References

  1. Boyden, S. The chemotactic effect of mixtures of antibody and antigen on polymorphonuclear leucocytes. J. Exp. Med. 115, 453-466 (1962).
  2. Lauffenburger, D. A., Tranquillo, R. T., Zigmond, S. H. Concentration gradients of chemotactic factors in chemotaxis assays. Methods Enzymol. 162, 85-101 (1988).
  3. Nelson, R. D., Quie, P. G., Simmons, R. L. Chemotaxis under agarose: a new and simple method for measuring chemotaxis and spontaneous migration of human polymorphonuclear leukocytes and monocytes. J. Immunol. 115, 1650-1650 (1975).
  4. Newton-Nash, D. K., Tonellato, P., Swiersz, M., Abramoff, P. Assessment of chemokinetic behavior of inflammatory lung macrophages in a linear under-agarose assay. J. Leukoc. Biol. 48, 297-305 (1990).
  5. Giaever, I., Keese, C. R. Monitoring fibroblast behavior in tissue culture with an applied electric field. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 81, 3761-374 (1984).
  6. Keese, C. G. I. A Whole Cell Biosensor bsed on Cell-Substrate Interactions. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. 12, 500-501 (1990).
  7. Laevsky, G., Knecht, D. A. Cross-linking of actin filaments by myosin II is a major contributor to cortical integrity and cell motility in restrictive environments. J. Cell. Sci. 116, 3761-3770 (2003).
  8. Condeelis, J., Bresnick, A., Demma, M., Dharmawardhane, S., Eddy, R., Hall, A. L., Sauterer, R., Warren, V. Mechanisms of amoeboid chemotaxis: an evaluation of the cortical expansion. 11, 5-6 (1990).
  9. Hadjout, N., Laevsky, G., Knecht, D. A., Lynes, M. A. Automated real-time measurement of chemotactic cell motility. Biotechniques. 31, 1130-1138 (2001).
  10. Hadjout, N., Yin, X., Knecht, D. A., Lynes, M. A. Automated real-time measurements of leukocyte chemotaxis. J. Immunol. Methods. 320, 70-80 (2007).
  11. Yin, X., Knecht, D. A., Lynes, M. A. Metallothionein mediates leukocyte chemotaxis. BMC Immunol. 6, 21-21 (2005).
  12. Lundien, M. C., Mohammed, K. A., Nasreen, N., Tepper, R. S., Hardwick, J. A., Sanders, K. L., Van Horn, R. D., Antony, V. B. Induction of MCP-1 expression in airway epithelial cells: role of CCR2 receptor in airway epithelial injury. J. Clin. Immunol. 22, 144-152 (2002).
  13. Zudaire, E., Cuesta, N., Murty, V. The aryl hydrocarbon receptor repressor is a putative tumor suppressor gene in multiple human cancers. J. Clin. Invest. 118, 640-650 (2008).
  14. Opp, D., Wafula, B., Lim, J., Huang, E., Lo, J. C., Lo, C. M. Use of electric cell-substrate impedance sensing to assess in vitro cytotoxicity. Biosens. Bioelectron. 24, 2625-269 (2009).
  15. Foxman, E. F., Kunkel, E. J., Butcher, E. C. Integrating conflicting chemotactic signals. The role of memory in leukocyte navigation. J. Cell. Biol. 147, 577-588 (1999).
  16. Heit, B., Tavener, S., Raharjo, E., Kubes, P. An intracellular signaling hierarchy determines direction of migration in opposing chemotactic gradients. J. Cell. Biol. 159, 91-102 (1999).

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Reprints and Permissions

Tags

ECIS/Taxis SystemElectric Cell-substrate Impedance SensingUnder-agarose AssayReal-time Chemotaxis MeasurementChemoattractant GradientTarget ElectrodeResistance FluctuationMicrotransient DetectionJCAT T Cells