In vitro culture systems have proven indispensible to our understanding of vertebrate myogenesis. However, much remains to be learned about nonmammalian skeletal muscle development and growth, particularly in basal taxa. An efficient and robust protocol for isolating the adult stem cells of this tissue, the myogenic precursor cells (MPCs), and maintaining their self-renewal, proliferation, and differentiation in a primary culture setting allows for the identification of conserved and divergent regulatory mechanisms throughout the vertebrate lineages.
Due to the inherent difficulty and time involved with studying the myogenic program in vivo, primary culture systems derived from the resident adult stem cells of skeletal muscle, the myogenic precursor cells (MPCs), have proven indispensible to our understanding of mammalian skeletal muscle development and growth. Particularly among the basal taxa of Vertebrata, however, data are limited describing the molecular mechanisms controlling the self-renewal, proliferation, and differentiation of MPCs. Of particular interest are potential mechanisms that underlie the ability of basal vertebrates to undergo considerable postlarval skeletal myofiber hyperplasia (i.e. teleost fish) and full regeneration following appendage loss (i.e. urodele amphibians). Additionally, the use of cultured myoblasts could aid in the understanding of regeneration and the recapitulation of the myogenic program and the differences between them. To this end, we describe in detail a robust and efficient protocol (and variations therein) for isolating and maintaining MPCs and their progeny, myoblasts and immature myotubes, in cell culture as a platform for understanding the evolution of the myogenic program, beginning with the more basal vertebrates. Capitalizing on the model organism status of the zebrafish (Danio rerio), we report on the application of this protocol to small fishes of the cyprinid clade Danioninae. In tandem, this protocol can be utilized to realize a broader comparative approach by isolating MPCs from the Mexican axolotl (Ambystomamexicanum) and even laboratory rodents. This protocol is now widely used in studying myogenesis in several fish species, including rainbow trout, salmon, and sea bream1-4.
Considerable understanding of mammalian myogenesis has been obtained through the recapitulation of this process in both primary mouse (Mus musculus) myoblast cultures and the well-described mouse-derived cell line, C2C125. Beginning in the 1950s6, these cultures have led to much advancement in the understanding of the murinemyogenic program and, by extension, myogenesis in other vertebrates. Additionally, single cell myofiber explant techniques have increased out understanding of interactions between satellite cells and surrounding myofibers7-9.Cell cultures are particularly attractive for investigations of myogenesis due to the short time from precursor to differentiated cell10, relative ease of transfection for RNAi11-14, transgenic15,16 and overexpression studies14,17,18 , in vitro expansion followed by in vivo transplantation18-20, and even comparison of myogenic precursor cells and their regulating agents across taxa21,22. While differences due to the artificial environment of the culture system have been described5,23 , these in vitro systems have proven to be indispensible to our dissection of the intricate program governing the formation of multinucleated, terminally differentiated myofibersfrom mononucleated proliferative progenitor cells known as myosatellite cells (MSCs) among the mammals.
Outside of the class Mammalia, however, the conservation and/or divergence of mechanisms controlling myogenesis are poorly understood, largely due to the difficulty in culturing myogenic precursor cells (MPCs) and myoblasts from various taxa. Indeed, primary myoblast cultures have only been described in three birds24-26, one reptile27, a few amphibians28-30, and some fishes1,3,4,31-33. Continuous myogenic cell lines from vertebrates other than rodents34-36are even more rare, with the only non-mammalian myogenic cell line being derived from Japanese quail (Cortunix japonica), QM737. Despite many attempts at immortalization, a teleost myogenic cell line remains elusive and a protocol for efficient transfection of these cells was only published this year15. Thus, clear and well-optimized protocols for culturing primary MPCs and myoblasts from a variety of vertebrates are very much needed to not only further expand our knowledge of the evolution of the myogenic program, but to employ the power of comparative physiology to make breakthroughs in the treatment of human skeletal muscle diseases and disorders.
While the literature contains many reports of MPC/myoblast isolation38-49, it is common for authors to describe the protocols for such isolations in brief, often incomplete, formats. Further, the most instructive protocols reported have been developed for mice50-53, and some of these rely on antibody selection54,55 or fluorescence transgenes56,57, making these protocols unusable or impractical inmost non-rodent species utilized by muscle biologists. With little known about piscine, amphibian, and reptile myogenesis, a detailed and thorough protocol, described with audiovisual guidance and with demonstrated efficiency in distantly related species, would be most helpful to the field.
First described by Powell and colleagues in 198958, the following protocol was initially developed to isolate MPCs and myoblasts from salmonid fishes (namely, rainbow trout, Oncorhynchus mykiss, and Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar) and some larger cyprinids (i.e. goldfish, Carassiusauratusauratus). In 2000, Fauconneau and Paboeuf optimized a primary myoblast culture for rainbow trout59, and minoroptimizations made that protocol utilizable in several smaller minnows of the Danioninae clade (zebrafish, Danio rerio, and giant danio, Devario aequipinnatus)32 due to the many genetic tools available for zebrafish work and thus its close relatives. Teleost fish are attractive organisms for study due to their divergent growth strategy (at least in most species). Large salmonids, like most fishes, grow indeterminately, with growth potential unfettered by an asymptote at maturity, even in old age60-62. Unlike zebrafish, large danionins such as the giant danio63 and moustached danio display growth potentials typical of teleost fish, making their direct juxtaposition an ideal platform for understanding whether MPC cell fate choice plays a role in skeletal muscle hyperplasia versus hypertrophy.
Likewise, we have demonstrated that this protocol can be used with mice and axolotls, with relatively high cell yield and viability indices. Urodele salamanders, such as the Mexican axolotl (Ambystomamexicanum),possess the remarkable ability to regenerate tissues, including entire limbs and tails64-66. This characteristic makes these amphibians interesting models of skeletal muscle wasting and aging. Using the protocol described below, a similar approach can be undertaken as has been done in many fish species, providing an even wider comparative context for such studies. As many truly comparative biologists appreciate, the most meaningful advances in basic biology and translational biomedicine can be made when data are analyzed within the widest spectrum (here, the entire vertebrate lineage).
Ethics Statement: All experimentation involving vertebrate animals described herein was approved in advance by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of the University of Alabama at Birmingham and is consistent with guidelines established by the Office of Laboratory Animal Welfare, National Institutes of Health of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
1. Preparation for Culture
2. Tissue Dissection
3. Mechanical Dissociation
4. Enzymatic Dissociation
5. Counting, Dilution, and Seeding of Cells
Twenty-four hours post-seeding, myogenic precursor cells (MPCs) should be visible attached to the laminin substratum (see Figures 1a and 1d). Following seeding, cells (MPCs) adopt a spindle-like shape, indicative of this cell type (Figure 1) and are MyoD1+ (Figure 2). In Danio species, MPCs appear to be more compact with smaller bipolar processes than do MPCs from Oncorhynchus and Salmo species. However, over four days of culture, MPCs from all piscine species examined adopt similar morphologies and look distinctly like myoblasts (Figures 1b and 1e). Complete media should be removed, and MPCs should be washed twice with wash medium. Myofibroblasts can contaminate myogenic cultures and are readily distinguishable from MPCs/myoblasts by their star-like morphology (versus the spindle shape of the myoblast). Washing of the plates greatly improves the removal of such fibroblasts.
In the species described here (see Table 7), daily media changes produce the best results. MPCs and progeny (myoblasts and nascent myotubes) should be washed once or twice prior to the addition of fresh complete media. Alternatively, media changes can be reduced to every other day after the cells have reached the definitive myoblast stage (approximately day 4 of culture). Myotubes should form within 2-3 days (Figures 1c and 1f) and be myogenin+ (Figure 2), especially when cultured in differentiation medium (see below). While periods of weeks to months have been reported in several mammalian species, piscine MPCs and myoblasts do not appear to tolerate such periods of time. Cells proliferate for the first six days of culture (Figure 3), with subsequent differentiation between days 7 and 9-11 of culture. Afterward, cells senescence or apoptose.
The myogenic nature of MPCs and their progeny isolated using this protocol has been determined3,32,33 based on gene expression. Unlike mammalian culture systems, proliferation of MPCs and myoblast progeny is relatively low during the initial days of culture (when compared to systems utilizing primary murine myoblasts or C2C12), with rapid increases detected as the cells form immature myotubes during days 6-9 of culture in Danio species32. Reports from rainbow trout have utilized a differentiation medium (common in mammalian myoblast cultures, but not required in piscine systems) and indicate that proliferation indices decrease as expected with myotube formation33. In our hands, the resultant myotubes can remain in culture for up to 9-11 days (Danio species) and 11-13 days (Oncorhynchus species) before cellular senescence or apoptosis occurs.
Reagent | Company (Preferred v. Alternate) | Catalog Number (Preferred v. Alternate) | Quantity per Culture |
γ-irradiated poly-L-lysine | Sigma-Aldrich (MP Biomedicals) | P5899 (ICN19454405) | 5 mg |
DMEM (high glucose) | Sigma-Aldrich (cellgro) | MT-50-003-PB (D7777) | 2 L |
Laminin | BD Biosciences (Sigma-Aldrich) | CB-40232 (L2020) | 1 mg |
Sodium Bicarbonate (NaHCO3) | Fisher Scientific (Sigma-Aldrich) | BP328-500 (S5761) | 1.51 g |
HEPES (C8H18N2O4S) | Fisher Scientific (Sigma-Aldrich) | BP310-1 (H6147) | 9.53 g |
Antibiotic/Antimycotic | Thermo Scientific (Sigma-Aldrich) | SV3007901 (A5955) | 17-20 ml |
Gentamicin Sulfate | Lonza (Sigma-Aldrich) | BW17-519Z (G1397) | 2-3 ml |
Donor Equine Sera | Thermo Scientific (Sigma-Aldrich) | SH3007403 (H1270) | 75 ml |
Fetal Bovine Sera | Thermo Scientific (Sigma-Aldrich) | SH3007103 (F2442) | 25 ml |
Collagenase (Type IV) | Worthington (Sigma-Aldrich) | LS004189 (C9891) | 0.44 g |
Trypsin (from Pancreas) | MP Biomedicals (Sigma-Aldrich) | ICN15357125 (T5266) | 1 g |
Table 1. Detailed reagent list with preferred manufacturer and catalog number.
Consumable | Tools | Equipment |
Cell Culture Plates | Forceps (Coarse) | Serological Pipettor |
Sterile 50 ml Conical Tubes | Forceps (Fine) | pH Meter |
Laboratory Tape | Scalpel Handles | Chilling Incubator (Echotherm) |
0.2 μm Vacuum Sterilization Systems | Scalpel Blades (#10, #11) | Laminar Flow Hood |
Water-repellant Autoclave Paper | Surgical Scissors | Vacuum Manifold |
Serological Pipettes | Glass Petri Dishes | Microosmolality Meter |
12-16 G Cannulas with Luer Locks |
Table 2. Consumables, tools, and equipment needed for cell culture.
Plate Size | cm2 per Well | Poly-L-lysine* | Laminin** |
6 well | 9.5 | 1.6 ml | 1 |
24 well | 1.9 | 0.32 | 0.2 |
48 well | 0.95 | 0.16 | 0.1 |
96 well | 0.32 | 0.06 | 0.03 |
*0.1 mg/ml concentration | ** 0.020 mg/ml concentration |
Table 3. Optimized volumes for coating cell culture plates with poly-L-lysine and laminin.
Reagent | Isolation | Wash | Dissociation | Complete |
Base Medium | 419.25 ml | 395.40 ml | 297.00 ml | 178.00 ml |
PSF* | 5.00 ml | 4.00 ml | 3.00 ml | 2.00 ml |
Gentamicin Sulfate** | 0.75 ml | 0.60 ml | – | – |
Donor Equine Serum | 75.00 ml | – | – | – |
Fetal Bovine Serum*** | – | – | – | 20.00 ml |
* PSF: penicillin/streptomycin/fungizone cocktail (100x); ** 50 mg/ml concentration; *** Characterized |
Table 4. Different media preparations for isolation and culture of myogenic precursor cells (MPCs).
Plate Size | cm2 per Well | Dilution | Plating Volume |
6 well | 9.5 | 1.5 – 2.0 x 106 cells/ml | 1 ml |
24 well | 1.9 | 1.5 – 2.0 x 106 cells/ml | 250 μl |
48 well | 0.95 | 1.5 – 2.0 x 106 cells/ml | 150 μl |
96 well | 0.32 | 1.5 – 2.0 x 106 cells/ml | 50-100 μl |
Table 5. Recommended dilutions and plating volumes by cell culture plate well size.
Species | Average # cells/g tissue |
Danio rerio | 6,400,000 |
Danio dangila | 1,783,000 |
Devario aequipinnatus | 1,797,000 |
Oncorhynchus mykiss | 66,800 |
Table 6. Average number of myogenic precursor cells isolated from 1 gram of muscle tissue from various teleost species: Danio rerio (zebrafish), Daniodangila (moustacheddanio), Devario aequipinnatus (giant danio), and Oncorhynchus mykiss (rainbow trout).
Species | Temperature |
Danio/ Devario spp. | 26 – 28 °C |
Oncorhynchus/Salmo spp. | 10* – 18 °C |
Ambystoma mexicanum | 18 °C |
* Lower temperatures support lower proliferation rates. |
Table 7. Recommended incubation temperatures for piscine and amphibian myogenic precursor cells (MPCs).
Figure 1. Representative bright field images of MPCs (leftmost), myoblasts (middle), and early myotubes (rightmost) from two species, rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss, top) and zebrafish (Danio rerio, bottom).
Figure 2. Representative immunocytochemical staining of MPCs (a, c) and myotubes (b, d) isolated and cultured from giant danio (Devario aequipinnatus, top) and rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss, bottom). In culture, myoblasts are MyoD1+ positive (a, c) as visualized using commercially available MyoD1+ antibodies (danio: C-20, Santa Cruz Biotechnology; trout: NB100-80899, Novus Biologicals). Additionally, as myoblasts differentiate, they express myogenin (b, d) as visualized using commercially available myogenin antibodies (danio: M-225; trout: SC-567; both from Santa Cruz Biotechnology).
Figure 3. Representative cell proliferation data using BrdU to measure cell proliferation rates over time in culture. Data obtained from MPCs isolated and cultured from giant danio67.
The myogenic program, in whichever species examined, can be most easily studied through an in vitro system. Indeed, upon isolation, myogenic precursor cells (MPCs) in fish or myosatellite cells (MSCs) in mammals readily enter this highly regulated process involving the proliferation, cell cycle withdrawal, and terminal differentiation of myoblasts and the fusion of those myoblasts into nascent myotubes. The general lack of transgenic gene reporter strains of piscine species (with the possible exception of the zebrafish67 and rainbow trout69) constrainsin vivo work of MPC/MSC activation, proliferation, and differentiation, and thus the in vitro system presented here is an attractive platform for studies in fish species.
Successful culture of MPC/MSCs, no matter the species, is highly dependent on a) rigorous attention to sterility; b) thorough mechanical dissociation of skeletal muscle tissue; and c) optimization of enzymatic digestion. During the initial steps of muscle tissue isolation, great care must be taken to ensure that the necessary quantity of tissue is excised without contamination. It is of utmost importance that fish (or any animals being utilized, for that matter) are properly disinfected in 70% ethanol and for sufficient time. In our hands, 30 seconds works best; shorter periods of time can result in contamination and longer, loss of tissue integrity and cell viability. Ethanol can be used as a fixative, so care must be taken not to dehydrate the fish before dissection. Dissection can be done outside of a laminar flow cell culture hood; however, we recommend that this process be done within a hood to minimize any potential bacterial or fungal contamination.
While the mechanical dissociation described above may seem crude and/or tedious at first, it is critical to the isolation procedure. Two large scalpel blades, pulled past each other in a sliding motion (as shown in the video protocol), produces the best results. Once finished, the consistency of the homogenate should be that of a slurry or purée, and easily collected with a wide-bore serological pipette (i.e. 25 ml). Simply, the better the mechanical dissociation, the higher the MPC/MSC yield and the better the resulting culture. Poor dissociation will hinder enzymatic digestion and decrease cell yield. Although it may be tempting to consider, the use of electric tissue homogenizers dramatically lowers cell viability despite its obvious convenience, at least with piscine MPCs.
As with all protocols, optimization of the procedure detailed above is often necessary. This has proven true in our work with several danionin species. Results from our laboratory indicate that smaller danionins (e.g. the zebrafish) yield more MPCs per gram of skeletal muscle than do larger species (e.g. giant or moustached danio). However, this is only realized if a higher concentration of collagenase (0.3%) is used with tissue from smaller species. In our hands, a concentration of 0.2% is appropriate for salmonid species (e.g. rainbow trout; cutthroat trout [Oncorhynchusclarki], Chinook salmon [Oncorhynchustschawytscha]), the larger danionins, axolotl (Ambystomamexicanum) limb and tail, and even mouse skeletal muscle. Likewise, care must be taken to select the appropriate collagenase. In our experience, type IV collagenase preserves cell viability far better than collagenases recommended for fibrous tissues such as bone and muscle (i.e. collagenase type II)70. While digestion may be more complete in a shorter time period, cell membrane receptor integrity is likely compromised by increased tryptic activity in these preparations. With respect to trypsin, our laboratory has always utilized the cruder trypsin preparation purified from porcine pancreas, rather than the ‘purer’ preparations available. In our culture activities with various species, we have noticed little beneficial effect of varying trypsin concentrations.
Trituration is critical to this protocol. It both dissociates the fibrous matrix of skeletal muscle and increases surface area for tryptic digestion all the while manually disrupting the structural integrity of the myofibers. When performing the triturations, successively using smaller bore pipettes and cannulas is much easier than using the cannula and syringe straightaway. Proceeding directly to triturations with a cannula and syringe can result in plugged cannulas and/or excessive pressure being applied to cells. Applying tryptic digestion without adequate trituration will dramatically reduce cell yields.
Once isolated, the culture process is quite straightforward. Most publications to date have utilized a protocol with one media for both proliferation and differentiation33,71-75, including our own; however, more recent articles written by several French investigators have described a two media protocol, with separate based media and serum content for proliferation and differentiation33. This ‘newer’ protocol more closely mimics those used in the culture of murine MSCs and myoblastsand appears to enhance proliferation of early stage myoblasts33 and may be more appropriate to control proliferation and/or differentiation of cells. However, without extensive characterization of gene expression, it is difficult to conclude whether such a ‘proliferation’ media also conserves a more ‘myoblast-like’ state than does the traditional one media methodology. Previous publications describing gene expression, whether at the transcript or protein level, reported using the traditional one media protocol3. Alternatively, a single media (DMEM described herein) can be supplemented with differing concentrations of fetal bovine serum (FBS): 10% for proliferation and 2% for differentiation.
While investigators employing mammalian cell culture systems may be acclimated to using carbon dioxide atmospheres for the cultivation of these cells, the intrinsic differences between terrestrial and aquatic gas exchange call for a different approach when culturing piscine or water-confined urodele cells, including MPCs. Media detailed here are buffered with a piperazine-derived, zwitterionic organic compound [HEPES: 4-(2-Hydroxyethyl)piperazine-1-ethanesulfonic acid] and sodium bicarbonate (NaHCO3). Thus, an incubator with gas injection is not needed or required for culture of these cells. More importantly, such incubators should possess the ability to cool rather than heat, as the temperatures needed to culture piscine and urodele MPCs range between 18-26 °C. Further, salmonid MPCs can be cultured at lower temperatures if needed, further highlighting the need for a cooling incubator. Additionally, we have found (as have other investigators, as communicated previously) that sealing of culture plates is necessary to preserve cellular viability. Simply wrapping the interface between the culture lid and plate with standard laboratory tape is sufficient to realize this goal.
While passaging of both primary MPCs/MSCs/myoblasts is common in mammalian cell culture, it does not appear to be possible with piscine cells, at least before the late Mb stage (around day 6 of culture). Therefore, the appropriate number of cells sufficient to support proliferation and to reach the goals of the experiment must be seeded at the initiation of the culture. Further, if less than expected cell yields are obtained, it is not possible to propagate cells and then replate the progeny later. We have attributed this characteristic to the increased reliance on the extracellular matrix (ECM) of piscine MPC/myoblasts. Alternatively, it is possible that this is an artifact of the laminin substrate and thus further empirical determination of ECM components necessary for piscine MPC/Mb proliferation and differentiation is warranted. We do note, however, that several of our collaborators have successfully removed late-stage myoblasts (~ day 6 of culture) from the culture substratum and replated these cells (J. M. Froehlich and P. R. Biga, personal communication).
Using this protocol or one similar to it, experimentation involving RT-PCR3,71-74,76-78, Western blot32,79-81, immunocytochemistry32,33, proliferation assays32,33,59, gene transfection15, morphometric analysis78, toxicology screening82, and chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP; J. M. Froehlich and P. R. Biga, unpublished results) has been done. However, further descriptions of additional in vitro protocols, namely those involving passaging and clonal propagation, are very much needed. Indeed, the Rodgers laboratory15 made significant advancements in the culture of piscine MPCs/myoblasts by optimizing a protocol for inducing transfection of rainbow trout myoblasts. Based on this methodology, further investigations involving RNAi or overexpression of skeletal muscle-specific targets, especially those postulated to be involved with the lifelong growth trajectories of teleost fishes, are not only possible, but may lead to significant advancements in the aquaculture and biomedical fields of science.
The authors have nothing to disclose.
The authors would like to extend many thanks to Drs. Josep Planas and Juan Castillo for their professional expertise in the development and application of this culture protocol to small fishes and amphibians. Thanks are also due to the countless individuals who have tirelessly assisted with the dissection and dissociation of muscle tissue from many fish (both in species and number), including Matthew Charging, Delci Christensen, Zachary Fowler, Brooke Franzen, Nathan Froehlich, Kira Marshall, Ben Meyer, Ethan Remily, and Sinibaldo Romero. This work was supported by University of Alabama at Birmingham Department of Biology start-up funds, Center for Protease Research NIH Grant # 2P20 RR015566, NIH NIAMS Grant # R03AR055350, and NDSU Advance FORWARD NSF Grant #HRD-0811239 to PRB. Support was also provided by the UAB Nutrition Obesity Research Center award # P30DK056336, NIH NIDDK. Its contents are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of the NIH.
Table 1. Detailed Reagent Information | ||||
Reagent | Company (Preferred v. Alternate) | Catalog Number (Preferred v. Alternate) | Quantity per Culture | |
γ-irradiated poly-L-lysine | Sigma-Aldrich (MP Biomedicals) | P5899 (ICN19454405) | 5 mg | |
DMEM (high glucose) | Sigma-Aldrich (cellgro) | MT-50-003-PB (D7777) | 2 L | |
Laminin | BD Biosciences (Sigma-Aldrich) | CB-40232 (L2020) | 1 mg | |
Sodium Bicarbonate (NaHCO3) | Fisher Scientific (Sigma-Aldrich) | BP328-500 (S5761) | 1.51 g | |
HEPES (C8H18N2O4S) | Fisher Scientific (Sigma-Aldrich) | BP310-1 (H6147) | 9.53 g | |
Antibiotic/Antimycotic | Thermo Scientific (Sigma-Aldrich) | SV3007901 (A5955) | 17-20 mL | |
Gentamicin Sulfate | Lonza (Sigma-Aldrich) | BW17-519Z (G1397) | 2-3 mL | |
Donor Equine Sera | Thermo Scientific (Sigma-Aldrich) | SH3007403 (H1270) | 75 mL | |
Fetal Bovine Sera | Thermo Scientific (Sigma-Aldrich) | SH3007103 (F2442) | 25 mL | |
Collagenase (Type IV) | Worthington (Sigma-Aldrich) | LS004189 (C9891) | 0.44 g | |
Trypsin (from Pancreas) | MP Biomedicals (Sigma-Aldrich) | ICN15357125 (T5266) | 1 g | |
Table 2. Consumables, Tools and Equipment | ||||
Consumable | Tools | Equipment | ||
Cell Culture Plates | Forceps (Coarse) | Serological Pipettor | ||
Sterile 50 mL Conical Tubes | Forceps (Fine) | pH Meter | ||
Laboratory Tape | Scalpel Handles | Chilling Incubator (Echotherm) | ||
0.2 μm Vacuum Sterilization Systems | Scalpel Blades (#10, #11) | Laminar Flow Hood | ||
Water-repellant Autoclave Paper | Surgical Scissors | Vacuum Manifold | ||
Serological Pipettes | Glass Petri Dishes | Microosmolality Meter | ||
12-16 G Cannulas with Luer Locks | ||||
Table 3. Optimized Volumes for Coating Cell Culture Plates | ||||
Plate Size | cm^2 per Well | Poly-L-lysine* | Laminin** | |
6 well | 9.5 | 1.6 mL | 1 | |
24 well | 1.9 | 0.32 | 0.2 | |
48 well | 0.95 | 0.16 | 0.1 | |
96 well | 0.32 | 0.06 | 0.03 | |
*0.1 mg/mL concentration | ** 0.020 mg/mL concentration | |||
Table 4. Media for Isolation, Dissociation, and Culture | ||||
Reagent | Isolation | Wash | Dissociation | Complete |
Base Medium | 419.25 mL | 395.40 mL | 297.00 mL | 178.00 mL |
PSF* | 5.00 mL | 4.00 mL | 3.00 mL | 2.00 mL |
Gentamicin Sulfate** | 0.75 mL | 0.60 mL | – | – |
Donor Equine Serum | 75.00 mL | – | – | – |
Fetal Bovine Serum*** | – | – | – | 20.00 mL |
* PSF: penicillin/streptomycin/fungizone cocktail (100x); ** 50 mg/mL concentration; *** Characterized | ||||
Table 5. Recommended Dilutions and Plating Volumes | ||||
Plate Size | cm^2 per Well | Dilution | Plating Volume | |
6 well | 9.5 | 1.5-2.0×10^6 cells/mL | 1 mL | |
24 well | 1.9 | 1.5-2.0×10^6 cells/mL | 250 μL | |
48 well | 0.95 | 1.5-2.0×10^6 cells/mL | 150 μL | |
96 well | 0.32 | 1.5-2.0×10^6 cells/mL | 50-100 μL | |
Table 6. Average number of cells per g tissue | ||||
Species | Average # cells/g tissue | |||
Danio rerio | 6,400,000 | |||
Danio dangila | 1,783,000 | |||
Devario aequipinnatus | 1,797,000 | |||
Oncorhynchus mykiss | 66,800 | |||
Table 7. Recommended Incubation Temperatures | ||||
Species | Temperature | |||
Danio/ Devario spp. | 26 – 28 °C | |||
Oncorhynchus/Salmo spp. | 10* – 18 °C | |||
Ambystoma mexicanum | 18°C | |||
* Lower temperatures support lower proliferation rates. |