$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$
$$\longleftharp{xx}$$,
$$\longrightharp{xx}$$,
Our knowledge of cell ultrastructure comes mainly from electron microscopy, which can resolve details in the range of a few nanometers 1. Despite being so powerful in resolution TEM is not considered user-friendly, as sample preparation requires time-consuming and laborious protocols, and demands some expertise from the practitioner. Traditional fixation of samples has combined the use of aldehydes and osmium tetroxide before further processing that includes dehydration, embedding in resin and then sectioning to produce ultra-thin sections that are then stained with heavy metals. However, it is known that chemical fixation can produce artifacts including protein aggregation and loss of lipids 1, and changes to membranes that ultimately affect several cellular compartments 2. These artifacts are largely attributed to the slow rate of fixation and dehydration at room temperature 3,4,5.
Cryofixation by high pressure freezing (HPF) avoids most of the artifacts caused by chemical fixation. The principle of cryofixation is that it lowers the freezing point of water by 20 degrees, slows down the nucleation and growth of ice crystals and increases the viscosity of water in a biological sample so that cellular constituents are essentially immobilized 6, 7. HPF decreases a sample’s temperature to that of liquid nitrogen, under very high pressure (210 MPa or 2,100 bar) in milliseconds. When done properly HPF prevents formation of large ice crystals that can cause major damage to cell ultrastructure. HPF can be used to fix samples of 100-200 μm thickness at typical concentrations of biological solutes 7. There are numerous reviews on the physics and principles underlying HPF, e.g.1,7,8.
After HPF, samples are incubated at low temperature (-78.5 °C to -90 °C) in the presence of liquid organic solvent containing chemical fixatives like osmium tetroxide, generally for a few days. At this low temperature, the water in the sample is replaced by the organic solvent, typically acetone or methanol 1,9. Thus, this process is called freeze substitution (FS). The sample is then gradually warmed and during this time is fixed, usually with osmium tetroxide and uranyl acetate 9. Crosslinking at low temperatures has the advantage of fixing molecules that are immobilized 1. FS therefore produces samples of superior quality compared to those fixed by conventional chemical fixation at room temperature, in particular it results in improved ultrastructural preservation, better preservation of antigenicity and reduced loss of unbound cellular components 10,11.
Most FS is carried out over long time periods, typically up to several days. This is particularly true for plants samples 12,13,14. A recent protocol developed by McDonald and Webb greatly reduces the time for FS from several days to a few hours 15. In their quick freeze substitution (QFS) procedure, FS is carried out over 3 hours, while in the super quick FS (SQFS) samples are processed in 90 minutes. The quality of samples produced by these methods is comparable to those yielded by traditional FS protocols. We have adopted the QFS protocol for downstream processing of plant samples after HPF. This has proven to save not only time but also money, as QFS and SQFS use common lab equipment instead of the costly commercially available FS machines.
Plant tissues are often very challenging to prepare for TEM. On average, plant cells are bigger than either bacterial or animal cells. The presence of hydrophobic waxy cuticle, thick cell walls, large water-filled vacuoles containing organic acids, hydrolases and phenolic compounds that may occupy up to 90% of the total cell volume 16, and the presence of aerated spaces severely decreases heat conductivity of the system 17. Further, in the case of plants, the sample thickness almost always exceeds 20 μm, the limit for use of chemical fixation. At these thicknesses, the low heat conductivity of water prevents a freezing rate more than –10,000 °C/sec in the center of the sample. That rate is required to avoid damaging hexagonal ice formation (ice crystals with a lower density and bigger than 10 to 15 nm) 8. Together, these present challenges to both proper freezing of the sample and subsequent FS. Nonetheless, cryofixation is the best method for fixing plant samples. Here a protocol for HPF-QFS of plant tissue samples is presented. It focuses on the model species Arabidopsis thaliana, but has also been used with Nicotiana benthamiana. The typical results demonstrate that HPF-QFS produces samples of comparable quality to traditional HPF-FS in a fraction of the time. With proper adjustments, this protocol may also be used for other relatively thick biological samples.