$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$
$$\longleftharp{xx}$$,
$$\longrightharp{xx}$$,
The term “sick sinus syndrome” summarizes multiple diseases leading to the deterioration of the cardiac pacemaker system. It comprises pathological, symptomatic sinus bradycardia, sinoatrial block, sinus arrest as well as the tachycardia-bradycardia syndrome. Thereby, a “sick sinus syndrome” is often accompanied by general cardiac diseases such as an ischemic heart disease, cardiomyopathies or myocarditis. At present, therapeutic approaches are based on the implantation of electrical pacemakers. However, this goes along with a number of risks such as infections and battery failure. Overall, the incidence of complications is still very high in patients having implanted an artificial pacemaker. Furthermore, as opposed to the endogenous pacemaker, these devices do not respond to hormone stimulation.
A future alternative may rely on the availability of “biological pacemakers” for which PSCs could serve as a suitable cellular source and which would also be highly valuable for in vitro drug testing. Yet, a major problem lies in the very rare appearance of sinus nodal cells within embryoid bodies (EBs) - this typically does not exceed ~0.5%1.
Previously, it was shown that “forward programming” towards specific cardiomyocyte subtypes is feasible via overexpression of distinct early cardiovascular transcription factors such as Mesoderm-specific-posterior 1 (MesP1) and NK2 transcription factor related, locus 5 (Nkx2.5)2,3. For normal size and function of the sinoatrial node (SAN), the T-box transcription factor Tbx3 is crucial, which has been shown to initiate the pacemaker gene program and to control differentiation of the SAN4. While this enhanced the appearance of functional pacemaker cells, the content still did not exceed ~40% within the entire cardiomyocytic cell population.
Therefore, an additional Myh6-promoter based antibiotic selection step5 was introduced by us. This ultimately leads to yet unobserved cardiomyocyte aggregates (“induced sino-atrial bodies; “iSABs”) which exhibit highly increased beating frequencies (>400 bpm) in vitro, for the first time approximating those of a murine heart and comparable to in vitro cultivated sinus nodal cells isolated from a murine heart6. Under Isoprenaline administration even beating frequencies of 550 bpm are achieved. Notably, iSABs consist of over 80% functional nodal cells as evident from extensive physiological analyses7. Recently, several approaches to generate sinus nodal cells using direct reprogramming19, surface markers14 or pharmacological treatment with small molecules16,17 were described. Yet, none of these methods led to such a high purity of pacemaker cells and beating frequencies close to the murine heart as observed in iSABs.
Moreover, in an ex vivo model of cultivated adult mouse ventricular slices which have lost their spontaneous beating activity, the iSABs are capable of integrating into the slice tissue, thereby remaining spontaneously active and robustly pacing the heart slices to contractions7. A detailed protocol for the generation of these iSABs is described in this paper.