There are a multitude of techniques that have been developed to measure lipid levels8-10. However, each of these methods comes with some major drawbacks that are addressed by the buoyancy-based assay outlined above. First, this assay is extremely quick. Testing a full concentration gradient takes no more than 30 - 60 min. This is a huge improvement on most of the techniques currently in use. For example, lipid quantitation by MS takes 7 - 9 hr to isolate the lipids and another several hours to analyze them. This is a strong deterrent when performing a screen on a large number of animals. By measuring a quick buoyancy phenotype, one can quickly focus on the genotypes that have the phenotype of interest. Second, the density assay requires only common reagents such as salts (for PBS) and sucrose. This makes it much easier and cheaper to screen a large number of larvae or quickly test an interesting genotype. Finally, this protocol is non-invasive and the larvae are still alive at the end. This allows further experimentation to be performed on the animals such as specific lipid quantitation or transcript or protein analysis. Additionally, recovered larvae may be allowed to continue growth to adulthood.
An additional benefit of this technique over others is increased sensitivity to small changes in fat levels in a population. By performing a whole concentration gradient on a population of 50 larvae, slight shifts in the population fat levels will be identified by a change in the intermediate concentrations, although the concentration at which the larvae begin floating and are totally floated may not be different than controls. This small shift in the population may not always be identified by other fat quantitation methods as they require a large group of larvae to analyze. The density assay on the other hand interrogates individuals within the population and can consequently identify these small changes or shifts in the overall population distribution.
As this technique relies on the density of the solution to produce reliable results, it is extremely important that the PBS and sucrose solutions are made consistently. We have found that different PBS recipes produce differences in solution density, leading to varying results. We use the recipe outlined above for consistent results. Furthermore, making the 20% sucrose from the same batch of 1x PBS is important as it results in the same background solution density. If the two solutions were made separately, slight variations in the PBS density could bring in additional density variable beyond the addition of sucrose to the experimental conical vial. Lastly, evaporation can be a problem, because over time the solutions will become more concentrated with the evaporation of water. It is therefore important to cap the bottles tightly and to remake the solution every week so that the experimental solutions remain consistent.
Among the steps outlined above, there are several critical steps that if altered, could result in inaccurate results by the buoyancy assay. First, it is important that the larvae transferred into the experimental food vial be the same age. Transferring larvae that vary in size will result in larvae at different developmental stages at the time the buoyancy assay is performed. This protocol has been developed to determine changes in fat levels in wandering L3 larvae and will not work accurately for early L3 or pre-pupae or later. Early third instar larvae have a tendency to float independently of fat levels while pre-pupae and pupae sink even at the highest concentrations used. For this reason, the age of the L1 larvae transferred is critical. Similarly, the point at which the vial is taken to perform the buoyancy assay is important. For the same developmental timing reasons stated above, the vials should be taken only when 20 - 40 larvae are wandering to ensure accurate density measurements. Additionally, the number of L1 transferred can affect results as well. The wide vials used in this protocol allow 50 larvae to eat without competition during development. A much larger number of larvae transferred than this will result in competition for food and may affect the amount of fat stored independent of genotype.
There may be genotypes with such extremely high fat levels that most or all of the larvae will float at the first concentration. In this case, the protocol may be modified by decreasing the concentration of the starting solution in order to obtain a full spectrum of the population density distribution. On the other hand, a specific genotype may be so lean that no larva floats in the initial sucrose. In this case, the initial steps may be omitted and a higher starting concentration used. This assay is very flexible and can be modified to better fit a wide range of fat levels. We advise the use of controls such as appropriate wild type animals (controlled for genetic background), positive controls (established fat mutants, such as adp or Sir217), and negative controls (published lean mutants such as lsd219). Appropriate use of this protocol will allow future screening of collections to determine new regulators of metabolism and obesity predisposition. Furthermore, this protocol provides an easy way for researchers in any field to test whether their genetic manipulation of interest causes a change in fat levels, without the need for complex protocols or expensive equipment. This protocol will help to elucidate the complex relationship between genetics and obesity.