Here, we present partial bile duct ligation as a surgical model of liver injury and regeneration in rodents.
Method Article
Here, we present partial bile duct ligation as a surgical model of liver injury and regeneration in rodents.
In rodents, complete bile duct ligation (cBDL) of the common bile duct is an established surgical technique for studying obstructive cholestasis and bile duct proliferation. However, long-term experiments can lead to increased morbidity and mortality. In select mouse strains with underlying liver disease, meaningful comparisons can be made even with ligation of a single lobe of the liver, which can reduce animal losses and expenses. Here, we describe partial bile duct ligation (pBDL) in the mouse, in which only the left hepatic bile duct is ligated, causing biliary obstruction in the left lobe but not the remaining lobes. With careful microsurgical technique, pBDL experiments can be cost-effective, since the unligated lobe serves as an internal control to the ligated lobes, when subjected to the same conditions in the same animal. Unlike cBDL, a separate sham-operated control group is not necessary. pBDL is highly useful to directly compare localized versus systemic effects of cholestasis and other retained bile components. pBDL can also be repurposed as a novel method to investigate mechanisms related to medications and cell migration.
Surgical models of acute liver injury and repair, such as partial hepatectomy or common bile duct ligation (cBDL), have been used for decades in rodents to study liver regeneration and pathobiology1,2. In cBDL, the common bile duct (which drains all bile produced in the liver) is ligated, resulting in obstructive cholestasis, inflammation, and fibrosis in the first 2-3 weeks following surgery, with eventual progression to cirrhosis3. Bile duct proliferation, transdifferentiation, and induction of resident liver progenitor cells are also features of cBDL4,5. Although cBDL elucidates specific mechanisms of obstructive cholangiopathy, which are well-characterized with reproducible outcomes in wild-type mice and in those strains with normal livers6,7,8, the procedure can be technically demanding in some transgenic mouse models of liver diseases, requiring more animals than anticipated due to the higher morbidity and mortality of biliary obstruction over time. This technique is also beneficial for studying transgenic mice with underlying liver disease, which might not otherwise tolerate the stress of prolonged time course experiments following cBDL.
pBDL can provide a reasonable alternative to help overcome some of these challenges. Initial pBDL studies in wild-type mice aimed to distinguish locally acting and systemic mediators of inflammation9. In pBDL, the main biliary confluence of the right and left hepatic bile ducts above the common bile duct is carefully visualized at the hilum, and only the left hepatic bile duct is ligated to generate a localized obstructive cholestasis. pBDL offers several advantages to cBDL. In pBDL, the unligated right lobe serves as an identically matched internal control for the ligated left lobe, subjected to the same systemic effects, such as nutritional status or circulating factors. Although systemic pro-inflammatory mediators were present, Osawa et al. observed less fibrosis and necrosis in the unligated lobes, but increased inflammatory cells and transforming growth factor-β expression in the ligated lobe9.
More recently, pBDL has been redefined to study liver parenchymal effects of retained bile10. By using the same animal for internal control (unligated "sham") and experimental groups, pBDL effectively halves the number of animals needed per experiment, which in turn is more cost-effective. The mice tolerate the effects of pBDL much better, so that the ideal time course experiment (≥2 weeks) can be achieved in the ligated lobe. Most importantly, pBDL can distinguish direct intrahepatic effects of obstructive cholestasis and retained bile components in the ligated lobe, compared to the unligated control lobe. Overall, pBDL is an attractive method to study lobe-specific effects of localized cholestasis in the liver.
Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.
All procedures were conducted in accordance with ethical guidelines of the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of the University of Pittsburgh.
1. Basic Techniques and Common Procedures
2. Presurgical Preparation
3. Partial Bile Duct Ligation Operation
4. Postoperative Treatment and Follow-Up
Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.
For this typical experiment, pBDL was performed in triplicate PiZ transgenic mice, which recapitulate the human liver disease found in alpha-1 antitrypsin (A1AT) deficiency. The PiZ mouse overexpresses a transgene consisting of multiple genomic fragments of DNA that contain the coding regions of the mutant human A1AT gene and promoter, together with introns and ~2 kilobases of upstream and downstream flanking regions14,15. Normal ...
Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.
Although cBDL is the most common experimental technique for obstructive cholestasis, it can present multiple challenges in rodents. Depending on the number of post-operative days required to achieve an endpoint, the animals can experience significant morbidity and mortality as time progresses. The degree of tissue injury and biliary necrosis is further exacerbated when working with some transgenic mouse models of liver disease, which demonstrate abnormal liver parenchyma and function at baseline. Compared to cBDL, report...
Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.
The authors have no disclosures.
Dr. Khan acknowledges grant support from NIH/NICHD K12HD052892, the Alpha-1 Foundation, the Hillman Foundation, and the Pittsburgh Liver Research Center. Dr. Michalopoulos acknowledges grant support from NIH/NIDDK P01DK096990. We appreciate the excellent and generous technical assistance of Anne Orr. We are also grateful to Dr. David A. Geller for providing access to the Transplant/Rodent Microsurgery lab.
Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.
| Name | Company | Catalog Number | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|
| Microscope-Leica Wild M650, 6–40× magnification | Leica Microsystems | n/a | |
| Tec 3 isoflurane funnel fill vaporizer | General Anesthetic Services | n/a | |
| Stevens Tenotomy Scissors | Accurate Surgical & Scientific Instruments Corporation | ASSI.9193 | |
| Adson Forceps | Fine science tools | 11006-12 | |
| Mosquito classic delicate hemostatic forceps | Codman | 30-4472 | |
| Micro-retractor | Murdock; Roboz Surgical Instrument | RS-6550 | |
| Nonwoven gauze sponges | Fisherband | 870-PC-DBL | |
| Puritan 6” Small Cotton Swab w/Wooden Handle | Puritan Medical Products Company | 868-WCS | |
| Dumont SS Forceps - Standard Tips/Straight/Inox/13.5cm | Fine science tools | 11203-23 | |
| Dumont SS Forceps - Standard Tips/Angled 45°/Inox/13.5cm | Fine science tools | 11203-25 | |
| Vannas Spring Scissors - 3mm Cutting Edge | Fine science tools | 15000-00 | |
| Microneedle holder | Aesculap Surgical Instruments | FD231R | |
| Micro AROSuture, sterile 10-0 nylon suture, 70 µm, TAP points | AROSurgical Instruments Corporation | T4A10N07 | |
| 4-0 Vicryl | Ethicon | J662H | |
| 5-ml Syringe | BD | 309646 | |
| Falcon tissue culture dish, 60 × 15 mm | Corning | 353002 | |
| Isoflurane, United States Pharmacopeia (USP) liquid for inhalation, 250 ml | Piramal Healthcare | NDC 66794-017-25 | |
| Buprenex injectable (buprenorphine hydrochloride) | Reckitt Benckiser Pharmaceuticals | NDC 12496-0757-1 | |
| Cefazolin for injection , USP | APP Pharmaceuticals | NDC 63323-238-61 | |
| PVP scrub solution (povidone–iodine 7.5%) | Medline | NDC 12496-0757-1 | |
| 70% Ethanol | Decon Labs | 2716 | |
| Phosphate Buffered Saline Without Calcium or Magnesium | LONZA | 17-516F | |
| Sirius Red | Sigma | 365548 | |
| Hematolxylin | Fisher (Richard-Allan Scientific) | 22-050-111 (7211) | |
| Eosin | Anatech (Fisher) | 832 (NC9686037) | |
| Formalin | Fisher | SF100-20 |
Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.
Request permission to reuse the text or figures of this JoVE article
Request Permission