$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$
$$\longleftharp{xx}$$,
$$\longrightharp{xx}$$,
Olfactory information in a Drosophila larva's environment is sensed by only 21 functionally distinct ORNs, the activities of which ultimately determine larval behavior1,2,3,4. Yet, relatively little is known about the logic by which sensory information is encoded in the activities of these 21 ORNs. There is thus a need to experimentally measure the functional contributions of each larval ORN to behavior.
Although the sensory response profile of the entire repertoire of Drosophila larval ORNs has been studied in detail1,4,5, the contributions of individual ORNs to the olfactory circuit and thereby to navigational behavior remain largely unknown. Difficulties in larval behavior studies, so far, arise due to the inability to spatially and temporally activate single ORNs. A panel of odorants that specifically activate 19 of the 21 Drosophila larval ORNs was recently described1. Each odorant in the panel, at low concentrations, elicits a physiological response only from its cognate ORN. However, at higher concentrations that are normally used for conventional behavior assays, each odorant elicits physiological responses from multiple ORNs1,5,6. Further, odorants in this panel have varied volatilities that complicate interpretation of behavior studies that depend on formation of stable odor gradients7,8. Finally, naturally occurring odor stimuli have a temporal component that is difficult to replicate under laboratory conditions. It is therefore important to develop a method that can measure larval behavior while simultaneously activating individual ORNs in a spatial and temporal manner.
Here, we demonstrate a method that has advantages over previously described larval tracking assays1,8. The tracking assay described in Gershow et al. uses electronically controlled valves to maintain a stable gradient of odor in the behavior arena8. However, due to the level of complex engineering involved to build the odor stimulus setup, this method is difficult to replicate in other laboratories. Further, the issues related to using odorants to specifically activate single ORNs remain unresolved. The tracking assay described in Mathew et al. uses a simpler odor delivery system, but the resulting odor gradient is dependent on the volatility of test odorant and is unstable for long durations of the assay1. Thus, by replacing odor stimuli with light stimuli, our method has the advantages of specificity and precise temporal control of ORN activation and is not dependent on formation of odor gradients of different strengths.
Our method is easy to set up and is appropriate for researchers interested in measuring aspects of Drosophila larval navigation. This technique could be adapted to other model systems provided that the researcher is able to drive the expression of CsChrimson in their favorite system's neuron(s) of choice. CsChrimson is a red-shifted version of channel rhodopsin. It is activated at wavelengths that are invisible to the larva's phototaxis system. We are therefore able to manipulate the activity of neurons with specificity, reliability, and reproducibility9. By modifying the custom written software to account for size changes of the subjects, this method could easily be adapted for crawling larvae of other insect species.