A subscription to JoVE is required to view this content. Sign in or start your free trial.

Method Article

Gene-targeted Random Mutagenesis to Select Heterochromatin-destabilizing Proteasome Mutants in Fission Yeast

10.2K views

DOI:

10.3791/57499

May 15th, 2018

In This Article

Summary

This article describes a detailed methodology for random mutagenesis of a target gene in fission yeast. As an example, we target rpt4+, which encodes a subunit of the 19S proteasome, and screen for mutations that destabilize heterochromatin.

Abstract

Random mutagenesis of a target gene is commonly used to identify mutations that yield the desired phenotype. Of the methods that may be used to achieve random mutagenesis, error-prone PCR is a convenient and efficient strategy for generating a diverse pool of mutants (i.e., a mutant library). Error-prone PCR is the method of choice when a researcher seeks to mutate a pre-defined region, such as the coding region of a gene while leaving other genomic regions unaffected. After the mutant library is amplified by error-prone PCR, it must be cloned into a suitable plasmid. The size of the library generated by error-prone PCR is constrained by the efficiency of the cloning step. However, in the fission yeast, Schizosaccharomyces pombe, the cloning step can be replaced by the use of a highly efficient one-step fusion PCR to generate constructs for transformation. Mutants of desired phenotypes may then be selected using appropriate reporters. Here, we describe this strategy in detail, taking as an example, a reporter inserted at centromeric heterochromatin.

Introduction

Forward genetics is a classical method in which researchers seek naturally occurring mutants that display a particular phenotype, and perform genetic analyses. In reverse genetics, mutations are introduced into a gene of interest and the phenotype is examined. In the latter case, random mutagenesis of a target gene is often used to generate a pool of mutants that are subsequently selected for desired phenotypes, such as temperature sensitivity or altered enzymatic activity. Various methods may be used to achieve random mutagenesis, including error-prone PCR1; UV irradiation2; chemical mutagens, such as ethyl methanesulfo....

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Protocol

1. Preparation of Media

  1. Prepare Yeast Extract with supplements (YES), YES without adenine (YES Low Ade), Pombe Glutamate medium (PMG12), and PMG without adenine (PMG-Ade) by mixing the components as described in Table 1. YES-Ade (Low Ade) and PMG-Ade plates have all of the same components, but the adenine is omitted from the latter.
    1. Use the following salt (50x) stock: 52.5 g/L MgCl2·6H2O, 2 g/L CaCl2·2H2O, 50 g/L KCl, 2 g/L Na2SO4 in distilled water. Filter sterilize using a 0.22-µm pore-size filter and store at 4 °C.

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Results

The acquired Rpt4 mutants by following the procedures described in Figure 1 can be analyzed by assessing the colors of the colonies. The colors of the colonies are spotted onto the relevant plates in decreasing cell number in Figure 2. The ade6+ reporter inserted at the heterochromatin region is silenced in wild-type and shows red colonies in YES-Ade plate. Once the heterochromatin is destabilized and the ade6+ .......

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Discussion

Random mutagenesis via error-prone PCR is a powerful tool for generating a diverse pool of mutants in a given region. This technique is especially useful for studies that seek to assess the function of a protein under a specific circumstance. For example, we herein used error-prone PCR to assess the function of the 19S proteasome subunit, Rpt4, in heterochromatin maintenance. By varying the region targeted by the error-prone PCR and adjusting the screening conditions, we were able to mutate cells at the genomic region of.......

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Disclosures

The authors have nothing to disclose.

Acknowledgements

Funding support for this project was provided by the Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Science and ICT (2016R1A2B2006354).

....

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Materials

List of materials used in this article
NameCompanyCatalog NumberComments
1. Media
GlucoseSigma-AldrichG8270-10KG
Yeast extractBD Biosciences212720
L-LeucineJUNSEI87070-0310
Adenine sulfateACR16363-0250
Uracil Sigma-AldrichU0750
L-HistidineSigma-AldrichH8125
KH2PO4Sigma-Aldrich1.05108.0050
NaClJUNSEI19015-0350
MgSO4•7H2OSigma-Aldrich63140
CaCl2Sigma-Aldrich12095
Potassium phthalateSigma-AldrichP6758-500g
InositolSigma-AldrichI7508-50G
BiotinSigma-AldrichB4501-100MG
Boric AcidSigma-AldrichB6768-1KG
MnSO4Sigma-AldrichM7634-500G
ZnSO4•7H2JUNSEI83060-031
FeCl2•4H2OKANTOCB8943686
Sodium molybdate dihydrateYAKURI31621
KIJUNSEI80090-0301
CuSO4•5H2OYAKURI09605
D-myo-inositolMP biomedicals102052
PantothenateYAKURI26003
Nicotinic AcidSigma-AldrichN4126-500G
(NH4)2SO4 Sigma-AldrichA4418-100G
AgaroseBiobasicD0012
G418, geneticinLPSG41805
2. Enzyme reactions
PfuUltra II Fusion HS DNA PolymeraseAglient600380For site-directed mutagenesis
GeneMorphII Random mutagenesis KitAglient200500For error-prone PCR
Phusion High-Fidelity DNA PolymeraseThermo FisherF-530LFor fusion PCR
Ex Taq DNA PolymeraseTakaraRR001bFor general PCR
BamH1New England BioLabsR0136S
Xho1New England BioLabsR0146S
Dpn1New England BioLabsR0176S
3. Equipment
Velveteen square, blackVWR89033-116For replica
Replica-plating toolVWR25395-380For replica
MicroPulser ElectroporatorBiorad1652100 For fission yeast transformation
Electroporation Cuvettes, 0.2 cm gapBiorad1652086 For fission yeast transformation
Thermal CyclerBioerBYQ6078For fusion PCR ramp reaction 

References

  1. Pritchard, L., Corne, D., Kell, D., Rowland, J., Winson, M. A general model of error-prone PCR. J Theor Biol. 234 (4), 497-509 (2005).
  2. Pfeifer, G. P., You, Y. H., Besaratinia, A. Mutations induced by ultraviolet light. Mutat Res. 571 (1-2), 19-31 (2005).
  3. Moreno, S., Klar, A., Nurse, P.

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Reprints and Permissions

Tags

Error prone PCRGene targeted MutagenesisHeterochromatin DestabilizationFusion PCRColony PCRGel ElectrophoresisDNA SequencingReporter Gene AssaySpotting Assay