Method Article

Single-cell Analysis of Immunophenotype and Cytokine Production in Peripheral Whole Blood via Mass Cytometry

DOI:

10.3791/57780

⸱

June 26th, 2018

* These authors contributed equally

In This Article

Summary

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

Here we describe a single-cell proteomic approach to evaluate immune phenotypic and functional (intracellular cytokine induction) alterations in peripheral whole blood samples, analyzed via mass cytometry.

Abstract

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

Cytokines play a pivotal role in the pathogenesis of autoimmune diseases. Hence, the measurement of cytokine levels has been the focus of multiple studies in an attempt to understand the precise mechanisms that lead to the breakdown of self-tolerance and subsequent autoimmunity. Approaches thus far have been based on the study of one specific aspect of the immune system (a single or few cell types or cytokines), and do not offer a global assessment of complex autoimmune disease. While patient sera-based studies have afforded important insights into autoimmunity, they do not provide the specific cellular source of the dysregulated cytokines detected. A comprehensive single-cell approach to evaluate cytokine production in multiple immune cell subsets, within the context of "intrinsic" patient-specific plasma circulating factors, is described here. This approach enables monitoring of the patient-specific immune phenotype (surface markers) and function (cytokines), either in its native "intrinsic pathogenic" disease state, or in the presence of therapeutic agents (in vivo or ex vivo).

Introduction

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

Autoimmune diseases are a major cause of morbidity and mortality affecting 3-8% of the population. In the United States, autoimmune disorders are among the leading causes of death among young and middle-aged women (ages <65 years)1,2. Autoimmune disorders are characterized by heterogeneous clinical presentation and diverse underlying immunological processes. The spectrum of heterogeneity is well represented across different disorders, such as joint involvement in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and neurological disease in multiple sclerosis (MS). However, this level of heterogeneity is also exemplified within a single disorder, such as systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE): some patients may present with renal pathology, while others suffer from hematologic or joint involvement3.

The underlying immunopathogenesis in autoimmune disorders mirrors the clinical heterogeneity, involving auto- and hyper-activation of multiple innate and adaptive immune cell subsets, and concomitant dysregulated cytokine production. While cytokines play a pivotal role in the pathogenesis of autoimmune disease, understanding their specific role in the mechanism of disease has proven to be challenging. Cytokines are characterized by pleiotropy (one cytokine can have multiple effects on different cell types), redundancy (multiple cytokines can have the same effect), duality (one cytokine can have pro- or anti-inflammatory effects under different conditions), and plasticity (cytokines can be molded into a role different from its "original" one, depending on the environment)4,5,6. Consequently, population-level methods cannot distinguish heterogeneous cellular responses to the same "cytokine milieu". Similarly, study designs that focus on one specific aspect of the immune system (a single cell type or cytokine), do not offer a global assessment of all the elements involved in complex autoimmune disease. While patient sera-based studies have afforded important insights into autoimmunity, they do not provide the specific cellular source of the dysregulated cytokines detected.

Recently, we developed a single-cell proteomic approach to simultaneously assess multiple immune cell types, and detect their various cytokine perturbations in the milieu of patient specific "pathogenic" peripheral blood plasma circulating factors. The workflow described here is characterized by the use of intact peripheral whole blood samples, as opposed to isolated peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs). Peripheral whole blood represents the most physiologically relevant vehicle to study systemic immune-mediated disease, including 1) non-mononuclear blood cells often involved in autoimmune disease (i.e., neutrophils, platelets), and 2) plasma circulating factors, such as nucleic acids, immune complexes, and cytokines, which have immune activating roles. To capture the "intrinsic pathogenic" dysregulated cytokine production, peripheral blood samples are processed immediately after the blood draw (T0, Time zero), and after 6 h of incubation at 37 °C (physiological body temperature) with a protein transport inhibitor in the absence of any exogenous stimulating condition (T6, Time 6 h), to detect cytokine production (accumulation, T6-T0) that would reflect the "intrinsic" disease state (Figure 1). To study dysregulated processes that reflect over or under-activation of signaling pathways involved in immune responses relevant to the disease, peripheral blood samples are treated (6 h incubation at 37 °C with a protein transport inhibitor) with an exogenous stimulating condition that reflects disease pathogenesis, such as Toll-Like-Receptor (TLR) agonists in the case of SLE (T6 + R848, Time 6 h with 1 µg/mL R848), to detect cytokine production that would reflect a response to nucleic acids (comparing T0 vs. T6 vs. T6 + R848, Figure 1). To study immunomodulatory effects of available therapeutics ex vivo, as they pertain to the precise immune dysregulated processes for specific patients, peripheral blood samples are treated with a JAK inhibitor at the relevant therapeutic concentration (here, 5 uM ruxolitinib; T6 + 5R, Time 6 h with 5 uM ruxolitinib), to detect changes in "intrinsic" disease state in response to the drug (T0 vs. T6 vs. T6 + 5R, Figure 1). A JAK inhibitor was chosen for this study because JAK inhibitors have been shown to be successful in the treatment of autoimmune disorders such as RA.

To simultaneously evaluate the dysregulated processes described above in multiple immune cell subsets, peripheral blood samples from SLE patients and healthy controls were processed as described above and analyzed by mass cytometry. Mass cytometry, also known as Cytometry-Time-Of-Flight, offers single-cell analysis of over 40 parameters without issues of spectral overlap7,8,9. This technique utilizes rare earth metal isotopes in the form of soluble metal ions as tags bound to antibodies, instead of fluorophores10. Additional details regarding the mass cytometry technological platform (i.e., tuning and calibration, sample acquisition) can be found in Leipold et al. and McCarthy et al.11,12 The high-dimensionality of mass cytometry enables simultaneous measurement of multiple cytokines throughout innate and adaptive immune cell subsets with single-cell granularity (Table of Materials).

Current conventional clinical and laboratory parameters are often not sensitive or specific enough for detecting ongoing disease activity or the response to specific immunomodulators13, reflecting the need to better delineate the underlying immune changes that drive flare-ups. Given the pervasiveness of cytokine dysregulation in autoimmune disease, a plethora of treatment approaches that use antibodies or small molecular inhibitors targeting cytokines or signaling proteins involved in the regulation of cytokine production have recently emerged. In its basic format, the peripheral blood analytical approach described here provides a platform to identify patient-specific dysregulated cell subsets and their abnormal cytokine production in autoimmune disease with systemic manifestations. This methodology allows for the personalization of therapeutic choices as specific dysregulated cytokines can be identified, and specific treatment options can be tested ex vivo to assess their ability to immunomodulate the patient specific disease process.

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Protocol

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

All methods described here have been approved by the Colorado Multiple Institutional Review Board (COMIRB) of the University of Colorado. All described procedures below should be performed in a sterile tissue culture hood unless stated otherwise, with filtered pipette tips, and all reagents filtered.

1. Preparation of Reagents for Peripheral Whole Blood Processing

  1. Prepare ruxolitinib stock aliquots (10–15 μL/vial for single use) at 10 mM by diluting the lyophilized reagent in DMSO as per the manufacturer’s instructions (store at -80 °C). Keep DMSO concentrations in all assays including unstimulated controls below 0.2% (vol/vol).
  2. Prepare R848 (resiquimod) stock aliquots (10–15 μL/vial for single use) at 1 μg/μL by diluting the lyophilized reagent in sterile water as the per manufacturer’s instructions. Store at -80 °C.
  3. Prepare lipopolysaccharide (LPS) stock aliquots (5 μL per vial for one time use only) at 1 μg/μL by diluting the lyophilized reagent in sterile water as per manufacturer instructions. Store at -80 °C.
  4. Prepare the Cell Staining Media (CSM) using PBS, 0.5% BSA, and 0.02% NaN3.
  5. Acquire and keep ready the protein transport inhibitor (PTI) cocktail (Table of Materials).
  6. Thaw and dilute the ruxolitinib stock vial (10 mM) 1:10 in sterile PBS (1 mM). Set aside at room temperature in a tissue culture hood.
  7. Thaw and dilute the R848 stock vial (1 μg/µL) 1:10 in sterile PBS (0.1 μg/µL). Set aside at room temperature in a tissue culture hood.
  8. Thaw and dilute the LPS stock vial (1 μg/µL) 1:100 in sterile PBS (0.01 μg/µL). Set aside at room temperature in a tissue culture hood.
  9. Pre-warm sterile RPMI (no L-glutamine) in a standard 37 °C water bath (for at least 10 min).
  10. Dilute the lyse/fix buffer by 1:5 in filtered ddH2O (working concentration) on the benchtop (does not need to be sterile).
    Note: 1 mL of whole blood requires 20 mL of working concentration of lyse/fix buffer.
    1. Make lyse/fix buffer for 5 conditions of 1 mL of whole blood each (at least 100 mL). Aliquot 20 mL of the working concentration of lyse/fix buffer into 50 mL conical tubes per milliliter of whole blood (keep the lyse/fix solution at 37 °C until needed). Label the conditions on the conical tubes containing lyse/fix buffer as follows: T0 (Time zero), T6 + 5R (Time 6 h with 5 uM ruxolitinib), T6 + R848 (Time 6 h with 1 μg/mL R848), T6 + LPS (Time 6 h with 0.1 μg/mL LPS), T6 (Time 6 h).
  11. Label round bottom sterile polystyrene tubes with caps and 1 mL microcentrifuge tubes with the same nomenclature as in step 1.10.

2. Stimulation and Processing of Peripheral Whole Blood (Figure 1)

  1. Place the labeled round bottom polystyrene tubes from step 1.11 (T0, T6 + 5R, T6 + R848, T6 + LPS, T6) on a rack.
    Note: All the following steps are performed in this type of tube unless specified otherwise. Cap the tubes when transferring between the tissue culture hood and incubator to maintain sterility.
  2. Add 1 mL of 37 °C RPMI (no L-glutamine) to each of the tubes (T0, T6 + 5R, T6 + R848, T6 + LPS, T6). Invert the blood collection tube several times, add 1 mL of whole blood to each tube, and pipette up and down several times to mix thoroughly with RPMI (dilution with RPMI prevents clumping of the blood during the 6 h incubation period).
  3. Add 10 μL of the 1:10 ruxolitinib to T6 + 5R. Mix thoroughly with a P1000 pipette. Place the rack of tubes in the incubator at 37 °C and begin timing the incubation (T = 0).
  4. Process the T0 sample as follows.
    1. Pipette the entire contents of the T0 tube into a labeled conical tube containing 20 mL of 37 °C working concentration lyse/fix buffer. To optimize cell recovery, rinse the tube with working concentration lyse/fix buffer. Mix by inverting the conical tube.
    2. Incubate at 37 °C for 15 min to allow for lysis and fixation. Following fixation, perform all subsequent steps at the benchtop. Centrifuge cells at 500 x g for 5 min at room temperature.
    3. Decant the supernatant. Resuspend the cells in 1 mL of ice cold PBS to break up the pellet, then fill the conical to a 15 mL volume with PBS.
    4. Centrifuge the cells at 500 x g for 5 min at room temperature. Decant the supernatant. Repeat the PBS wash (steps 2.4.3–2.4.4) if pellets are red. Resuspend the cells in 1 mL of CSM to break up the pellet, then transfer to the labeled microcentrifuge tube (step 1.11) for antibody staining. Take a 10 µL sample to count cells using an automated cell counter or hemocytometer.
      Note: Since all cells are fixed at this point, it is not necessary to include a viability stain.
    5. Centrifuge the cells at 500 x g for 5 min at room temperature. Aspirate the supernatant, leaving the pellet in ~60 µL of residual volume. Keep this pellet on ice until samples from other conditions have completed processing.
  5. At T = 30 min, move the tube rack (step 2.3) to the tissue culture hood and perform the following.
    1. Add 10 μL of the 0.1 μg/μL R848 to T6 + R848. Mix thoroughly with a P1000 pipette.
    2. Add 10 μL of the 0.01 μg/μL LPS to T6 + LPS. Mix thoroughly with a P1000 pipette.
    3. Add 4 μL of protein transport inhibitor (stock at 500X) to T6, T6 + 5R, and T6 + LPS (but NOT to T6 + R848) and return the samples to the incubator until T = 6 h. Mix thoroughly with a P1000 pipette every 2 h.
      Note: R848 is an endoplasmic TLR agonist and therefore requires a temporal delay in the addition of the protein transport inhibitor to allow for access to its target receptor.
  6. At T = 2 h, add 4 μL of protein transport inhibitor cocktail (stock at 500X) to the T6 + R848 tube. Mix all samples with a P1000 pipette and return the rack to the incubator until T = 6 h.
  7. Mix the samples with a P1000 one more time at T = 4 h.
  8. At T = 6 h, process T6, T6 + LPS, T6 + R848, and T6 + 5R blood sample tubes as described in step 2.4 for the T0 sample.
  9. Store the cell pellets in residual CSM volume at -80 °C to process on a future date. Alternatively, proceed to barcoding and antibody staining without storing.

3. Barcode of Lysed/Fixed Blood Cells

  1. Thaw the lysed/fixed cell samples from the -80 °C storage slowly on ice; a maximum of 20 samples can be labeled with unique barcodes and pooled using this system. Dilute the 10X barcoding perm buffer by 1:10 with PBS; make enough buffer for ~3 mL per sample.
  2. Fill one non-sterile trough with the CSM and one with the 1X barcoding perm buffer. Add 1 mL of ice cold CSM to freshly thawed samples, mix thoroughly with a pipette, and transfer to the respective pre-labeled polypropylene cluster tubes.
  3. Take a 10 μL sample to count cells using an automated cell counter or hemocytometer. Normalize the cell counts to 1.5–2 x 106 cells per sample in each cluster tube: remove and discard the volume of excess cells above 2 x 106 cells.
  4. Centrifuge the cells at 600 x g for 5 min at room temperature. Resuspend the cells in 1 mL of 1X barcoding perm buffer with a multichannel pipette and centrifuge at 600 x g for 5 min at room temperature. Aspirate off the supernatant.
  5. Line up the cluster tubes on a rack in the same order as indicated on the barcode key so the sample matches with its barcode. Add 800 μL 1X barcoding perm buffer by multichannel pipette to all samples in the cluster tubes without touching the cell pellet with the pipette tips (no mixing) to reduce cell loss. Set aside the rack with the cluster tubes.
  6. Remove 20-plex Pd Barcoding Kit tube strips from -20 °C and thaw at room temperature. Add 100 μL of 1X barcoding perm buffer, mix thoroughly, and transfer 120 μL of the resuspended barcode mix into the corresponding cell samples in the cluster tubes.
  7. Mix thoroughly by multichannel pipette so that there is no cross-contamination between individually barcoded samples. Incubate cluster tubes for 30 min at room temperature to allow the barcodes to label the cells.
  8. Centrifuge at 600 x g for 5 min at room temperature. Aspirate the supernatant, then resuspend in 1 mL of CSM.
  9. Centrifuge and resuspend in CSM again as in step 3.8.
    Note: Each sample is now labeled with a unique barcode, and samples are ready to be pooled.
  10. Centrifuge at 600 x g for 5 min at room temperature and aspirate the supernatant. With a single pipette and using the same tip, transfer all cell pellets in ~70–80 μL residual volume to one polystyrene tube. Do NOT eject the pipette tip; set aside the single pipette with this tip.
  11. With a multichannel pipette and new tips, add ~100 μL CSM to each original cluster tube to maximize cell recovery. With the single pipette with the tip that was set aside, transfer all cell pellets in ~100 μL residual volume to the same polystyrene tube.
  12. Add CSM to top off the polystyrene tube (~3 mL). Count and record the cell number of the pooled barcode set. Centrifuge at 600 x g for 5 min at room temperature and aspirate the supernatant. Proceed to staining the barcoded samples on the same day.
    Note: It is normal to expect ~20–30% cell loss in the barcoding process.

4. Staining of Barcoded Lysed/Fixed Blood Cells and Preparation for Analysis on Mass Cytometry Instrument

Note: Each 1X titer of staining antibody (1 μL of antibody per 100 μL staining reaction), can usually stain 3–4 x 106 cells. Therefore, when all barcoded samples are pooled into one tube, the amount of antibody must be scaled up. If 20 barcoded samples amount to 30 x 106 cells, and each 1X titer can stain 3–4 x 106 cells, the barcoded sample only requires a 10X titer, as opposed to staining each sample individually, which would require a 20X amount of antibody (1X per individual tube). The concentration of the antibody to cell number should be carefully titrated for each individual antibody cocktail (not discussed here).

  1. Stain the cells using antibodies (Table of Materials) for surface staining and cytokine induction.
    1. Make the surface staining cocktail by calculating the amount to be added and accounting for pipetting error (i.e., if staining 20 barcoded samples of 2 x 106 cells in each sample, a 10X titer stain is required; for final volume calculations, compensate for pipetting error by making a 10.5X final staining solution).
    2. Add 10X worth of surface staining volume to the barcoded cell pellet. To reduce cell loss, with the same tip, mix and measure up the volume of surface stains and cell pellet.
    3. Based on the volume of cells and staining cocktail, add CSM to a final staining volume of 50 μL per number of cell samples (i.e., if running a set of 20 samples, 50 μL X 20 = 1 mL). Incubate for 30 min at 4 °C. Agitate the sample every 15 min to promote even staining.
    4. During the surface stain incubation, prepare the Perm/Wash buffer (Table of Materials) by diluting 1:10 with filtered ddH2O. Prepare volumes of 2 mL for permeabilization, and 5 mL for washing. Keep at 4 °C or on ice.
    5. Top off the surface staining tube with CSM, and centrifuge at 600 x g at 4 °C for 5 min. Aspirate the supernatant. Resuspend the barcoded sample in 2 mL of 4 °C, 1:10 dilution Perm/Wash buffer. Incubate at 4 °C for 20–30 min to fully permeabilize the cells.
    6. Centrifuge at 600 x g at 4 °C for 5 min and aspirate the supernatant.
    7. For intracellular staining, follow similar staining steps (as for surface staining). However, use the 4 °C, 1:10 dilution Perm/Wash buffer instead of the CSM to make the total staining volume so that the cells remain in a permeabilizing environment throughout the intracellular staining.
    8. Add the intracellular antibody cocktail to the surface stained and permeabilized cell pellet (steps 4.1.2–4.1.17). Bring the total staining volume to 50 μL per number of cell samples. Incubate for 60 min at 4 °C. Agitate the sample every 15 min to ensure even staining.
    9. During the intracellular staining, prepare the intercalator solution: 900 μL of filtered PBS + 100 μL of filtered 16% PFA (final concentration of 1.6% PFA) + 0.2 μL of 500 uM of intercalator dye (Table of Materials).
    10. Top off the cell pellet + intracellular antibody cocktail with cold 1:10 Perm/Wash buffer.
    11. Centrifuge at 600 x g at 4 °C for 5 min, and aspirate the supernatant. Top off the staining tube with CSM. Count and record the cell number. Centrifuge at 600 x g at 4 °C for 5 min, and aspirate the supernatant. Resuspend the cells in 1 mL of intercalator solution from step 4.9. Incubate for at least 20 min at room temperature for full intercalation, or overnight at 4 °C (samples in intercalator solution can stay at 4 °C for up to 1 week before running them on the mass cytometry instrument).
  2. Prepare the cells for the mass cytometry instrument.
    1. Top off the tube with 3 mL of filtered ddH2O, and centrifuge at 600 x g for 5 min at 4 °C. Resuspend the cells in 3 mL of filtered ddH2O. Pass this suspension through a 100 μm filter to remove any debris or aggregates that could potentially clog the mass cytometry instrument.
    2. Count and record the cell number post-filtration. Centrifuge at 600 x g for 5 min at 4 °C
  3. Prepare the calibration bead solution (Table of Materials) by diluting it 1:10 in filtered ddH2O.
  4. Resuspend the stained cells in the required volume of 1:10 diluted calibration bead solution to attain a cell concentration of ~1 x 106 cells/mL.
    Note: For a CyTOF1 at 45 µL/min, the recommended optimum is 5 x 105 cells/mL; for Helios at 30 µL/min, 7.5 x 105 cells/mL.
  5. Proceed to run the sample on the mass cytometry instrument9.

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Results

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

Figure 1 demonstrates the workflow for the stimulation and processing of the peripheral blood samples, including allocation of blood sample aliquots, timing of the addition of stimulation agents, protein transport inhibitor cocktail, and incubation times until the red blood cell (RBC) lysis and fixation. The choice of stimulating agents will depend on the signaling and cytokine pathways that are targeted for assessment. For example, in the protocol described ...

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Discussion

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

Here we describe a novel, single-cell, proteomic approach to simultaneously assess multiple immune cell types and detect their various cytokine perturbations in the milieu of patient specific "pathogenic" peripheral blood plasma circulating factors. This method employs peripheral whole blood as the analytical vehicle, and mass cytometry as the tool for the evaluation of immune cellular phenotypic and functional abnormalities. The method is readily applicable to human and mice studies21, an...

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Disclosures

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

The authors have nothing to disclose.

Acknowledgements

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

We would like to thank Aimee Pugh-Bernard for her intellectual input and helpful comments. This work was supported by the Boettcher Foundation Webb-Waring Biomedical Research Award and award number K23-1K23AR070897 from the NIH to Elena W.Y. Hsieh. She was also supported by award number K12-HD000850 from the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development and the Lucile Packard Foundation for Children's Health, Stanford CTSA UL1 TR001085, and Child Health Research Institute of Stanford University.

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Materials

List of materials used in this article
NameCompanyCatalog NumberComments
RuxolitinibSanta CruzSC-364729AStock Conc: 10 mM; Final Conc: 5 μM
R848Invivogentlrl-r848-5Stock Conc: 1 μg/μL; Final Conc: 1 μg/mL
LPS-EKInvivogentlrl-eklpsStock Conc: 1 μg/μL; Final Conc: 0.1 μg/mL
Sterile PBSLonza17-516F
Lyse/Fix BufferBD biosciences558049Stock Conc: 5X; Final Conc: 1X (dilute in ddH2O)
BD Phosflow perm/wash buffer IBD biosciences557885Stock Conc: 10X; Final Conc: 1:10 (dilute in ddH2O)
RPMIGibco21870-076
Sodium Azide (NaN3)Sigma-AldrichS-8032Stock Conc: >99.9%; Final Conc: 0.0002
Protein Transport Inhibitor (PTI)eBiosciences00-4980-93Stock Conc: 500X; Final Conc: 1X
DNA IntercalatorFluidigm201192BStock Conc: 500 μM; Final Conc: 0.1 μM
Cell Staining Media (CSM)PBS + 0.5% BSA, 0.02% NaN3
MaxPar Barcode Perm BufferFluidigm201057Stock Conc: 10X; Final Conc: 1X
20-plex Pd Barcode SetFluidigmS0014Stock Conc: n/a; Final Conc: n/a
EQ TM Four Element Calibration BeadsFluidigm201078Stock Conc: 10X; Final Conc: 1X
16% MeOH-free Formaldehyde SolutionThermo28908Stock Conc: 16% (w/v); Final Conc: 1.6% (w/v)
Sterile round bottom polystyrene tubesVWR60818-496Stock Conc: n/a; Final Conc: n/a
Polypropylene cluster tubesLight LabsA-9001Stock Conc: n/a; Final Conc: n/a
Helios CyTOF instrumentFluidigmHeliosAll solutions to be used in CyTOF analysis need to be free of metal contamination. ddH2O is used in the preparation of any solutions should have a resistivity of at least 18.0 MΩ.cm. ddH2O and any self-prepared solutions should be stored in new plastic or glass bottles that have never been autoclaved.
NameCompanyCatalog NumberComments
Antibodies used for Mass Cytometry
Surface markers
CD1cBiolegendL161Mass: 161
CD3BDUCHT1Mass: 144
CD4BiolegendSK3Mass: 174
CD7BDM-T701Mass: 149
CD8BiolegendSK1Mass: 142
CD11bFluidigmICRF44Mass: 209
CD11cBDB-ly6Mass: 152
CD15BDHI98Mass: 115
CD14BiolegendM5E2Mass: 154
CD16eBioscience/ThermoB73.1Mass: 165
CD19Santa CruzSJ25C1Mass: 163
CD21BiolegendBu32Mass: 141
CD27BDL128Mass: 155
CD38FluidigmHIT2Mass: 172
CD45 totalBiolegendHI30Mass: 89
CD45RABiolegendHI100Mass: 153
CD56MiltenyiREA196Mass: 168
CD66BDB1.1/CD66Mass: 113
CD86FluidigmIT2.2Mass: 150
CD123Fluidigm6H6Mass: 143
CD278/ICOSBiolegendC398.4AMass: 156
CD179/PD1BiolegendEH12.2H7Mass: 162
IgDBiolegendIA6-2Mass: 146
IgMBiolegendMHM-88Mass: 151
CXCR5BDRF8B2Mass: 173
HLADRBiolegendL243Mass: 167
Cytokines
IL-1αBiolegend364-3B3-14Mass: 147
IL-1βBiolegend H1b-98Mass: 169
IL-1RASanta Cruz AS17Mass: 157
IL-6BiolegendMQ2-13A5Mass: 164
IL-8BDE8N1Mass: 160
IL-12/IL-23p40Biolegend C8.6Mass: 171
IL-17ABiolegend BL168Mass: 148
IL23p19eBioscience/Thermo23dcdpMass: 176
MIP1βBDD21-1351Mass: 158
MCP1BD5D3-F7Mass: 170
IFNαMiltenyi LT27:295Mass: 175
IFNγBiolegend4S.B3Mass: 165
PTENBDA2B1Mass: 159
TNFαBiolegendMab11Mass: 166
Note: If the manufacturer is stated as Fluidigm, this antibody was purchased from Fluidigm with metal pre-conjugated. If the manufacturer is stated as other than Fluidigm, this antibody was self-conjugated using the MaxPar Multi-Metal Labeling  Kit (Fluidigm Cat: 201300) according to manufacturer protocol. 

References

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,
  1. Walsh, S. J., Rau, L. M. Autoimmune diseases: a leading cause of death among young and middle-aged women in the United States. American journal of public health. 90 (9), 1463-1466 (2000).
  2. Mak, A., Cheung, M. W. -L., Chiew, H. J., Liu, Y., Ho, R. C. -M. Global trend of survival and damage of systemic lupus erythematosus: meta-analysis and meta-regression of observational studies from the 1950s to 2000s. Seminars in arthritis and rheumatism. 41 (6), 830-839 (2012).
  3. Kaul, A., Gordon, C., et al. Systemic lupus erythematosus. Nature reviews. Disease primers. 2, 16039(2016).
  4. Annunziato, F., Romagnani, S. Heterogeneity of human effector CD4+ T cells. Arthritis Research & Therapy. 11 (6), 257(2009).
  5. Peck, A., Mellins, E. D. Plasticity of T-cell phenotype and function: the T helper type 17 example. Immunology. 129 (2), 147-153 (2010).
  6. Basso, A. S., Cheroutre, H., Mucida, D. More stories on Th17 cells. Cell research. 19 (4), 399-411 (2009).
  7. Ornatsky, O., Bandura, D., Baranov, V., Nitz, M., Winnik, M. A., Tanner, S. Highly multiparametric analysis by mass cytometry. Journal of Immunological Methods. 361 (1-2), 1-20 (2010).
  8. Ornatsky, O., Baranov, V. I., Bandura, D. R., Tanner, S. D., Dick, J. Multiple cellular antigen detection by ICP-MS. Journal of Immunological Methods. 308 (1-2), 68-76 (2006).
  9. Bendall, S. C., Simonds, E. F., et al. Single-Cell Mass Cytometry of Differential Immune and Drug Responses Across a Human Hematopoietic Continuum. Science. 332 (6030), 687-696 (2011).
  10. Bandura, D. R., Baranov, V. I., et al. Mass Cytometry: Technique for Real Time Single Cell Multitarget Immunoassay Based on Inductively Coupled Plasma Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometry. Analytical Chemistry. 81 (16), 6813-6822 (2009).
  11. Leipold, M. D., Maecker, H. T. Mass cytometry: protocol for daily tuning and running cell samples on a CyTOF mass cytometer. Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE. (69), e4398(2012).
  12. McCarthy, R. L., Duncan, A. D., Barton, M. C. Sample Preparation for Mass Cytometry Analysis. Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE. (122), (2017).
  13. Rahman, A., Isenberg, D. A. Systemic lupus erythematosus. The New England journal of medicine. 358 (9), 929-939 (2008).
  14. O'Gorman, W. E., Hsieh, E. W. Y., et al. Single-cell systems-level analysis of human Toll-like receptor activation defines a chemokine signature in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology. 136 (5), 1326-1336 (2015).
  15. O'Gorman, W. E., Kong, D. S., et al. Mass cytometry identifies a distinct monocyte cytokine signature shared by clinically heterogeneous pediatric SLE patients. Journal of Autoimmunity. 81, 74-89 (2017).
  16. Simonds, E. F., Bendall, S. C., et al. Extracting a cellular hierarchy from high-dimensional cytometry data with SPADE. Nature Biotechnology. , 1-8 (2011).
  17. Amir, E. -A. D., Davis, K. L., et al. viSNE enables visualization of high dimensional single-cell data and reveals phenotypic heterogeneity of leukemia. Nature Biotechnology. 31 (6), 545-552 (2013).
  18. Bruggner, R. V., Bodenmiller, B., Dill, D. L., Tibshirani, R. J., Nolan, G. P. Automated identification of stratifying signatures in cellular subpopulations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 111 (26), E2770-E2777 (2014).
  19. Levine, J. H., Simonds, E. F., et al. Data-Driven Phenotypic Dissection of AML Reveals Progenitor-like Cells that Correlate with Prognosis. Cell. 162 (1), 184-197 (2015).
  20. Samusik, N., Good, Z., Spitzer, M. H., Davis, K. L., Nolan, G. P. Automated mapping of phenotype space with single-cell data. Nature Publishing Group. 13 (6), 493-496 (2016).
  21. Spitzer, M. H., Gherardini, P. F., et al. IMMUNOLOGY. An interactive reference framework for modeling a dynamic immune system. Science. 349 (6244), 1259425(2015).
  22. Fienberg, H. G., Simonds, E. F., Fantl, W. J., Nolan, G. P., Bodenmiller, B. A platinum-based covalent viability reagent for single-cell mass cytometry. Cytometry Part A. 81 (6), 467-475 (2012).
  23. Jansen, K., Blimkie, D., et al. Polychromatic flow cytometric high-throughput assay to analyze the innate immune response to Toll-like receptor stimulation. Journal of Immunological Methods. 336 (2), 183-192 (2008).
  24. Zunder, E. R., Finck, R., et al. Palladium-based mass tag cell barcoding with a doublet-filtering scheme and single-cell deconvolution algorithm. Nature Protocols. 10 (2), 316-333 (2015).
  25. Lai, L., Ong, R., Li, J., Albani, S. A CD45-based barcoding approach to multiplex mass-cytometry (CyTOF). Cytometry Part A. , (2015).
  26. Mei, H. E., Leipold, M. D., Schulz, A. R., Chester, C., Maecker, H. T. Barcoding of live human peripheral blood mononuclear cells for multiplexed mass cytometry. The Journal of Immunology. 194 (4), 2022-2031 (2015).
  27. Finck, R., Simonds, E. F., et al. Normalization of mass cytometry data with bead standards. Cytometry Part A. 83 (5), 483-494 (2013).
  28. Takahashi, C., Au-Yeung, A., et al. Mass cytometry panel optimization through the designed distribution of signal interference. Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology. 91 (1), 39-47 (2017).

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Reprints and Permissions

Request permission to reuse the text or figures of this JoVE article

Request Permission

Tags

Mass CytometryPeripheral BloodCytokine ProductionImmunophenotype AnalysisAutoimmune DiseaseSingle cell AnalysisBlood StimulationBarcoding ProtocolCell Surface MarkersProtein Transport Inhibitor

Related Articles