Login processing...

Trial ends in Request Full Access Tell Your Colleague About Jove

Developmental Biology

Imaging Intranuclear Actin Rods in Live Heat Stressed Drosophila Embryos

doi: 10.3791/61297 Published: May 15, 2020
Natalie Biel1,2, Lauren Figard3, Anna Marie Sokac1,2,3


The purpose of this protocol is to visualize intranuclear actin rods that assemble in live Drosophila melanogaster embryos following heat stress. Actin rods are a hallmark of a conserved, inducible Actin Stress Response (ASR) that accompanies human pathologies, including neurodegenerative disease. Previously, we showed that the ASR contributes to morphogenesis failures and reduced viability of developing embryos. This protocol allows the continued study of mechanisms underlying actin rod assembly and the ASR in a model system that is highly amenable to imaging, genetics and biochemistry. Embryos are collected and mounted on a coverslip to prepare them for injection. Rhodamine-conjugated globular actin (G-actinRed) is diluted and loaded into a microneedle. A single injection is made into the center of each embryo. After injection, embryos are incubated at elevated temperature and intranuclear actin rods are then visualized by confocal microscopy. Fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) experiments may be performed on the actin rods; and other actin-rich structures in the cytoplasm can also be imaged. We find that G-actinRed polymerizes like endogenous G-actin and does not, on its own, interfere with normal embryo development. One limitation of this protocol is that care must be taken during injection to avoid serious injury to the embryo. However, with practice, injecting G-actinRed into Drosophila embryos is a fast and reliable way to visualize actin rods and can easily be used with flies of any genotype or with the introduction of other cellular stresses, including hypoxia and oxidative stress.


This protocol describes how to inject G-actinRed to visualize the assembly of intranuclear actin rods in heat-stressed embryos that are undergoing an inducible Actin Stress Response (ASR)1. We developed this protocol to aid studies of the ASR, which in embryos leads to disrupted morphogenesis and reduced viability, and in adult human cell types is associated with pathologies including renal failure2, muscle myopathies3, and Alzheimer’s and Huntington’s Disease4,5,6,7,8. This ASR is induced by numerous cellular stresses, including heat shock9,10,11, oxidative stress4,6, reduced ATP synthesis12, and abnormal Huntingtin or β-amyloid oligomerization4,5,6,7,9,13,14,15,16. A hallmark of the ASR is the assembly of aberrant actin rods in either the cytoplasm or nucleus of affected cells, which is driven by stress-induced hyperactivation of an actin interacting protein, Cofilin1,5,6,10. Unfortunately, key knowledge gaps remain regarding the ASR. For example, the function of the actin rods is not known. We do not understand why rods form in the cytoplasm of some cell types, but the nucleus of others. Nor is it clear whether the ASR is protective or maladaptive for cells or embryos undergoing stress. Finally, we still do not know the detailed mechanisms underlying Cofilin hyperactivation or actin rod assembly. Thus, this protocol provides a rapid and versatile assay to probe the ASR by visualizing actin rod formation and dynamics in the highly tractable experimental system of the living fruit fly embryo.

The protocol to microinject G-actinRed into living Drosophila embryos was initially developed to study the dynamics of normal cytoplasmic actin structures17 during tissue building events. In those studies, we found that G-actinRed injection did not adversely affect early developmental processes in the embryo, including cytokinesis or gastrulation17,18. We then modified the protocol, adapting the embryo handling and G-actinRed injection to allow imaging of actin rods in heat stressed embryos undergoing the ASR1. Other methods besides G-actinRed injection can be used to visualize actin in embryos. These methods rely on expressing fluorescent proteins (FPs) tagged to actin or to domains of actin binding proteins, such as Utrophin-mCherry, Lifeact, F-tractin-GFP, and Moesin-GFP (reviewed in19). However, using these FP probes requires caution because they can stabilize or disrupt some actin structures, do not equally label all actin structures20, and in the case of actin-GFP, are highly overexpressed – problematic for the analysis of rod assembly which is not only stress dependent but also actin concentration dependent1. Thus, G-actinRed is the preferred probe for rod studies in fly embryos, and the large size of the embryo allows its easy injection.

The workflow of this protocol is similar to other well-established microinjection techniques that have been used for injecting proteins, nucleic acids, drugs, and fluorescent indicators into Drosophila embryos21,22,23,24,25,26,27. However, following the microinjection of G-actinRed here, embryos are exposed to mild heat stress to induce the ASR and intranuclear actin rod assembly. For labs with access to flies and an injection rig, this method should be readily implementable and adaptable for specific lines of study in regard to the ASR, including its induction by different stresses or modulation in distinct genetic backgrounds.

Subscription Required. Please recommend JoVE to your librarian.


1. Prepare embryo collection cups and apple juice agar plates

  1. Five days prior to the injection experiment, construct28 or procure at least two small embryo collection cups. Make fresh 60 mm apple juice agar plates to be used with small collection cups28. Store plates in plastic boxes covered with damp paper towels at 4 °C.
    NOTE: Small embryo collection cups, populated with fly numbers as described in step 1.3, will provide sufficient embryo numbers per experiment, while also ensuring that embryo handling and injection can be done in a short enough time to allow imaging of early developmental stages.
  2. Warm apple juice plates to 18 °C and add a dab of yeast paste to the center of the plate. Yeast paste is a simple paste of active yeast and distilled water.
  3. To promote the most generous egg laying, set up collection cups with flies 2 days prior to the experiment. Add at least 100 females and 50 male flies to the collection cups, and top with a prepared apple juice plate (Figure 1, step 1). On the days leading up to the injection experiment change the apple juice plates at least twice each day, once in the morning and once in the evening.
    NOTE: The best injection and imaging results are obtained when embryo collection cups are kept at 18 °C with a 12 h light on/light off cycle.

2. Prepare a working stock solution of G-actinRed for microinjection

NOTE: This preparation only makes 2 μL of a 5 mg/mL working stock of G-actinRed, so if users are unaccustomed to the microinjection technique, it is advantageous to skip to step 3 and practice the microinjections with a neutral pH buffer to conserve precious working stock. The 10 μg stock of G-actinRed from the vendor can be stored in its original packaging in a 16 oz screw top jar with ~500 g of desiccant at 4 °C for up to 6 months.

  1. Prepare a G-buffer stock solution in advance: 5 mM Tris-HCl, 0.2 mM CaCl2, pH 8.0. Filter and store at room temperature.
  2. On the day of injections, prepare 1 mL of a G-buffer working solution in a fresh snap cap microcentrifuge tube on ice using the G-buffer stock from step 2.1, supplemented with the following at the indicated final concentrations: 1 mM dithiothreitol (DTT) and 0.2 mM ATP, pH 8.0.
    NOTE: The 1 mL volume of G-buffer working solution is more than what is needed for an experiment but simplifies the preparation. Excess can be discarded after the experiment or users can scale down according to their preference.
    1. Keeping the 10 μg G-actinRed stock on ice, first add 1 μL of filtered, distilled water to the top of the pink droplet of G-actinRed inside the tube.
    2. Next, add 1 μL of the cold, freshly prepared G-buffer working solution from step 2.2. Pipet up and down ~20 times to mix well with the pipette volume set to 1 μL. The G-actinRed stock will now be at the final dilution of 5 mg/mL.
  3. Incubate the prepared G-actinRed for 30 min on ice undisturbed.
  4. Centrifuge the prepared G-actinRed at 16,000 x g for 20 min at 4 °C in a microcentrifuge to remove any precipitate.
  5. Carefully pipet 1.5 μL of the supernatant into a fresh snap cap microcentrifuge tube on ice, avoiding the dark pink pellet.
  6. Store the prepared G-actinRed supernatant on ice for up to 6 h until ready to load into a microneedle.
    NOTE: Microneedles can be pulled from capillary tubes in advance on a micropipette puller, then stored at room temperature on a strip of modeling clay in a 100 x 20 mm Petri dish. Suggested parameters for microneedle pulling can be found in the Pipette Cookbook29.

3. Collect embryos and mount for injection

  1. Allow flies to lay embryos for 30 min on apple juice plates with yeast paste at 18 °C.
  2. While flies are laying, pre-warm an apple juice agar plate without yeast paste to room temperature, cut out a 4 cm x 1 cm rectangular wedge of apple juice agar with a razor blade, and place on a 25 mm x 75 mm glass slide.
    1. Harvest plate from the 30 minute collection and dechorionate embryos by pouring fresh bleach, diluted 1:1 with distilled water, onto the plate and swirling the plate for 1 min, as described in28 (Figure 1, step 2).
      NOTE: Different brands of bleach are sold at different concentrations. The bleach used here is 6% sodium hypochlorite from the bottle and is diluted to a final concentration of 3% sodium hypochlorite. Other bleach brands at slightly lower concentrations will work equally well.
    2. Pour the bleach and dechorionated embryos into a collection basket (a 70 μm cell strainer) and rinse the plate twice with distilled water from a squirt bottle, adding these washes to the collection basket.
    3. Vigorously rinse the dechorionated embryos in the collection basket with distilled water until no yeast clumps are visible and the basket leaves no pink marks from excess bleach when blotted on a paper towel.
  3. Using a paintbrush with bristles dampened with distilled water, transfer dechorionated and washed embryos from the collection basket onto the prepared apple juice agar wedge on the glass slide.
  4. Use a pair of fine tip tweezers or a dissecting needle to arrange ten embryos in a straight line along the long axis of the rectangular agar wedge (Figure 1, step 3). Arrange the embryos head-to-tail, such that their anterior pole is facing to the right and dorsal side is facing the researcher (Figure 1, step 3, magnified).
  5. Cut off 0.5 cm of the end of a P200 pipette tip with a razor blade and dip into the “embryo glue” (described in28). Generously coat a region 5 mm in width (Figure 1, step 4) along the long edge of a 24 mm x 50 mm rectangular coverslip, and let dry, glue side up. Drying will take ~30 s and is complete once the entire glue-coated region appears matte rather than wet or shiny.
    NOTE: Prepare “embryo glue” at least 48 h in advance. Add n-Heptane to strips of double-sided tape in a scintillation vial as described in28.
  6. Once the “embryo glue” has dried, gently place the coverslip glue side down on top of the row of aligned embryos on the agar, leaving 2-3 mm of space between the edge of the coverslip and the row of embryos.
    NOTE: Sticking the embryos too close to the edge of the coverslip may lead to the embryos drying out too much during the course of the experiment.
  7. Flip the coverslip over so that the embryos are now facing up. They should be stuck in a line along one long edge of the coverslip, and their ventral region facing the closest edge of the coverslip (Figure 1, step 4, magnified).
  8. Desiccate the embryos by placing the coverslip with embryos gently on top of 150 g of fresh blue desiccant stored in a 16 oz screw top jar. Tightly screw on the lid and incubate for 8-10 min (Figure 1, step 5).
  9. After desiccation, remove the coverslip from the desiccant jar and tape each short side of the coverslip to a microscope slide, embryo side up, with two 4 cm2 pieces of double-sided tape so that the embryo coverslip will fit onto the injection stage (Figure 1, step 6).
  10. Add 2-3 drops of Halocarbon 27 oil with a Pasteur pipette to cover the aligned embryos and protect them from further dehydration (Figure 1, step 6).

4. Inject and heat stress embryos to promote actin rod formation

NOTE: All injections are done in a temperature-controlled room at 18 °C.

  1. Prepare humid incubation chambers from a glass Petri dish at least 100 mm x 20 mm in size and line the chamber with twists of lab tissue wipers dampened with distilled water (Figure 1, step 8). Pre-warm the incubation chambers at 32 °C or the desired incubation temperature prior to injecting embryos.
  2. Open the airflow valve for the microinjector and turn on the microinjector (compressed air or house air with a pressure of at least 90 psi is suitable).
  3. While embryos are desiccating, backload the previously prepared G-actinRed supernatant into the microneedle using a micro loader tip. Set the pipette to draw up 1-1.5 μL.
    NOTE: Because of the viscosity of the actin, loading volumes may not be accurate and there may be enough actin left to load at least one to two more microneedles. Up to 60 embryos can be injected per loaded microneedle if the microneedle is calibrated properly and does not become clogged during the course of the experiment.
  4. Attach the microneedle to the needle holder and tighten the screw. Connect the air tube to the microinjector and ensure that the backflow pressure on the microneedle equilibrates to 30 hPa.
  5. Calibrate the microinjector settings to expel a 100 μm diameter bubble of G-actinRed (~500 pL) on a slide micrometer. Rotate the pressure knob (500-1500 hPa) and injection pulse time knob (0.1-0.5 s) on the microinjector to get the right bubble size. Adjust these settings each time a new microneedle is loaded to account for variability in actin viscosity and microneedle tip size.
    NOTE: The prepared G-actinRed is viscous and there may be air in the tip of the microneedle that should be expelled before injecting embryos. If the G-actinRed does not readily expel from the tip of the microneedle, gently break the microneedle tip against the edge of the slide micrometer.
  6. Place the slide with mounted embryos onto the microscope stage.
    NOTE: Every injection set up will be different, so researchers will have to adjust their injection method accordingly. Here the embryos are moved with respect to a stationary microneedle, injecting each embryo by running the embryo into the microneedle.
  7. Adjust the micromanipulator stage and focus of the 10x objective on the light microscope so that the embryos are visible. The embryos are in the correct focal plane when the outlines of the vitelline membrane are sharpest and the embryo appears largest. Choose embryos to inject that are in the correct developmental stage, so that by the time the post-injection incubation is complete, most of the clutch reaches the desired developmental stage (e.g., inject embryos at Bownes’ stage 2-330 in order to observe rods at cellularization after heat stress at 32 °C).
  8. Use the microneedle controls to bring the needle into the same focal plane as the embryos.
    NOTE: If the microneedle catches on the coverslip while moving the stage or microneedle, then the microneedle is too close to the slide and is not in the correct focal plane. The microneedle should be parallel to the coverslip, and not at a significant angle (Figure 1, step 7).
  9. Insert the microneedle into the embryo so that it hits the embryo in the middle of its ventral region, at the embryo “equator”. Trigger injection with the foot pedal or “inject” button when the microneedle tip is visible inside the middle of the embryo (Figure 1, step 7).
  10. Inject the G-actinRed once and slowly remove the microneedle. Move the stage and repeat for each embryo of the appropriate developmental stage.
    NOTE: Expansion of the embryo is normal as the G-actinRed is injected and a bit of cytoplasm may leak out of the embryo.
  11. After all the embryos have been injected, place the slide with the embryos in the prepared humid incubation chamber and close the lid (Figure 1, step 8). If trying to obtain embryos that reach cellularization, heat stress the embryos at 32 °C for 60-75 min in the humid incubation chamber.
    NOTE: Incubation times are noted that allow visualization of rods in cellularizing heat stressed embryos. The incubation time will be longer for non heat stress control embryos because development will be slower at a lower temperature31. These control embryos can be incubated in humid chambers at temperatures such as 18 °C or 25 °C, depending on design of the specific experiment and the question to be asked. The minimum incubation time necessary for the G-actinRed to diffuse throughout the embryo is 30 min.

5. Image actin rods in heat stressed embryos by confocal microscopy

  1. While the embryos are being heat stressed, turn on the confocal microscope and select the 561 nm laser channel.
  2. Move the objective lens (25x, 40x or 63x recommended) to the working position.
  3. If imaging heat stressed embryos, then set the heated stage incubator to achieve an internal temperature of 32 °C. A point-and-shoot or infrared thermometer can be used to check the temperature at or near the objective.
  4. Remove the slide with injected embryos from the humid incubation chamber after incubation is complete (Figure 1, step 9).
  5. Working quickly, gently pry off the double-sided tape pieces that were used to adhere the coverslip with mounted embryos to the slide (Figure 1, step 9).
    CAUTION: Be gentle during these steps as coverslips can easily shatter if too much force is applied.
  6. Stick two 2.5 cm long pieces of double-sided tape together and cut the tape in half lengthwise to make two strips, 2.5 x 0.5 cm long (Figure 1, step 10).
  7. Stick two-thirds of the length of each tape strip onto the first coverslip, flanking each side of the embryos in Halocarbon 27 oil (Figure 1, step 10, orange), leaving one-third of the tape strips hanging off the edge of the first coverslip where the embryos are stuck. Use gloved hands and be careful not to touch the embryos during this step.
  8. Gently place a second rectangular coverslip on top of the tape strips to sandwich the embryos between the coverslips (Figure 1, step 10, blue). Align the 25 mm edges but keep the 50 mm edges offset from one another by 1 cm in width.
    NOTE: This second coverslip’s full surface will become the new imaging surface that will face the objective lens, so take care not to get fingerprints or Halocarbon 27 oil on this second coverslip surface. The offset is necessary so that extra Halocarbon 27 oil can be added to evenly immerse the embryos. If needed, add Halocarbon 27 oil at the seam where the two coverslips meet at the top of the sandwich and it will coat the embryos by capillary action (see dashed lines in Figure 1, step 10).
  9. Gently tap down on the areas of the coverslip that are directly on top of the tape strips with the blunt side of a razorblade to get the coverslip to adhere to the tape.
  10. Flip the coverslip sandwich over and place on a lab tissue wiper to keep the imaging surface clean and carry to the confocal microscope (Figure 1, step 11). Ensure that the tape is completely stuck to both coverslips before imaging.
  11. Confirm that the heated stage is at temperature and if using an inverted microscope, add immersion liquid onto the selected objective lens.
  12. Place the coverslip sandwich onto the stage carefully to ensure that the new imaging surface (2nd coverslip) is the one touching the immersion liquid (Figure 1, step 11).
    NOTE: If needed, adhere the coverslip sandwich to the stage with two small pieces of double-sided tape to prevent unnecessary movement during imaging if the coverslips do not fit well in the heated stage.
  13. Focus on an embryo that is in cellularization (Bownes stage 4a30) or desired developmental stage using either transmitted light or fluorescence.
  14. Once an embryo has been brought into focus, switch to the laser acquisition mode on the confocal microscope and adjust laser power and gain, frame size, tiling, and projection settings as desired.
  15. Take surface-view images through the focal planes of the embryo’s nuclei to find intranuclear actin rods. Rods should appear in multiple orientations as bright streaks or dots inside the comparatively dark nuclei (Figure 2A, 2C).

6. Alternative imaging experiments

  1. Perform FRAP to investigate actin turnover along the length of intranuclear actin rods or in cytoplasmic actin structures, such as the tips of the plasma membrane furrows during cellularization.
  2. In the imaging software, choose a rectangular region around furrow tips or actin rods in which to acquire the experiment.
  3. Choose a small square region of the center of an actin rod within the rectangular acquisition region to bleach. Ensure that the tips of the actin rod are visible and do not get bleached during the course of the experiment to allow for accurate tracking of the rod inside the nucleus.
  4. Set the bleach laser to iterate 50x and set the bleach laser power to maximum.
  5. Choose a time course to acquire images every second for a total up to 120 s at maximum pixel dwell speed and set the laser to bleach after the first two seconds of image acquisition.
  6. Quantify the data to determine the half-time of fluorescence recovery1.

Subscription Required. Please recommend JoVE to your librarian.

Representative Results

A schematic workflow of embryo handling is depicted in Figure 1, and a timetable for a typical experiment is presented in Table 1. An estimate for a good experimental outcome is that for every 10 embryos injected, at least half of the embryos viewed will be at the correct developmental stage, undamaged, and exhibit a robust ASR with heat stress at 32 °C. This ASR will be evidenced by the assembly of intranuclear actin rods as shown in the representative surface view image of an embryo in Figure 2A (right panel). Actin rods will appear in several orientations (parallel or perpendicular to the imaging plane) inside the nuclei and can be imaged through several focal planes. In comparison, control embryos incubated at 18 °C will not display actin rods (Figure 2A, left panel). The percent nuclei containing rods can be quantified, as demonstrated in Figure 2B. In addition, FRAP experiments may be performed on rods (Figure 2C). A suggested quantification method for FRAP data is referenced in1 and an example of a fluorescence recovery plot for a bleached versus unbleached region of an actin rod is shown in Figure 2D.

If an embryo is severely damaged by injection or becomes too dry during the experiment, mitotic asynchrony might be observed and cellularization will be disrupted. Sometimes, rods may not be visible because of a failure to get enough actin injected into the embryo. If this happens, ensure that the amount of G-actinRed injected is 500 pL (measured with a micrometer in step 4.5) and confirm that this amount remains consistent between embryos by doing a test injection into the surrounding oil to check the size of the G-actinRed bubble in between each embryo microinjection. Additionally, to ensure rod visualization, work quickly to add the coverslip and move the embryos to the heated microscope stage once they are taken from the humid chamber in step 5.4, as rod assembly is reversible1 and rods can disassemble if the embryos are kept at a temperature less than 32°C for more than 30 min.

Figure 1
Figure 1: Schematic overview of embryo handling during the experiment. (1) Adult flies in embryo collection cups lay embryos on apple juice agar plates. (2) Embryos are dechorionated with 1:1 bleach:distilled water, poured into a collection basket, and thoroughly washed with distilled water to remove bleach and debris. (3) Embryos are transferred with a paintbrush to a rectangular apple juice agar wedge on a slide and arranged on their sides, head-to-tail, with dorsal region facing the edge of the agar. (4) A 5 x 50 mm region of a glass coverslip (orange) is coated with “embryo glue” and pressed down gently onto the row of embryos arranged on the agar to adhere them to the coverslip. (5) The coverslip with embryos is inverted so that embryos face up. The embryos are desiccated in a screw top jar. (6) Immediately after desiccation, the coverslip is taped to a slide, embryos facing up, and embryos are covered with Halocarbon 27 oil. (7) A microneedle previously loaded with prepared G-actinRed is used to make a single injection into the center of the ventral region of each embryo, with needle positioned parallel to the coverslip. (8) After injection, embryos are incubated inside a Petri dish humidified with damp lab tissue wipers at the control temperature (18 °C) or with heat stress (32 °C). (9) After incubation, the coverslip with the embryos on it is removed from the slide. (10) Two pieces of double-sided tape are layered on top of each other, sliced in half lengthwise, and placed on either side of the oil surrounding the embryos on the first coverslip. A second coverslip (blue) is placed on top of the first to create a new imaging surface, offset so that it leaves a gap for more oil to be added to cover the embryos as necessary. (11) If imaging on an inverted confocal microscope, the coverslip sandwich is inverted so that the second coverslip faces the objective. Imaging is done in an incubated chamber, and actin rods are visualized over several focal planes of each embryos’ nuclei. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 2
Figure 2: Representative results of actin rods in heat-stressed embryos. (A) Actin rods are not seen in an embryo that was incubated at the control temperature of 18 °C (left panel), but are seen in the nuclei of an embryo that was heat-stressed at 32 °C (right panel). (B) Quantification of the percentage of nuclei with actin rods from a representative experiment. Each dot represents one embryo where rods and nuclei were counted in the entire imaged region (n = 22 embryos at 18 °C; n = 23 embryos at 32 °C; error bars show standard deviation). A Student’s t-test, with unequal variance assumed, was used to calculate the p-value. (C) A representative time series shows FRAP on an actin rod. The portion of the rod that was bleached is indicated by a white arrowhead. Pre-bleach is 2 s prior to the bleach step. Time = 0 s is the bleach step, and fluorescence recovery was tracked until 60 s post bleach. (D) A plot shows recovery dynamics for actin fluorescence in a bleached region of a rod, compared to an unbleached region in the same rod. Rods are remarkably stable and actin within them does not turnover. Thus, no recovery is seen. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Table 1: Experimental workflow with suggested timetable. This timetable summarizes the expected time it will take to complete each step of the protocol.

Order Step Required time for each step Description
1 1.1 5 days in advance Make embryo collection cages. Pour apple juice agar plates.
2 1.2-1.3 2 days in advance Set up collection cages with adult male and female flies.
3 2.6 Note 1 day in advance Pull capillary tubes to make microneedles.
4 2.1-2.6 1 h Prepare G-actin.
5 3.1 30 min Allow flies to lay eggs.
6 3.2-3.10 15-30 min Collect, mount, desiccate embryos. Cover embryos with oil.
7 4.1 30 min in advance Prepare humid incubation chambers.
8 4.2-4.4 1 min Load microneedle.
9 4.5-4.10 10-20 min Calibrate G-actin bubble size and inject embryos.
10 4.11 30 min-1+ h Incubate/heat stress embryos.
11 5.1-5.3 1 h in advance Turn on microscope and incubation stage.
12 5.4-5.10 5 min Sandwich embryos between coverslips for imaging.
13 5.11-6.6 15 min-1+ h Image intranuclear actin rods in embryos.

Table 2: Troubleshooting suggestions. This table provides suggestions for troubleshooting to aid the successful completion of the protocol.

Potential problem Suggestions
Flies do not lay enough embryos. Set up the cup at least 5 days in advance (refer to steps 1.1-1.3). Change plates 3x per day leading up to the experiment to encourage egg laying. Let flies lay embryos for 1 h instead of 30 min. Set up cups with young adult flies.
No G-actin is expelled from the microneedle. Increase pressure and time settings on microinjector. Break the microneedle tip further (refer to step 4.5 Note). Since major clogs may not clear, load a new needle.
Difficult to calibrate a small enough bubble size. Adjust the pressure and time settings (refer to step 4.5). Since the microneedle tip opening might be too large, load a new needle.
Embryos release from the glue on the coverslip during injecting. Adjust “embryo glue” consistency for future coverslips by adding more double-sided tape to the heptane solution (refer to step 3.5 Note).
Embryos dry out during temperature incubation. Make sure that the slide is level in the incubation chamber (refer to step 4.11) and that the oil is not touching anything that might wick it away. Add extra drops of oil to the embryos. Decrease the pre-injection desiccation time (refer to step 3.8).
Oil does not completely cover the embryos in between the first and second coverslips. Add extra oil via capillary action to the small gap between the coverslips (refer to step 5.8 Note).
Intranuclear actin rods are not visible in heat-stressed embryos. Inject a larger volume of G-actin (refer to step 4.5). Confirm that the temperature of both the post-injection incubation (refer to step 4.11) and imaging chamber are 32 °C (refer to step 5.3).
Large bubbles of G-actin are visible around the injection site of embryos. Inject a smaller volume of G-actin (refer to step 4.5). Increase the embryo desiccation time to promote better retention of the injected actin inside the embryo (refer to step 3.8).

Subscription Required. Please recommend JoVE to your librarian.


The significance of this method is that it utilizes the well-established protocol of microinjection in Drosophila embryos21,22,23,24,25,26,27 to enable new research regarding the ASR and accompanying actin rod assembly. A major advantage of injecting G-actinRed into live embryos is that the ASR can be studied under a variety of contexts. For future studies, these contexts may include injecting embryos of other genotypes as part of a mutant screen or exposing injected embryos to different stress conditions, such as oxidative stress4,32. Although not described in detail here, this injection technique can also be modified to inject nucleic acids, other proteins, drugs and indicator dyes (for examples, see21,22,23,24,32) to study the ASR. Thus, this method presents a number of approaches for identifying the range of stresses that induce ASR, further characterizing cellular responses during ASR (e.g. changes in mitochondrial activity), and uncovering new molecules and mechanisms underlying intranuclear actin rod assembly.

Some critical steps of the protocol include the following: In step 3.8, embryos must be properly desiccated to ensure successful injection and best embryo health. Desiccation time will depend on the ambient temperature and humidity of the laboratory, so it is recommended to practice the mounting, desiccation, and injections with a neutral pH buffer first to establish this parameter for handling the embryos. In step 4.5, the microneedle and injection settings must be fine-tuned to allow injection of enough G-actinRed into embryos. If too little G-actinRed is injected into the embryo, actin rods may not be easily visualized, since the formation of actin rods is dependent on the concentration of free actin1. Additionally, it will be difficult to get consistent results from FRAP experiments if there is not enough G-actinRed injected, since the fluorescence intensity will not be high enough to overcome background fluorescence. Therefore, it is important to calibrate the bubble size each time a new needle is loaded and used. G-actinRed is viscous and tends to clog inside the microneedle. Sometimes, this can lead to injecting variable amounts of G-actin into the embryos. If the microneedle is clogged and clearing the microneedle with high pressure fails, it may be necessary to attempt breaking the tip of the microneedle further or even loading a new microneedle and injecting a fresh set of embryos. Finally, in step 4.11, embryos must be incubated at elevated temperature and for sufficient time for the ASR to be induced and rods to form1. The temperatures of all incubators should be constantly monitored, time to transfer embryos from incubator to incubator must be limited, and a timer should be used for all incubations. Other possible problems are listed in Table 2 with accompanying troubleshooting tips.

One major limitation of this protocol is that exceptional care must be taken to preserve the health of the embryos during injections, incubations and imaging. The protocol has been designed to maximize embryo health, and with significant practice, a researcher can complete all steps of the protocol with embryo development progressing at the rates expected per temperature31. A second limitation of the protocol is the necessity for a microinjection rig, which can be fairly expensive and is not common equipment for every fly lab. However, if an adjacent lab is equipped to inject other embryos (e.g., Xenopus, Zebrafish, and Caenorhabditis elegans) or adherent cells, the injection rig used is likely suitable for Drosophila injections. In that case, only the shape of the needle need be adapted for Drosophila embryos according to the guidelines of the Pipette Cookbook29. Alternatively, there are some less expensive micoinjector options on the market (e.g., analog microinjectors), which can significantly reduce the cost of assembling an injection rig.

Subscription Required. Please recommend JoVE to your librarian.


No conflicts of interests declared.


The authors gratefully acknowledge the work of Liuliu Zheng and Zenghui Xue, who helped pioneer this technique in the Sokac lab, as well as Hasan Seede who helped with the analysis. The work for this study is funded by a grant from NIH (R01 GM115111).


Name Company Catalog Number Comments
Adenosine triphosphate (ATP) Millipore-Sigma A23835G Component of G buffer
Apple juice, Mott's, 64 fl oz Mott's 014800000344 Component of apple juice plates
Bacto Agar BD 214010 Component of apple juice plates
Bleach, PureBright Germicidal, 6.0% sodium hypochlorite KIK International 059647210020 For dechorionating embryos
Calcium chloride Millipore-Sigma C1016500G Component of G buffer
Cell strainer, 70 μm Falcon 352350 For collecting dechorionated embryos
Confocal microscope, LSM 880 34-channel with Airyscan Zeiss 0000001994956 For imaging intranuclear actin rods
Desiccant Drierite 24001 For desiccating embryos
Dissecting microscope, Stemi 508 Stereoscope with 8:1 zoom Zeiss 4350649000000 For arranging embryos on agar wedge
Dissecting needle, 5 in Fisher Scientific 08965A For arranging embryos on agar wedge
Dithiothreitol (DTT) Fisher Scientific BP1725 Component of G buffer
Double-sided Tape, Scotch Permanent, 0.5 in x 250 in 3M 021200010323 For making embryo glue
Embryo collection cage Genessee Scientific 59100 For housing adult flies and collecting embryos
Fine tip tweezers, Dumont Tweezer, Style 5 Electron Microscopy Sciences 72701D For arranging embryos on agar wedge
Glass capillaries, Borosillicate glass, thin 1 mm x 0.75 mm World Precision Instruments, Inc. TW1004 For microneedles
Halocarbon oil 27 Millipore-Sigma H8773100ML For hydration of embryos
Heated stage incubator Zeiss 4118579020000, 4118609020000, 4118609010000 For confocal imaging
Lab Tissue Wipers, KimWipes Kimberly-Clark 34155 Lab tissue wipers
Light microscope, Invertoskop 40C Inverted Phase contrast microscope, refurbished Zeiss Discontinued Injection microscope
Methyl-4-hydroxybenzoate Millipore-Sigma H36471KG Component of apple juice plates
Microinjector, FemtoJet4x Eppendorf 5253000025 Microinjector
Micro loader tips, epT.I.P.S. 20 μL Eppendorf 5242956003 For loading microneedles
Micromanipulator and injection stage with x,y,z dials for needle adjustment Bernard Instruments, Inc (Houston, TX) Custom For performing microinjections
Micropipette puller, Model P-97, Flaming/Brown Sutter Instruments P97 For pulling capillary tubes to make microneedles
Microscope cover glass 24x50-1.5 Fisher Scientific 12544E For mounting embryos
Microscope slides, Lilac Colorfrost, Precleaned, 25 x 75 x 1mm Fisher Scientific 22037081 For mounting embryos for injection
n-Heptane Fisher Scientific H3601 Component of embryo glue
Objective, 10x Zeiss Discontinued 10x objective for injection microscope
Objective, C-Apochromat 40x/1,2 W Korr. FCS Zeiss 4217679971711 40x water objective for confocal
Objective, LD LCI Plan-Apochromat 25x/0.8 Imm Cor DIC M27 for oil, water, silicone oil or glycerine immersion (D=0-0.17mm) (WD=0.57mm at D=0.17mm) Zeiss 4208529871000 25x mixed immersion objective for confocal
Objective, Plan-Apocrhomat 63x/1.40 Oil DIC f/ELYRA Zeiss 4207829900799 63x oil objective for confocal
Paintbrush, Robert Simmons Expression E85 Pointed Round size 2 Daler-Rowney 038372016954 For transferring embryos
Paper towels, Kleenex C-fold paper towels, white Kimberly-Clark 884266344845 For blotting cell strainer
Pasteur pipette, 5 3/4 in Fisher Scientific 1367820A For covering embryos with oil
Petri dish, glass, 100 x 20 mm Corning 3160102 For humid incubation chamber
Petri dish, plastic, 60 x 15 mm VWR 25384092 For apple juice plates
Pipette, Eppendorf Reference 0.5-10 μL Eppendorf 2231000604 For loading the microneedle
Pipette tip, xTIP4 250 μL Biotix 63300006 For adding embryo glue to coverslip
Razor blade VWR 55411050 For cutting agar wedge, tape, pipette tips
Rhodamine-conjugated globular actin, human platelet (non-muscle; 4x10 μg) Cytoskeleton, Inc. APHR-A G-actin^Red
Scintillation vial, 20 mL Glass borosillicate with polyethylene liner and urea caps Fisher Scientific 033377 For making embryo glue
Screw top jar, 16 oz Nalgene 000194414195 For desiccating embryos
Stage micrometer Electron Microscopy Sciences 602104PG For calibrating volume of G-actin injection
Sucrose Millipore-Sigma 840971KG Component of apple juice plates
Trizma base Millipore-Sigma T15031KG Component of G buffer
Yeast, Lesaffre Yeast Corporation Yeast, Red Star Active Dry, 32 oz Lesaffre Yeast Corporation 117929157002 Component of yeast paste



  1. Figard, L., et al. Cofilin-mediated Actin Stress Response is maladaptive in heat-stressed embryos. Cell Reports. 26, (49), 3493-3501 (2019).
  2. Ashworth, S. L., et al. ADF/cofilin mediates actin cytoskeletal alterations in LLC-PK cells during ATP depletion. American Journal of Physiology Renal Physiology. 284, (4), 852-862 (2003).
  3. Vandebrouck, A., et al. In vitro analysis of rod composition and actin dynamics in inherited myopathies. Journal of Neuropathology and Experimental Neurology. 69, (5), 429-441 (2010).
  4. Minamide, L. S., Striegl, A. M., Boyle, J. A., Meberg, P. J., Bamburg, J. R. Neurodegenerative stimuli induce persistent ADF/cofilin-actin rods that disrupt distal neurite function. Nature Cell Biology. 2, (9), 628-636 (2000).
  5. Bamburg, J. R., et al. ADF/Cofilin-actin rods in neurodegenerative diseases. Current Alzheimer Research. 7, (3), 241-250 (2010).
  6. Bamburg, J. R., Bernstein, B. W. Actin dynamics and cofilin-actin rods in alzheimer disease. Cytoskeleton. 73, (9), 477-497 (2016).
  7. Bernstein, B. W., Chen, H., Boyle, J. A., Bamburg, J. R. Formation of actin-ADF/cofilin rods transiently retards decline of mitochondrial potential and ATP in stressed neurons. AJP: Cell Physiology. 291, (5), 828-839 (2006).
  8. Munsie, L. N., Desmond, C. R., Truant, R. Cofilin nuclear-cytoplasmic shuttling affects cofilin-actin rod formation during stress. Journal of Cell Science. 125, (17), 3977-3988 (2012).
  9. Iida, K., Iida, H., Yahara, I. Heat shock induction of intranuclear actin rods in cultured mammalian cells. Experimental Cell Research. 165, 207-215 (1986).
  10. Ohta, Y., Nishida, E., Sakai, H., Miyamoto, E. Dephosphorylation of cofilin accompanies heat shock-induced nuclear accumulation of cofilin. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 264, (27), 16143-16148 (1989).
  11. Iida, K., Matsumoto, S., Yahara, I. The KKRKK sequence is involved in heat shock-induced nuclear translocation of the 18-kDa actin-binding protein, cofilin. Cell Structure and Function. 17, (1), 39-46 (1992).
  12. Minamide, L. S., et al. Isolation and characterization of cytoplasmic cofilin-actin rods. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 285, (8), 5450-5460 (2010).
  13. Masurovsky, E. B., Benitez, H. H., Kim, S. U., Murray, M. R. Origin, development, and nature of intranuclear rodlets and associated bodies in chicken sympathetic neurons. The Journal of Cell Biology. 44, (7), 172-191 (1970).
  14. Feldman, M. L., Peters, A. Intranuclear rods and sheets in rat cochlear nucleus. Journal of Neurocytology. 1, (2), 109-127 (1972).
  15. Nishida, E., et al. Cofilin is a component of intranuclear and cytoplasmic actin rods induced in cultured cells. Cell Biology. 84, (8), 5262-5266 (1987).
  16. Ono, S., Abe, H., Nagaoka, R., Obinata, T. Colocalization of ADF and cofilin in intranuclear actin rods of cultured muscle cells. Journal of Muscle Research and Cell Motility. 14, (2), 195-204 (1993).
  17. Xue, Z., Sokac, A. M. Back-to-back mechanisms drive actomyosin ring closure during Drosophila embryo cleavage. The Journal of Cell Biology. 215, (3), 335-344 (2016).
  18. Cao, J., Albertson, R., Riggs, B., Field, C. M., Sullivan, W. Nuf, a Rab11 effector, maintains cytokinetic furrow integrity by promoting local actin polymerization. Journal of Cell Biology. 182, (2), 301-313 (2008).
  19. Spracklen, A. J., Fagan, T. N., Lovander, K. E., Tootle, T. L. The pros and cons of common actin labeling tools for visualizing actin dynamics during Drosophila oogenesis. Developmental Biology. 393, (2), 209-226 (2014).
  20. Chen, Q., Nag, S., Pollard, T. D. Formins filter modified actin subunits during processive elongation. Journal of Structural Biology. 177, (1), 32-39 (2012).
  21. Iordanou, E., Chandran, R. R., Blackstone, N., Jiang, L. RNAi interference by dsRNA injection into Drosophila embryos. Journal of Visualized Experiments. (50), 2477 (2011).
  22. Juarez, M. T., Patterson, R. A., Li, W., McGinnis, W. Microinjection wound assay and in vivo localization of epidermal wound response reporters in Drosophila embryos. Journal of Visualized Experiments. 81, 50750 (2013).
  23. Carreira-Rosario, A., et al. Recombineering homologous recombination constructs in Drosophila. Journal of Visualized Experiments. (77), 50346 (2013).
  24. Brust-Mascher, I., Scholey, J. M. Microinjection techniques for studying mitosis in the Drosophila melanogaster syncytial embryo. Journal of Visualized Experiments. (31), 1382 (2009).
  25. Catrina, I. E., Bayer, L. V., Omar, O. S., Bratu, D. P. Visualizing and tracking endogenous mRNAs in live Drosophila melanogaster egg chambers. Journal of Visualized Experiments. (148), 58545 (2019).
  26. Wessel, A. D., Gumalla, M., Grosshans, J., Schmidt, C. F. The mechanical properties of early Drosophila embryos measured by high-speed video microrheology. Biophysical Journal. 108, (8), 1899-1907 (2015).
  27. Mollinari, C., González, Microinjection and transgenesis. Microinjection and Transgenesis: Strategies and Protocols. Cid-Arregui, A., García-Carrancá, A. Springer. Berlin. 587-603 (1998).
  28. Figard, L., Sokac, A. M. Imaging cell shape change in living Drosophila embryos. Journal of Visualized Experiments. (49), 2503 (2011).
  29. Oesterle, A. Pipette Cookbook 2018: P-97 and P-1000 Micropipette Pullers. Sutter Instruments. Novato, CA. (2018).
  30. Bownes, M. A photographic study of development in the living embryo of Drosophila melanogaster. Journal of Embryology and Experimental Morphology. 33, (3), 789-801 (1975).
  31. Powsner, L. The effects of temperature on the durations of the developmental stages of Drosophila melanogaster. Physiological Zoology. 8, (4), 474-520 (1935).
  32. Hunter, M. V., Willoughby, P. M., Bruce, A. E. E., Fernandez-Gonzalez, R. Oxidative Stress Orchestrates Cell Polarity to Promote Embryonic Wound Healing. Developmental Cell. 47, (3), 377-387 (2018).
This article has been published
Video Coming Soon

Cite this Article

Biel, N., Figard, L., Sokac, A. M. Imaging Intranuclear Actin Rods in Live Heat Stressed Drosophila Embryos. J. Vis. Exp. (159), e61297, doi:10.3791/61297 (2020).More

Biel, N., Figard, L., Sokac, A. M. Imaging Intranuclear Actin Rods in Live Heat Stressed Drosophila Embryos. J. Vis. Exp. (159), e61297, doi:10.3791/61297 (2020).

Copy Citation Download Citation Reprints and Permissions
View Video

Get cutting-edge science videos from JoVE sent straight to your inbox every month.

Waiting X
simple hit counter