Login processing...

Trial ends in Request Full Access Tell Your Colleague About Jove

Medicine

Real-Time Assessment of Spinal Cord Microperfusion in a Porcine Model of Ischemia/Reperfusion

doi: 10.3791/62047 Published: December 10, 2020
Christoph R. Behem1, Till Friedheim1, Sabine H. Wipper2, Hans O. Pinnschmidt3, Michael F. Graessler1, Catharina Gaeth4, Hannes Holthusen1, Adina Rapp5, Timo Suntrop1, Josephina Haunschild6, Christian D. Etz6, Constantin J. C. Trepte1

Abstract

Spinal cord injury is a devastating complication of aortic repair. Despite developments for the prevention and treatment of spinal cord injury, its incidence is still considerably high and therefore, influences patient outcome. Microcirculation plays a key role in tissue perfusion and oxygen supply and is often dissociated from macrohemodynamics. Thus, direct evaluation of spinal cord microcirculation is essential for the development of microcirculation-targeted therapies and the evaluation of existing approaches in regard to spinal cord microcirculation. However, most of the methods do not provide real-time assessment of spinal cord microcirculation. The aim of this study is to describe a standardized protocol for real-time spinal cord microcirculatory evaluation using laser-Doppler needle probes directly inserted in the spinal cord. We used a porcine model of ischemia/reperfusion to induce deterioration of the spinal cord microcirculation. In addition, a fluorescent microsphere injection technique was used. Initially, animals were anesthetized and mechanically ventilated. Thereafter, laser-Doppler needle probe insertion was performed, followed by the placement of cerebrospinal fluid drainage. A median sternotomy was performed for exposure of the descending aorta to perform aortic cross-clamping. Ischemia/reperfusion was induced by supra-celiac aortic cross-clamping for a total of 48 min, followed by reperfusion and hemodynamic stabilization. Laser-Doppler Flux was performed in parallel with macrohemodynamic evaluation. In addition, automated cerebrospinal fluid drainage was used to maintain a stable cerebrospinal pressure. After completion of the protocol, animals were sacrificed, and the spinal cord was harvested for histopathological and microsphere analysis. The protocol reveals the feasibility of spinal cord microperfusion measurements using laser-Doppler probes and shows a marked decrease during ischemia as well as recovery after reperfusion. Results showed comparable behavior to fluorescent microsphere evaluation. In conclusion, this new protocol might provide a useful large animal model for future studies using real-time spinal cord microperfusion assessment in ischemia/reperfusion conditions.

Introduction

Spinal cord injury induced by ischemia/reperfusion (SCI) is one of the most devastating complications of aortic repair associated with reduced outcome1,2,3,4. Current prevention and treatment options for SCI include the optimization of macrohemodynamic parameters as well as the normalization of cerebrospinal fluid pressure (CSP) to improve spinal cord perfusion pressure2,5,6,7,8,9. Despite the implementation of these maneuvers, incidence of SCI still ranges between 2% and 31% depending on the complexity of aortic repair10,11,12.

Recently, microcirculation has gained increased attention13,14. Microcirculation is the area of cellular oxygen uptake and metabolic exchange and therefore, plays a critical role in organ function and cellular integrity13. Impaired microcirculatory blood flow is a major determinant of tissue ischemia associated with increased mortality15,16,17,18,19. Impairment of spinal cord microcirculation is associated with reduced neurological function and outcome20,21,22,23. Therefore, optimization of microperfusion for the treatment of SCI is a most promising approach. Persistence of microcirculatory disturbances, despite macrocirculatory optimization, has been described26,27,28,29. This loss of hemodynamic coherence occurs frequently in various conditions including ischemia/reperfusion, emphasizing the need for direct microcirculatory evaluation and microcirculation-targeted therapies26,27,30.

So far, only few studies have used laser-Doppler probes for real-time assessment of spinal cord microcirculatory behavior20,31. Existing studies have often used microsphere injection techniques, which are limited by intermittent use and post-mortem analysis32,33. The number of different measurements using microsphere injection technique is limited by the availability of microspheres with different wavelengths. Moreover, in contrast to Laser-Doppler techniques, real-time assessment of microperfusion is not possible, as post-mortem tissue processing and analysis is needed for this method. Here, we present an experimental protocol for the real-time assessment of spinal cord microcirculation in a porcine large animal model of ischemia/reperfusion.

This study was part of a large animal project combining a randomized study comparing the influence of crystalloids vs. colloids on microcirculation in ischemia/reperfusion as well as an explorative randomized study on the effects of fluids vs. vasopressors on spinal cord microperfusion. Flow probe 2-point calibration as well as pressure-tip catheter calibration has been previously described34. In addition to the reported protocol, fluorescent microspheres were used for the measurement of spinal cord microperfusion, as previously described, using 12 samples of spinal cord tissue for each animal, with samples 1-6 representing the upper spinal cord and 7-12 representing the lower spinal cord35,36. Microsphere injection was performed for each measurement step after the completion of Laser-Doppler recordings and macrohemodynamic evaluation. Histopathological evaluation was performed using the Kleinman-Score as previously described37.

Subscription Required. Please recommend JoVE to your librarian.

Protocol

The study was approved by the Governmental Commission on the Care and Use of Animals of the City of Hamburg (Reference-No. 60/17). The animals received care in compliance with the 'Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals' (NIH publication No. 86-23, revised 2011) as well as FELASA recommendations and experiments were carried out according to the ARRIVE guidelines24,25. This study was an acute trial, and all animals were euthanized at the end of protocol.

NOTE: The study was performed in six three-month-old male and female pigs (German Landrace) weighing approximately 40 kg. Animals were brought to the animal care facilities at least 7 days prior to the experiments and were housed in accordance to animal welfare recommendations. Animals were provided food and water ad libitum, and their health status was regularly assessed by the responsible veterinarian. A fasting time of 12 h was maintained prior to the experiments. The entire experimental procedure and handling of the animals was supervised by the responsible veterinarian.

1. Anesthesia induction and maintenance of anesthesia

  1. For anesthesia induction and maintenance of anesthesia, premedicate the animals and deeply sedate them using an intramuscular injection followed by intravenous injections, if necessary, to perform endotracheal intubation. Thereafter, induce and maintain anesthesia by using a combination of a volatile anesthesia agent with a continuous opioid application complemented with an additional opioid bolus injection.
  2. Perform intramuscular injections of ketamine 20 mg·kg-1, azaperone 4 mg·kg-1, and midazolam 0.1 mg·kg-1 for premedication and sedation.
  3. Place a venous catheter in an ear vein, secure proper fixation, and assess functionality by fast application of 10 mL of saline.
  4. Place the animal in a supine position on a warming blanket to prevent heat loss.
  5. Establish basic monitoring with electrocardiography (ECG) and pulse oximetry to monitor the cardio-pulmonary state of the animals, and connect it to the basic monitoring hardware.
  6. Administer 15 L·min-1 of oxygen via a pig-shaped mask for preoxygenation.
  7. Inject intravenous boli of 0.1 mg·kg-1 of 1% propofol, if necessary, and perform endotracheal intubation.
  8. Secure correct placement with end tidal capnography and auscultation, administer 0.1 mg•kg-1 of pancuronium, and ensure proper fixation of the endotracheal tube.
  9. Establish volume-controlled ventilation using tidal volumes of 10 mL·kg-1 bodyweight-1, a positive end-expiratory pressure of 10 cmH2O, and a fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2)of 0.3 using the anesthesia machine. Adjust the ventilator frequency to maintain an end-expiratory carbon dioxide tension (etCO2) of 35-45 mmHg.
  10. Introduce a gastric tube, perform suction of gastric fluids, properly fix the tube, and connect it to a collection bag. Carefully close the animal's eyes to prevent dryness of eyes during anesthesia.
  11. Maintain anesthesia by continuous infusion of fentanyl (10 µg·kg-1·h-1) and sevoflurane (3.0% expired concentration, delivered by the vapor). Ensure adequate level of anesthesia by careful observation of vital signs and ventilation parameters as well as by absence of any movements during the entire protocol, paying special attention to the phases of surgical stimulus. Give additional bolus doses of fentanyl (50 µg) if there is any indication of pain or distress.
    NOTE: Ensure the presence of researchers who are experienced in animal anesthesia during the entire procedure, and use supervision by an experienced veterinarian to secure proper anesthesia.
  12. Administer a baseline infusion rate of 10 mL·kg-1·h-1 balanced crystalloids to compensate for fluid losses during anesthesia, surgical preparation, and execution of the experimental protocol. Use a fluid warmer to prevent heat loss.
  13. Gently clean the pig's skin using soap water. Use a skin disinfection solution containing povidone-iodine to decrease skin contamination. Use sterile gloves for surgical preparations. Apply 300 mg of clindamycin as antimicrobial prophylaxis, and repeat the dosage after 6 h.

2. Probe placement

  1. Place the animal in the right lateral position, and flex the animal's back to widen the space between the vertebrae.
  2. Surgically expose the paravertebral area for the preparation of spinous processes and vertebral arches (Figure 1A).
  3. Place a vascular 14 G peripheral vein catheter paramedian into the spinal cord at the level of thoracic vertebra (Th) 13/14 or lumbar vertebra (L) 1/2 between two vertebral arches (Figure 1B).
  4. Remove the needle, insert the laser/Doppler needle probe over the vein catheter (Figure 1C), and test the signal quality by connection to the designated hard- and software. Ensure that there is a stable signal with moderate pulsatility.
  5. Carefully fix the probe with sutures (Figure 1D) and use padding to prevent dislocation or kinking of the probe.
  6. For percutaneous placement of cerebrospinal fluid drainage for measuring and controlling cerebrospinal pressure, identify the level of L 4/5 or L 5/6, puncture the skin and the subcutaneous space with the introducer needle, and remove the inlay needle.
  7. Place a saline-filled syringe on the needle, and carefully introduce the needle with constant pressure on the fluid-filled syringe.
  8. Once a loss of resistance is felt as evidence for epidural position, re-introduce the inlay needle, and introduce the needle 2-3 mm further to puncture the dura mater and remove the inlay needle.
  9. Verify intrathecal position by fast dripping of clear liquor. Introduce the drainage up to 20 cm depth, attach the Luer-lock adapter, and verify the position by careful aspiration of liquor.
  10. Carefully fix the drainage with sutures, and connect it to the cerebrospinal fluid drainage system.
  11. Expose the skull behind the left ear, and carefully perform a drill hole trepanation of the skin using a 6 mm drill attachment.
  12. Introduce a second laser doppler probe directly into the brain. Carefully fix the probe with sutures, and test the signal quality by connection to designated hard- and software. Again, make sure that there is a stable signal with moderate pulsatility.
  13. Disconnect all probes, carefully place the animal in a supine position, ensuring unaffected probe position. Ensure that at least 4-5 researchers perform this maneuver.
  14. Reconnect the probes, and re-check signal quality.
  15. Connect the output channels of the laser-Doppler hardware to the amplifier and synchronic acquisition hardware and software to additionally record laser/Doppler Flux simultaneously with macrohemodynamic signals.
  16. Calibrate Flux as per unit (PU) with 2-point calibration.
    1. Press Enter to open the menu and select the analogue output setting.
    2. Use the displayed conversion factor (5.0 V = 1000 PU) to calibrate Flux with 2-point calibration for use with the synchronic acquisition software.
    3. Select Return to return to the previous menu, and select Measurement to continue with measurement.
    4. Open the synchronic acquisition software. Select zero all inputs from the Setup menu. Connect all inputs with the used devices and probes.
    5. Perform 2-point calibration for Flux by clicking on the dropdown menu of the Flux channel. Select 2-point calibration. Set units-conversion to on and select BPU as units. For point 1, set 0 V to 0 BPU. For point 2, set 5.0 V to 1000 BPU. Select set units for all and new data. Press OK to close the menu.
  17. Start continuous cerebrospinal fluid drainage with a target pressure of 10 mmHg and drainage volume of 20 mL·h-1.

3. Catheter placement

  1. Expose both femoral arteries.
  2. Ligate the distal part of the right femoral artery, temporarily occlude the proximal lumen of the artery using a vessel loop, perform a 2 mm cut of the vessel using a Potts' scissor, and introduce the guide wire.
  3. Introduce the guide wire further, ensuring resistance-free insertion and avoiding any kinking of the wire; introduce the catheter over the wire.
  4. Fix the catheter with sutures.
  5. Ensure correct position by aspiration of arterial blood verified with blood gas analysis and arterial signal measurement after proper connection to the blood pressure and trans-cardiopulmonary monitoring hard- and software.
  6. Place a 5 mm flow-probe on the left femoral artery, and test the signal quality by connection to the flowmeter.
  7. Close both groins with sutures.
  8. Expose the right carotid artery as well as the right internal jugular vein for placement of 8 Fr. introducer sheaths.
  9. For catheter placement, proceed in the same manner as described in 3.2-3.4.
  10. Connect the side-lumen of the carotid artery introducer sheath to the basic pressure monitoring and pulmonary thermodilution hardware for arterial pressure measurement.
  11. Introduce a pressure-tip catheter into the ascending aorta, and verify the position by connection to the amplifier and synchronic acquisition hard- and software.
  12. Place a Swan-Ganz pulmonary artery catheter via the venous sheath in the pulmonary artery by inflating the balloon with air at 20 cm depth and gently inserting it until a wedge pressure is seen in the hemodynamic curve. Deflate the balloon and pull the catheter back 2 cm. Ensure satisfying signal quality of pulmonary artery pressure. Connect the thermistors to basic pressure monitoring and pulmonary thermodilution hardware.
  13. Use sonographic guidance for percutaneous placement of a 12 Fr. 5-Lumen central venous catheter for drug administration and central venous pressure measurement into the external right jugular vein. Use the 6 step-approach for sonographic placement38
  14. Connect the distal lumen of the catheter to the blood pressure and trans-cardiopulmonary monitoring hard- and software. Switch all drugs and infusions to the central venous catheter. Use different lumen for analgesics, fluids, and catecholamines, and spare the large lumen for administration of colloids during volume-loading steps.

4. Surgical preparation

  1. Perform a mini-laparotomy, mobilize the bladder, insert a foley catheter for urine drainage, inflate the balloon with saline, and fix the catheter with pouch sutures.
  2. Connect the catheter to a urine collection bag displaying the urine amount in mL.
  3. Increase the FiO2 to 1.0, and re-administer 0.1 mg·kg-1 pancuronium intravenously.
  4. Perform a median sternotomy by using electrocautery for prepping down to the sternum. Gently dissect the sternum from the surrounding tissue. Perform retrosternal placement of a compress to prevent injuries.
  5. Stop ventilation and divide the bone with an oscillating saw. Continue ventilation and reduce FiO2 to 0.3. Use electrocautery to reduce bleeding, and seal the sternum with bone wax.
  6. Carefully mobilize the apex of the left lung, and divide the left lateral part of the diaphragm to facilitate surgical exposure.
  7. Expose the descending aorta proximal to the celiac trunk by gentle retraction of the left lung, ensuring undisturbed ventilation and avoiding trauma to the left lung (Figure 2A) and divide the surrounding tissue (Figure 2B). Administer 7 mL·kg-1 hydroxyethyl starch colloid if hemodynamic stabilization is needed.
  8. Place an overhold around the descending aorta to ensure proper exposure (Figure 2C).
  9. Attach a flow probe around the descending thoracic aorta (Figure 2D). Ensure proper signal quality by connection to the flow module and synchronic acquisition hard- and software. Use contact gel to improve signal quality if needed.
  10. Attach a vessel loop around the descending aorta, distal to the flow probe to mark the area of aortic cross clamping.

5. Assessment and data acquisition

  1. Zero all catheters and level catheters using fluid-filled lines placed at the right atrial level.
  2. Place needle ECG electrodes and connect them to the synchronic acquisition hard- and software.
  3. Assessment of trans-cardiopulmonary thermodilution as well as aortic flow and pressure measurements have been previously described 34.
  4. For cardiac output measurement using pulmonary artery thermodilution, perform 3 injections with 10 mL of cold saline, and note the mean value displayed by basic monitoring hardware.
  5. Start the laser-Doppler software by simply pressing Start, and set a mark for each measurement step by carefully labeling the steps as M0 to M5.

6. Experimental protocol

  1. Perform baseline measurements (M0).
  2. Perform hemodynamic optimization using volume-loading steps of 7 mL·kg-1 hydroxyethyl starch colloid. Perform each volume-loading step over 5 min using pressurized infusions. After completion of each volume-loading step, allow 5 min for equilibration. Commence volume loading until the increase in cardiac output is <15%.
  3. Repeat measurements (M1) after completion of hemodynamic optimization.
  4. Induce ischemia/reperfusion for a total of 48 min of supra-celiac aortic cross-clamping by placing an aortic clamp at the marked area.
  5. Apply aortic clamping in ascending order of 1-, 2-, 5-, 10-, and 30-min intervals to improve the survival of the animals during the study protocol.
  6. Continue aortic cross-clamping after each interval after a maximum of 5 min or after normalization of femoral artery flow.
  7. Perform manual inflow occlusion of the inferior vena cava to prevent blood pressure increases of > 100 mmHg mean arterial pressure.
  8. Administer bolus injections of norepinephrine or epinephrine during the clamping phase, if needed, to prevent decreases in mean arterial pressure below 40 mmHg.
  9. Repeat measurements at the end of the 30-min clamping interval prior to reperfusion (M2).
  10. Gradually open the clamp to ensure hemodynamic stability. Close the clamp if blood pressure drops too quickly and allow stabilization.
  11. Administer 7 mL·kg-1 of hydroxyethyl starch colloids as well as additional bolus injections of 10-20 µg of norepinephrine and/or epinephrine for stabilization. Administer 2 mL kg-1 of 8.4% sodium bicarbonate if the pH drops below 7.1. Ensure proper adjustment of the respiratory rate to ensure normocapnia.
  12. Repeat measurements 1 h after reperfusion (M3).
  13. Repeat hemodynamic optimization as described under 6.2, and repeat measurements (M4).
  14. Perform final measurements 4.5 h after the induction of ischemia/reperfusion (M5).

7. Euthanasia

  1. Administer 40 mmol of potassium chloride intravenously for euthanasia to induce ventricular fibrillation and asystole.
  2. Terminate ventilation and remove all catheters.

8. Organ harvesting

  1. Place the animal in a prone position, and remove the needle probes as well as the drainage.
  2. Expose the spine by skin incision and removal of muscle tissue using a scalpel and forceps.
  3. Use an oscillating saw to divide the vertebral arch paramedian on both sides, and remove the dorsal part of the vertebral bone by carefully moving the spinous process sideways to loosen the remaining connections.
  4. Use forceps to carefully lift the spinal cord from the caudal to cranial ends, and use a scalpel to cut the spinal nerves to remove the spinal cord.
  5. Store the spinal cord in 4% formalin until further utilization for histopathological evaluation or microsphere quantification.

9. Statistical analysis

  1. Use statistical software.
  2. Ensure normal distribution by inspection of histograms and log-transform variables if necessary.
  3. Subject the dependent variables-spinal cord Flux, cardiac output, heart rate, stroke volume, systolic arterial pressure, mean arterial pressure, diastolic arterial pressure, central venous pressure, systemic vascular resistance - as well as upper and lower spinal cord microperfusion as assessed with fluorescent microspheres if desired - to general linear mixed model analyses, using the routine GENLINMIXED for continuous data with an identity link function.
  4. Use baseline adjustments.
  5. Specify models with fixed effects for variable baseline and measurement point. Consider measurement point as repeated measures within animals.
  6. Report p-values of fixed effects for measurement point for each parameter.
  7. For spinal cord fluorescent microsphere analysis, use region (lower spinal cord, upper spinal cord) in addition as fixed effect and interaction between region and measurement point to evaluate interactions between regions and measurement point, and report p-values of fixed effects for interaction as well.
  8. Compute baseline adjusted marginal means with 95% confidence interval (CI) for all dependent variables at measurement points M1-M5, followed by pairwise comparisons via least significant difference tests.
  9. Express variables as mean (95% CI). Express animal weight as mean ± standard deviation.
  10. Present unadjusted p-values.

Subscription Required. Please recommend JoVE to your librarian.

Representative Results

All six animals survived until the completion of the protocol. Animal weight was 48.2 ± 2.9 kg; five animals were male, and one animal was female. Spinal cord needle probe insertion as well as spinal cord Flux measurement was feasible in all animals.

Examples of real-time spinal cord microcirculatory recordings in combination with cerebral microcirculatory and macrohemodynamic recordings during aortic cross-clamping for ischemia induction as well as during unclamping and reperfusion are shown in Figure 3A, Figure 3B. The disruption of descending aortic flow was followed by a marked decrease in spinal cord Flux, while pressure in the ascending aortic increased (Figure 3A). Reperfusion led to opposite effects (Figure 3B).

Statistical analysis of macro- and microcirculatory parameters is shown in Table 1. Mixed-model-estimated marginal means and their confidence intervals indicate marked reduction of spinal cord Flux during ischemia. In contrast, cerebral Flux markedly increased during ischemia, as indicated by the estimated marginal means and their confidence intervals. This was accompanied by increase in arterial pressure, heart rate, and systemic vascular resistance, whereas cardiac output and stroke volume decreased. Fluorescent microsphere analysis revealed a marked decrease in spinal cord microcirculatory blood flow in the lower spinal cord, while there was no significant change in the upper spinal cord, as indicated by the estimated marginal means and their confidence intervals. Reperfusion led to opposite effects. Although there was a further decrease in cardiac output, stroke volume, and arterial pressure at the end of the protocol, spinal cord Flux as well as spinal cord microcirculatory blood flow were stable.

The results of this study show the ability of Laser/Doppler needle probes to detect real-time changes in spinal cord microperfusion. As expected, the decrease in spinal cord microcirculation during ischemia was drastic with minimal microcirculatory Flux. Recovery of spinal cord Flux occurred after reperfusion. Lower spinal cord perfusion, as assessed with fluorescent microspheres, showed a comparable behavior, thus supporting the method. As expected, upper spinal cord perfusion and cerebral Flux showed different behaviors. Although spinal cord microcirculation was stable, macrocirculation declined at the end of the protocol, showing a loss of hemodynamic coherence. While flow in the descending aorta was zero during ischemia, reperfusion led to a recovery of aortic flow. Histopathological analysis revealed mild necrosis of the spinal cord with Kleinman-scores for the lower spinal cord between 0 and 2 and for the upper spinal cord between 0 and 1.

Figure 1
Figure 1: Placement of laser/Doppler needle probe in the spinal cord. (A) Surgical exposure of vertebral structures. (B) Puncture of the spinal cord using a vein catheter. (C) Insertion of the needle probe after removal of the inlay needle. (D) Fixation of the needle probe. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 2
Figure 2: Exposure of the descending aorta and placement of flow probe and vessel loop. (A) Exposure of the descending aorta after mobilizing the apex of the left lung and dividing of the left-lateral part of the diaphragm. (B) Dividing of the surrounding tissue for surgical exposure. (C) Placement of an overhold around the descending aorta to secure proper circular exposure. (D) Placement of flow probe as well as vessel loop around the descending aorta. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 3
Figure 3: Sample recordings of microcirculatory and macrohemodynamic signals during ischemia as well as reperfusion. Sample recordings of ECG, pressure in the ascending aorta as measured using a microtip-catheter, flow in the descending aorta as measured using an ultrasonic flow probe, spinal cord as well as cerebral microcirculatory FLUX as measured using laser/Doppler needle probes. (A) 50 s sample during ischemia induction by supra-celiac aortic cross-clamping. (B) 20 s sample during reperfusion induction by gentle re-opening of the aortic cross-clamp. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

M1 M2 M3 M4 M5
Spinal Cord Flux 61.35 (41.96-89.70) 6.78 (4.63-9.91)  58.97 (40.33-86.22)  66.05 (45.17-96.57) 59.09 (40.41-86.40)
Main Effect Measurement Point: p < 0.001 Pairwise comparison M1 p < 0.001 p = 0.878 p = 0.777 p = 0.886
Cerebral Flux 41.12 (28.17-60.04)  71.73 (49.13-104.73)  60.34 (41.33-88.10) 59.91 (36.93-78.71) 49.82 (34.12-72.74)
Main Effect Measurement Point: p = 0.023 Pairwise comparison M1 p = 0.001 p = 0.045 p = 0.173 p = 0.341 
Spinal Cord Microperfusion (ml/min/g) Upper spinal cord 0.071 (0.058-0.087) 0.063 (0.052-0.078) 0.088 (0.072-0.11)  0.082 (0.067-0.100) 0.083 (0.068-0.102)
Pairwise comparison M1 p = 0.420 p = 0.146 p = 0.344 p = 0.281
Main Effect Measurement Point: p < 0.001
Lower spinal cord 0.079 (0.065-0.097) 0.031 (0.026-0.039)  0.111 (0.090-0.136)  0.089 (0.073-0.110) 0.105 (0.086-0.129)
Interaction Measurement Point · Spinal Cord Region: p < 0.001 Pairwise comparison M1 p < 0.001 p = 0.021 p = 0.400 p = 0.051
Cardiac Output (l/min) 4.15 (3.69-4.61) 3.13 (2.67-3.60)  3.30 (2.84-3.76) 3.67 (3.20-4.13) 2.67 (2.00-2.93) 
Main Effect Measurement Point:: p < 0.001 Pairwise comparison M1 p < 0.001 p = 0.007 p = 0.125 p < 0.001
Heart Rate (bpm) 74.42 (53.70-95.15) 131.09 (110.36-151.82)  88.92 (68.19-109.65) 80.62 (59.89-101.35) 99.38 (78.65-120.11)
Main Effect Measurement Point: p = 0.002 Pairwise comparison M1 p < 0.001 p = 0.314  p = 0.666 p = 0.092
Stroke Volume (ml) 55.50 (49.20-61.81) 25.33 (19.03-31.64)  37.00 (30.69-43.31)  45.33 (39.03-51.64)  27.17 (20.86-33.47) 
Main Effect Measurement Point: p < 0.001 Pairwise comparison M1 p < 0.001 p < 0.001 p = 0.004 p < 0.001
Systolic Arterial Pressure Ascending Aorta (mmHg) 94.36 (85.20-103.52) 122.05 (112.89-131.20)  76.72 (67.56-85.88)  88.36 (79.20-97.52)  73.36 (64.20-82.52) 
Main Effect Measurement Point: p < 0.001 Pairwise comparison M1 p < 0.001 p = 0.006 p = 0.321 p = 0.002
Mean Arterial Pressure Ascending Aorta (mmHg) 78.18 (68.68-87.67) 107.29 (97.80-116.78)  59.08 (49.58-68.57) 70.38 (60.89-79.87) 58.35 (48.85-67.84)
Main Effect Measurement Point: p < 0.001 Pairwise comparison M1 p < 0.001  p = 0.005  p = 0.217 p = 0.004
Diastolic Arterial Pressure Ascending Aorta (mmHg) 59.20 (49.41-69.00) 93.76 (83.97-103.56)  45.18 (35.38-54.98)  52.48 (42.69-62.28) 45.33 (35.54-55.13)
Main Effect Measurement Point: p < 0.001 Pairwise comparison M1 p < 0.001 p = 0.038 p = 0.302 p = 0.040
Systemic Vascular Resistance (dyn x sec x cm-5) 1421.13 (1236.94-1632.74) 208089.94 (181128.10-239085.87)  1335.36 (1162.29-1534.21)  1412.62 (1229.54-1622.97) 1807.46 (1573.21-2076.60) 
Main Effect Measurement Point: p < 0.001 Pairwise comparison M1 p < 0.001 p = 0.407 p = 0.938 p = 0.005
Flow (l/min) Descending Aorta 3.27 (0.96-5.58) 0 3.27 (0.96-5.58)  3.54 (1.23-5.85) 4.54 (2.32-6.85)
Main Effect Measurement Point: p = 0.003 Pairwise comparison M1 p = 0.998 p = 0.844 p = 0.381

Table 1: Changes in hemodynamic parameters during the protocol. Values are given as baseline-adjusted estimated marginal means with 95% confidence intervals. Unadjusted p-values of F-tests of main effects of measurement point are given for each parameter as well as of interaction effects between region and measurement point for upper and lower spinal cord microperfusion. Unadjusted p-values of pairwise comparisons of individual measuring points with M1 are also presented. Measurement points are: M1 = Hemodynamic optimization prior ischemia/reperfusion, M2 = During ischemia, M3 = 1 h after reperfusion M4 = Hemodynamic optimization after ischemia/reperfusion, M5 = 4.5 h after induction of ischemia/reperfusion.

Subscription Required. Please recommend JoVE to your librarian.

Discussion

SCI induced by spinal cord ischemia is a major complication of aortic repair with tremendous impact on patient outcome1,2,3,4,10,11,12. Microcirculation-targeted therapies to prevent and treat SCI are most promising. The protocol provides a reproducible method for real-time spinal cord microcirculatory evaluation and offers the ability to evaluate effects of novel therapeutic approaches on spinal cord microcirculation under ischemia/reperfusion conditions.

There are some critical methodological steps in this experimental model. To prevent loss of animals, researchers must be experienced in anesthesiologic techniques (cerebrospinal fluid drainage insertion, sonographic vascular access and hemodynamic therapy during aortic exposure, aortic cross-clamping, and reperfusion) as well as in surgical techniques (sternotomy, vessel exposure, surgical exposure of the descending aorta). Insertion of the spinal cord needle probe requires experience, profound knowledge of the anatomy, and sound technical skills. However, in our experience, the learning curve is considerably steep, and most experienced researchers will achieve success in a short time, although multiple attempts must be avoided to prevent spinal cord injuries that could affect the methodology.

Another critical step is the change from the right lateral to supine position to prevent dislocation or damage of the spinal cord needle probe. For this maneuver, 4-5 persons are recommended, proper padding of the insertion site is essential, and meticulous caution should be taken not to dislocate the probe. Exposure of the descending aorta requires some critical steps as well. The apex of the left lung must be mobilized to allow gentle retraction of the left lung to expose the surgical field. In addition, the left-lateral part of the diaphragm should be dissected to facilitate exposure. During aortic preparation, optimal communication between those researchers performing surgery and those providing anesthesia and hemodynamic management is needed to ensure adequate cardiopulmonary stability. During aortic cross-clamping, manual compression of the inferior vena cava is recommended to reduce venous return. Without this maneuver, severe afterload increases may occur that could lead to deleterious myocardial injury39,40.

Reperfusion should be performed cautiously with fluids, vasopressors, and inotropes ready to use. During reperfusion, dramatic changes occur that may lead to severe hypotension, cardiac arrythmias, and circulatory failure41. However, cautious observation of hemodynamic behavior, prompt initiation of interventions, as well as use of a structured and gentle performance during this critical phase can prevent loss of animals. In addition, the use of ascending intervals of aortic cross-clamping, followed by time periods to improve regeneration, as used in the protocol, induces ischemic pre-conditioning effects that enhance hemodynamic stability during reperfusion42,43.

The model provides the ability to monitor spinal cord microcirculation in addition to macrocirculatory evaluation. Owing to the loss of hemodynamic coherence frequently seen in high-risk surgery and critically ill patients, direct evaluation of spinal cord microcirculation is necessary13,30. Sublingual microcirculation is often used to replace direct microcirculatory evaluation in the organ of interest44. However, dissociation between sublingual microcirculation and vital organs has been shown, emphasizing the value of direct microcirculatory evaluation in the spinal cord, as used in the experimental model45. Finally, the model has the advantage of real-time monitoring of spinal cord blood flow in comparison to fluorescent microsphere evaluation, which is limited by intermittent use and post-mortem analysis46. The impact of real-time assessment can best be seen when looking at example recordings during ischemia as well as reperfusion induction, showing rapid changes in spinal cord microperfusion. However, it should be considered that laser-Doppler probe insertion in the spinal cord could lead to small, but considerable, injuries of the spinal cord.

As the integrity of the spinal cord could possibly influence the hemodynamic parameters, this could be a disadvantage of the method. However, the use of laser-Doppler techniques to assess spinal cord microperfusion have been previously used47,48,49,50. Moreover, although we did not observe hemodynamic changes following probe insertion, we could not rule out hemodynamic effects induced by this method. It should be noted that hemodynamic alterations may also be induced by use of microsphere injections, which would, however, be of minor importance in large animals51. Moreover, sensory or motor function may be affected by probe insertion and therefore, use of sensory- or motor-evoked potential assessment should be performed with caution in combination with laser-Doppler evaluation.

In this regard, the microsphere injection technique might be advantageous. In addition, the techniques should not be used for chronic trials; however, this is also true for microsphere injections, which are limited to acute trials because they are dependent on post-mortem tissue analysis. Most studies using laser-Doppler techniques were performed in small animals47,48,49,50 Here, we describe a technique for use in pigs, as a large animal model, which could facilitate translation to clinical studies. The paramedian-introducing technique overcomes the problem of large spinous processes in pigs, which complicates proper placement of spinal cord probes. Moreover, the technique has the advantage that laminectomy or removal of dura tissue is not needed, preventing a constant loss of liquor. As the cerebrospinal fluid pressure has a tremendous impact on spinal cord perfusion32, the model has the advantage of measuring and optimizing cerebrospinal fluid pressure in addition to spinal cord microperfusion and will address the effect of cerebrospinal fluid pressure on spinal cord microperfusion in future projects.

The protocol has some limitations that should be mentioned. Absolute values of spinal cord Flux differ considerably between animals due to differences in exact probe position and proximity of larger spinal cord vessels. Therefore, baseline adjustments should be performed when comparing values. However, intra-individual differences between measurement points are highly consistent as long as meticulous caution is exercised to avoid movements of the needle probe during the protocol. Moreover, this study was not designed as a comparison study between the Laser-Doppler and the fluorescent microsphere methods. Given the number of animals, we did not perform a correlation analysis between these two methods.

Although both methods showed a comparable behavior with significant reductions during ischemia and recovery after reperfusion for both, a comparison of the methods should be addressed using properly designed studies in the future. Nevertheless, the use of microspheres additionally enabled evaluation of different behaviors for upper and lower spinal cord microperfusion. In addition, histopathological analysis revealed only moderate spinal cord necrosis compared to other models of spinal cord ischemia37. Prolonging the duration of ischemia as well as omitting pre-conditioning measures may lead to more severe changes that may be desired by some researchers. Although we evaluated only mild histopathological changes, this may be different with a longer duration of ischemia. In this regard, a longer period after ischemia/reperfusion prior to termination of the protocol may have also led to more severe histopathological changes. However, the protocol enabled hemodynamic stability one hour after reperfusion without the need for additional or even continuous inotrope or vasopressor application.

For the evaluation of different hemodynamic interventions, this model provides optimal conditions. Although we used fluid optimization as an example of hemodynamic intervention, other approaches may be evaluated with this method. While this protocol provides microcirculatory evaluation in a model of ischemia/reperfusion, the duration of ischemia limits the evaluation of therapeutic approaches during ischemia prior to reperfusion. Moreover, during ischemia, a variation in hemodynamic changes occurred (e.g., hypertension, hypotension, tachycardia, bradycardia, as well as cardiac arrythmias). Manual inflow occlusion further affects hemodynamic variables during this phase. Therefore, the protocol is not recommended for the evaluation of therapeutic approaches during ischemia prior to reperfusion. However, other experimental settings, such as the use of embolization or ligation techniques, may be combined with spinal cord laser/Doppler needle probe evaluation, as described in this protocol.

Subscription Required. Please recommend JoVE to your librarian.

Disclosures

Constantin J. C. Trepte has received an honorary award for lectures by Maquet. All other authors declare no conflicts of interest.This study was supported by the European Society of Anaesthesiology Young Investigator Start-Up Grant 2018.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Lena Brix, V.M.D, Institute of Animal Research, Hannover Medical School, as well as Mrs. Jutta Dammann, Facility of Research Animal Care, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany, for providing pre- and perioperative animal care and their technical assistance on animal handling. The authors would further like to thank Dr. Daniel Manzoni, Department of Vascular Surgery, Hôpital Kirchberg, Luxembourg, for his technical assistance.

Materials

Name Company Catalog Number Comments
CardioMed Flowmeter Medistim AS, Oslo, Norway CM4000 Flowmeter for Flow-Probe Femoral Artery
CardioMed Flow-Probe, 5mm Medistim AS, Oslo, Norway PS100051 Flow-Probe Femoral Artery
COnfidence probe,  Transonic Systems Inc., Ithaca, NY, USA MA16PAU Flow-Probe Aorta
16 mm liners
DIVA Sevoflurane Vapor Dräger Medical, Lübeck, Germany Vapor
Hotline Level 1 Fluid Warmer Smiths Medical Germany GmbH, Grasbrunn, Germany HL-90-DE-230 Fluid Warmer
Infinity Delta Dräger Medical, Lübeck, Germany Basic Monitoring Hardware
Infinity Hemo Dräger Medical, Lübeck, Germany Basic Pressure Monitoring and Pulmonary Thermodilution Hardware
LabChart Pro ADInstruments Ltd., Oxford, UK v8.1.16 Synchronic Laser-Doppler, Blood Pressure, ECG and Blood-Flow Aquisition Software
LiquoGuard 7 Möller Medical GmbH, Fulda, Germany Cerebrospinal Fluid Drainage System
Millar Micro-Tip Pressure Catheter (5F, Single, Curved, 120cm, PU/WD) ADInstruments Ltd., Oxford, UK SPR-350 Pressure-Tip Catheter Aorta
moor VMS LDF moor Instruments, Devon, UK Designated Laser-Doppler Hardware
moor VMS Research Software moor Instruments, Devon, UK Designated Laser-Doppler Software
Perivascular Flow Module Transonic Systems Inc., Ithaca, NY, USA TS 420 Flow-Module for Flow-Probe Aorta
PiCCO 2, Science Version Getinge AB, Göteborg, Sweden v. 6.0 Blood Pressure and Transcardiopulmonary Monitoring Hard- and Software
PiCCO 5 Fr. 20cm Getinge AB, Göteborg, Sweden Thermistor-tipped Arterial Line 
PowerLab ADInstruments Ltd., Oxford, UK PL 3516 Synchronic Laser-Doppler, Blood Pressure, ECG and Blood-Flow Aquisition Hardware
QuadBridgeAmp ADInstruments Ltd., Oxford, UK FE 224 Four Channel Bridge Amplifier for Laser-Doppler and Invasive Blood Pressure Aquisition
Silverline Spiegelberg, Hamburg, Germany ELD33.010.02 Cerebrospinal Fluid Drainage
SPSS statistical software package  IBM SPSS Statistics Inc., Armonk, New York, USA v. 27 Statistical Software
Twinwarm Warming System Moeck & Moeck GmbH, Hamburg, Germany 12TW921DE Warming System
Universal II Warming Blanket Moeck & Moeck GmbH, Hamburg, Germany 906 Warming Blanket
VP 3 Probe, 8mm length (individually manufactured) moor Instruments, Devon, UK Laser-Doppler Probe
Zeus Dräger Medical, Lübeck, Germany Anesthesia Machine

DOWNLOAD MATERIALS LIST

References

  1. Etz, C. D., et al. Contemporary spinal cord protection during thoracic and thoracoabdominal aortic surgery and endovascular aortic repair: a position paper of the vascular domain of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgerydagger. The European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. 47, (6), 943-957 (2015).
  2. Schraag, S. Postoperative management. Best Practice & Research Clinical Anaesthesiology. 30, (3), 381-393 (2016).
  3. Cambria, R. P., et al. Thoracoabdominal aneurysm repair: results with 337 operations performed over a 15-year interval. Annals of Surgery. 236, (4), 471-479 (2002).
  4. Becker, D. A., McGarvey, M. L., Rojvirat, C., Bavaria, J. E., Messe, S. R. Predictors of outcome in patients with spinal cord ischemia after open aortic repair. Neurocritical Care. 18, (1), 70-74 (2013).
  5. McGarvey, M. L., et al. The treatment of spinal cord ischemia following thoracic endovascular aortic repair. Neurocritical Care. 6, (1), 35-39 (2007).
  6. Fukui, S., et al. Development of collaterals to the spinal cord after endovascular stent graft repair of thoracic aneurysms. European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery. 52, (6), 801-807 (2016).
  7. Augoustides, J. G., Stone, M. E., Drenger, B. Novel approaches to spinal cord protection during thoracoabdominal aortic interventions. Current Opinion in Anesthesiology. 27, (1), 98-105 (2014).
  8. Bicknell, C. D., Riga, C. V., Wolfe, J. H. Prevention of paraplegia during thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair. European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery. 37, (6), 654-660 (2009).
  9. Feezor, R. J., Lee, W. A. Strategies for detection and prevention of spinal cord ischemia during TEVAR. Seminars in Vascular Surgery. 22, (3), 187-192 (2009).
  10. Heidemann, F., et al. Incidence, predictors, and outcomes of spinal cord ischemia in elective complex endovascular aortic repair: An analysis of health insurance claims. Journal of Vascular Surgery. (2020).
  11. Rizvi, A. Z., Sullivan, T. M. Incidence, prevention, and management in spinal cord protection during TEVAR. Journal of Vascular Surgery. 52, (4), Suppl 86-90 (2010).
  12. Wortmann, M., Bockler, D., Geisbusch, P. Perioperative cerebrospinal fluid drainage for the prevention of spinal ischemia after endovascular aortic repair. Gefasschirurgie. 22, Suppl 2 35-40 (2017).
  13. Saugel, B., Trepte, C. J., Heckel, K., Wagner, J. Y., Reuter, D. A. Hemodynamic management of septic shock: is it time for "individualized goal-directed hemodynamic therapy" and for specifically targeting the microcirculation. Shock. 43, (6), 522-529 (2015).
  14. Moore, J. P., Dyson, A., Singer, M., Fraser, J. Microcirculatory dysfunction and resuscitation: why, when, and how. British Journal of Anaesthesia. 115, (3), 366-375 (2015).
  15. De Backer, D., Creteur, J., Preiser, J. C., Dubois, M. J., Vincent, J. L. Microvascular blood flow is altered in patients with sepsis. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine. 166, (1), 98-104 (2002).
  16. De Backer, D., Creteur, J., Dubois, M. J., Sakr, Y., Vincent, J. L. Microvascular alterations in patients with acute severe heart failure and cardiogenic shock. American Heart Journal. 147, (1), 91-99 (2004).
  17. Sakr, Y., Dubois, M. J., De Backer, D., Creteur, J., Vincent, J. L. Persistent microcirculatory alterations are associated with organ failure and death in patients with septic shock. Critical Care Medicine. 32, (9), 1825-1831 (2004).
  18. Trzeciak, S., et al. Early microcirculatory perfusion derangements in patients with severe sepsis and septic shock: relationship to hemodynamics, oxygen transport, and survival. Annals of Emergency Medicine. 49, (1), 88-98 (2007).
  19. Donati, A., et al. From macrohemodynamic to the microcirculation. Critical Care Research and Practice. 2013, 892710 (2013).
  20. Hamamoto, Y., Ogata, T., Morino, T., Hino, M., Yamamoto, H. Real-time direct measurement of spinal cord blood flow at the site of compression: relationship between blood flow recovery and motor deficiency in spinal cord injury. Spine. 32, (18), Phila Pa 1976 1955-1962 (2007).
  21. Soubeyrand, M., et al. Real-time and spatial quantification using contrast-enhanced ultrasonography of spinal cord perfusion during experimental spinal cord injury. Spine. 37, (22), Phila Pa 1976 1376-1382 (2012).
  22. Han, S., et al. Rescuing vasculature with intravenous angiopoietin-1 and alpha v beta 3 integrin peptide is protective after spinal cord injury. Brain. 133, Pt 4 1026-1042 (2010).
  23. Muradov, J. M., Ewan, E. E., Hagg, T. Dorsal column sensory axons degenerate due to impaired microvascular perfusion after spinal cord injury in rats. Experimental Neurology. 249, 59-73 (2013).
  24. Guillen, J., , FELASA guidelines and recommendations. J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci. 51, 311-321 (2012).
  25. Kilkenny, C., Browne, W. J., Cuthill, I. C., Emerson, M., Altman, D. G. Improving bioscience research reporting: the ARRIVE guidelines for reporting animal research. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 20, 256-260 (2012).
  26. Ospina-Tascon, G., et al. Effects of fluids on microvascular perfusion in patients with severe sepsis. Intensive Care Medicine. 36, (6), 949-955 (2010).
  27. Pottecher, J., et al. Both passive leg raising and intravascular volume expansion improve sublingual microcirculatory perfusion in severe sepsis and septic shock patients. Intensive Care Medicine. 36, (11), 1867-1874 (2010).
  28. De Backer, D., Ortiz, J. A., Salgado, D. Coupling microcirculation to systemic hemodynamics. Current Opinion in Critical Care. 16, (3), 250-254 (2010).
  29. van Genderen, M. E., et al. Microvascular perfusion as a target for fluid resuscitation in experimental circulatory shock. Critical care medicine. 42, (2), 96-105 (2014).
  30. Ince, C. Hemodynamic coherence and the rationale for monitoring the microcirculation. Critical care. 19, Suppl 3 8 (2015).
  31. Kise, Y., et al. Directly measuring spinal cord blood flow and spinal cord perfusion pressure via the collateral network: correlations with changes in systemic blood pressure. Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. 149, (1), 360-366 (2015).
  32. Haunschild, J., et al. Detrimental effects of cerebrospinal fluid pressure elevation on spinal cord perfusion: first-time direct detection in a large animal model. European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. 58, (2), 286-293 (2020).
  33. Wipper, S., et al. Impact of hybrid thoracoabdominal aortic repair on visceral and spinal cord perfusion: The new and improved SPIDER-graft. Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. 158, (3), 692-701 (2019).
  34. Kluttig, R., et al. Invasive hemodynamic monitoring of aortic and pulmonary artery hemodynamics in a large animal model of ARDS. Journal of Visualized Experiments. (141), e57405 (2018).
  35. Detter, C., et al. Fluorescent cardiac imaging: a novel intraoperative method for quantitative assessment of myocardial perfusion during graded coronary artery stenosis. Circulation. 116, (9), 1007-1014 (2007).
  36. Wipper, S., et al. Distinction of non-ischemia inducing versus ischemia inducing coronary stenosis by fluorescent cardiac imaging. International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging. 32, (2), 363-371 (2016).
  37. Etz, C. D., et al. Spinal cord blood flow and ischemic injury after experimental sacrifice of thoracic and abdominal segmental arteries. European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. 33, (6), 1030-1038 (2008).
  38. Saugel, B., Scheeren, T. W. L., Teboul, J. L. Ultrasound-guided central venous catheter placement: a structured review and recommendations for clinical practice. Critical care. 21, (1), 225 (2017).
  39. Marty, B., et al. Partial inflow occlusion facilitates accurate deployment of thoracic aortic endografts. Journal of Endovascular Therapy. 11, (2), 175-179 (2004).
  40. Matyal, R., et al. Monitoring the variation in myocardial function with the Doppler-derived myocardial performance index during aortic cross-clamping. Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia. 26, (2), 204-208 (2012).
  41. Miller, R. D. Miller'sanesthesia. 8th Edition. Elsevier. Philadelphia. (2015).
  42. Martikos, G., et al. Remote ischemic preconditioning decreases the magnitude of hepatic ischemia-reperfusion injury on a swine model of supraceliac aortic cross-clamping. Annals of Vascular Surgery. 48, 241-250 (2018).
  43. Lazaris, A. M., et al. Protective effect of remote ischemic preconditioning in renal ischemia/reperfusion injury, in a model of thoracoabdominal aorta approach. Journal of Surgical Research. 154, (2), 267-273 (2009).
  44. Ince, C., et al. Second consensus on the assessment of sublingual microcirculation in critically ill patients: results from a task force of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine. Intensive Care Medicine. 44, (3), 281-299 (2018).
  45. Edul, V. S., et al. Dissociation between sublingual and gut microcirculation in the response to a fluid challenge in postoperative patients with abdominal sepsis. Annals of intensive care. 4, 39 (2014).
  46. Schierling, W., et al. Sonographic real-time imaging of tissue perfusion in a porcine haemorrhagic shock model. Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology. 45, (10), 2797-2804 (2019).
  47. Jing, Y., Bai, F., Chen, H., Dong, H. Using Laser Doppler Imaging and Monitoring to Analyze Spinal Cord Microcirculation in Rat. Journal of Visualized Experiments. (135), e56243 (2018).
  48. Jing, Y., Bai, F., Chen, H., Dong, H. Meliorating microcirculatory with melatonin in rat model of spinal cord injury using laser Doppler flowmetry. Neuroreport. 27, (17), 1248-1255 (2016).
  49. Jing, Y., Bai, F., Chen, H., Dong, H. Melatonin prevents blood vessel loss and neurological impairment induced by spinal cord injury in rats. Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine. 40, (2), 222-229 (2017).
  50. Phillips, J. P., Cibert-Goton, V., Langford, R. M., Shortland, P. J. Perfusion assessment in rat spinal cord tissue using photoplethysmography and laser Doppler flux measurements. Journal of Biomedical Optics. 18, (3), 037005 (2013).
  51. Glenny, R. W., Bernard, S. L., Lamm, W. J. Hemodynamic effects of 15-microm-diameter microspheres on the rat pulmonary circulation. Journal of Applied Physiology. 89, (1985), 499-504 (2000).
This article has been published
Video Coming Soon
PDF DOI DOWNLOAD MATERIALS LIST

Cite this Article

Behem, C. R., Friedheim, T., Wipper, S. H., Pinnschmidt, H. O., Graessler, M. F., Gaeth, C., Holthusen, H., Rapp, A., Suntrop, T., Haunschild, J., Etz, C. D., Trepte, C. J. C. Real-Time Assessment of Spinal Cord Microperfusion in a Porcine Model of Ischemia/Reperfusion. J. Vis. Exp. (166), e62047, doi:10.3791/62047 (2020).More

Behem, C. R., Friedheim, T., Wipper, S. H., Pinnschmidt, H. O., Graessler, M. F., Gaeth, C., Holthusen, H., Rapp, A., Suntrop, T., Haunschild, J., Etz, C. D., Trepte, C. J. C. Real-Time Assessment of Spinal Cord Microperfusion in a Porcine Model of Ischemia/Reperfusion. J. Vis. Exp. (166), e62047, doi:10.3791/62047 (2020).

Less
Copy Citation Download Citation Reprints and Permissions
View Video

Get cutting-edge science videos from JoVE sent straight to your inbox every month.

Waiting X
simple hit counter