Login processing...

Trial ends in Request Full Access Tell Your Colleague About Jove


Reverse Genetic Approach to Identify Regulators of Pigmentation using Zebrafish

Published: March 1, 2022 doi: 10.3791/62955
* These authors contributed equally


Regulators of melanocyte functions govern visible differences in the pigmentation outcome. Deciphering the molecular function of the candidate pigmentation gene poses a challenge. Herein, we demonstrate the use of a zebrafish model system to identify candidates and classify them into regulators of melanin content and melanocyte number.


Melanocytes are specialized neural crest-derived cells present in the epidermal skin. These cells synthesize melanin pigment that protects the genome from harmful ultraviolet radiations. Perturbations in melanocyte functioning lead to pigmentary disorders such as piebaldism, albinism, vitiligo, melasma, and melanoma. Zebrafish is an excellent model system to understand melanocyte functions. The presence of conspicuous pigmented melanocytes, ease of genetic manipulation, and availability of transgenic fluorescent lines facilitate the study of pigmentation. This study employs the use of wild-type and transgenic zebrafish lines that drive green fluorescent protein (GFP) expression under mitfa and tyrp1 promoters that mark various stages of melanocytes.

Morpholino-based silencing of candidate genes is achieved to evaluate the phenotypic outcome on larval pigmentation and is applicable to screen for regulators of pigmentation. This protocol demonstrates the method from microinjection to imaging and fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS)-based dissection of phenotypes using two candidate genes, carbonic anhydrase 14 (Ca14) and a histone variant (H2afv), to comprehensively assess the pigmentation outcome. Further, this protocol demonstrates segregating candidate genes into melanocyte specifiers and differentiators that selectively alter melanocyte numbers and melanin content per cell, respectively.


While the use of melanin for photoprotection has evolved several times across the animal kingdom, vertebrates have seemingly perfected the process. Dedicated pigment-producing cells with an elaborate machinery to synthesize and contain melanin are conserved from fish to humans1. However, the outcome of pigmentation is dramatically varied, ranging in the color to recipience and presents as vivid patterns on integuments, the skin, and hair2. Despite the diversity, the repertoire of genes involved in pigmentation response is strikingly conserved. The core components of the melanin-synthesizing machinery, such as the key melanin-synthesizing enzymes, the components of the melanosomes, and the upstream connectivity to the signaling pathway, remain essentially identical across organisms. Subtle genetic differences bring about dramatic changes in the patterns of pigmentation observed across species3. Hence, a reverse genetic approach in a lower vertebrate organism, the zebrafish (Danio rerio), offers an excellent opportunity to decipher the involvement of genes in rendering the pigmented state4.

Zebrafish embryos develop from a single-celled fertilized zygote to a larva within a span of ~24 h post fertilization (hpf)5. Strikingly, the melanocyte-equivalent cells-the melanophores-are large cells that are present in the dermis and are conspicuous due to the dark melanin content6. These neural crest-derived cells emanate ~11 hpf and begin to pigment ~24 hpf6,7. Conserved gene expression modules have enabled the identification of key factors that orchestrate melanocyte functions and led to the development of transgenic fluorescent reporter lines Tg(sox10:GFP), Tg(mitfa:GFP), and Tg(ftyrp1:GFP)8,9,10 that label selective stages of melanocyte development. Using these transgenic fish lines enables the interrogation of cell biology of melanocytes at the organismal level in the tissue context with appropriate cues according to the developmental timelines. These reporters complement pigment-based quantitation of melanocytes and enable a distinct assessment of melanocyte numbers irrespective of melanin content.

This article provides a detailed protocol for deciphering the biology of melanocytes by assessing two critical parameters, namely melanin content and melanocyte numbers. While the former is a common functional readout emanating from a hypopigmentation response, the latter is associated with a reduction in the specification or survival of melanocytes and is often associated with genetic or acquired depigmentation conditions. The overall strategy of this reverse genetic screen is to silence select genes using a morpholino and investigate the melanocyte-specific outcomes. Melanin content is analyzed using image-based quantitation of mean grey values followed by confirmation using a melanin content assay. The number of melanocytes at various stages of maturation is analyzed using image-based quantitation and further confirmed using FACS analysis. Here, the screening protocol is demonstrated using two candidate genes, namely carbonic anhydrase 14, involved in melanogenesis, and a histone variant H2AFZ.2 involved in the specification of melanocytes from the neural crest precursor population. While the former alters melanin content and not the melanocyte numbers, the latter alters the number of specified melanocytes and, consequently, the melanin content in the embryo. In all, this method provides a detailed protocol to identify the role of a candidate gene in pigmentation and distinguish its role in controlling melanocyte numbers versus melanin content.

Subscription Required. Please recommend JoVE to your librarian.


Zebrafish experiments were performed in strict accordance with the institutional animal ethics approval (IAEC) of the CSIR-Institute of Genomics and Integrative Biology (IGIB), India (Proposal No 45a). All efforts were made to minimize animal suffering.

1. Injecting morpholino into zebrafish embryos

  1. Using a standard needle puller, draw very sharp and closed-tipped pipets.
  2. Load the solution containing morpholino into the micropipettes using a microloader tip and insert it into the microinjector apparatus. Tighten the screw properly to lock the micropipette.
    NOTE: Dosage standardization of morpholinos is necessary. The appropriate dosage has a survival rate of >70% and a specific phenotype at 24 hpf.
  3. Cut the tip of the micropipette using fine forceps and calibrate it11.
  4. To calibrate, inject 1 volume of morpholino solution into the capillary tube from the micropipette, keeping the injecting time at 1 s. Repeat this five times. Using the standard, 1 mm = 30 nL volume, find the volume injected in 5 s by keeping the capillary tube against a measuring scale. Using the above information, calculate the time (in seconds) required to inject 1-3 nL per injection12.
    ​NOTE: The standard, 1 mm = 30 nL, is specific to the microinjector pressure settings and diameter of the capillary used for calibration. Ideally, the injection must be made into the yolk-cell interface, which is formed within 15-20 min after fertilization. To facilitate multiple injections, development can be slightly delayed by maintaining embryos at a lower temperature (18 °C). However, this should be kept to a minimum and not extended beyond 30 min due to the compounding effect of lower temperature on gene expression changes.
  5. Mount the embryos on an agarose-cast Petri dish (60 mm). Stack the embryos tightly within the ridges. Using fire-polished glass pipettes, align them in the proper orientation for injection.
  6. Under a microscope, use manipulators to bring the micropipette closer to the embryo and inject inside the yolk-cell interface by pressing the footswitch.
  7. Inject all the embryos similarly; collect them in a Petri dish containing fresh embryo water medium and incubate at 28 °C.
  8. Check the injected embryos after 6-8 h. Remove all the dead embryos identifiable due to their high opacity and keep changing the embryo water at least once per day to avoid infection.

2. Pigmentation analysis

  1. Preparation for counting lateral midline melanophores in 3 dpf zebrafish embryos
    1. Treat embryos with 0.016% neuro-muscular anesthetic to immobilize them.
    2. To mount the embryos for imaging, add a few milliliters of 1.5-2% methylcellulose in the Petri dish (60 mm) so that it forms a thin layer. Using a Pasteur pipette, pick embryos and gently position them in methylcellulose to restrict further movement during imaging.
    3. Adjust their position for optimal lateral (dorsal stripe, ventral stripe, yolk stripe, and mid-line melanophores) or dorsal (melanophores on the dorsal part of the head) imaging. For better resolution of adjacent melanophores, image at higher magnification (>5x)
  2. Brightfield imaging
    NOTE: Brightfield imaging is performed using a stereomicroscope with 8-10x magnification.
    1. Place the Petri dish containing the zebrafish embryos under the microscope. Using a manipulator, adjust the fish in such orientation so that all five melanocyte embryonic stripes are visible (dorsal, ventral, two lateral, yolk) simultaneously (Figure 1C). Quickly capture images using the acquisition software. In case where the animal regains movement before it is imaged, re-immerse it in anesthetic and proceed with imaging once it is sufficiently immobilized.
    2. Repeat this with all the fish and ensure that magnification remains the same for every image.
  3. Calculating mean gray value using ImageJ software
    1. Take dorsal and lateral images of 2 dpf zebrafish embryos.
    2. Open the image to be quantified in ImageJ using the Open tool. Use the freehand shape tool to outline the area for analysis. Go to the Set measurements option and select Mean grey value | area. Press M (or Analyze | Measure) to calculate the mean grey value for the selected area.
    3. Keeping the area to be analyzed constant, calculate the mean grey area for every animal separately.
    4. Plot a bar graph with the acquired data (Figure 2F).
  4. Melanin content assay
    1. At 2 dpf, use a glass Pasteur pipette to collect ~25 zebrafish embryos.
    2. Perform manual dechorionation using 1 mL insulin needles and add them to 1.5 mL microcentrifuge tubes.
    3. Discard the embryo medium carefully and add 1 mL of ice-cold lysis buffer (20 mM sodium phosphate (pH 6.8), 1% Triton X-100, 1 mM PMSF, 1 mM EDTA) with protease inhibitor cocktail and prepare protein lysates by sonication.
    4. Dissolve the lysates in 1 mL of 1 N NaOH and incubate the samples at 100 °C for 50 min in a water bath. Vortex it intermittently to homogenize the lysates completely.
    5. Take absorbance readings of the samples at 490 nm using a spectrophotometer.
    6. Calculate the melanin content by comparing the sample absorbance to a standard curve of known concentrations of synthetic melanin (Figure 2G).

3. Melanophore count

NOTE: Fluorescence analysis in transgenic Zebrafish embryos can be done by two methods: 1) counting GFP-positive cells; 2) measuring fluorescence intensity.

  1. Preparation for FACS-based counting of GFP-positive cells in early zebrafish embryos
    1. Collect 200-250 ftyrp:GFP embryos and wash them in a strainer using plain embryo water. As a negative control, process GFP-negative, stage-matched wild-type (Assam Wildtype) embryos12.
    2. Based on the stage of interest, transfer the embryos to a Petri dish containing 0.6 mg/mL pronase. After 5-10 min, using a Pasteur pipette, transfer the dechorionated embryos to a fresh Petri dish containing plain embryo water. Using a glass Pasteur pipette, collect ~100 embryos and transfer them to a 2 mL microcentrifuge tube.
    3. Discard the medium carefully and add 200 µL of ice-cold Ringer's solution (deyolking buffer). Keeping the tube on ice, pipette the contents up and down ~20 times until the yolk is dissolved. Centrifuge the tubes at 100 × g for 1 min in a tabletop centrifuge at 4 °C. Centrifuge again and carefully discard the supernatant.
    4. Using a 1 mL pipette, transfer the deyolked embryos to a Petri dish containing 10 mL of trypsin solution (cell dissociation buffer). Perform it in multiple Petri dishes to avoid overcrowding of the embryos and inefficient trypsinization. Use a 1 mL pipette, mix the solution containing the embryo bodies once or twice to decrease aggregation.
    5. Incubate the Petri dishes at room temperature for 15 min (<24 hpf embryos) or 30 min (24-30 hpf embryos). Aspirate and dispense the suspension occasionally using a 1 mL pipette to aid the disintegration of cells.
    6. During the incubation period, initialize the flow cytometer machine for cell counting.
    7. Place a 70 µm cell strainer above a 50 mL conical tube and pass the trypsinized suspension through the strainer to obtain a single-cell suspension. Wash the Petri dishes with the same suspension a few times to remove cells adhered to the surface.
    8. Spin the samples at 450 × g, 4 °C for 5 min in a swinging bucket rotor.
    9. Discard the supernatant and resuspend the pellet in 1mL of ice-cold 1x phosphate-buffered saline (PBS).
    10. Spin again at 450 × g, 4 °C for 5 min and discard the supernatant.
    11. Finally, resuspend the pellet in PBS + 5% fetal bovine serum and keep it on ice until the FACS run.
  2. Preparing the flow cytometer
    1. Switch on the flow cytometer and initiate start-up.
      ​NOTE: Before switching on the machine, empty the waste bin and fill the sheath fluid tank.
    2. Normalize the flow of the stream for a 70 µm (or 85 µm) nozzle. Leave it undisturbed for 10-15 min if it is unstable.
  3. Counting fluorescently labeled cells using a flow cytometer
    1. Initialize a new experiment folder and make a scatter plot of forward scatter versus side scatter and a histogram of fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC) intensity.
    2. Load the wild-type cells first to set the forward and side scatter gates (to exclude doublets and debris) and the FITC threshold.
    3. After the gates are set, remove the sample and load the cells isolated from Tg(ftyrp1:GFP) embryos to count melanocytes.
      NOTE: Here, as ftyrp1:GFP specifically labels mature melanocytes, the number of GFP-positive cells under the FITC gate will correspond to the number of melanocytes.
    4. Repeat the above step with morpholino-injected samples to estimate and compare the number of melanocytes with the control.
  4. Measuring fluorescence intensity in zebrafish embryos
    1. Using a glass Pasteur pipette, collect 100-120 embryos and transfer them to a Petri dish containing plain embryo water.
    2. At ~10-12 hpf, transfer the embryos to 0.003% 1-phenyl-2-thiourea to inhibit pigmentation.
    3. Perform manual dechorionation using insulin needles for imaging <48 hpf embryos.
    4. To immobilize embryos, treat them with 0.016% tricaine.
    5. To mount embryos for imaging, put a few mL of 1.5-2% methylcellulose in the Petri dish (60 mm) so that it forms a thin layer. Add the embryos to methylcellulose to restrict any further movement during imaging. Place the Petri dish containing the samples under the microscope. Using a pipette tip, adjust the animal in the desired orientation.
    6. Acquire images using the acquisition software. For embryos <24 hpf, capture the whole embryo at once under 10x magnification. For >24 hpf stages, acquire multiple scan-fields and subsequently assemble (stitch) them together.
    7. Repeat this with all the fish and ensure that the setting for aquisition remains constant throughot the experiment.
  5. Quantification
    1. Analyze the image further using ImageJ software.
    2. Open the image to be quantified in ImageJ using the Open tool.
    3. Use the freehand shape tool to outline the area for analysis (Figure 3E).
    4. Press M (or Analyze | Measure) to acquire a selected area intensity measurement.
    5. Keeping the area to be analyzed constant, calculate the mean intensity per area for every animal separately.

Subscription Required. Please recommend JoVE to your librarian.

Representative Results

The workflow described in Figure 1 was used to perform morpholino-based genetic perturbation at the zebrafish one-cell stage. Pigmentation analysis was performed using various methods, as mentioned below. To illustrate the representative results, standardized volumes of antisense morpholino targeting h2afv and ca14 genes were injected in the yolk or one-cell stage of the zebrafish embryo. The initial phenotyping based on brightfield imaging was performed at 48 hours post fertilization (hpf), when all the five pigmented melanophore stripes (dorsal, ventral, yolk, two lateral) were evident.

Figure 2A,B represent an approach to analyze pigmentation by calculating the number of lateral melanophores per embryo. Lateral melanophores were manually counted at the 48 hpf stage by zooming in on the lateral region of the tilted zebrafish. An alternative method to quantify the pigmented melanophores (Supplemental Figure S1) involves the manual counting of the head melanophores by imaging the dorsal view of the zebrafish.

The melanin content per embryo is calculated by measuring the mean gray value, keeping the region of interest constant with the help of ImageJ software. Figure 2C-F show that the mean gray value of ca14 and h2afv morphants was higher than in control morphants. As the mean gray value is inversely proportional to melanin content, knockdown of ca14 and h2afv genes led to a decrease in melanin content per embryo. Another robust method to quantify the melanin content is a NaOH-based spectrophotometric absorption method. As shown in Figure 2G, the total melanin content in ca14 morphants was less than in control morphants.

Fluorescent imaging revealed two different stages of zebrafish melanophore development: early specified melanophores (mitfa:gfp) and differentiating melanophores (ftyrp:gfp). The morpholino-based alteration was evaluated by fluorescent imaging (Figure 3A and Figure 3C). To further validate these observations, the frequency of GFP-positive cells was calculated using FACS. The knockdown of h2afv but not ca14 significantly reduced the number of melanophores with respect to control(Figure 3A-D). Moreover, a reduction in the mean fluorescence intensity/area can be calculated using ImageJ software, keeping the region of interest constant. H2afv morphants show a significant decrease in the mean fluorescent intensity/area relative to control morphants (Figure 3E,F).

Figure 1
Figure 1: Workflow for a reverse genetic approach to identify regulators of melanocyte biology using zebrafish. (A) Flowchart depicting the experimental workflow starting from microinjection to evaluating pigmentation by various methods. (B) Microinjection needle holder and micromanipulator, along with a dissecting microscope, is a typical setup for microinjection of one-cell stage zebrafish embryos. (C) Embryonic melanocyte patterning in zebrafish at 3 dpf showing all five stripes: dorsolateral, two lateral midlines (pointed by four red arrows), ventral stripe, and yolk stripe. (D) To study the pigmentation outcome upon morpholino injection, lateral midline melanophores can be counted under a stereomicroscope. Brightfield image of a dorsal region at 2 dpf; melanin content can be quantified by measuring mean grey value. (E) The mean gray values are inversely proportional to the melanin content of the embryo. Melanin-filled melanophores at 2 dpf in wild-type embryos. (F) Melanin content assay can be performed to estimate the melanin production within these melanophores. Transgenic zebrafish labeling the cells expressing TYRP1 protein at 2 dpf. (G) Fluorescently labeled cells can be quantified using FACS; scale bar = 100 µm. Transgenic zebrafish labeling the cells expressing Mitfa protein at 1 dpf. Meanfluorescence intensity per animal can be measured using ImageJ software. Scale bars = 100 µm. Abbreviations: dpf = days post fertilization; FACS = fluorescence-activated cell sorting. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 2
Figure 2: Counting lateral midline melanophores, measuring mean gray value, and melanin content assay. Brightfield microscopic images of the lateral view of morphants were used to quantify melanin content using ImageJ software. (A) Control and Histone variant h2afv (h2afv) morphants at 3 dpf; on the right are zoomed-in trunk regions of these embryos depicting melanocyte numbers. (B) The number of melanophores in h2afv morphants is drastically reduced relative to control, n > 10 each in 3 biological replicates. (C) Representative image of control vs carbonic anhydrase 14 morphants at 2 dpf. (D) Melanin quantification of ca14 vs control morphants, n > 10 across 3 biological replicates. (E) Lateral view of h2afv vs control morphants at 2 dpf. (F) Melanin content quantification of h2afv vs control morphants. Red rectangles represent ROI chosen for ImageJ-based analysis. (G) Melanin content assay performed on morpholino-injected embryos for quantifying the total melanin content. Mean of three independent experiments ± SEM.; **P < 0.01, **** P < 0.0001. Student's t-test; error bars are mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM). Scale bars = 100 µm. Abbreviations: MO = morpholino; dpf = days post fertilization; ROI = region of interest. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 3
Figure 3: Quantifying fluorescently labeled cells using FACS and measuring mean fluorescence intensity. (A) Fluorescence images of ca14 and control morphant embryos at 2 dpf from Tg (ftyrp1: GFP) line, where the differentiating melanocytes are marked by GFP expression. (B) Number of melanophores in ca14 and control morphant embryos at 2 dpf remain unchanged, n = 3 biological replicates. (C) Fluorescence images at 2 dpf of h2afv and control morphants from Tg(ftyrp1:GFP) line. (D) The number of melanophores in h2afv morphants is significantly reduced compared to the control morphant embryos at 2 dpf, n = 3 biological replicates. (E) Fluorescence images of control and h2afv morphant embryos at 36 hpf from Tg(mitfa:GFP) with labeled melanocytes. (F) MFI per animal is calculated using ImageJ software and represented as a bar graph depicting individual data sets. MFI is significantly reduced in h2afv morphants compared to control. Red rectangle represents ROI chosen for ImageJ software-based analysis. n = 3 biological replicates; ***P < 0.001, ****P < 0.0001. Student's t-test; error bars are mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM); scale bars = 100 µm. Abbreviations: MO = morpholino; FACS = fluorescence-activated cell sorting; GFP = green fluorescent protein; dpf = days post fertilization; ROI = region of interest; MFI = mean fluorescence intensity. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Supplemental Figure S1: Quantitation of head melanophores. (A) Dorsal view of h2afv and control morphants at 48 hpf showing head melanophores. Red box represents the ROI. Keeping the area of interest constant, the number of head melanophores can be quantified manually. (B) Number of head melanophores significantly reduced upon h2afv knockdown. Bars represent geometric mean with 95% CI of the number of head melanophores per embryo with >30 embryos each. Scale bars = 100 µm. Abbreviations: MO = morpholino; CI = confidence interval; hpf = hours post fertilization; ROI = region of interest. Please click here to download this File.

Supplemental Figure S2: Microarray of human primary melanocytes treated with PTU. Heat map shows the expression of pigmentation genes (mitf, tyrosinase, dct, mc1r) upon treatment in human primary melanocytes. Abbreviations: PTU = 1-phenyl-2-thiourea; tyr = tyrosinase. Please click here to download this File.

Subscription Required. Please recommend JoVE to your librarian.


Pigmentation phenotype is often manifested as alterations in the content of melanin or the number of pigment-bearing melanocytes. The method described herein allows the dissection of this dichotomy and permits qualitative as well as quantitative assessment of melanin content and the number of melanophores per embryo, irrespective of the melanin content. The high fecundity of zebrafish, visible nature of pigmented melanocytes, and lack of melanosome transfer enable the dissection of melanocyte biology using this reverse genetic approach that is amenable to medium-throughput screening.

The choice of morpholino-based silencing emanates from the ease of silencing and the ability to test multiple candidates parallelly. There are certain limitations of using a morpholino-based silencing approach, and guidelines for using and interpreting these valuable tools have been described previously13. Essentially, the validation of phenotype upon knockdown using multiple MOs provides a tangible solution to this problem. An alternate strategy is the use of CRISPR-based genetic perturbation. The penetrance of the phenotype is limited due to the inherently lower frequency of genetic events and could be compounded by heterogeneous mutations. That limits its use for reverse genetic screening14.

Phenotype assessment of melanocyte-selective perturbations often results in decreased pigment content due to altered melanogenic response. However, there are several genes that perturb the specification of melanocytes and hence cause a reduction in pigmentation due to a decrease in overall melanocyte numbers. A systematic dissection of the two scenarios is essential to ascribe the molecular function of the gene in pigmentation. The measurement of melanin content is compounded by the complex nature of melanin polymer. Of the two available methods, namely melanin solubilization by NaOH and HPLC-based detection of stable melanin oxidation products 1H-pyrrole-2,3,5-tricarboxylic acid and pyrrole-2,3- dicarboxylic acid, the former method can be routinely performed in a laboratory setting while the latter requires specific standards and sophisticated instrumentation15.

Additionally, the number of embryos required by the NaOH method is also higher due to several steps involved in the detection. NaOH-based hydrolysis solubilizes melanin and enables spectrophotometric quantitation. While this method is robust and can be adopted for a medium-throughput screen (10-15 candidates at a time), xanthine present in xanthophores is a potential interfering substance due to its inherent absorption in the 400-450 nm range16. Hence, a concordance between image analysis-based mean grey value determination and melanin content assay must be carried out to confirm the reduction in the melanin content.

PTU offers an easy tool to reduce the pigmentation and visualize the otherwise transparent embryo. The use could possibly result in feedback changes and invoke alterations in melanocytes. However, we have observed minimal changes in the expression of pigmentation genes (Supplemental Figure S2).

The counting of melanocytes is easiest in the lateral mid line and the head region, as the melanocytes are relatively distinctly observable in these regions (Supplemental Figure S1). Lateral line melanophores arise from the melanocyte stem cell population that resides close to the dorsal root ganglia18. Imaging this population has several advantages such as fixed number per embryo and clear distinction. However, the two contralateral lines need to be imaged by tilting the embryo slightly; else the two merge due to the transparent nature of the embryo, making it difficult to count (Figure 1C versus Figure 2C).

Zebrafish melanophores are distinct from the pigmented cells of the eye that are derived from neuro-ectoderm. These are distinguishable by their positioning within the embryo and are evident in the eye versus the body pattern. In the FACS-based experiment, the eye-derived cells can be distinguished by their size as they are significantly smaller than the melanophores and can be gated using size or scatter criteria.

Estimates of melanocytes at different maturation stages using transgenic lines are easily carried out using image-based quantitation. Quantitation of the number of lateral-line melanophores is robust as their number varies in a window between 2 dpf and 5 dpf on each side of the embryo17. However, the number of lateral-line melanophores is determined by the migration and establishment of a dorsal root ganglion-associated stem cell pool18. Hence, any alterations in these processes can lead to a similar observation. To circumvent this confounding factor, FACS-based estimation of all melanophores is a tangible solution.

Alternately, quantitation of head melanophores can be performed as delineated in Supplemental Figure S1 as a surrogate for melanophore numbers. It is interesting to note that the alterations in steady-state levels of melanocyte numbers could signify two opposite functions for the candidate gene in question. It could either result in decreased specification of melanocytes from neural-crest precursors or cause melanocyte-specific death and need to be addressed using methods such as the tunnel assay. Variations such as microinjections followed by live-cell imaging would enable monitoring other melanocyte-specific phenotypes such as migration and patterning. Of interest to pigment-cell researchers would be the process of melanosome transfer, which is not operative in the fish system. However, concerted melanosome movement in melanophores can be studied with alterations in live-cell imaging described herein with modifications. In all, the detailed protocol presented in this video article would enable pigment cell biology researchers to query candidate genes and assess their role in melanocyte biology.

Subscription Required. Please recommend JoVE to your librarian.


All authors declare no conflict of interest.


We acknowledge the funding support from the Council for Scientific and Industrial Research vide project MLP2008 and the Department of Science and Technology for the project GAP165 for supporting the work presented in this manuscript. We thank Jeyashri Rengaraju and Chetan Mishra for their help with experiments.


Name Company Catalog Number Comments
1.5 mL Microtubes Axygen MCT-150-A For preparing MO solution
2 mL Microtubes Axygen MCT-200-C For washing steps in FACS protocol
Agarose Sigma-Aldrich A-9539-500G For microinjection
BD FACSAria II BD Biosciences NA For cell sorting
Capillary tube Drummond 1-000-0010
Corning cell strainer Corning CLS431751 For making single cell suspension
DMEM High Glucose Media Sigma-Aldrich D5648 FACS protocol
Ethyl 3-aminobenzoate methanesulfonate (Tricaine) Sigma-Aldrich E10521-50G to immobilize ZF for imaging
Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid disodium salt dihydrate (EDTA) Sigma-Aldrich E5134 For cold lysis buffer
FACS tubes BD-Biosciences 342065 FACS protocol
Fetal bovine serum (FBS) Invitrogen 10270 FACS protocol
Graphpad prism Software Graphstats Technologies NA For data representation
ImageJ Software National Institute of health NA For image analysis
Insulin Syringes (1 mL) DispoVan NA For manual dechorionation
Melanin, Synthetic Sigma-Aldrich M8631 For melanin content assay
Methylcellulose Sigma-Aldrich M7027-250G to immobilize ZF for imaging
Microloader tips Eppendorf 5242956003 For microinjection
Morpholino Gene-tools NA For knock-down experiments
N-Phenylthiourea (PTU) Sigma-Aldrich P7629 to inhibit melanin formation
Needle puller Sutter Instrument P-97 For microinjection
Nunc 15 mL Conical Sterile Polypropylene Centrifuge Tubes Thermo Fisher Scientific 339650 FACS protocol
Petridish (60 mm) Tarsons 460090 For embryo plates
Phenylmethylsulphonyl fluoride Sigma-Aldrich 10837091001 For cold lysis buffer
Phosphate buffer saline (PBS) HiMedia TL1099-500mL For washing cells
Pronase Sigma-Aldrich 53702 For dechorionation
Protease inhibitor cocktail Sigma-Aldrich P8340 For cold lysis buffer
Sheath fluid BD FACSFlowTM 342003 FACS protocol
Sodium phosphate Merck 7558-79-4 Cold lysis buffer
Triton X-100 Sigma-Aldrich T9284-500ML For cold lysis buffer
TrypLE Gibco 1677119 For trypsinization



  1. Kelsh, R. N. Genetics and evolution of pigment patterns in fish. Pigment Cell Research. 17 (4), 326-336 (2004).
  2. Jablonski, N. G. The evolution of human skin and skin color. Annual Review of Anthropology. 33, 585-623 (2004).
  3. Hoekstra, H. Genetics, development and evolution of adaptive pigmentation in vertebrates. Heredity. 97 (3), 222-234 (2006).
  4. Quigley, I. K., Parichy, D. M. Pigment pattern formation in zebrafish: a model for developmental genetics and the evolution of form. Microscopy Research and Technique. 58 (6), 442-455 (2002).
  5. Meyers, J. R. Zebrafish: development of a vertebrate model organism. Current Protocols Essential Laboratory Techniques. 16 (1), 19 (2018).
  6. Kelsh, R. N., Schmid, B., Eisen, J. S. Genetic analysis of melanophore development in zebrafish embryos. Developmental Biology. 225 (2), 277-293 (2000).
  7. Rocha, M., Singh, N., Ahsan, K., Beiriger, A., Prince, V. E. Neural crest development: insights from the zebrafish. Developmental Dynamics. 249 (1), 88-111 (2020).
  8. Carney, T. J., et al. A direct role for Sox10 in specification of neural crest-derived sensory neurons. Development. 133 (23), 4619-4630 (2006).
  9. Curran, K., Raible, D. W., Lister, J. A. Foxd3 controls melanophore specification in the zebrafish neural crest by regulation of Mitf. Developmental Biology. 332 (2), 408-417 (2009).
  10. Zou, J., Beermann, F., Wang, J., Kawakami, K., Wei, X. The Fugu tyrp1 promoter directs specific GFP expression in zebrafish: tools to study the RPE and the neural crest-derived melanophores. Pigment Cell Research. 19 (6), 615-627 (2006).
  11. Xu, Q. Microinjection into zebrafish embryos. Methods in Molecular Biology. 127, 125-132 (1999).
  12. Hermanson, S., Davidson, A. E., Sivasubbu, S., Balciunas, D., Ekker, S. C. Sleeping Beauty transposon for efficient gene delivery. Methods in Cell Biology. 77, 349-362 (2004).
  13. Stainier, D. Y., et al. Guidelines for morpholino use in zebrafish. PLoS Genetics. 13 (10), 1007000 (2017).
  14. Wu, N., et al. The progress of CRISPR/Cas9-mediated gene editing in generating mouse/zebrafish models of human skeletal diseases. Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal. 17, 954-962 (2019).
  15. Affenzeller, S., Frauendorf, H., Licha, T., Jackson, D. J., Wolkenstein, K. Quantitation of eumelanin and pheomelanin markers in diverse biological samples by HPLC-UV-MS following solid-phase extraction. PLoS One. 14 (10), 0223552 (2019).
  16. Fernandes, B., Matamá, T., Guimarães, D., Gomes, A., Cavaco-Paulo, A. Fluorescent quantification of melanin. Pigment Cell & Melanoma Research. 29 (6), 707-712 (2016).
  17. Hultman, K. A., Johnson, S. L. Differential contribution of direct-developing and stem cell-derived melanocytes to the zebrafish larval pigment pattern. Developmental Biology. 337 (2), 425-431 (2010).
  18. Mort, R. L., Jackson, I. J., Patton, E. E. The melanocyte lineage in development and disease. Development. 142 (4), 620-632 (2015).


Reverse Genetic Approach Regulators Of Pigmentation Zebrafish Candidate Gene Melanocyte Biology Logical Inference Confounding Factors Immobilize Embryos Methyl Cellulose Imaging Acquisition Software Quantification Gray Value Area Analysis Stage Of Interest Prona
Reverse Genetic Approach to Identify Regulators of Pigmentation using Zebrafish
Play Video

Cite this Article

Sharma, B., Subramaniam, Y. J.,More

Sharma, B., Subramaniam, Y. J., Ayyappa Raja, D., Aggarwal, A., Sivasubbu, S., Natarajan, V. T. Reverse Genetic Approach to Identify Regulators of Pigmentation using Zebrafish. J. Vis. Exp. (181), e62955, doi:10.3791/62955 (2022).

Copy Citation Download Citation Reprints and Permissions
View Video

Get cutting-edge science videos from JoVE sent straight to your inbox every month.

Waiting X
Simple Hit Counter