Method Article

Visualizing Bacterial Motility Based on a Color Reaction

DOI:

10.3791/63706

⸱

February 15th, 2022

 , 
1Department of Microbiology, School of Life Science and Technology, China Pharmaceutical University, 2National Experimental Teaching Demonstration Center of Biopharmaceuticals, China Pharmaceutical University

In This Article

Summary

$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

Here, we present a protocol to detect bacterial motility based on a color reaction. Key advantages of this method are that it is easy to evaluate and more accurate, and does not require specialized equipment.

Abstract

$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

Bacterial motility is crucial for bacterial pathogenicity, biofilm formation, and drug resistance. Bacterial motility is crucial for the invasion and/or dissemination of many pathogenic species. Therefore, it is important to detect bacterial motility. Bacterial growth conditions, such as oxygen, pH, and temperature, can affect bacterial growth and the expression of bacterial flagella. This can lead to reduced motility or even loss of motility, resulting in the inaccurate evaluation of bacterial motility. Based on the color reaction of 2,3,5-triphenyl tetrazolium chloride (TTC) by intracellular dehydrogenases of living bacteria, TTC was added to traditional semisolid agar for bacterial motility detection. The results showed that this TTC semisolid agar method for the detection of bacterial motility is simple, easy to operate, and does not involve large and expensive instruments. The results also showed that the highest motility was observed in semisolid medium prepared with 0.3% agar. Compared with the traditional semisolid medium, the results are easier to evaluate and more accurate.

Introduction

$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

Bacterial motility plays a critical role in bacterial pathogenicity, biofilm formation, and drug resistance1. Bacterial motility is closely associated with pathogenicity and is necessary for bacterial colonization during early infection of host cells2. Biofilm formation is closely related to bacterial motility, where bacteria adhere to the surface of solid media through motility. Bacterial motility has long been considered to be positively correlated with biofilm formation. A high degree of bacterial drug resistance due to biofilm can lead to persistent infections that are a threat to human health3,4,5. Therefore, it is important to detect bacterial motility. The bacterial motility test is mainly used to examine the motility of different forms of bacteria in the living state, which can indirectly determine the presence or absence of flagella and, thus, has an important role in the identification of bacteria.

There are direct and indirect methods to detect bacterial motility6. As bacteria with flagella show motility, it is possible to detect whether bacteria are motile indirectly by detecting the presence or absence of flagella. For example, it is possible to detect motility indirectly by electron microscopy and flagellar staining to indicate that bacteria are motile. It is also possible to detect by direct methods, such as suspension drop and semisolid puncture methods.

The semisolid puncture method commonly used in undergraduate microbiology laboratories to detect bacterial motility inoculates the bacteria into the puncture in the semisolid agar medium containing 0.4-0.8% agar, according to the direction of bacterial growth. If the bacteria grow along the puncture line to spread around, cloud-like (brush-like) growth traces appear, indicating the presence of flagella and, therefore, motility. If there are no puncture-line growth traces, the bacterium is neither flagellated nor motile.

However, this method has its drawbacks: the bacteria are colorless and transparent, the flagellar activity is affected by the physiological characteristics of the living bacteria and other factors, and the concentration of agar and the small diameter of the test tube. Moreover, aerobic bacteria are only suitable for growth on the agar surface, affecting the observation of bacterial motility. Hence, to improve this experiment, 2,3,5-triphenyltetrazolium chloride (TTC) (colorless) was added to the medium to establish a more reliable and intuitive method of determining bacterial motility than the current direct-puncture method using intracellular dehydrogenases to catalyze the formation of a red product of TTC7,8,9,10.

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Protocol

$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

1. Preparation of semisolid medium

  1. Traditional semisolid agar
    1. Prepare the traditional semisolid agar according to the bacterial motility test medium recipe using the basic ingredients11. Dissolve 10 g of Tryptose, 15 g of NaCl, 4 g of agar in enough distilled water, adjust the pH to 7.2 ± 0.2, and make up the final volume to 1,000 mL.
    2. Autoclave the agar at 121 °C for 20 min, and dispense it into 10 mL test tubes as a 3-cm high semisolid medium.
  2. Traditional semisolid agar with TTC
    1. After autoclaving the conventional semisolid medium, cool it to 50 °C, add 5 mL of sterile 1% TTC solution to 100 mL of medium, mix, and dispense it into 10 mL test tubes to form a 3-cm-high semisolid medium.

2. Bacterial strains

NOTE: Eighty strains were isolated from the aquatic environment and identified using an automated bacteria identification instrument (see the Table of Materials), including Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Salmonella spp., Vibrio spp., Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Aeromonas hydrophila (Table 1). Staphylococcus aureus (see the Table of Materials) was used as a negative nonmotile control; Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Salmonella typhimurium (see the Table of Materials) were used as positive control strains.

  1. Identify test bacterial strains to be used for motility analysis.
  2. Include negative nonmotile controls and motile positive control strains.

3. TTC-enhanced bacterial motility observation

  1. Pick single colonies of test bacteria from agar plates and inoculate them into the above two semisolid media (steps 1.1.2 and 1.2.1) by puncture using inoculating needles.
  2. Culture the tubes at 37 °C in the incubator for 24-48 h to observe the results.
  3. Observe the growth state: characterize the bacteria as nonmotile (-) if only the puncture line is red. Characterize the bacteria as motile (+) if the red color spreads lightly outward along the puncture line12.

4. Effect of different agar concentrations on bacterial motility

  1. Prepare semisolid media containing 0.3%, 0.5%, and 0.8% agar and inoculate them by puncture, as described above. Observe the results after 24-48 h of incubation.

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Results

$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

Both standard strains and isolated strains were compared for motility detection, and the results are shown in Table 1. Due to the absence of flagella, Staphylococcus aureus and Klebsiella pneumoniae only grew along the inoculated line on both traditional and TTC semisolid media. In contrast, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Escherichia coli, and Salmonella typhimurium showed growth in all directions around the inoculated line after culturing for 24 h on TTC semisolid m...

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Discussion

$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

The detection of bacterial motility by the semisolid medium method is affected by many factors13,14. Bacterial growth conditions, such as oxygen (aerobic on agar surface, nonaerobic at the bottom of the tube with the semisolid medium), pH, and temperature, can affect the viability of bacterial flagella, which can lead to reduced motility or even loss of motility15. In addition, some mucus-type bacteria as their motility can be affected by ...

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Disclosures

$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Acknowledgements

$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

This study was supported by the Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (PAPD) and Teaching Reform Research Project of China Pharmaceutical University (2019XJYB18).

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Materials

List of materials used in this article
NameCompanyCatalog NumberComments
Bacto AgarDifco
Escherichia coliATCCATCC25922Positive control
Pseudomonas aeruginosaATCCATCC27853Positive control
Salmonella typhimuriumATCCATCC14028Positive control
Staphylococcus aureusATCCATCC25923Negative nonmotile control
Tryptose OXOID
TTCSigma298-96-4
VITEK 2 automated microbial identification systemBio Mérieux

References

$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,
  1. Jordan, E. O., Caldwell, M. E., Reiter, D. Bacterial motility. Journal of Bacteriology. 27 (2), 165(1934).
  2. Lai, S. L., Hou, H., Jiang, W. Bacterial motility and its role during initial stage of pathogenesis. Journal of Microbiology. 26 (5), in Chinese 68-70 (2006).
  3. Ding, S. S., Wang, Y. Relationship between flagella-dependent motility and biofilm in bacteria - A review. Acta Microbiologica Sinica. 49 (4), in Chinese 417-422 (2009).
  4. Zeng, J., Wang, D. Recent advances in the mechanism of bacterial resistance and tolerance. Chinese Journal of Antibiotics. 45 (2), 113-121 (2020).
  5. Xu, M., Zhou, M. X., Zhu, G. Q. Progress in the mechanism of bacterial flagellum motility, adhesion and immune escape. Chinese Journal of Veterinary Science. 37 (2), 369-375 (2017).
  6. Leboffe, M. J., Pierce, B. E. Microbiology: laboratory theory and application. Third edition. , Morton Publishing Company. Colorado. (2015).
  7. Ball, R. J., Sellers, W. Improved motility medium. Applied Microbiology. 14, 670-673 (1966).
  8. An, S., Wu, J., Zhang, L. H. Modulation of Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm dispersal by a cyclic-di-GMP phosphodiesterase with a putative hypoxia-sensing domain. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 76 (24), 8160-8173 (2010).
  9. Chouhan, O. P., et al. Effect of site-directed mutagenesis at the GGEEF domain of the biofilm forming GGEEF protein from Vibrio cholerae. AMB Express. 6 (1), 2(2016).
  10. McLaughlin, M. R. Simple colorimetric microplate test of phage lysis in Salmonella enterica. Journal of Microbiological Methods. 69 (2), 394-398 (2007).
  11. Difco Laboratories. Difco manual: Dehydrated culture media and reagents for microbiology. Difco Laboratories. , Detroit. (1984).
  12. Tittsler, R. P., Sandholzer, L. A. The use of semi-solid agar for the detection of bacterial motility. Journal of Bacteriology. 31 (6), 575(1936).
  13. Qian, Y., Tian, X. Y., Zhang, S. Y., Wang, J. Explore the influencing factors of bacterial motility. Health Care Today. 6, 50-51 (2018).
  14. Wang, J., et al. Filamentous Phytophthora pathogens deploy effectors to interfere with bacterial growth and motility. Frontiers in Microbiology. 11, 581511(2020).
  15. Kühn, M. J., et al. Spatial arrangement of several flagellins within bacterial flagella improves motility in different environments. Nature Communication. 9 (1), 5369(2018).
  16. Mitchell, A. J., Wimpenny, J. W. T. The effects of agar concentration on the growth and morphology of submerged colonies of motile and non-motile bacteria. Journal of Applied Microbiology. 83 (1), 76-84 (2010).
  17. Xu, A., Zhang, M., Du, W., Wang, D., Ma, L. Z. A molecular mechanism for how sigma factor AlgT and transcriptional regulator AmrZ inhibit twitching motility in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Environmental Microbiology. 23 (2), 572-587 (2021).
  18. Bartley, S. N., et al. Attachment and invasion of Neisseria meningitidis to host cells is related to surface hydrophobicity, bacterial cell size and capsule. PLoS One. 8, 55798(2013).

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Reprints and Permissions

Request permission to reuse the text or figures of this JoVE article

Request Permission

Tags

TTC AgarSemisolid MediumMotility DetectionPathogenic BacteriaFlagella ExpressionBiofilm FormationInoculation TechniqueDehydrogenase Activity

Related Articles