Whole-Brain Single-Cell Imaging and Analysis of Intact Neonatal Mouse Brains Using MRI, Tissue Clearing, and Light-Sheet Microscopy

Summary

This protocol describes methods for conducting magnetic resonance imaging, clearing, and immunolabeling of intact mouse brains using iDISCO+, followed by a detailed description of imaging using light-sheet microscopy, and downstream analyses using NuMorph.

Abstract

Tissue clearing followed by light-sheet microscopy (LSFM) enables cellular-resolution imaging of intact brain structure, allowing quantitative analysis of structural changes caused by genetic or environmental perturbations. Whole-brain imaging results in more accurate quantification of cells and the study of region-specific differences that may be missed with commonly used microscopy of physically sectioned tissue. Using light-sheet microscopy to image cleared brains greatly increases acquisition speed as compared to confocal microscopy. Although these images produce very large amounts of brain structural data, most computational tools that perform feature quantification in images of cleared tissue are limited to counting sparse cell populations, rather than all nuclei.

Here, we demonstrate NuMorph (Nuclear-Based Morphometry), a group of analysis tools, to quantify all nuclei and nuclear markers within annotated regions of a postnatal day 4 (P4) mouse brain after clearing and imaging on a light-sheet microscope. We describe magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to measure brain volume prior to shrinkage caused by tissue clearing dehydration steps, tissue clearing using the iDISCO+ method, including immunolabeling, followed by light-sheet microscopy using a commercially available platform to image mouse brains at cellular resolution. We then demonstrate this image analysis pipeline using NuMorph, which is used to correct intensity differences, stitch image tiles, align multiple channels, count nuclei, and annotate brain regions through registration to publicly available atlases.

We designed this approach using publicly available protocols and software, allowing any researcher with the necessary microscope and computational resources to perform these techniques. These tissue clearing, imaging, and computational tools allow measurement and quantification of the three-dimensional (3D) organization of cell-types in the cortex and should be widely applicable to any wild-type/knockout mouse study design.

Introduction

Whole-brain imaging at single-cell resolution is an important challenge in neuroscience. Cellular-resolution brain images allow for detailed analysis and system-level mapping of brain circuitry and how that circuitry is disrupted by genetic or environmental risk factors for neuropsychiatric disorders, cellular behavior in developing embryos, as well as neural circuits in the adult brain^1,2,3. There are multiple histological methods that allow for high-resolution images of the reconstructed 3D brain; however, these techniques require expensive, specialized equipment, may not be compatible with immunolabeling, and the two-dimensional (2D) nature of some methods may lead to tissue damage and shearing during sectioning^4,5.

Recent advancements have provided an alternative approach for imaging entire brains that does not require tissue sectioning; they involve using tissue clearing to make brains transparent. Transparency is achieved in most tissue clearing methods by both removing lipids, as they are a major source of light scattering, and matching the refractive index (RI) of the object with the RI of the sample immersion solution during imaging. Light can then pass through the boundary between materials without being scattered^6,7,8,9.

Tissue clearing methods, such as iDISCO+, are often combined with rapid 3D imaging using single-photon excitation microscopy, such as LSFM^6,7,10. Within transparent tissues labeled with a fluorophore, light-sheet fluorescence microscopy images sections by excitation with a thin plane of light¹¹. The main advantage of LSFM is that a single optical section is illuminated at a time, with all the fluorescence from the molecules within that section being excited, which minimizes photobleaching. Moreover, imaging an entire optical slice enables camera-based detection of that excited slice, increasing speed relative to point scanning¹². LSFM nondestructively produces well-registered optical sections that are suitable for 3D reconstruction.

While the iDISCO+ method allows for inexpensive tissue clearing within ~3 weeks, dehydration steps within the protocol may lead to tissue shrinkage and potential alteration of the sample morphology, thus affecting volumetric measurements^6,10. Adding a secondary imaging method, such as MRI, to be used prior to the tissue clearing procedure can measure the degree of tissue clearing-induced shrinkage across the sample. During the dehydration steps, differences in mechanical properties between gray and white matter may lead to nonuniform brain matter deformations, resulting in dissimilar tissue clearing-induced volume deformations between wild-type and mutant samples and may confound interpretations of volumetric differences in these samples^10,13. MRI is performed by first perfusing the animal with a contrast agent (e.g., gadolinium), followed by incubating the extracted tissue of interest in an immersion solution (e.g., fomblin) before imaging¹⁴. MRI is compatible with tissue clearing and performing LSFM on the same sample.

LSFM is often used to create large-scale microscopy images for qualitative visualization of the brain tissue of interest rather than quantitative evaluation of brain structure (Figure 1). Without quantitative evaluation, it is difficult to demonstrate structural differences resulting from genetic or environmental insults. As tissue-clearing and imaging technologies improve, along with decreased costs of storage and computing power, quantifying cell type localizations within the tissue of interest is becoming more accessible, allowing more researchers to include these data in their studies.

With over 100 million cells in the mouse brain¹⁵ and whole-brain imaging sessions that can generate terabytes of data, there is increased demand for advanced image analysis tools that allow accurate quantification of features within the images, such as cells. A host of segmentation methods exist for tissue-cleared images that apply thresholding for nuclear staining intensity and filter objects with predefined shapes, sizes, or densities^10,16,17,18. However, inaccurate interpretations of results can arise from variations in parameters such as cell size, image contrast, and labeling intensity. This paper describes our established protocol to quantify cell nuclei in the mouse brain. First, we detail steps for tissue collection of the P4 mouse brain, followed by a tissue clearing and immunolabeling protocol optimized from the publicly available iDISCO+ method¹⁰. Second, we describe image acquisition using MRI and light-sheet microscopy, including the parameters used for capturing images. Finally, we describe and demonstrate NuMorph¹⁹, a set of image analysis tools our group has developed that allows cell-type specific quantification after tissue clearing, immunolabeling with nuclear markers, and light-sheet imaging of annotated regions.

Protocol

All mice were used in accordance with and approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.

1. Mouse dissection and perfusion

NOTE: The following dissections were performed on P4 and P14 mice using a syringe. The volume of perfusion fluid will vary depending on the age of the animal.

1. Perfusion
   CAUTION: Paraformaldehyde (PFA) is a hazardous chemical. Perform all perfusion steps in a chemical fume hood.
   1. Prior to surgery, administer pentobarbital via intraperitoneal injection (100 mg/kg) and allow the anesthetic to take effect.
   2. Once the animal has reached a surgical plane of anesthesia, use the toe-pinching response method to confirm unresponsiveness.
   3. Make a lateral incision beneath the rib cage to expose the thoracic cavity of the animal.
   4. Using curved, surgical scissors, carefully cut through the rib cage up to the collarbone on one side of the animal and make an identical cut on the opposite side, allowing the sternum to be lifted away, exposing the heart.
   5. Without damaging the descending aorta, carefully trim any tissue connected to the heart before making a small incision on the right atrium to allow blood to flow out of the vasculature.
   6. Using a syringe-based method, perfuse the mouse through the left ventricle with 10 mL and 7 mL of phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) for P14 and P4, respectively, with a perfusion rate of 1.5 mL/min through the system.
   7. Once the blood is cleared, perfuse again with 10 mL of PBS + 4% PFA and 7 mL of PBS + 4% PFA for P14 and P4, respectively, at 4 °C with a perfusion rate of 1.5 mL/min to fix the animal.
      NOTE: Fixation tremors will be observed, and the animal will be stiff upon completion. If using MRI on samples, perfuse with similar volumes of PBS and PFA for each timepoint + 20% gadolinium-based MRI contrast agent in the PFA solution.
   8. Remove the head using surgical scissors and drop-fix with PBS + 4% PFA for 24 h at 4 °C for complete fixation.
      ​NOTE: At this stage, the brain remains intact with the skull on (see Section 2). Pause point: brains can be stored for several months at this stage in PBS + 0.1% sodium azide at 4 °C.

2. MR-based gross brain structure imaging with intact skull and analysis

NOTE: The brain must be perfused and incubated in gadolinium as described above without being removed from the skull. All MRI occurs before removal of the brain from the skull to avoid unintended tissue loss during dissection. Imaging with an intact skull also provides support to the brain in the sample holder (i.e., syringe) during sample preparation and imaging.

1. Sample preparation
   NOTE: The following steps are optimized for P4 and P14 mouse brain samples. The syringe size needed will depend on the physical size of the sample.
   1. If performing MRI on the sample, remove the skin from the skull and incubate in PBS + 3% gadolinium for 23 days at 4 °C before imaging¹⁴. After 23 days, rinse the samples quickly in PBS.
   2. Use 5 mL syringes to create a sample holder for MRI, using syringe pistons to close each end of the holder made with the syringe²⁰. Use plastic pieces to hold the skull tightly in place in the holder (Figure 2A). Remove the markings on the syringe with ethanol to prevent artifacts upon imaging.
   3. Securely place the skull in the sample holder and fill with an immersion solution compatible with MRI (see the Table of Materials). Close the holder and remove all the air bubbles using a syringe.
      NOTE: Pause point: The skull may be stored in the immersion solution for several months before imaging.
2. Gross brain structure imaging (MRI)
   1. Image the samples with a 9.4T/30 cm horizontal-bore, animal MRI system using a 15 mm volume coil and a spin-echo-based sequence with the following parameters: Spatial resolution: 60 µm x 60 µm x 60 µm; total scan time: 7 h 12 min; time to echo (TE): 6.83 ms; repetition time (TR): 40 ms; excitation/refocusing flip angles: 90/180 degrees; image size:166 x 168 x 209 voxels; Field of view (FOV): 9.9 mm x 10.1 mm x 12.4 mm; bandwidth: 100,000 kHz.
3. Computational gross brain structure analysis
   1. Remove the surrounding skull from raw MRI images by manually tracing the mouse brain using segmentation software. Next, apply the voxel-wise multiplication operation between the mask image and raw MRI image to generate the skull-stripped brain MRI image.
      NOTE: The output is a binary mask image where the intensity for brain voxels is set to 1 and 0 otherwise.
   2. Apply rigid image registration (estimating only translation and rotation) using 'flirt' in the FSL package^21,22 to align the skull-stripped MRI image (moving image) to the corresponding light-sheet microscopy image (reference image).
   3. Apply non-rigid registration (using 'SyN' in ANTS software²³) to find the point-to-point correspondences between the rigid-aligned MRI image in step 2.3.2 to the light-sheet image (same reference image in step 2.3.2).
      NOTE: The output includes the warped MRI image and the deformation field associated with the volume changes from MRI to the light-sheet images.
   4. Calculate the Jacobian determinant on the deformation field generated in step 2.3.3, which quantifies the volume change in a 3 x 3 x 3 voxel local neighborhood.
   5. Align skull-stripped images to the Allen Developmental Mouse Brain Atlas using deformable image registration.
      ​NOTE: The established spatial point-to-point correspondence allows automatic annotation of brain regions of interest in the new mouse image (Figure 2C-H).

3. Brain dissection from the skull

1. Make a midline incision along the top of the skull from the neck to the nose to expose the skull.
2. Expose the base of the skull by trimming away the remaining neck muscle and all other residual muscle.
3. Using sharp surgical scissors, carefully cut along the inner surface of the skull, taking care not to damage the brain by maintaining a gentle upward pressure while cutting with the sharp surgical equipment.
4. Use tweezers to peel the two cut halves of the skull away from the brain and carefully trim away excess fat attached to the brain.
5. Use a surgical scissors to trim any dura that connects the brain to the skull, and then use a spatula to gently remove the brain from the head.
6. Remove the brain, wash with PBS, and then swap to PBS with 0.1% sodium azide and keep at 4 °C for long-term storage.

4. Tissue clearing

NOTE: This protocol is adapted from the iDISCO+ protocol for P4 mice⁶, with minor changes. Some details may change for different time points/species/experiments). CAUTION: Methanol, dichloromethane (DCM), and dibenzyl ether (DBE) are hazardous chemicals. These tissue clearing steps are performed in a chemical fume hood.

1. Antibody validation
   NOTE: Methanol compatibility of untested antibodies needs to be checked as they may be negatively affected by the harsh methanol washes required in the iDISCO+ protocol. For a list of antibodies that have been shown to work in iDISCO+, see the website²⁴.
   1. Harvest 10 µm frozen sections of the PFA-fixed tissue of interest onto stereological slides.
   2. Incubate the sections in 100% methanol for 3 h at room temperature.
   3. Rehydrate in PBS before proceeding with standard immunohistochemistry protocols to determine whether the antibody shows the expected pattern of fluorescence after methanol washes. For positive control, use a slide not treated with methanol.
2. Buffer preparation
   1. Prepare buffers according to the official iDISCO protocol. See the Table of Materials for composition of the buffers and other solutions used in this protocol.
3. Pretreatment
   1. Dehydrate the sample with methanol/PBS series: 20%, 40%, 60%, 80%, 100%; 1 h each at room temperature.
      NOTE: Using PBS during dehydration helps prevent cracking of the samples in methanol washes.
   2. Wash the sample in 100% methanol for 1 h, and then chill at 4 °C for 1 h before incubating overnight with shaking in 66% DCM/33% methanol at room temperature.
   3. Wash the sample 2x in 100% methanol at room temperature, and then chill it at 4 °C.
   4. Use fresh 5% H₂O₂ in methanol to bleach the sample overnight at 4 °C.
   5. Rehydrate the sample with methanol/PBS series: 80%, 60%, 40%, 20%, PBS; 1 h each at room temperature and wash 2x for 1 h in PTx.2 at room temperature.
   6. Incubate the sample in 1x PBS/0.2% TritonX-100/20% DMSO at 37 °C overnight.
   7. Incubate the sample in 1x PBS/0.1% Tween-20/0.1% TritonX-100/0.1% Deoxycholate/0.1% NP40/20% DMSO at 37 °C overnight.
   8. Wash in PTx.2 at room temperature for 1 h twice.
4. Immunolabeling
   1. Incubate the samples in Permeabilization Solution at 37 °C for 2 days (~48 h).
   2. Block the samples in Blocking Solution at 37 °C for 2 days (~48 h).
   3. Incubate the samples with primary antibody in PTwH / 5%DMSO / 3% Serum at 37 °C for 4 days (~96 h) (e.g., rabbit(Rb) Brn2/POU3F2 mAb (1:100) and anti-Ctip2 rat(Rt) antibody (1:400) (Table of Materials).
   4. Wash 3 x 1 h in PTwH. Wash for another 2 h in PTwH. Leave in the wash solution overnight at room temperature.
   5. Incubate the samples with secondary antibody and a nuclear dye, such as TO-PRO-3, in PTwH / 3% Serum at 37 °C for 4 days (~96 h; e.g., goat anti-Rb(1:50) and (goat anti-Rt(1:200)) (Table of Materials).
   6. Wash 3 x 1 h in PTwH Wash for another 2 h in PTwH. Leave in the wash solution overnight at room temperature.
5. Clearing
   1. Dehydrate in methanol/PBS series-20%, 40%, 60%, 80%, 100%-1 h each at room temperature. Incubate for 3 h, with shaking, in 66% DCM / 33% methanol at room temperature.
      NOTE: The sample can be left overnight at room temperature immediately after dehydration in 100% methanol.
   2. Incubate in 100% DCM for 15 min twice at room temperature (with shaking) to wash the MeOH.
   3. Incubate in dibenzyl ether (DBE) without shaking at room temperature. Ensure that the tube is filled almost completely with DBE to prevent oxidation of the sample. Finish mixing the solution by inverting a couple of times before imaging.

5. Light-sheet imaging

NOTE: iDISCO tissue-cleared brains were imaged with a light-sheet microscope, equipped with a 2X/0.5 NA objective, a complementary metal oxide semiconductor camera, and microscope operating and image acquisition software at 0.75 x 0.75 x 4 µm/voxel for the P4 timepoint as this allowed single-cell resolution within the cortex (Figure 3A,B).

1. Sample mounting
   1. Carefully mount the sample in the correct sample size holder such that the sample is oriented with the z-dimension no more than 5.2 mm in depth due to the rated working distance of the light-sheet microscope (5.7 mm minus 0.5 mm safety margin)²⁵.
   2. Place holder in the sample cradle with the screw of the holder at a 45° angle to the cradle supports (Figure 1B). Position the cradle so that the light path is perpendicular to the sample (Figure 1C).
2. Imaging parameters
   1. Set the zoom body on the microscope to 4x magnification or higher yielding 0.75 µm/pixel.
      NOTE: Single-cell computational analyses on P4 light-sheet images can be done with any commercially available light-sheet microscope that allows resolution of 0.75 x 0.75 x 4 µm/voxel or higher. A lower resolution is sufficient for brains at later time points in which nuclei are more sparsely distributed.
   2. In the image acquisition software, select a single light-sheet with an NA = ~0.08 (9 µm thickness/4 µm z step).
      NOTE: This setting combined with horizontal dynamic focusing allows whole-brain imaging at a single-cell resolution of a mouse brain within a reasonable time. For a postnatal day 4 (P4) brain, image acquisition time is estimated to be 11-15 h for three channels depending on the size of the brain.
   3. To ensure axial resolution is maintained along the width of the image, select Horizontal Dynamic Focusing and apply the recommended number of steps depending on the laser wavelength. For a whole P4 mouse brain, set the horizontal dynamic focusing to 11. Adjust Fine Focus for each channel with respect to the registration channel.
      NOTE: Here, TO-PRO-3 channel (647 nm) is registered to the Allen Developmental Mouse Brain Atlas as this labels all nuclei.
   4. Adjust the laser power per channel with respect to the channel properties.
      NOTE: Longer wavelengths require higher laser power compared to shorter wavelengths. For instance, the 780 nm needs to be imaged at a high laser power (70% - 75%) and low exposure (50 ms), while the 647 nm channel requires an average laser power (40% - 45%) and low exposure (50 ms).
   5. Adjust the Light-Sheet Width to ~50% to ensure that the sheet power is distributed optimally in the y dimension for this sample size.
      NOTE: In combination with the horizontal dynamic focusing, a 50% sheet width provides an average distribution of power across the image with a reduced risk of photobleaching²⁵.
   6. Set Number of Tiles in respect to the size of the sample with a recommended Overlap of 15% between tiles, and capture images for each channel sequentially for each stack at a given tile position.

6. Image processing using NuMorph

NOTE: The NuMorph pipeline has three main parts for 3D image analysis: preprocessing, analysis, and evaluation. These parts have been organized into NMp_template.m, NMa_template.m, and NMe_template.m, respectively, which are discussed below. Additionally, NM_setup.m is added to download and install software packages needed for NuMorph to run smoothly. NM_samples.m also provides a template to input image acquisition information.

1. NuMorph setup
   1. Download and install the conda environment manager for Linux²⁶. Download and install NuMorph¹⁹ image processing tools.
   2. On the command line, run Matlab. Run NM_setup.m from NuMorph to download and install image analyses software packages needed for analyses.
      NOTE: This step ensures the conda environment is set up properly as well as ensures all tools and add-ons needed for Matlab to run each of the three pipelines are downloaded and installed correctly. Most notable here are Elastix for running registration and 3D-Unet for cell detection and counting.
2. Specify sample names, input and output directories, channel information, and light-sheet imaging parameters by editing the file NM_samples.m.
   NOTE: Here, it is recommended to double-check to make sure the right information, especially image input directory, is specified properly. Errors are not usually called here until running subsequent steps.
3. Image preprocessing
   1. Intensity adjustment
      1. In the NMp_template, set intensity adjustment = true.
         NOTE: Set to true if intensity adjustment is required. If not, set intensity adjustment = false. There is also an option to use 'update' to overwrite previous adjustment parameters.
      2. Set use processed images = false when working with a new set of images. Otherwise, indicate any previously saved image datasets in the output directory (e.g., "aligned", "stitched") to use for subsequent processing steps.
         NOTE: This option is provided in the case where input images have already been preprocessed. In this case, preprocessed images will be used as input images and the option will be set to the name of the subdirectory in the output directory.
      3. Set save images = true.
         NOTE: Using this option ensures processed images are saved in the output directory; otherwise, only parameters will be calculated and saved.
      4. Set save samples = true.
         NOTE: This option ensures sample results are saved for each major step.
      5. Set adjust tile shading = basic to apply shading correction using the BaSiC algorithm²⁷ or manual to apply tile shading correction using measurements from the light-sheet microscope at specific light-sheet widths.
         NOTE: This option corrects for the uneven illumination along the y dimension caused by the shape of the sheet waist.
   2. Image channel alignment
      1. In NMp_template, set channel alignment = true. Set this option to true if channel alignment is required. If not, set to false. Set channel alignment method to either translation (rigid) or elastix (nonrigid).
         NOTE: The translation method utilizes rigid 2D registration approaches in aligning multiple channels while the elastix method utilizes non-rigid B-splines²⁸ to correct for rotational drift, which may occur during long image acquisition¹⁹.
   3. Iterative image stitching
      1. In NMp_template, set stitch images = true.
         NOTE: Set this option to true if stitching is required.
      2. Set sift refinement = true.
         NOTE: This option is used to further refine translation in xy using the Scale Invariant Feature Transform²⁹.
      3. Set load alignment params = true.
         NOTE: This option utilizes the channel alignment translations during stitching. This option is recommended with multichannel imaging. Otherwise, set to false.
      4. Set overlap = 0.15 to match tile overlaps during imaging.
   4. To run any of these preprocessing steps, run the following in Matlab outside NMp_template environment:
      1. Specify sample name. Set config = NM_config(process,sample).
      2. Run any of the preprocessing steps by specifying NM_process(config,stage) and specify the stage using intensity, align, or stitch for any of the processes. Check the output directory for output files for each of the stages (Figure 3 and Figure 4).
4. Image analysis
   1. Before NuMorph
      1. Start with a 3D atlas image and an associated annotation image that assigns each voxel to a particular structure.
         NOTE: The P4 Allen Developmental Mouse Brain Atlas generated from the MagellanMapper³⁰ is used here.
      2. Align both the atlas image and annotation file to ensure they match correctly in the right orientation.
   2. Within NuMorph
      NOTE: Now that the atlas and its annotations are aligned correctly, the files have to be "munged" or processed within NuMorph so that they can be saved for later use. To do this, use the munge_atlas function to specify inputs as shown below.
      1. Specify Atlas_file: (string). Provide the full path to the atlas file.
      2. Specify Annotation_file: (string). Provide the full path to the associated annotations.
      3. Specify Resolution: (1x3 numeric). Specify the atlas y,x,z resolution as micron per pixel.
      4. Specify Orientation: (1 x 3 char). Provide the atlas orientation and ensure it matches the setup of the sample in the cradle (anterior(a)/posterior(p),superior(s)/inferior(i),left(l)/right(r)).
      5. Specify Hemisphere: Specify which brain hemisphere was imaged ("left", "right", "both", "none").
      6. Specify out_resolution:(int). Specify the isotropic resolution of atlas output in microns. (default: 25).
      7. Run the command "munge_atlas(atlas_file, annotation_file, resolution, orientation, hemisphere)" to generate munged annotations in /data/annotation_data and a copy of the atlas image in /data/atlas.
      8. Read the Matlab structure and atlas file to verify both files are munged correctly in the right orientation.
         NOTE: An additional cell classification step can be performed to quantify cell-types based on co-localization of immunolabeled protein markers.
   3. Resampling
      1. In NMa_template, set resample images = true, if performing image registration to reference the atlas or to generate downsampled volumes of high-resolution datasets.
         NOTE: The NMa_template.m will be used to set the parameters for resampling, registration, nuclei detection, and cell counting.
      2. Set resample resolution to match the atlas.
         NOTE: Here, 25 µm³/voxel isotropic resolution is used because the reference atlas is at this resolution.
      3. Specify the channel number to be resampled using resample channels = [ ].
         NOTE: Here, channel number is set to match the nuclear channel. If this option is empty, only the registration channel will be resampled.
   4. Registration
      1. In NMa_template, set register images = true. Set to true if registration is required. If not, set registration = false.
      2. Specify the atlas file to match the file in the atlas directory.
      3. Set registration parameters = default.
         NOTE: This option utilizes an affine followed by B spline transformation to estimate spatial correspondence. Otherwise, define a new set of registration parameters via Elastix in /data/elastix_parameter_files/atlas_registration.
      4. Set save registered images = true.
         NOTE: Output files from registration and resampling can be downloaded and visually inspected in Matlab or other visualization tools such as FIJI³¹.
   5. Nuclei Detection, Cell Counting and Classification
      NOTE: Errors occurring here may be due to not specifying the annotations file correctly or not matching the age of the sample with the right annotation.
      1. In NMa_template, set both count nuclei and classify cells = true.
      2. Set count method = 3dunet.
         NOTE: This option allows the use of the trained 3D-Unet model¹⁹. Otherwise, select Hessian that utilizes the Hessian blob detection method.
      3. Set min_intensity to define a minimum intensity threshold for detected objects.
         NOTE: An appropriate threshold is determined empirically based on the signal-to-noise ratio of nuclear labeling.
      4. Set classify_method to either threshold, which is based on an unsupervised fluorescence intensities at centroid positions or svm, which models a supervised linear Support Vector Machine (SVM) classifier.
         NOTE: This step will classify all the detected cells into four major classes with 3-channel imaging. With this protocol, Ctip2⁺/Brn2^-, Ctip2^-/Brn2⁺, Ctip2^-/Brn2^-, and Outliers are generated.
   6. Analysis steps
      1. Specify sample name. Set config =NM_config(analyze,sample).
      2. Run any of the analysis steps by specifying NM_analyze(config,stage) and specify the stage using resample, register, count, or classify. Check the output directory for output files for each of the stages (Figure 5).
   7. Cell-type classification and group analysis
      1. In NMe_template, set update = true and overwrite all previous statistics calculated.
         NOTE: The NMe_template.m provides the option to perform cell-type group analysis across brain regions of the same brain being analyzed.
      2. Set compare_structures_by to either index to compare by all unique annotations or table to compare structures according to the table.
      3. Set the template_file, which specifies all the possible structure indexes and must exist in /annotations.
      4. Set structure_table and specify structures to evaluate.
      5. Specify cell counting and cell-type classification as described in NMa_template.m.
      6. Set compare_groups to specify groups to compare.
      7. Set paired to either true or false to either perform paired t-test or two-sample t-test.
   8. Run analysis.
      NOTE: To perform this step, run the following in Matlab outside NMe_template.m environment.
      1. Specify sample name.Set config =NM_config(evaluate,sample).
      2. Run the analysis step by specifying NM_evaluate(config,stage) and specify the stage. Check the output directory for output files for the group analysis.

Results

As the iDISCO+ protocol introduces significant tissue shrinkage, which is easily noticeable by eye (Figure 2B), we added an MRI step to this pipeline prior to tissue clearing to quantify the shrinkage induced by tissue clearing. The workflow starts with removal of the non-brain tissue from the MR image (Figure 2C). Next, a rigid transformation (3 translation and 3 rotation angles) is applied to align the MR image to the light-sheet image (Fi...

Discussion

Tissue clearing methods are useful techniques for measuring 3D cellular organization of the brain. There are a host of tissue clearing methods described in the literature, each with its advantages and limitations^6,7,8,9. The options for computational tools to analyze the cell types in the tissue-cleared images are relatively limited. Other available tools have been implemented to sparse cell po...

Materials

List of materials used in this article

Name	Company	Catalog Number	Comments
Bruker 9.4T/30 cm MRI Scanner	Bruker Biospec		Horizontal Bore Animal MRI System
Dibenzyl ether	Sigma-Aldrich	108014-1KG
Dichloromethane (DCM)	Sigma-Aldrich	270997-1L
Dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO)	Fisher-Scientific	ICN19605590
Donkey serum	Sigma-Aldrich	S30-100ML
EVO 860 4TB external SSD
Fomblin Y	Speciality Fluids Company	YL-VAC-25-6	perfluoropolyether lubricant
gadolinium contrast agent (ProHance)	Bracco Diagnostics	A9576
gadolinium contrast agent(ProHance)	Bracco Diagnostics	0270-1111-03
GeForce GTX 1080 Ti 11GB GPU	EVGA	08G-P4-6286-KR
Glycine	Sigma-Aldrich	G7126-500G
Heparin sodium salt	Sigma-Aldrich	H3393-10KU	Dissolved in H2O to 10 mg/mL
Hydrogen peroxide solution, 30%	Sigma-Aldrich	H1009-100ML
ImSpector Pro	LaVision BioTec		Microscope image acquisition software
ITK Snap			segmentation software
Methanol	Fisher-Scientific	A412SK-4
MVPLAPO 2x/0.5 NA Objective	Olympus
Paraformaldehyde, powder, 95% (PFA)	Sigma-Aldrich	30525-89-4	Dissolved in 1x PBS to 4%
Phosphate Buffered Saline 10x (PBS)	Corning	46-013-CM	Diluted to 1x in H2O
Sodium Azide	Sigma-Aldrich	S2002-100G	Dissolved in H2O to 10%
Sodium deoxycholate	Sigma-Aldrich	D6750-10G
Tergitol type NP-40	Sigma-Aldrich	NP40S-100ML
TritonX-100	Sigma-Aldrich	T8787-50ML
Tween-20	Fisher-Scientific	BP337 500
Ultramicroscope II Light Sheet Microscope	LaVision BioTec
Xeon Processor E5-2690 v4	Intel	E5-2690
Zyla sCMOS Camera	Andor		Complementary metal oxide semiconductor camera
Antibody			Working concentration
Alexa Fluor Goat 790 Anti-Rabbit	Thermofisher Scientific	A11369	(1:50)
Alexa Fluor Goat 568 Anti-Rat	Thermofisher Scientific	A11077	(1:200)
Rat anti-Ctip2	Abcam	ab18465	(1:400)
Rabbit anti-Brn2	Cell Signaling Technology	12137	(1:100)
To-Pro 3 (TP3)	Thermofisher Scientific	T3605	(1:400)