We developed a simple and efficient protocol for the preparation of large quantities of soybean protoplasts to study complex regulatory and signaling mechanisms in live cells.
Soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr.) is an important crop species and has become a legume model for the studies of genetic and biochemical pathways. Therefore, it is important to establish an efficient transient gene expression system in soybean. Here, we report a simple protocol for the preparation of soybean protoplasts and its application for transient functional analyses. We found that young unifoliate leaves from soybean seedlings resulted in large quantities of high quality protoplasts. By optimizing a PEG-calcium-mediated transformation method, we achieved high transformation efficiency using soybean unifoliate protoplasts. This system provides an efficient and versatile model for examination of complex regulatory and signaling mechanisms in live soybean cells and may help to better understand diverse cellular, developmental and physiological processes of legumes.
Protoplasts are plant cells that have cell walls removed. As they maintain most of features and activities of plant cells, protoplasts are a good model system to observe and evaluate diverse cellular events, and are valuable tools to study somatic hybridisation1 and plant regeneration2. Protoplasts have been also widely utilized for plant transformation3,4,5, since cell walls would otherwise block the passage of DNA into the cell. Protoplasts possess some of the physiological responses and cellular processes of intact plants, hence offering fundamental value in basic research to study subcellular protein localization6,7,8, protein-protein interactions9,10, and promoter activity11,12,13 in live cells.
The isolation of plant protoplasts was first reported in 196014 and the protocols for both isolation and transformation of protoplasts have been developed and optimized. A standard procedure of protoplast isolation involves the cutting of leaves and enzymatic digestion of cell walls, followed by separation of released protoplasts from non-digested tissue debris. Transformation strategies includes electroporation15,16, microinjection17,18, and polyethylene glycol-based (PEG)4,5,19 methods. A wide range of species have been reported successful for protoplast isolation, including Citrus20, Brassica21, Solanaceae22 and other ornamental plant families23,24. While diverse tissue types are used in various species, a system of transient expression in Arabidopsis mesophyll protoplast (TEAMP) isolated from leaves of the model plant Arabidopsis thaliana has been well established25 and widely adopted to diverse applications.
Soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr.) is one of the most important protein and oil crops26. Unlike Arabidopsis and rice, obtaining transgenic soybean plants is known to be rather difficult and low efficiency. Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated infiltration has been popularly used for transient gene expression studies in the epidermal cells in tobacco27 and seedlings in Arabidopsis28,29, whereas Agrobacterium rhizogenes has been used for transformation of hairy roots in soybean30. Virus-induced gene silencing approaches have been utilized for downregulation of target genes31,32 and transient expression33 in a systemic manner. Protoplasts provide a valuable and versatile alternative to these approaches. Protoplasts can be obtained from soybean's aboveground materials and allow quick and synchronized transgene expression. However, since the initial successful isolation of soybean protoplasts in the 198334, there have been limited reports on the application of protoplasts in soybean35,36,37,38, primarily due to relatively low yields of soybean protoplasts.
Here, we describe a simple and efficient protocol for isolation of soybean protoplasts and its application for transient gene expression studies. Using young unifoliate leaves from soybean seedlings, we were able to obtain large quantities of vital protoplasts within a few hours. In addition, we have optimized a PEG-calcium-mediated transformation method that is simple and low cost to deliver DNA into soybean protoplasts with high efficiency.
1. Growth of the plants
2. Preparation of Plasmid DNA
3. Protoplast isolation
4. Protoplast transformation
5. Protoplast incubation and harvesting
Different organs of 10-day old soybeans were tested for protoplast preparation (Figure 1) and yields were observed under the microscope (Figure 2). Cell walls from hypocotyl and epicotyl were hardly digested, and some cells stayed attached to each other (Figure 2B, 2C). In cotyledon (Figure 2D) and root (Figure 2A), cell walls were removed only in a small portion of the cells. In contrast, a large number of protoplasts were observed when unifoliate was used (Figure 2E-G). Unifoliate leaves at different developmental stages were further examined (Figure 2H). While both the unexpanded and just expanded unifoliate leaves resulted in high yields of protoplasts, the size of protoplasts from the just expanded unifoliate were more uniform (Figure 2F) than the unexpanded unifoliate (Figure 2E). For the fully expanded unifoliate, the cell walls were still intact in most of the cells (Figure 2G). We tested cell wall-digestion enzymes from three different manufacturers and obtained comparable results as described above. Based on these observations, we concluded that selection of plant materials was a crucial factor and that just expanded unifoliate leaves from young soybean seedlings were the best material for protoplast preparation.
A range of different amounts of plasmid DNA (0.1 µg, 1 µg, 5 µg and 20 µg) was tested for optimal transformation efficiency of soybean unifoliate protoplasts (Figure 3A-D). 20 µg plasmid DNA showed the highest transformation efficiency with more than 50% transformation rate (Figure 3D), while 0.1 µg showed the lowest (less than 1%) (Figure 3A). We obtained comparable transformation efficiency using different DNA purification kits from three manufacturers. This result suggests that larger amounts of plasmid DNA would greatly help to increase the transformation efficiency.
Figure 4 is confocal images of soybean protoplasts transformed with construct p2GWF7-E1, which expresses GFP fused to the legume-specific gene E1 (Glyma.06G207800), driven by the CaMV 35S promoter in the vector p2GWF739. E1-GFP fusion protein shows nuclear localization in soybean protoplasts, which is consistent with a previous study using the Arabidopsis protoplast system40. Given that E1 is a legume-specific gene, our result using the soybean protoplast system provides a conclusive insight in the subcellular localization of E1 protein.
Figure 1. Illustration showing the organs of a soybean seedling that are tested for protoplast preparation in this study, including root, hypocotyl, cotyledon, epicotyl and unifoliate. After a pair of unifoliate leaves, soybean seedlings develop trifoliate leaves. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 2. Protoplast cells prepared from different organs and developmental stages of soybean seedlings. (A-D) Cells prepared from different organs of 10-day old soybean seedlings: root (A), hypocotyl (B), epicotyl (C), cotyledon (D). (E-G) Protoplast cells prepared from unifoliate leaves at different developmental stages: unexpanded (E), just expanded (F), and fully expanded (G) unifoliate, corresponding to the soybean seedlings in (H) on the left, middle and right, respectively. The scale bar is 25 µm (A-G) or 25 mm (H). Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 3. Confocal images showing transformation efficiency of soybean unifoliate protoplasts with different amounts of plasmid DNA. Images of GFP (represented in green) and bright field (grey) are merged. Protoplasts were transformed with different amounts of the plasmid p2GWF7-E1: 0.1 µg (A), 1 µg (B), 5 µg (C) and 20 µg (D). Fluorescence signal of GFP was monitored 24 hours after transformation under microscopy. The black scale bar is 50 µm. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 4. Confocal images showing the subcellular localization of E1-GFP in the nucleus of soybean unifoliate protoplasts. The plasmid p2GWF7-E1 was used for transformation. Images of GFP (represented in green) and bright field (grey) are merged. Fluorescence signal of GFP was monitored 24 hours after transformation. The black scale bar is 5 µm. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Enzyme solution (freshly prepared) | |
MES, pH 5.7 | 20mM |
Cellulase CELF | 2% (w/v) |
Pectolyase Y-23 | 0.1% (w/v) |
Mannitol | 0.75 M |
CaCl2 | 0.2 mM |
BSA | 0.1% (w/v) |
DTT | 0.5 mM |
W5 solution | |
NaCl | 154 mM |
CaCl2 | 125 mM |
KCl | 5 mM |
MES, pH 5.7 | 2 mM |
MMg solution | |
MES, pH 5.7 | 4 mM |
Mannitol | 400 mM |
MgCl2 | 15 mM |
PEG solution (freshly prepared) | |
PEG4000 | 20% (w/v) |
Mannitol | 200 mM |
CaCl2 | 100 mM |
WI solution | |
MES, pH 5.7 | 4 mM |
Mannitol | 0.5 M |
KCl | 20 mM |
Table 1. Solutions used for soybean protoplast isolation and transformation.
This protocol for the isolation of soybean protoplasts and the application to transient expression studies has been thoroughly tested and works very well in our laboratory. The procedures are simple and easy and require ordinary equipment and minimum cost. Our protocol yields large quantities of uniform, high quality protoplasts compared to previously reported methods34,35,36,37,38. However, since there are many factors that affect protoplast yields and transformation rates, it is strongly recommended for researchers to optimize the conditions according to their experimental conditions, desirable results and materials used. While this system is extremely useful for examination of immediate regulatory and biochemical events in plant cells, it is not suitable for observation of long term cellular processes and events that occur at tissue or organismal levels.
We found that selection of vigorously growing plant materials at an ideal developmental stage was the most crucial factor in the soybean protoplast preparation. It determines not only yields of protoplasts, but quality that affects the subsequent DNA transformation. It is important to always grow soybean plants in a constant environment away from any stress, such as drought, flooding, extreme temperatures or pests. The highest protoplast yield and transformation efficiency can be achieved using just expanded unifoliate leaves from young seedlings. For beginners, it is suggested to use unifoliate leaves at different developmental stages and make a comparison to obtain the best results.
Protoplast/DNA ratio is an important factor for optimal transformation efficiency. It is usually best to start with the ratio of 2 x 104 protoplasts/10-20 µg DNA, but optimization of the ratio for individual constructs is recommended25. The use of high quality DNA obtained by a DNA purification kit is strongly recommended.
For the choice of vectors for transient expression in protoplasts, high-copy number and small-sized vectors are generally preferred. Although binary vectors for Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated transformation of plants can be used for protoplast transformation, the large size of these vectors may result in less optimal transformation efficiency. For GFP-fusion protein expression, we usually use vectors that do not possess a selection marker for plants and are thus relatively small (6-7kb), such as p2GWF7 and p2FGW739 (https://gateway.psb.ugent.be).
Multiple vectors can be used to transform protoplasts simultaneously. We had success in expressing BiFC vectors for testing protein-protein interactions, as well as multiple fluorescent proteins for organelle and subcellular labeling in soybean protoplasts. Furthermore, simplicity and large yields of our method offers an ideal system for examination of regulatory and biochemical events, gene-targeting vector design, isolation of transiently expressed proteins and protein complex, and purification of specific organelle such as nuclei, enabling further applications to emerging genomic and proteomic approaches.
The authors have nothing to disclose.
This work was supported by the Plant Genome Research Program from the National Science Foundation (NSF-PGRP-IOS-1339388).
MES | Sigma Aldrich | M8250-100G | |
Cellulase CELF | Worthington Biological Corporation | LS002611 | |
Pectolyase Y-23 | BioWorld | 9033-35-6 | |
CELLULASE "ONOZUKA" R-10 | yakult | 10g | |
MACEROZYME R-10 | yakult | 10g | |
Mannitol | ICN Biomedicals | 152540 | |
CaCl2 | Fisher | C79-500g | |
BSA | NEB | R3535S | |
DTT | Sigma Aldrich | D5545-5G | |
NaCl | Sigma Aldrich | S7653-1kg | |
KCl | Fisher | P217-500g | |
MgCl2 | Sigma Aldrich | M8266-100g | |
PEG4000 | Fluka | 81240 | |
nylon mesh | carolina | 652222N | |
Tissue Culture Plates | USA Scientific | CC7682-7506 | |
Razor Blades | Fisher | 12-640 | |
hemacytometer | hausserscientific | 1483 | |
QIAprep Spin Miniprep Kit | Qiagen | 27104 | |
EZNA plasmid miniprep kit | Omega | D6942-01 | |
GeneJET Plasmid Miniprep Kit | Thermo Scientific | K0502 | |
Centrifuge 5810 | eppendorf | 5811000827 | |
Centrifuge 5424 | eppendorf | 22620401 | |
Jencons Powerpette Plus Pipet Controller | Jencons | 14526-202 | |
Zeiss 710 Confocal Microscope | Zeiss | N/A | |
Nonstick, RNase-free Microfuge Tubes, 1.5 mL | Ambion | AM12450 | |
15 mL Centrifuge Tubes | Denville | C1018-P | |
50 mL Centrifuge Tubes | Denville | C1060-P | |
Newborn Calf Serum | Thermo Scientific | 16010159 | |
Soil | Ingram's Nursery | ||
perlite | Vigoro | 100521091 | |
Torpedo Sand | JKS Ventures | ||
LB Broth, Lennox (Powder) | Fisher | BP1427-500 |