A subscription to JoVE is required to view this content. Sign in or start your free trial.

Method Article

Porcine As a Training Module for Head and Neck Microvascular Reconstruction

7.4K views

DOI:

10.3791/58104

September 29th, 2018

* These authors contributed equally

In This Article

Summary

Here we present a protocol for the use of the pig superior epigastric artery perforator flap as a learning module for head and neck microvascular reconstruction.

Abstract

Live models that resemble surgical conditions of humans are needed for training free-flap harvesting and anastomosis. Animal models for training purposes have been available for years in many surgical fields. We used the female (because they are easy to handle for the procedure) Yorkshire pigs for the head and neck reconstruction by harvesting the deep inferior epigastric artery perforator or the superior epigastric artery perforator flap. The anastomosis site (neck skin defect or tracheal wall defect) was prepared via the dissection of the common carotid artery and the internal jugular vein, in which 3.5× loupe magnification was used for anastomosis as we use on human cases in real life. This procedure demonstrates a new training method using a reliable learning model and provides a detailed anatomy in a live scenario. We focused on the ischemia time, harvesting, vessel anastomosis, and designing the flap to fit the defect site. This model improves tissue handling and with the use of proper instruments can be repeated many times so that the surgeon is fully confident before starting the surgery on humans.

Introduction

Reconstruction following surgery for the head and neck malignant diseases is a difficult procedure associated with significant morbidity. Microvascular free-flap reconstruction has been well established as the standard approach to reconstruction for over 20 years1,2,3. Free-flap transfer plays a significant role in improving the head and neck management in cancer patients and in post-traumatic injuries thereby pushing the boundaries of surgical excision of disease beyond previous techniques, resulting in greater patient quality of life and longer survival rates

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Protocol

This study was guided and approved by the Department of Laboratory Animal Resources, Yonsei Biomedical Research Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, accredited by the Association for Assessment and Accreditation of Laboratory Animal Care International. This study followed the guidelines for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of the Institute of Laboratory Animal Resources Commission on Life Sciences National Research Council. All Pigs were acclimated for One week before the operation.

1. Preparation

  1. Keep the pigs without food for over 12 h before general anesthesia with free access to water.
    Note: Six fem....

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Results

We performed the procedure on six pigs: cervical skin defect reconstruction on two pigs, tracheal reconstruction on two pigs, and free flap to test vascular anastomosis device in two pigs. The pigs were monitored for 3 months and there was no clinical sign of neurological deficit.

The mean time for ischemia was 50 min (range, 35-80 min); the time decreased as the procedure was repeated. The mean harvest time of the six pigs was .......

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Discussion

Significant morbidity and defects can occur in head and neck malignancy patients during surgical management. Microvascular free tissue transfer has become essential for reconstruction in most cases. The viability of the flap is a critical issue, requiring steadiness, precise handling of the pedicle, tactile sensation, visuospatial ability, and excellent operative flow from the surgeon8. To develop these skills, one needs extensive practice with a training model3,.......

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Disclosures

The authors have nothing to disclose.

Acknowledgements

This work was funded and supported by the Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning (2015R1C1A1A01051907). This work was also supported by the Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Science, ICT & Future Planning (NRF-2016M3A9E9941746).

....

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Materials

List of materials used in this article
NameCompanyCatalog NumberComments
Pigs XP Bio, Seoul, South Korea
Surgical Hair Removal shaver3M
22 gage catheterB.BRAUN
syring with needle size 18Jung Rim Medical
Intramuscular alfaxanCareside10ml/VAL
IntramuscularxylazineBayer
Intramuscular azaperoneSigma-aldrich34223
Intramuscular atropineDaewon0.5mg/A
Intramuscular cefazolinYuhan1g
intravenous KetorolacHana Pharm30mg
Swine ansthesia maskDRE1392
endotracheal cuff tube 6.5 mmSMITH medical100/150/065
ansthesia MachineDrägerPRIMUS IE
2% lidocaine topical solutionTaejoon
vet ointmentPfizerterramycin figure-materials-1
eye cover patchInnomedS-universal010S
betadine solution 1%.Korea Pharma
gauze 4*4First Medical22*30CM 320S
blade No. 23Paragon23
lahey retractorV.MuellerSU3960
kelly tissue scissorsSOLCO05-1990
blade No. 11Paragon11
surgical marking penAspen SurgicalRegular #2750
allisV.MuellerSU4055
tie sutureCovideinnon-needle
3.5× surgical loupezeisseyemag smart
double clamp without frameV.MuellerCH7155
microscissorsAESCULAPFD038R
Ringer's lactateDaehan500ml/1bag
amoxicillin–clavulanateIlsung0.6g/V
MeloxicamSamil7.5mg
propofolDong Kook120mg/V
intravenous KCl solutionDaehan20ml/50P
mosquito curvedSOLCO013-0111
mosquito straightSOLCO05-1050
ethilone 10-0 sutureethicone10/0W1756
Vicryl 3-0.ethicone3/0W9890
buprenorphineHanlim0.3mg

References

  1. Chen, C. L., Zenga, J., Roland, L. T., Pipkorn, P. Complications of double free flap and free flap combined with locoregional flap in head and neck reconstruction: A systematic review. Head & Neck journal of the Science and Specialties of the Head and Neck. 40 (3), 632-646 (2018).
  2. Smith, R. K., Wykes, J., Martin, D. T., Niles, N.

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Reprints and Permissions

Tags

Head Neck ReconstructionMicrovascular Surgery TrainingYorkshire Pig ModelFlap Harvesting TechniqueVessel Anastomosis MethodSuperior Epigastric FlapCommon Carotid ArteryInternal Jugular VeinSurgical Loupe MagnificationIschemia Time Measurement