$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$
$$\longleftharp{xx}$$,
$$\longrightharp{xx}$$,
Nonuniform multiscale architectures at various physical and biological organizations are commonly found1,2. The brain is also a very nonuniform and multiscale network organization3,4. Various cognitive functions are coded in such network organizations, holding temporal changes of electrical spike patterns of neuronal populations in submillisecond temporal resolutions. Historically, the complex networks among neurons were structurally observed in detail using the staining techniques by Santiago Ramón y Cajal from over 150 years ago5. To observe group behaviors of active neurons, researchers have developed various recording technologies6,7,8, and the recent significant developments of such technologies have enabled us to record electrical activities from huge numbers of neurons simultaneously. Furthermore, from such functional activities, scientists have succeeded to reconstruct networks of causal interactions among huge numbers of neurons and have declared the topological architecture of their complex interactions ‘microconnectome’9. Macroscopic observations of the brain also allow for regarding a whole brain as a network organization because many brain regions are connected by multiple fiber-bundles. The embedding of microconnectomes into the global brain map still has clear limitations within current technological advances, which is why this embedding protocol is so important. However, there are many challenges to the development of the embedding protocol. For example, in order to observe activities of living local neuronal circuits in purely isolated brain regions, brain slices need to be produced for in vitro recordings. Additionally, recordings from brain slices for in vitro recordings are still an important choice for at least two reasons. First, it is still not easy to observe activities of many living individual neurons simultaneously from brain regions deeper than ~1.5 mm and in high temporal resolution (<1 ms). Second, when we hope to know the internal architecture of a local neuronal circuit, we need to stop all inputs coming from external brain regions to eliminate confounding factors. In order to identify the directions and positions of produced brain slices, it will be further necessary to integrate the spatial positions of these produced brain slices using coordinates. There are, however, a few systematic and reliable ways to make brain slices in an organized way10,11. Here, a new coregistration protocol is introduced, using 3D scanning technology for neuroscientific research in order to provide an integrative protocol. This protocol acts to coordinate micro- and macroscales and embed multielectrode array (MEA) microdata12,13 and staining data onto a macroscopic MRI space through 3D scan surfaces of extracted brains, as well as of noninvasively recorded brains. Surprisingly, this showed a distance error of only ~50 μm as the mode value of the histogram. As a result, the mode values of minimum distances between two surfaces between the MRI surface and the scanned 3D surface were nearly 50 µm for all six mice, which is a suitable number when checking for commonality among individuals. The typical slice width had a recorded spike activity of around 300 µm.