Innate immune responses against viruses are an under-investigated field of study in antiviral management. The airway epithelial cells and innate immune cells work in concert to suppress viral replication during an infection, besides serving as a determinant of overactive adaptive response if the viral load is not kept in check12,13,17. However, the development of a relevant human model for the study of epithelial-innate immune crosstalk to investigate the activation of innate immune cells to confer an appropriate antiviral response remains a challenge. Hence, this ALI co-culture model represents a versatile technique that can be used to assess a whole host of interactions between the nasal epithelial layer and the immune cells. As this model combines in-vitro-differentiated hNECs, PBMC activation analysis via flow cytometry, and viral infection, many of the crucial steps have been clearly demarcated to ensure the success of this protocol. In addition, further modification can also be done to the part of the airway involved where in-vitro-differentiated cells from both the upper and lower airways can be used, adding another layer of versatility to the protocol.
However, when working with epithelial-immune cell crosstalk in viral infection, it is critical that the viruses do not interact directly with the PBMCs to identify early local epithelial-derived soluble factors released by the hNECs. Therefore, this model is more suitable for examining viruses with polarized viral release, wherein viruses only bud out from the apical surface into the apical chamber, e.g., influenza viruses12 and SARS-CoV-2 virus19. In addition, to prevent leakage of apical-release viruses into the basal chamber compromising the experiment, an intact epithelial layer of sufficient thickness is vital. Therefore, it is important that TEER measurement and viral RNA quantification be performed to ensure that the results are free of viral leakages into the basal chamber13,16,20. A TEER reading of >1000 implies an intact multilayer of cells suitable for viruses with polarized release; the basal media should be free of any viral RNA contamination13,15,16. However, the utility of the model for bidirectional release viruses, such as rhinoviruses, remains to be explored16. Such viruses are not limited to releasing their progeny in a polarized manner and may bidirectionally release new viruses into both apical and basal regions of the epithelium. Further optimization is required before this model can be applied to viruses with non-polarized release.
As this protocol involves working with human samples from different individuals, no two samples of hNECs will exhibit the same properties and responses12,16. For example, the viscosity of the mucus produced by the terminally differentiated hNEC layer could differ greatly. The speed of cilia development may also be different. It is important, therefore, to exercise some level of flexibility when adhering to the guidelines laid out in this protocol. While it is certainly possible to utilize epithelial cell lines, this would remove the complexity (mucus, interactions between different cell types) of the interactions between the different cell types of the epithelial layer, which would be ideal for investigation of how epithelial crosstalk influences the responses of the PBMCs. A primary cell line is necessary to mimic the physiology of the nasal tissues, where the cells are multilayered, and the different cell types are localized to their own individual niche, although variability might be an issue. Variability in this respect can be overcome by utilizing single-cell RNA sequencing to differentiate and separate the heterogenous population of cells.
The types of interactions that can be assessed are indeed limited by the origin of the PBMCs and the hNECs. When the PBMCs and hNECs are obtained from different donors, ensuring epithelial integrity and separation is crucial. When PBMCs come into contact with hNECs, allogenic immune reactions could occur. Hence, the only interactions that are relevant are interactions mediated by soluble factors that can pass through the membrane inserts, as has been described in the protocol above. However, when both populations of cells originate from the same individual, this model has an added layer of utility as conventional immune cell reactions between the hNECs and the PBMC population can now be assessed, including T-cell-mediated cytotoxicity and antibody-mediated responses. In addition, epigenetic studies can also be performed to examine how modifications to the genome may affect cytokine gene/protein expression/secretion.
Furthermore, different cell populations can be added to the basal chamber to further investigate a specific population. This can be performed by isolating the cell populations of interest (T cells, NK cells, monocytes) and introducing them to the basal chamber instead of the PBMCs. However, this model cannot be used to investigate cellular interactions that require direct contact owing to the separation of the two cell populations by the membrane. As such, the investigation of adaptive immune responses may be limited by this detail. In conclusion, this ALI co-culture model offers a versatile starting point for the in vitro investigation of the crosstalk between nasal tissues and immune cells. The protocol described in this manuscript attempts to provide a guideline that will be helpful even if the populations/conditions are altered.