Polymerase chain reaction (PCR), a well-recognized technique, has undergone several transformations since its advent to become a powerful technique capable of providing answers to nucleic acid research. These transformations have been a constant improvement of the old technique. These transformations can be summarized into three generations1. The first generation is conventional PCR that relies on gel electrophoresis to quantify and detect amplified targets. The second generation is quantitative real time PCR (qPCR) that can detect samples in real time and rely on a standard curve to directly quantify targets in a sample. The third generation, digital PCR (dPCR), can perform both detection, and absolute quantification of nucleic acid targets without the need of a standard curve. dPCR has also been improved further from reaction chambers being separated by the wells of a wall into emulsions of oil, water, and stabilizing chemicals within the same well as seen in droplet-based digital PCR2. In droplet digital PCR (ddPCR), a sample is partitioned into thousands of nanoliter-sized droplets containing individual targets that will later be quantified using Poisson statistics2,3,4. This technique gives ddPCR an edge in quantifying low abundant targets when compared to the other generations of PCR.
Recently, multiple applications have highlighted the superiority of ddPCR over the commonly used qPCR when detecting and quantifying low abundant targets1,5,6. SARS-CoV-2 is no exception to these applications7,8,9,10,11,12. Since the outbreak of SARS-CoV-2, scientists have been working on all fronts to come up with solutions on how to diagnose the virus and detect it efficiently. The current gold standard still remains to be qPCR13. However, RT-ddPCR has been shown to be more accurate in detecting low abundant SARS-CoV-2 targets from both environmental and clinical samples when compared to RT-qPCR7,8,9,10,11,12. Most of the SARS-CoV-2 ddPCR published works depend on simplex assays with the multiplex ones depending on commercial assays. Hence, more should be done to explain how to develop multiplex RT-dPCR assays for SARS-CoV-2 detection.
In a proper assay design, multiplexing can be used to save on cost, increase sample throughput, and maximize on the number of targets that can be sensitively detected within a small sample. When multiplexing with ddPCR, one must take account of how many fluorophores can be detected in a particular system. Some ddPCR platforms can support up to three channels while others support only two channels. Hence, when multiplexing with two channels, one has to use different approaches, including higher order multiplexing to detect more than two targets14,15,16. In this work, a two color ddPCR detection system is used to show steps on how to develop different SARS-CoV-2 RT-ddPCR assays that can be adapted for different research applications.