Login processing...

Trial ends in Request Full Access Tell Your Colleague About Jove


Polysome Profiling without Gradient Makers or Fractionation Systems

doi: 10.3791/62680 Published: June 1, 2021
Mack Sobhany1, Robin E. Stanley1


Polysome fractionation by sucrose density gradient centrifugation is a powerful tool that can be used to create ribosome profiles, identify specific mRNAs being translated by ribosomes, and analyze polysome associated factors. While automated gradient makers and gradient fractionation systems are commonly used with this technique, these systems are generally expensive and can be cost-prohibitive for laboratories that have limited resources or cannot justify the expense due to their infrequent or occasional need to perform this method for their research. Here, a protocol is presented to reproducibly generate polysome profiles using standard equipment available in most molecular biology laboratories without specialized fractionation instruments. Moreover, a comparison of polysome profiles generated with and without a gradient fractionation system is provided. Strategies to optimize and produce reproducible polysome profiles are discussed. Saccharomyces cerevisiae is utilized as a model organism in this protocol. However, this protocol can be easily modified and adapted to generate ribosome profiles for many different organisms and cell types.


Ribosomes are mega-Dalton ribonucleoprotein complexes that perform the fundamental process of translating mRNA into proteins. Ribosomes are responsible for carrying out the synthesis of all proteins within a cell. Eukaryotic ribosomes comprise two subunits designated as the small ribosomal subunit (40S) and the large ribosomal subunit (60S) according to their sedimentation coefficients. The fully assembled ribosome is designated as the 80S monosome. Polysomes are groups of ribosomes engaged in translating a single mRNA molecule. Polysome fractionation by sucrose density gradient centrifugation is a powerful method used to create ribosome profiles, identify specific mRNAs associated with translating ribosomes and analyze polysome associated factors1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13. This technique is often used to separate polysomes from single ribosomes, ribosomal subunits, and messenger ribonucleoprotein particles. The profiles obtained from fractionation can provide valuable information regarding the translation activity of polysomes14 and the assembly status of the ribosomes15,16,17.

Ribosome assembly is a very complex process facilitated by a group of proteins known as ribosome assembly factors18,19,20,21. These factors perform a wide range of functions during ribosome biogenesis through interactions with many other proteins, including ATPases, endo- and exo-nucleases, GTPases, RNA helicases, and RNA binding proteins22. Polysome fractionation has been a powerful tool used to investigate the role of these factors in ribosome assembly. For example, this method has been utilized to demonstrate how mutations in the polynucleotide kinase Grc3, a pre-rRNA processing factor, can negatively affect the ribosome assembly process17,23. Polysome profiling has also highlighted and shown how the conserved motifs within the ATPase Rix7 are essential to ribosome production16.

The procedure for polysome fractionation begins with making soluble cell lysates from cells of interest. The lysate contains RNA, ribosomal subunits, and polysomes, as well as other soluble cellular components. A continuous, linear sucrose gradient is made within an ultracentrifuge tube. The soluble fraction of cell lysate is gently loaded onto the top of the sucrose gradient tube. The loaded gradient tube is then subjected to centrifugation, which separates the cellular components by size within the sucrose gradient by the force of gravity. The larger components travel further into the gradient than the smaller components. The top of the gradient houses the smaller, slower traveling cellular components, whereas the larger, faster traveling cellular components are found at the bottom. After centrifugation, the contents of the tube are collected as fractions. This method effectively separates ribosomal subunits, monosomes, and polysomes. The optical density of each fraction is then determined by measuring the spectral absorbance at a wavelength of 254 nm. Plotting absorbance vs. fraction number yields a polysome profile.

Linear sucrose density gradients can be generated utilizing a gradient maker. Following centrifugation, gradients are often fractionated, and absorbances measured using an automated density fractionation system3,7,13,24,25. While these systems work very well to produce polysome profiles, they are expensive and can be cost-prohibitive to some laboratories. Here a protocol to generate polysome profiles without the use of these instruments is presented. Instead, this protocol utilizes equipment typically available in most molecular biology laboratories.

Subscription Required. Please recommend JoVE to your librarian.


1. Preparation of 7% - 47% sucrose gradients

NOTE: The linear range of the sucrose gradient can be modified to achieve better separation depending on the cell type used. This protocol is optimized for polysome profiles for S. cerevisiae.

  1. Prepare stock solutions of 7% and 47% sucrose in sucrose gradient buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.4, 60 mM KCl, 10 mM MgCl2, and 1 mM DTT). Filter sterilize the sucrose stock solutions through a 0.22 μm filter and store at 4 °C.
  2. Prepare 14 mL of 17%, 27%, and 37% sucrose solutions by dispensing and mixing the 7% and 47% sucrose stock solutions in the manner described in Table 1.
  3. Place six polypropylene centrifuge tubes (14 x 89 mm) into a full view test tube rack. Ensure enough space between the tubes so that actions with one tube do not disturb the others.
  4. Attach a long needle to a 3 mL syringe. For this protocol, use a 9 in, 22 G needle with a blunt tip (Figure 1), but any needle long enough to reach the bottom of the centrifuge tube will suffice.
    NOTE: Perform a test fill and dispensation to ensure that the syringe can hold the sucrose solution without any dripping prior to setting up the gradients.
  5. Add 2 mL of the 7% sucrose to the bottom of each centrifuge tube.
  6. Add 2 mL of the 17% sucrose beneath the 7% solution by positioning the needle tip within the immediate vicinity of the tube bottom and dispensing the solution slowly and carefully.
  7. Repeat with 2 mL each of the 27%, 37%, and 47% sucrose solutions. Ensure that each layer is distinguishable from one another by a line marking the separation of densities (Figure 2).
    NOTE: If the gradients are not going to be used within 48 hours then at this point, prior to their settlement into a continuous gradient, flash freeze the tubes with layered sucrose solutions in liquid nitrogen and store in a -80 °C freezer for long-term storage.
  8. Store gradients at 4 °C overnight to allow gradients to settle into a continuous, increasing percentage of sucrose. It takes 8-12 h for the layered sucrose solutions to settle into a linear sucrose gradient. Linear gradients are stable for up to 48 h. Overnight storage at 4 °C provides sufficient time for thawing and settlement into a linear gradient for using frozen, layered sucrose solutions. Use a densitometer to assess the gradient quality.
    NOTE: It is critical to store the gradients in a stable place where they will not be disturbed, as any movements or vibrations will disrupt the gradient.

2. Preparation of yeast cell extracts

  1. Inoculate the yeast strain of interest into 50 mL of yeast extract peptone dextrose (YPD) media and grow overnight at 30 °C in a shaking incubator to stationary phase.
    NOTE: The temperature may vary depending upon yeast strain requirements.
  2. Transfer 10 mL of stationary phase culture into 1 L of fresh YPD media. Incubate the cells with vigorous shaking at 30 °C (or other suitable temperature) until the culture reaches the mid-exponential growth phase (OD600 = 0.4-0.6).
  3. At the mid-exponential growth phase, add cycloheximide to the culture at a final concentration of 0.1 mg/mL. Incubate on ice for 5 min.
  4. Harvest the cells by centrifugation at 3,000 x g for 10 min at 4 °C.
    NOTE: At this point, cells can be frozen and stored at -80 °C.
  5. Resuspend the cells in chilled 700 μL of polysome extraction buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.4, 60 mM KCl, 10 mM MgCl2, 1 mM DTT, 1% Triton X-100, 0.1 mg/mL of cycloheximide, 0.2 mg/mL of heparin). Add 100 units of RNase Inhibitor and transfer it to a 1.5 mL centrifuge tube.
  6. Add ~400 μL of pre-chilled glass beads with a size range or 425-600 µm to a centrifuge tube. Disrupt the yeast cells by vigorous agitation in a bead-beater for 5 min.
  7. Clarify the lysate by centrifugation at 8,000 x g for 5 min at 4 °C.
  8. Determine the concentration of the RNA in the clarified lysate by measuring the absorbance at 260 nm with a spectrophotometer or using a fluorescence-based RNA detection system.
    NOTE: For very accurate RNA concentration measurements, use fluorescence-based RNA detection kits.
  9. Ensure that the RNA concentration is 0.5-1 µg/μL. If the RNA concentration is too low, reduce the volume of polysome extraction buffer used to resuspend the cells in future experiments.
    ​NOTE: Load the lysate onto the gradients immediately after lysis and RNA quantitation. If necessary, flash freeze the lysates in liquid nitrogen and store at -80 °C for a few days.

3. Centrifugation of gradients

  1. Carefully load the lysate onto the top of the gradients. Place the pipette tip against the inner wall, at the top of the polypropylene tube. Gently angle the tube and slowly dispense the lysate onto the top of the gradient by dribbling against the wall. Take great care not to disrupt or disturb the gradient when loading the lysate.
    NOTE: The amount of lysate loaded will vary per cell type. The content of the RNA will also vary. It may be necessary to perform a number of experiments to determine the amount of lysate needed to generate an optimal polysome profile. For yeast, 300 μg of RNA is a good starting point for optimization.
  2. Gently place the tubes into the pre-chilled buckets of a swinging bucket rotor.
    NOTE: Each polypropylene centrifuge tube should have equal volumes of gradient and the amount of the lysate loaded. This can vary from tube to tube. Ensure that the variation does not cause an imbalance error during ultracentrifugation.
  3. Centrifuge the gradients at 260,110 x g for 150 min at 4 °C.

4. Fraction and data collection

  1. Carefully remove the centrifuge tubes from the swinging bucket rotor and place them in a tube holder.
  2. Label the 96-well plates to store the fractions and pre-chill on ice.
    NOTE: Use a 96-well plate suitable for a spectrophotometer that has an optical window down to 230 nm for nucleic acid determinations at 260 nm/280 nm.
  3. Collect 100 µL or 200 µL fractions starting from the top of the gradient by carefully inserting a pipet tip into the top of the gradient. Collect fractions until the entire gradient is aliquoted. The number of fractions will depend on total gradient volume.
    NOTE: Collect the fractions in a manner that does not disrupt the rest of the gradient. Ensure that all the fractions have equal volume. In addition to manual fractionation, another low-cost method for fractionation is to use a small peristaltic pump.
  4. Transfer each fraction to the 96-well plate to reach the bottom of the centrifuge tube. Keep the collected fractions on the ice at all times.
  5. Measure the absorbance of each fraction at 254 nm with a spectrophotometer. Use the 7% and 47% sucrose solutions as blanks.
    NOTE: When measuring the absorbance of fractions, bear in mind that for most spectrometers and colorimeters, the most effective absorbance range is 0.1-1. If the absorbance measurements are out of range (≥1.0), the fractions have too much material. Dilute the sample, recollect the data, and then account for the dilution factor when plotting the profile.
  6. Create the polysome profile by plotting the fraction number versus absorbance.

Subscription Required. Please recommend JoVE to your librarian.

Representative Results

Three representative polysome profiles are shown in Figure 3. All profiles are from the same yeast strain. A typical polysome profile will have well-resolved peaks for the 40S, 60S, and 80S ribosomal subunits as well as polysomes. The crest of each ribosomal subunit and polysome peak will be apparent on each profile (Figure 3). A representative profile from an automated density fractionation system is shown in Figure 3A. The sucrose gradients used to generate this profile were prepared by hand as described in this protocol. This profile shown in Figure 3A was produced from a continuous absorbance profile as the sucrose gradient was displaced from the bottom up by a chase solution through a detector flow cell and collected in fractions. Because these systems continuously measure absorbance, they can record over 1,500 data points. It is impractical to manually generate the same number of data points. The fraction volume generally utilized for manual profiles is 100-200 μL. A fraction volume within this range yields a profile with enough detail for most comparative analyses. The representative results obtained from both 100 μL and 200 μL fractionations are shown in Figure 3B and Figure 3C. All three profiles presented utilized sucrose gradients prepared as described in this protocol to compare the data yielded. For an example of a polysome profile that utilizes a gradient maker to prepare sucrose gradients as opposed to the manual preparation described in this protocol, a recent manuscript by Chikashige et al. has several examples of gradient profiles generated using an automated gradient maker and fractionation system13.

Final Concentration mL of 7% Stock mL of 47% Stock
7% 14 0
17% 10.5 3.5
27% 7 7
37% 3.5 10.5
47% 0 14

Table 1: Preparation of sucrose solutions. Prepare 14 mL of 17%, 27%, and 37% sucrose solutions by dispensing and mixing the 7% and 47% sucrose stock solutions in the volumes indicated.

Figure 1
Figure 1: Assembled needle and syringe. A 9 in, 22 G needle with Hamilton needle point style 3 tip attached to a 3 mL syringe via a Luer lock mechanism. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 2
Figure 2: The final appearance of 7%-47% sucrose gradient layers. 7%, 17%, 27%, 37%, and 47% sucrose solutions layered on top of another as described in the protocol. The 17% and 37% layers had blue coloring added to help distinguish the layers for a photograph; no coloring should be added when performing an actual experiment. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 3
Figure 3: Polysome profiles. All sucrose gradients used to generate these profiles were prepared using the method described in this protocol. (A) The polysome profile generated by an automated fractionation system (Brandel Fractionator). (B) The polysome profile generated by hand fractionating 200 μL samples described in the current protocol. (C) The polysome profile generated by hand fractionating 100 μL samples described in the current protocol. Polysomes, 40S, 60S, and 80S peaks are indicated for each profile. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Subscription Required. Please recommend JoVE to your librarian.


Here a method to create polysome profiles without the use of expensive automated fractionation systems has been described. The advantage of this method is that it makes polysome profiling accessible to labs that do not have automated fractionation systems. The major disadvantages of this protocol are tedious hand fractionation and reduced sensitivity compared to the dedicated density fractionation system.

This protocol entails careful preparation of sucrose gradients with resolution sufficient to separate ribosomal subunits, monosomes, and polysomes. When preparing sucrose gradients, it is critical not to introduce air bubbles while loading gradient layers. Air bubbles rise to the top from the bottom and can disrupt the linearity of the gradient. Additionally, the outside of the needle should be wiped before each use, and excess sucrose solution should be wicked off from the lumen to ensure the integrity of each gradient layer. Overnight storage of gradients at 4 °C must be done in a cold room. The vibrations caused by a compressor switching on and off in a refrigerator can disrupt the gradient.

Another critical part of this assay is the volume of the gradient and the concentration of the RNA. The 14 mm x 89 mm centrifuge tubes can hold a volume of 12 mL, but this is the maximum volume that can be accommodated by these tubes and this volume is typically thought of as overfilling these tubes. A good maximum working volume that does not overfill these tubes is 11.5 mL. The sucrose gradient itself has a volume of 10 mL; therefore, the volume of polysome extraction buffer used to resuspend cells should not exceed 1.5 mL. The amount of RNA necessary to generate a good profile will vary by cell type. A number of initial runs should be performed to determine what amount of RNA generates a good polysome profile. Once this amount is determined, it should always be used with that specific cell type to maintain reproducibility and to be able to do comparative analysis. Also, to ensure that the same amount of RNA is loaded each time, the method used for RNA quantitation must always be the same. If a spectrophotometer is used to quantitate RNA, then it should be used at all times. If a fluorometer is utilized, then it should be used at all times. Instruments and quantitation techniques vary widely in both accuracy and sensitivity. Utilizing different instruments or techniques to quantitate RNA experiment to experiment will not generate reproducible results.

This method can be adapted to obtain important information about the status of protein translation in a cell. As mentioned above, the condition of the ribosomal subunits themselves within the assembly process can be determined. Performing experiments in the absence of cycloheximide, which inhibits elongation, enables run-off rate analysis, which indicates whether elongation is altered or not26. The individual fractions are a valuable source of material for further experiments and analysis. For example, the fractions can be used in Northern or Western blotting protocols to identify a specific RNA or protein associated with ribosomal subpopulations. Finally, RNA can be extracted from the fractions and used to identify mRNAs bound to active ribosomes by microarray analysis13,27 or by deep sequencing analysis on a DNA library generated from the total mRNA28.

Subscription Required. Please recommend JoVE to your librarian.


The authors have nothing to disclose.


The authors thank Dr. Percy Tumbale and Dr. Melissa Wells for their critical reading of this manuscript. This work was supported by the US National Institute of Health Intramural Research Program; US National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS; ZIA ES103247 to R.E.S).


Name Company Catalog Number Comments
Automatic Fractionator Brandel
Clariostar Multimode Plate Reader BMG Labtech
Cycloheximide Sigma Aldrich C7698
Dithiothreitol Invitrogen 15508-013
Glass Beads, acid washed Sigma Aldrich G8772 425–600 μm
Heparin Sigma Aldrich H4784
Magnesium Chloride, 1 M KD Medical CAC-5290
Needle, 22 G, Metal Hub Hamilton Company 7748-08 custom length 9 inches, point style 3
Optima XL-100K Ultracentrifuge Beckman Coulter
Polypropylene Centrifuge tubes Beckman Coulter 331372
Polypropylene Test Tube Peg Rack Fisher Scientific 14-810-54A
Potassium Chloride Sigma Aldrich P9541
Qubit 4 Fluorometer Thermo Fisher Scientific Q33228
Qubit RNA HS Assay Kit Thermo Fisher Scientific Q32855
RNAse Inhibitor Applied Biosystems N8080119
Sucrose Sigma Aldrich S0389
SW41 Swinging Bucket Rotor Pkg Beckman Coulter 331336
Syringe, 3 mL Coviden 888151394
Tris, 1 M,  pH 7.4 KD Medical RGF-3340
Triton X-100 Sigma Aldrich X100
UV-Star Microplate, 96 wells Greiner Bio-One 655801



  1. Choi, A., Barrientos, A. Sucrose gradient sedimentation analysis of mitochondrial ribosomes. Methods in Molecular Biology. 2192, Clifton, N.J. 211-226 (2021).
  2. Dos Santos, R. F., Barria, C., Arraiano, C. M., Andrade, J. M. Isolation and analysis of bacterial ribosomes through sucrose gradient ultracentrifugation. Methods in Molecular Biology. 2106, Clifton, N.J. 299-310 (2020).
  3. Pringle, E. S., McCormick, C., Cheng, Z. Polysome profiling analysis of mRNA and associated proteins engaged in translation. Current Protocols in Molecular Biology. 125, (1), 79 (2019).
  4. Liang, S., et al. Polysome-profiling in small tissue samples. Nucleic Acids Research. 46, (1), 3 (2018).
  5. Karamysheva, Z. N., et al. Polysome profiling in leishmania, human cells and mouse testis. Journal of Visualized Experiments: JoVE. e57600 (2018).
  6. Jin, H. Y., Xiao, C. An Integrated polysome profiling and ribosome profiling method to investigate in vivo translatome. Methods in Molecular Biology. 1712, Clifton, N.J. 1-18 (2018).
  7. Chasse, H., Boulben, S., Costache, V., Cormier, P., Morales, J. Analysis of translation using polysome profiling. Nucleic Acids Research. 45, (3), 15 (2017).
  8. Aboulhouda, S., Di Santo, R., Therizols, G., Weinberg, D. Accurate, streamlined analysis of mrna translation by sucrose gradient fractionation. Bio-protocol. 7, (19), 2573 (2017).
  9. Kudla, M., Karginov, F. V. Measuring mRNA translation by polysome profiling. Methods in Molecular Biology. 1421, Clifton, N.J. 127-135 (2016).
  10. Faye, M. D., Graber, T. E., Holcik, M. Assessment of selective mRNA translation in mammalian cells by polysome profiling. Journal of Visualized Experiments: JoVE. (92), e52295 (2014).
  11. Coudert, L., Adjibade, P., Mazroui, R. Analysis of translation initiation during stress conditions by polysome profiling. Journal of Visualized Experiments: JoVE. (87), e51164 (2014).
  12. Panda, A. C., Martindale, J. L., Gorospe, M. Polysome fractionation to analyze mRNA distribution profiles. Bio-protocol. 7, (3), 2126 (2017).
  13. Chikashige, Y., et al. Gcn2 eIF2alpha kinase mediates combinatorial translational regulation through nucleotide motifs and uORFs in target mRNAs. Nucleic Acids Research. 48, (16), 8977-8992 (2020).
  14. Ingolia, N. T. Ribosome footprint profiling of translation throughout the genome. Cell. 165, (1), 22-33 (2016).
  15. Ripmaster, T. L., Vaughn, G. P., Woolford, J. L. DRS1 to DRS7, novel genes required for ribosome assembly and function in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Molecular and Cellular Biology. 13, (12), 7901-7912 (1993).
  16. Lo, Y. H., et al. Cryo-EM structure of the essential ribosome assembly AAA-ATPase Rix7. Nature Communications. 10, (1), 513 (2019).
  17. Pillon, M. C., Sobhany, M., Borgnia, M. J., Williams, J. G., Stanley, R. E. Grc3 programs the essential endoribonuclease Las1 for specific RNA cleavage. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 114, (28), 5530-5538 (2017).
  18. Woolford, J. L., Baserga, S. J. Ribosome biogenesis in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics. 195, (3), 643-681 (2013).
  19. Klinge, S., Woolford, J. L. Ribosome assembly coming into focus. Nature Reviews. Molecular Cell Biology. 20, (2), 116-131 (2018).
  20. Bassler, J., Hurt, E. Eukaryotic ribosome assembly. Annual Review of Biochemistry. 88, 281-306 (2019).
  21. Kressler, D., Hurt, E., Bassler, J. A puzzle of life: Crafting ribosomal subunits. Trends in Biochemical Sciences. 42, (8), 640-654 (2017).
  22. Prattes, M., Lo, Y. H., Bergler, H., Stanley, R. E. Shaping the nascent ribosome: AAA-ATPases in eukaryotic ribosome biogenesis. Biomolecules. 9, (11), 715 (2019).
  23. Pillon, M. C., Sobhany, M., Stanley, R. E. Characterization of the molecular crosstalk within the essential Grc3/Las1 pre-rRNA processing complex. RNA. 24, (5), New York, N.Y. 721-738 (2018).
  24. Hu, W., Coller, J. Polysome analysis for determining mRNA and ribosome association in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Methods in Enzymology. 530, 193-206 (2013).
  25. He, S. L., Green, R. Polysome analysis of mammalian cells. Methods in Enzymolog. 530, 183-192 (2013).
  26. Anand, M., Chakraburtty, K., Marton, M. J., Hinnebusch, A. G., Kinzy, T. G. Functional interactions between yeast translation eukaryotic elongation factor (eEF) 1A and eEF3. The Journal of Biological Chemistry. 278, (9), 6985-6991 (2003).
  27. Serikawa, K. A., et al. The transcriptome and its translation during recovery from cell cycle arrest in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Molecular and Cell Proteomics: MCP. 2, (3), 191-204 (2003).
  28. Ingolia, N. T., Ghaemmaghami, S., Newman, J. R., Weissman, J. S. Genome-wide analysis in vivo of translation with nucleotide resolution using ribosome profiling. Science. 324, (5924), New York, N.Y. 218-223 (2009).
This article has been published
Video Coming Soon

Cite this Article

Sobhany, M., Stanley, R. E. Polysome Profiling without Gradient Makers or Fractionation Systems. J. Vis. Exp. (172), e62680, doi:10.3791/62680 (2021).More

Sobhany, M., Stanley, R. E. Polysome Profiling without Gradient Makers or Fractionation Systems. J. Vis. Exp. (172), e62680, doi:10.3791/62680 (2021).

Copy Citation Download Citation Reprints and Permissions
View Video

Get cutting-edge science videos from JoVE sent straight to your inbox every month.

Waiting X
simple hit counter