-1::1
Simple Hit Counter
Skip to content

Products

Solutions

×
×
Sign In

EN

EN - EnglishCN - 简体中文DE - DeutschES - EspañolKR - 한국어IT - ItalianoFR - FrançaisPT - Português do BrasilPL - PolskiHE - עִבְרִיתRU - РусскийJA - 日本語TR - TürkçeAR - العربية
Sign In Start Free Trial

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal

Peer reviewed scientific video journal

Behavior
Biochemistry
Bioengineering
Biology
Cancer Research
Chemistry
Developmental Biology
View All
JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments

Video encyclopedia of advanced research methods

Biological Techniques
Biology
Cancer Research
Immunology
Neuroscience
Microbiology
JoVE Visualize

Visualizing science through experiment videos

EDUCATION

JoVE Core

Video textbooks for undergraduate courses

Analytical Chemistry
Anatomy and Physiology
Biology
Calculus
Cell Biology
Chemistry
Civil Engineering
Electrical Engineering
View All
JoVE Science Education

Visual demonstrations of key scientific experiments

Advanced Biology
Basic Biology
Chemistry
View All
JoVE Lab Manual

Videos of experiments for undergraduate lab courses

Biology
Chemistry

BUSINESS

JoVE Business

Video textbooks for business education

Accounting
Finance
Macroeconomics
Marketing
Microeconomics

OTHERS

JoVE Quiz

Interactive video based quizzes for formative assessments

Authors

Teaching Faculty

Librarians

K12 Schools

Biopharma

Products

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal

Peer reviewed scientific video journal

JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments

Video encyclopedia of advanced research methods

JoVE Visualize

Visualizing science through experiment videos

EDUCATION

JoVE Core

Video textbooks for undergraduates

JoVE Science Education

Visual demonstrations of key scientific experiments

JoVE Lab Manual

Videos of experiments for undergraduate lab courses

BUSINESS

JoVE Business

Video textbooks for business education

OTHERS

JoVE Quiz

Interactive video based quizzes for formative assessments

Solutions

Authors
Teaching Faculty
Librarians
<<<<<<< HEAD
K12 Schools
Biopharma
=======
K12 Schools
>>>>>>> dee1fd4 (fixed header link)

Language

English

EN

English

CN

简体中文

DE

Deutsch

ES

Español

KR

한국어

IT

Italiano

FR

Français

PT

Português do Brasil

PL

Polski

HE

עִבְרִית

RU

Русский

JA

日本語

TR

Türkçe

AR

العربية

    Menu

    JoVE Journal

    Behavior

    Biochemistry

    Bioengineering

    Biology

    Cancer Research

    Chemistry

    Developmental Biology

    Engineering

    Environment

    Genetics

    Immunology and Infection

    Medicine

    Neuroscience

    Menu

    JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments

    Biological Techniques

    Biology

    Cancer Research

    Immunology

    Neuroscience

    Microbiology

    Menu

    JoVE Core

    Analytical Chemistry

    Anatomy and Physiology

    Biology

    Calculus

    Cell Biology

    Chemistry

    Civil Engineering

    Electrical Engineering

    Introduction to Psychology

    Mechanical Engineering

    Medical-Surgical Nursing

    View All

    Menu

    JoVE Science Education

    Advanced Biology

    Basic Biology

    Chemistry

    Clinical Skills

    Engineering

    Environmental Sciences

    Physics

    Psychology

    View All

    Menu

    JoVE Lab Manual

    Biology

    Chemistry

    Menu

    JoVE Business

    Accounting

    Finance

    Macroeconomics

    Marketing

    Microeconomics

Start Free Trial
Loading...
Home
JoVE Journal
Neuroscience
Quantifying the Heterogeneous Distribution of a Synaptic Protein in the Mouse Brain Using Immunof...
Quantifying the Heterogeneous Distribution of a Synaptic Protein in the Mouse Brain Using Immunof...
JoVE Journal
Neuroscience
A subscription to JoVE is required to view this content.  Sign in or start your free trial.
JoVE Journal Neuroscience
Quantifying the Heterogeneous Distribution of a Synaptic Protein in the Mouse Brain Using Immunofluorescence

Quantifying the Heterogeneous Distribution of a Synaptic Protein in the Mouse Brain Using Immunofluorescence

Full Text
8,472 Views
09:18 min
January 29, 2019

DOI: 10.3791/58940-v

Rebecca Wallrafen1, Thomas Dresbach1, Julio S. Viotti1

1Institute of Anatomy and Embryology,University Medical Center Göttingen

Overview

This study presents a quantitative method to analyze the distribution of a synaptic protein using immunofluorescence and confocal microscopy. The method allows for the evaluation of protein distribution ratios rather than absolute fluorescence levels, making it adaptable for various biological tissues beyond the brain.

Key Study Components

Area of Science

  • Neuroscience
  • Cell Biology
  • Immunofluorescence Techniques

Background

  • Detection of synaptic proteins is critical for understanding neuronal function.
  • Immunofluorescence staining is prone to variability, which this method mitigates.
  • The technique can be used across different tissues and model organisms.

Purpose of Study

  • To develop an accurate approach for quantifying synaptic protein distributions.
  • To assess heterogeneity in protein distribution at various brain levels.
  • To refine protein analysis techniques suitable for multiple biological contexts.

Methods Used

  • Immunofluorescence combined with confocal microscopy on brain slices.
  • Utilization of previously isolated mouse brain tissues as a biological model.
  • Cryopreservation and sectioning of brain tissue at 25 micrometers thickness.
  • Stepwise washing and incubation procedures for antibody application and staining.
  • Image analysis using FIJI software for quantifying fluorescence intensities.

Main Results

  • The method provides a clear depiction of protein distribution across brain regions.
  • Different synaptic proteins display heterogeneous and homogenous patterns in distribution.
  • High cell-density areas showed brighter signals, indicating the effectiveness of DAPI staining.

Conclusions

  • This study enhances the ability to quantitatively assess synaptic protein distribution.
  • The method is versatile, enabling analyses across varied tissues and model systems.
  • Understanding these distribution patterns can provide insights into neuronal mechanisms and potential disease models.

Frequently Asked Questions

What are the main advantages of this immunofluorescence technique?
This technique minimizes variability by using ratios of fluorescence intensities instead of absolute values, allowing for more reliable assessments of protein distributions across tissues.
How can this method be applied to different biological models?
The protocol is adaptable for various tissues and organisms, making it suitable for studies beyond mouse brain samples.
What types of data can be obtained using this method?
Data regarding the distribution patterns of synaptic proteins can be quantified and compared to reference proteins, revealing spatial heterogeneity.
What are the critical steps in the protocol?
Key steps include cryoprotecting the brain tissue, precise sectioning, thorough washing between incubations, and careful image analysis using software.
Are there any limitations to this technique?
While this method is robust, potential limitations include the dependence on the quality of antibodies and possible photobleaching during microscopy.

Here, we describe a quantitative approach to determining the distribution of a synaptic protein relative to a marker protein using immunofluorescence staining, confocal microscopy, and computer-based analysis.

Here we describe a protocol employing immunofluorescence, confocal microscopy, and computer based analysis to determine the distribution of synaptic protein relative to a reference protein. Our method circumvents the inherent variability of immunofluorescence stainings by using a ratio rather than absolute fluorescence levels. Additionally with this method you can analyze the heterogeneity of protein distribution on different levels.

From whole brain slices to brain regions to even sub regions such as the different layers of the hippocampus. This technique can be adapted to determine the protein distribution in different tissues other than the brain and model systems other than mice. Begin by washing previously isolated and fixed mouse brain as described in the manuscript.

Then transfer the brain to a 15 milliliter reaction tube with 30%sucrose 0.1 molar PB.To cryo protect the brain incubate it at 4 degrees celsius for 48 hours or until it sinks. After that use a a sharp blade to trim the cryo protected brain depending on the area of interest. Then place the brain in a cryo mold and add Optimal Cutting Temperature Compound to embed it making sure to avoid bubbles and orient the brain properly so as to have a coronal plane of cutting.

Place the cryo mold in the minus 80 degree celsius freezer until it is frozen solid. Mount the frozen tissue on the cryo microtome and wait for at least 15 minutes before section to equilibrate it to the microtome temperature. Start cutting the brain into 25 micrometer thick coronal slices.

Use a glass hook to the OCT of the first slice carefully without touching the brain tissue. The OCT will stick to the glass hook. Use the glass hook to transfer the brain slice into the first well.

Collect three adjacent slices per well in a 24 well plate filled with 0.1 molar PB.Store the slices at four degrees celsius until staining for up to two weeks. To prepare the slices for immuno staining use a plastic pipet to remove the PB solution from one well without drawing in the brain slices. Then use a 1000 micro liter pipet to add 250 microliters of fresh PB to wash them of excess OCT.

Repeat this washing for each well at the time to avoid drying out the slices. Then, use a plastic pipet to remove the PB solution from the first well. Use a 1000 microliter pipet to add 250 microliters of blocking buffer per well working well by well again.

Incubate the plate at room temperature on a shaker for three hours. During the incubation add 250 microliters of antibody buffer per well to a reaction tube. Then use a 2 microliter pipet to add the appropriate amount of antibody pipetting it directly into the solution and gently pipet up and down several times to mix.

Then vortex this diluted antibody to unsure proper mixing. Working well by well remove the blocking buffer with a plastic pipet and add 250 microliters of primary antibody solution per well. Incubate the plate on a shaker at four degrees celsius overnight.

The following day remove the antibody solution with a plastic pipet. Wash the slices with 300 microliters of washing buffer one per well three times ten minutes each wash on a shaker at room temperature. During the washing, working in the dark, dilute the fluor for a couple second antibody in a reaction tube in the same fashion as previously done with the primary antibody.

After completed washing remove the washing buffer with a plastic pipet and add 250 microliters of secondary antibody solution per well. Incubate in the dark at room temperature for 90 minutes. After completed incubation remove the antibody solution with a plastic pipet.

Wash the sections three times with washing buffer two in the same way as with washing buffer one. During this washing dilute DAPI stain in 0.1 molar PB to achieve a one to 2000 concentration. After removing the washing buffer from the plate add 250 microliters of DAPI solution and incubate at room temperature on the shaker for 5 minutes.

After removing the DAPI solution with a plastic pipet use a 1000 microliter pipet to add 500 microliters of 0.1 molar PB per well. Place a microscope slide under a stereoscope. Use a fine brush to add three separate drops of 0.1 molar PB onto the slide.

Using the brush place one slice per drop on the slide and then flatten and orient the slices. After all slices are positioned correctly use a paper tissue to remove excess PB and dry carefully without drying the slices completely. Then add 80 microliters of embedding medium onto the slide and carefully cover it with a cover slip to embed the brain slices.

Cover the slides to avoid light exposure and leave them to dry in the fume hood for one to two hours and then store them in a microscope slide box at four degrees celsius until ready for confocal microscopy. After acquiring virtual tissues of the whole brain slice for different channels as described in the manuscript load all single channels or one image into FIJI by clicking file and then open. Then use the free hand selection tool to delineate one hemisphere in the DAPI channel.

Click on edit, then selection, then create mask to create a mask of the selected region. Then click on analyze and then measure particles to determine the mean fluorescence intensity for single channels. Making sure to select single channels to determine the mean fluorescence intensity values for each channel.

After that, copy the mean fluorescence intensity for the single channels into a spreadsheet. To determine the mean fluorescence intensity for the single channels in an area of interest delineate the area with the free hand selection tool. After staining with DAPI which stains nuclei brain sections have a punctate pattern and regions with high cell density are brighter than regions with low cell density.

Staining with Mover antibody revealed heterogeneous distribution with bright hot spot areas and dimmer areas throughout the brain where as Synaptophysin revealed more homogenous distribution. An overlay of images showed the differential distribution of red fluorescence indicating Mover protein compared green fluorescence indicating Synaptophysin. After quantification analysis mean fluorescence intensity values for different channels across the hemispheres and across the areas of interest have been determined for both Mover and Synaptophysin.

Ratios of the mover fluorescence values to Synaptophysin fluorescence values show the heterogeneous distribution of Mover with areas of high and low Mover levels relative to Synaptic vesicles. Relative Mover abundance the ratio in one area of interest compared to that across the hemisphere and translated into a percentage showed how much Mover is present in one area of interest relative to the average. Relative Mover abundance was determined for different layers in the sub fields of the hippocampus.

The three regions of interest are quantified by comparing the ratio in the respective layers to the ratio of the corresponding hemisphere. This procedure can easily be adapted and combined with different imaging techniques such as super resolution microscopy to additionally determine the sub cellular distribution of the protein of interest. This technique can also be applied to different model systems such as genetically modified or drug treated animals.

This can allow for a comparative approach across different experimental conditions or even species.

View the full transcript and gain access to thousands of scientific videos

Sign In Start Free Trial

Explore More Videos

ImmunofluorescenceSynaptic ProteinConfocal MicroscopyProtein DistributionMouse BrainBrain RegionsHippocampus LayersCryo ProtectionOptimal Cutting Temperature CompoundImmuno StainingBlocking BufferProtocol AdaptationComputer-based Analysis

Related Videos

Quantifying Synapses: an Immunocytochemistry-based Assay to Quantify Synapse Number

18:11

Quantifying Synapses: an Immunocytochemistry-based Assay to Quantify Synapse Number

Related Videos

36.6K Views

Automated Quantification of Synaptic Fluorescence in C. elegans

12:22

Automated Quantification of Synaptic Fluorescence in C. elegans

Related Videos

10.8K Views

Quantifying the Distribution of a Presynaptic Protein in the Mouse Brain Using Immunofluorescence

05:59

Quantifying the Distribution of a Presynaptic Protein in the Mouse Brain Using Immunofluorescence

Related Videos

565 Views

Immunolabeling of Neuronal Membrane Proteins in a Freeze-fractured Specimen of Mouse Brain Tissue

02:19

Immunolabeling of Neuronal Membrane Proteins in a Freeze-fractured Specimen of Mouse Brain Tissue

Related Videos

442 Views

Microscopic Analysis of Synapses in Mouse Hippocampal Slices Using Immunofluorescence

05:09

Microscopic Analysis of Synapses in Mouse Hippocampal Slices Using Immunofluorescence

Related Videos

633 Views

Evaluation of Synapse Density in Hippocampal Rodent Brain Slices

07:44

Evaluation of Synapse Density in Hippocampal Rodent Brain Slices

Related Videos

18K Views

An Optical Assay for Synaptic Vesicle Recycling in Cultured Neurons Overexpressing Presynaptic Proteins

09:33

An Optical Assay for Synaptic Vesicle Recycling in Cultured Neurons Overexpressing Presynaptic Proteins

Related Videos

7.9K Views

Using Near-infrared Fluorescence and High-resolution Scanning to Measure Protein Expression in the Rodent Brain

06:04

Using Near-infrared Fluorescence and High-resolution Scanning to Measure Protein Expression in the Rodent Brain

Related Videos

6K Views

Immunofluorescence Staining Using IBA1 and TMEM119 for Microglial Density, Morphology and Peripheral Myeloid Cell Infiltration Analysis in Mouse Brain

10:40

Immunofluorescence Staining Using IBA1 and TMEM119 for Microglial Density, Morphology and Peripheral Myeloid Cell Infiltration Analysis in Mouse Brain

Related Videos

34.6K Views

Combining Multiplex Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization with Fluorescent Immunohistochemistry on Fresh Frozen or Fixed Mouse Brain Sections

07:36

Combining Multiplex Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization with Fluorescent Immunohistochemistry on Fresh Frozen or Fixed Mouse Brain Sections

Related Videos

8K Views

JoVE logo
Contact Us Recommend to Library
Research
  • JoVE Journal
  • JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments
  • JoVE Visualize
Business
  • JoVE Business
Education
  • JoVE Core
  • JoVE Science Education
  • JoVE Lab Manual
  • JoVE Quizzes
Solutions
  • Authors
  • Teaching Faculty
  • Librarians
  • K12 Schools
  • Biopharma
About JoVE
  • Overview
  • Leadership
Others
  • JoVE Newsletters
  • JoVE Help Center
  • Blogs
  • Site Maps
Contact Us Recommend to Library
JoVE logo

Copyright © 2026 MyJoVE Corporation. All rights reserved

Privacy Terms of Use Policies
WeChat QR code