We describe a protocol for performing an in utero transplantation (IUT) through intravenous and intra-amniotic routes of injection in the murine model. This protocol can be used to introduce cells, viral vectors, and other substances into the unique immune-tolerant fetal environment.
Cite this ArticleCopy Citation | Download Citations
Ahn, N. J., Stratigis, J. D., Coons, B. E., Flake, A. W., Nah-Cederquist, H. D., Peranteau, W. H. Intravenous and Intra-amniotic In Utero Transplantation in the Murine Model. J. Vis. Exp. (140), e58047, doi:10.3791/58047 (2018).
Translate text to:
In utero transplantation (IUT) is a unique and versatile mode of therapy that can be used to introduce stem cells, viral vectors, or any other substances early in the gestation. The rationale behind IUT for therapeutic purposes is based on the small size of the fetus, the fetal immunologic immaturity, the accessibility and proliferative nature of the fetal stem or progenitor cells, and the potential to treat a disease or the onset of symptoms prior to birth. Taking advantage of these normal developmental properties of the fetus, the delivery of hematopoietic stem cells (HSC) via an IUT has the potential to treat congenital hematologic disorders such as sickle cell disease, without the required myeloablative or immunosuppressive conditioning required for postnatal HSC transplants. Similarly, the accessibility of progenitor cells in multiple organs during development potentially allows for a more efficient targeting of stem/progenitor cells following an IUT of viral vectors for gene therapy or genome editing. Additionally, IUT can be used to study normal developmental processes including, but not limited to, the development of immunologic tolerance. The murine model provides a valuable and affordable means to understanding the potential and limitations of IUT prior to pre-clinical large animal studies and an eventual clinical application. Here, we describe a protocol for performing an IUT in the murine fetus through intravenous and intra-amniotic routes. This protocol has been used successfully to elucidate the necessary conditions and mechanisms behind in utero hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, tolerance induction, and in utero gene therapy.
Recent advances in antenatal screening and diagnosis have brought to light the possibility of treating the fetus for a number of congenital disorders which do not have adequate postnatal treatment options and result in significant morbidity and mortality. Specifically, in utero hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (IUHCT) and gene therapy/genome editing have the potential to take advantage of normal developmental properties of the fetus to treat congenital hematologic, immune, and genetic disorders more efficiently than postnatal HSC transplantation and gene therapy/genome editing can do1,2. Specifically, due to the small size of the fetus, the donor cell or viral vector dose can be maximized per the weight of the recipient. Additionally, the immunologic immaturity of the fetus allows donor HSCs to be injected without the myeloablative and immunosuppressive conditioning that is required in postnatal transplant protocols. Similarly, viral vectors carrying a therapeutic transgene or genome editing technology can be injected without a limiting immune response to either the transgene product or the viral vector. Finally, the accessibility and proliferative nature of fetal stem/progenitor cells afford the possibility of a more efficient transduction of target progenitor cells, as well as certain modes of genome editing (homology-directed repair) which require cycling cells to occur efficiently. The murine model serves as an insightful and affordable means to address important questions in stem cell biology and immunology prior to experimenting in pre-clinical large animal models and, as such, has served as the primary model in which IUHCT and in utero gene therapy have been explored1,2,3.
Although many variables play an important role in the success of IUHCT and in utero gene therapy/genome editing in murine and large animal models, a key variable is the method of delivery of the HSCs or viral vector. The delivery of large doses of donor HSCs with a first-pass effect occurring in the fetal liver, the hematopoietic organ at the time of the IUHCT, has been shown to be instrumental in achieving macrochimeric levels of engraftment in mouse and large animal models4,5. This was achieved via an injection of donor cells via the vitelline vein in the mouse model and via an intra-cardiac injection in the canine model. The route of injection also plays a fundamental role in targeting progenitor cells of different organs during development. For example, an intravenous injection via the vitelline vein has been shown to efficiently transduce cardiomyocytes and hepatocytes following a late gestation injection6,7. Alternatively, an intra-amniotic injection of viral vectors allows the targeting of organs that are physically exposed based on the embryonic folding/development at the time of the injection8. This is best exemplified by the targeting of respiratory epithelium via an intra-amniotic injection late in the gestation to take advantage of normal fetal "breathing" movements, which exposes the respiratory tract to the viral vector in the amniotic fluid9. These two modes of IUT, intravenous via the vitelline vein and intra-amniotic, have been the basis for multiple past and ongoing experiments in our laboratory. In this protocol, we describe in detail the methods for performing intravenous and intra-amniotic IUT in the murine model.
The experimental protocols were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia.
1. Creation of Injection Pipettes
- Using a vertical micropipette puller, pull a 100 µL microcapillary pipette (Figure 1A - 1C). Calibrate the micropipette puller so that the tapered end is > 1 cm long.
NOTE: Initially, the settings of the puller should be adjusted for an optimum length. A higher heat setting will make the tip longer, and a higher pull setting will make the diameter of the tip narrower.
- Cut the tapered end so that it is ≥ 1 cm long. Ensure that the internal diameter at the tip of the needle is between 70 µm and 100 µm and that it is inversely proportional to the length of the tapered end.
NOTE: The internal diameter also depends on the calibration of the micropipette puller. See the instructions from the manufacturer of the vertical micropipette puller or any preferred micropipette puller type.
- After ensuring that the needle has the correct internal diameter, create the bevel of 15 - 20 degrees by sharpening the tip using a micropipette beveller with a diamond sharpening wheel (Figure 2A - 2C). Make sure to rest the tip gently on the wheel without too much pressure, to decrease chances of breaking or cracking the tip.
NOTE: A paintbrush can be used to wipe away any debris that builds up on the needle tip.
- Evaluate the tip under a microscope and ensure that the tip is round without any chips or cracks. Reevaluate the internal diameter to make sure it is between 70 µm and 100 µm (Figure 2D - 2H).
- Draw lines on the rest of the needle to designate 5 µL of volume between them (e.g., needles with an internal diameter of 1.3 mm should have lines drawn at 3.77 mm increments).
- Autoclave the needles prior to use in surgery and handle them with sterile gloves.
2. In utero Injections
- Prepare the necessary instruments by autoclaving them ahead of time. Include essential instruments such as microinjector needle holder, a surgical needle driver, a pair of Adson forceps, a pair of curved regular tissue scissors, a 1 mL insulin syringe, a couple of cotton-tip applicators, a transfer pipette, a 50 mL conical tube, and a pack of 4-0 polyglactin 910 sutures.
- Using a sterile technique, attach the needle to the needle holder and plug it into the microinjector.
NOTE: The settings of the compressed nitrogen used are as followed: inject 4 - 6 psi, balance 0 psi. Depending on what is being injected, specifically, the viscosity of the injectate, as well as the size of the micropipette, the injection times vary between 0.3 - 1.5 s.
- Clean out the needle tip of any possible debris by drawing up 5 - 10 µL of sterile 1x phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and then clearing it out. Repeat this 2 - 3x.
- Prepare pregnant 2- to 6-month-old female mice for surgery by shaving their abdomens with a clipper. Be careful not to damage the nipples. Administer oral pain medication (e.g., 100 µL of 1.5 mg/mL meloxicam oral suspension per mouse).
- Start filling the needle with the desired material (cells/vector/drug) at the desired volume. Be careful not to break the needle tip while filling the needle.
NOTE: The volume of injection per fetus varies depending on the specific experimental design. 20 µL works well for injecting a large number of cells (i.e., up to 107 cells into the vitelline vein. For instance, we delivered 1 x 107 whole bone marrow cells isolated from C57BL/6TgN(act-EGFP)OsbY01 ["B6 Green Fluorescent Protein (GFP)"] mice via the vitelline vein into gestational day-14 Balb/c fetuses. For viral vector injections, a single injection of 10 µL of a 1:1 diluted vector with PBS works well.
- To calibrate the injection time, take the following steps.
- Push the Mode button 3x on the microinjector to get to the injection calibration screen. Adjust the injection time by adding intervals of 10 or 100 ms and push the Mode button 2x.
- Push the Balance button and push the foot pedal once. Now push the pedal again and assess how much volume is emptied out of the needle per push. If not calibrated to the desired volume of 5 - 20 µL per pedal push, repeat steps 2.6.1 and 2.6.2.
NOTE: Generally, it is good to calibrate each push to deliver half the total target volume at a time. While it is possible to inject more than 30 µL or even 40 µL of the total volume, we do not generally go over 20 µL per fetus, intravenous or intra-amniotic.
- Fill the needle up to the desired level.
- Start delivering anesthesia to the mouse by adjusting the oxygen flowmeter to 1 L/min and the isoflurane vaporizer to 3%.
- Confirm whether the mouse is anesthetized by checking for the absence of the pedal reflex. Transfer the mouse to a heating pad in a supine position.
- Apply lubricant eye gel to avoid corneal desiccation. Secure the mouse in place by taping the upper and lower limbs to the pad.
- Prep the abdomen with chlorhexidine scrub followed by alcohol and inject a local anesthetic (e.g., 100 µL of 0.25% bupivacaine) subcutaneously (Figure 3A).
- With scissors, make a 1 - 2 cm skin incision so that the lower border is no closer than 1 cm to the introitus; the fascia beneath is very thin and translucent.
- Identify the midline of the fascia which is more transparent than the surrounding area. Be careful not to injure the epigastric vessels which lie on either side of the midline. Should the epigastric vessels get injured, hold pressure with cotton-tip applicators to stop the bleeding.
- Using Adson forceps, pinch the fascia without grabbing any of the underlying organs such as the intestines, bladder, or fetuses. Open the fascia with scissors, being careful not to damage any of the organs. Once safely in the abdomen, extend the fascial incision. Make it no longer than the skin incision.
- Use cotton-tip applicators to move the intestines into the upper part of the abdomen, thus exposing the gravid uterus. Deliver the uterus out of the incision, carefully identifying the right and left ovaries to ensure all fetuses are counted (Figure 3B).
- Place the left uterus back into the abdomen so that only the right uterus is exposed; this prevents the desiccation of the uterus and keeps the non-injected fetuses warm.
- Hold the most lateral fetus/amniotic sac between the thumb and index fingers of the operator's non-dominant hand (Figure 3C). Always be gentle as to not cause any damage to the fetuses.
- Position the dissection microscope (a 10X magnification is ideal) and adjust the focus so that the fetus is in view. Adjust the lighting for a better visualization.
- Identify the part that will be injected (vitelline vein, amnion).For intravenous injections, visualize both the vitelline veins and their anastomosis first. For intra-amniotic injections, orient the fetus with the right side in view.
- Reach the target space with the needle as described below.
- For an intravenous injection, do as follows.
- Rotate the uterus so that the vitelline vein that is being injected is parallel to the tip of the needle; keep in mind that the injections must be made towards the anastomosis of the two veins.
- Lay the needle on the uterus at a 5° angle and pierce the uterine wall. Now that the tip is between the uterine wall and the amniotic sac, place the tip directly atop the vitelline vein.
- At a nearly tangential angle, glide the needle over the vein until the bevel pierces and advances into the vessel; this is evident by a flash of blood seen in the needle tip (Figure 3D).
NOTE: Accessing the vein may take a few tries as the needle may not pierce the vein with the first glide over the vein.
- For an intra-amniotic injection, do as follows.
- Rotate the amniotic sac and find a location devoid of vessels to pierce.
- Point the needle perpendicular to the uterine wall and pierce through the uterus, the yolk sac, and then the amniotic sac. Be careful not to pierce through any fetal tissue. Make sure the needle has passed between the limbs as this confirms that the needle is in the amniotic sac. Then proceed with the injection.
- For an intravenous injection, do as follows.
- Inject the appropriate volume of material desired (usually 10 - 20 µL) by pushing the foot pedal.
NOTE: Because the injector must maintain the visualization of the needle tip through the microscope at all times, a second person must read the markings on the needle to quantify the injected amount and inform the injector how much volume is left to inject. A discussion prior to the injection between the injector and assistant is important to avoid any confusion and delay. This is especially important for intravenous injections because a delayed removal of the needle will allow a backflow of venous blood into the needle and result in an inaccurate dosing.
- Withdraw the needle from the injection site once the desired volume is delivered. As there may be some bleeding from the vessel puncture site with intravenous injections, hold pressure with the side of the needle for 10 - 15 s to stop the bleeding.
- Proceed to the next fetus. Continue until all the fetuses of the right uterine horn have been injected.
- Remove the left uterine horn from the abdomen and replace the right uterine horn back inside the peritoneal cavity.
NOTE: Occasionally, the needle needs to be refilled with the injectant.
- Once all fetuses have been injected, replace the uterus into the abdomen (Figure 3E). Make sure to avoid a uterine or intestinal volvulus.
- With a disposable transfer pipette, place roughly 2 mL of 1x PBS into the abdomen to replace any insensible losses.
- Close the fascia and abdomen in one continuous layer using 4-0 polyglactin 910 sutures to avoid injuring the underlying organs during the closure (Figure 3F - 3G).
- Remove the tape and transfer the mouse to a cage underneath a heat lamp. Be careful not to place the heat lamp too close to the mouse. Make sure the cage has bedding, food, and water.
NOTE: A thermostatically controlled warm chamber may also be used. The mouse is awake when it is upright and walking.
- Observe the mouse daily and give pain medication as needed.
NOTE: We routinely give meloxicam on postoperative days 1 and 2, and sometimes on day 3 if the mouse shows signs of pain.
- If doing a batch surgery with the same injection material, clean out the injection needle with sterile PBS. If injecting with a different material, dispose of the needle in a sharps container and use a new needle.
NOTE: We recommend fostering the pups with surrogate dams immediately after birth in case the dam mounts an immune response to the injectant and transfers antibodies to the pups via breast milk.
Survival and engraftment are important measures of success for IUHCT experiments. Depending on the specific endpoints of an experiment, fetuses that received an IUHCT may be analyzed prenatally by a C-section or postnatally. On average, the survival rates after intravenous injections range from 75 - 100%. The survival rates after intra-amniotic injections tend to fair better than intravenous injections, at around 85 - 100%.
In our laboratory, the training process to attain proficiency in these techniques takes approximately 8 - 12 months. To assess the acquisition of the skills required to perform these injections in a reproducible fashion, trainees are monitored for fetal survival and donor cell engraftment at short time points following the IUT. This is demonstrated by the following quality control experiments. Specifically, 1 x 107 whole bone marrow cells are isolated from C57BL/6TgN(act-EGFP)OsbY01 ("B6 GFP") mice as previously described5 and are injected via the vitelline vein into gestational day-14 Balb/c fetuses. In one group, the IUT was performed by an experienced instructor, and in the other group by a trainee who has been practicing the technique for ~ 4 months. Representative fluorescent microscopy images of the harvested fetal livers 24 h after the IUT are shown in Figure 4A. The livers of the fetuses who received the IUT by the trainee fluoresce less due to a lower engraftment of the transplanted GFP cells. These livers were then analyzed for GFP+ donor cells by flow cytometry to quantify the engraftment levels. The difference in mean engraftment levels between the two injectors correlates with the images seen under fluorescent microscopy (Figure 4B).
The ability of viral vectors delivered via the intra-amniotic route to transduce cells in contact with the amniotic fluid is exemplified by the transduction of epithelial cells 48 h following an intra-amniotic injection of Ad-GFP (an adenovirus vector carrying GFP transgene10) in gestational day-12.5 fetuses (Figure 5A and 5B).
Figure 1. The process of making a glass pipette needle with the micropipette puller. (A) Mount the glass pipette and secure it by tightening the dials on either end of the puller. (B) Once secured, the pulling switch activates the heat. The settings shown are Heat #1: 985 and Pull: 27. The dark cover glass should be closed during this process for safety. It was opened for photoshoot purposes. (C) The micropipette is separated. Discard the bottom portion and take the top portion of the separated micropipette for the next steps. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 2. The process of grinding the micropipette to shape the tip of the needle. (A) This panel shows the general setup of the grinding. A light source is needed to visualize the tip under the microscope. (B and C) Mount the micropipette at a 15 - 20° angle. (D) A buildup of debris is expected throughout the grinding process. Use a paintbrush to clear the tip to get a better visualization of the grinding process. (E) A well-ground needle tip without any identifiable chips or jagged edges is shown under a 4X magnification. (F, G, and H) A re-inspection of the ground needle under a 10X magnification shows a well-ground needle with a sharp tip and smooth edges around the tip. Make sure to check the needle at different angles. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 3. Laparotomy and in utero transplantation. (A) Shave, anesthetize, and tape a pregnant dam and prep her abdomen. (B) After the laparotomy, deliver the entirety of the uterus outside the abdomen for an identification of all fetuses. (C) Position the fetus with the surgeon's non-dominant index finger and thumb while maintaining tension with the third finger. Identify the tip of the needle under the microscope in relation to the fetus. (D) A flash of blood back-flowing into the micropipette needle must be seen upon the cannulation of the vitelline vein. (E) After a completion of all injections, place all the fetuses back into the abdomen. (F) Close the abdomen with a single-layer running stitch using 4-0 polygalactin 910 sutures. (G) Once the abdomen is fully closed, let the dam recover under a heat lamp. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 4. Engraftment of donor whole bone marrow mononuclear cells after a vitelline vein injection. (A) The difference in the degree of engraftment with (trainee) and without (instructor) the leakage of cells is shown clearly under fluorescent microscopy. (B) Percent chimerism also reflected the same finding shown by the flow cytometry analysis. Each data point represents the liver from a different injected fetus. The experiment was performed by one trainee and one instructor. The error bars represent a standard deviation (SD). Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 5. The expression pattern of green fluorescent protein in a fetal embryo 48 h after an intra-amniotic injection of Ad-GFP. (A) This panel shows the cornea (red arrow) and skin stained with GFP at E14.5 after an intra-amniotic injection of Ad-GFP at E12.5 (E12.5/E14.5). (B) A cryosection of the back of the embryo (indicated with a light blue box in panel A) at a higher magnification shows that the viral transduction is limited to the superficial peridermal cell layer (red arrows) and not epidermis (epi). Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
In utero transplantation is a potential therapy for many congenital disorders that can be diagnosed early in gestation. The murine model for IUT allows researchers to explore the fetal environment or to experiment with different therapies. Depending on what is being injected and what is being targeted, intravenous or intra-amniotic in utero transplantation can provide a reliable delivery of an injectant into the desired space.
When targeting specific organs, it is important to pick the appropriate embryological age of the fetus as well as the injection technique. While the intravenous injection of cells at E14 is ideal for targeting the hematologic niche, and the intra-amniotic injection at E16 is ideal for lung targeting, these are not the only options available. For example, intra-amniotic injections can be performed for fetuses as early as E8 with ultrasound guidance8. Systemic delivery is also possible before E14 with ultrasound-guided intra-cardiac injections at E9 - E1011. The feasibility of performing injections at various stages of the fetus' development offers great potential for experiments investigating the safety and efficiency of gene transfers and cell transplants as well as investigating basic questions of developmental biology.
Furthermore, in addition to an intravenous and intra-amniotic delivery, other sites are also available for targeting depending on the purpose of the therapy or the scientific question being pursued. The in utero intramuscular approach has been used for a gene transfer for muscular dystrophies12, an intraspinal approach for the transduction of spinal cord motor neurons13, and an intracranial approach for gene transfers to target central nervous system diseases14. For in utero hematopoietic cell transplantation, intrahepatic and intraperitoneal routes are additional viable options as each route of delivery ultimately targets the hematopoietic niche15. However, the intravenous transplantation route allows for a more efficient homing of the donor cells into the hematopoietic niche and a larger dosing of the donor cells, thus resulting in overall higher levels of stable long-term donor cell engraftment without added fetal mortality1.
The protocols we have detailed above for performing IUT are powerful and versatile tools that allow for a unique in vivo approach to studying stem cell biology, developmental immunology and immunologic tolerance induction, developmental biology, and prenatal gene therapy/genome editing. These delivery methods also have relevant clinical implications and have been the basis for studies of IUHCT and in utero gene therapy in pre-clinical large animal models such as the canine and the ovine model4,16. They will continue to serve as a valuable tool to test new ideas in developmental biology and explore new therapies for devastating congenital genetic, hematologic, immune, and metabolic disorders.
The authors have nothing to disclose.
|Adson Forceps w/ teeth||Fine Science Tools||11027-12|
|Adson Forceps w/o teeth||Fine Science Tools||11006-12|
|Curved scissors||Fine Science Tools||14075-11|
|Heavy Scissors||Fine Science Tools||14002-13|
|Needle Driver||Fine Science Tools||12005-15|
|Cotton Tipped Applicators||Medline||MDS202000|
|50 mL Conical tube||Fischer Scientific||14-432-22|
|Eye lubricant||Major LubriFresh||0904-6488|
|Glass Capillary tubes||Kimble||71900-100|
|Vertical Micropipette Puller||Sutter Instruments||P-30|
|Microelectrode Beveler||Sutter Instruments||BV-10|
|IM-300 Pneumatic Microinjector||Narishige||IM-300|
|Compac5 Anesthesia Machine||VetEquip Compac5||901812|
|Isoflurane||Piramal Critical Care||NDC 66794-017-25|
|N2 gas||Airgas||NI 125|
|O2 gas||Airgas||OX 125|
|Ad-GFP viral vector||Penn Vector Core||H5'.040.CMV.eGFP|
- Loukogeorgakis, S., Flake, A. In utero stem cell and gene therapy: current status and future perspectives. European Journal of Pediatric Surgery. 24, 237-245 (2014).
- Vrecenak, J., Flake, A. In utero hematopoietic cell transplantation: recent progress and the potential for clinical application. Cytotherapy. 15, 525-535 (2013).
- Peranteau, W., et al. Correction of murine hemoglobinopathies by prenatal tolerance induction and postnatal nonmyeloablative allogeneic BM transplants. Blood. 126, (10), 1245-1254 (2015).
- Vrecenak, J., et al. Stable Long-Term Mixed Chimerism Achieved in a Canine Model of Allogeneic in utero Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation. Blood. 124, (12), 1987-1995 (2014).
- Peranteau, W., et al. CD26 Inhibition Enhances Allogeneic Donor-Cell Homing and Engraftment after in utero Hematopoietic-Cell Transplantation. Blood. 108, (13), 4268-4274 (2006).
- Waddington, S., et al. In utero gene transfer of human factor IX to fetal mice can induce postnatal tolerance of the exogenous clotting factor. Blood. 101, (4), 1359-1366 (2003).
- Stitelman, D., et al. Developmental Stage Determines Efficiency of Gene Transfer to Muscle Satellite Cells by in utero Delivery of Adeno-Associated Virus Vector Serotype 2/9. Molecular Therapy - Methods & Clinical Development. 1, 14040 (2014).
- Endo, M., et al. Gene Transfer to Ocular Stem Cells by Early Gestational Intraamniotic Injection of Lentiviral Vector. Molecular Therapy. 15, (3), 579-587 (2007).
- Boelig, M., et al. The Intravenous Route of Injection Optimizes Engraftment and Survival in the Murine Model of In utero Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation. Biology of Blood and Marrow Transplantation. 22, (6), 991-999 (2016).
- Wu, C., et al. Intra-amniotic Transient Transduction of the Periderm with a Viral Vector Encoding TGFβ3 Prevents Cleft Palate in Tgfβ3-/-. Mouse Embryos. Molecular Therapy. 1, 8-17 (2013).
- Roybal, J., Endo, M., Radu, A., Zoltick, P., Flake, A. Early gestational gene transfer of IL-10 by systemic administration of lentiviral vector can prevent arthritis in a murine model. Gene Therapy. 18, (7), 719-726 (2011).
- Reay, D., et al. Full-Length Dystrophin Gene Transfer to the Mdx Mouse in utero. Gene Therapy. 15, (7), 531-536 (2008).
- Ahmed, S., Waddington, S., Boza-Morán, M., Yáñez-Muñoz, R. High-Efficiency Transduction of Spinal Cord Motor Neurons by Intrauterine Delivery of Integration-Deficient Lentiviral Vectors. Journal of Controlled Release. 273, 99-107 (2018).
- Haddad, M., Donsante, A., Zerfas, P., Kaler, S. Fetal Brain-Directed AAV Gene Therapy Results in Rapid, Robust, and Persistent Transduction of Mouse Choroid Plexus Epithelia. Molecular Therapy - Nucleic Acids. 2, 101 (2013).
- Nijagal, A., Le, T., Wegorzewska, M., MacKenzie, T. A mouse model of in utero transplantation. Journal of Visualized Experiments. (47), e2303 (2011).
- Davey, M., et al. Jaagsiekte Sheep Retrovirus Pseudotyped Lentiviral Vector-Mediated Gene Transfer to Fetal Ovine Lung. Gene Therapy. 19, (2), 201-209 (2011).