$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$
$$\longleftharp{xx}$$,
$$\longrightharp{xx}$$,
Plaque Array Assay Based Analysis of Lipid-lowering Drug Effects on Cholesterol Particles Formation:
For evaluating the effect of statins in modulating morphology of cholesterol particles, fluorescent-labeled cholesterol aggregates were individually incubated with lovastatin, simvastatin, atorvastatin, rosuvastatin, and fluvastatin in the buffer. All these samples were acquired using imaging flow cytometry to capture images of the cholesterol particles for morphology analysis as shown in Figure 1 and Figure 2. Interestingly, analyzing the drug effect on cholesterol particles formation in buffer indicated that lovastatin, simvastatin, and atorvastatin induce the formation of a heterogeneous population of cholesterol particles displaying diverse sizes and shapes, Figure 3a-c. Conversely, the cholesterol particles formed in the presence of rosuvastatin, fluvastatin, and the negative control (without drug) were homogeneous in shape and morphology as shown in Figure 3d-f. In addition, it was observed that lovastatin, simvastatin, and atorvastatin induced the formation of cholesterol particles exhibiting both globular and linear strand morphologies, whereas rosuvastatin and fluvastatin induced the formation of cholesterol particles with only globular morphology. The statins effect on inducing the linear strands formation was found in the order of 16% for lovastatin, 2% for simvastatin, and 0.2% for atorvastatin.
To further evaluate the effect of lipid-lowering drugs on particles formation, fluorescent-labeled cholesterol aggregates were individually incubated with ezetimibe, fibrate, niacin, and omega-3 fatty acid. As observed with the statins, these drugs induced the formation of cholesterol particles with heterogeneous sizes and shapes as displayed in Figure 4a-d. Among them, ezetimibe induced the formation of cholesterol particles exhibiting both globular and linear strand morphologies whereas fibrate, niacin, and omega-3 fatty acid induced the formation of only globular-shaped cholesterol particles. Accordingly, the effect of drugs on the linear strand shaped cholesterol particles formation was in the order of 3% for ezetimibe, 0% for fibrate, 0% for niacin, and 0% for omega-3 fatty acid.
The morphological analysis revealed each globular or linear strand shaped cholesterol particle is composed of many smaller particles linked together. The sizes of fluorescent positive globular cholesterol particles identified are in the range of ~2 - 30 µm2, whereas the sizes of the linear shaped particles are in the range of ~2 - 60 µm2.
Analyzing the Effect of Lipid-Lowering Drugs on Purified VLDL and LDL Particles:
To further examine the cholesterol particles formation in the presence of lipoproteins, the fluorescent-labeled cholesterol aggregates were individually incubated with purified VLDL, LDL, and HDL proteins/particles. The results showed, compared to the incubation with LDL and HDL particles, that the cholesterol aggregates incubated with VLDL proteins caused the formation of a higher number of cholesterol particles, Figure 5. In addition, two major fractions of cholesterol particles were observed in VLDL populations suggesting their partial transformation into a LDL fraction during the incubation with the fluorescent-labeled cholesterol aggregates. The image analysis of particles indicated the presence of both globular (~97%) and linear shaped (~3%) particles among VLDL, LDL, and HDL populations. The size ranges of globular particles are ~2 - 30 µm2, whereas the size ranges of linear particles are ~2 - 60 µm2.
For examining the lipid-lowering drug effect on purified particles, the VLDL and LDL particles were individually incubated with ezetimibe, lovastatin, simvastatin, and niacin. As a result, compared to control experiments without the drug, the drug effect observed on VLDL particles formation was higher in ezetimibe, simvastatin, lovastatin, and niacin. The LDL particles incubated with the drugs showed a major single fraction and the drug-induced effect on particles formation was higher in ezetimibe, simvastatin, lovastatin, and niacin, Figure 6.
Variations of the Lipid-lowering Drug Effects in Altering the Distribution of Cholesterol Particles in Serum Samples:
The preceding experiments were performed in the buffer solution with purified lipoproteins for evaluating the drug effect. Hence, in the next step, the effectiveness of lipid-lowering drugs on cholesterol particles formation was examined using 50 serum samples collected from 25 subjects with dyslipidemia and 25 age-matched normal subjects. The drug response in each serum sample was measured based on changes in the profile of cholesterol particles formation in the presence and absence of drugs. In the plaque array assay, each serum sample was screened against ezetimibe, lovastatin, simvastatin, and niacin drugs. The results revealed disparity among these drugs in modulating the distribution of VLDL, LDL, and HDL particles in serum samples, particularly their effect on reducing LDL and increasing HDL cholesterol particles formation. Three representatives of dyslipidemia serum samples exhibiting unique responses to the lipid-lowering drugs are shown in Figure 7.
Identification of the Drug Effect on Modulating Morphology of Serum Derived LDL and HDL Cholesterol Particles:
The phenotype analysis of serum-derived cholesterol particles revealed the presence of both linear strands and globular shaped VLDL, LDL, and HDL subpopulations, thus confirming a similar morphology identified in the experiments performed both in the buffer and with purified lipoprotein particles as shown in Figure 8. However, the distribution of the globular and linear shaped cholesterol particles subpopulations widely varied among dyslipidemia and age-matched normal subjects. Notably, the control assays performed without the drugs showed differences in the distribution of linear strand shaped LDL cholesterol particles between dyslipidemia (mean of 2.0%) and age-matched normal (mean of 1.3%) serum samples. Similarly, an increased level of linear strand shaped HDL cholesterol particles was observed in dyslipidemia samples (mean of 18.3%) compared to the age-matched (mean of 11.1%) serum samples. In correlation, the assays performed in the presence of drugs in dyslipidemia serum samples showed a significant reduction in linear shaped HDL cholesterol particles formation for simvastatin (mean of 8.3%), ezetimibe (mean of 11.5%), lovastatin (mean of 11.7%), and no reduction for niacin (mean of 18.3%). In addition, a decrease in the formation of linear shaped LDL cholesterol particles was observed in dyslipidemia serum samples when incubated with the drugs displayed in Table 1.
Furthermore, the assays performed in the presence of drugs in age-matched control serum samples showed significant reduction in the linear shaped HDL cholesterol particles in simvastatin (mean of 5.0%), ezetimibe (mean 8.2%), lovastatin (mean 8.7%), and niacin (mean 10.8%) as shown in Table 2. Both dyslipidemia and age-matched normal serum samples exhibiting drug-induced reduction in the linear shaped LDL and HDL cholesterol particles showed a relative increase in globular shaped cholesterol particles (data not shown).

Figure 1: Diagram illustrating the process of in vitro visualization of cholesterol particles morphology. (a, b) The addition of lipid-lowering drug in buffer or serum samples. (c) The addition of fluorescence-labeled soluble cholesterol aggregates to the samples. (d) Acquiring the resulting samples for morphological analysis of insoluble cholesterol particles using imaging flow cytometry. Scale bars = 10 µm. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 2: Identification of two distinct morphologies of cholesterol particles using imaging flow cytometry. (a) Particles are segregated into linear or globular populations based on textural analysis of the bright field images. Specifically, the dot-plot of Mean H Homogeneity (x-axis) and Mean H Entropy (y-axis) contains two gated regions for detecting globular (red) and linear strand shaped (blue) cholesterol particles. (b) Images displaying morphology of globular shaped particles identified in population 1. (c) Images of linear strand shaped particles identified in population 2. (d) Histogram displaying the distribution of all fluorescent positive cholesterol particles used to determine their concentration and subpopulations. Scale bars = 10 µm. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 3: Image galleries displaying the effect of statins in modulating cholesterol particles formation. Bright field refers to the area similar to FSC in the conventional flow cytometer. Green channel refers to fluorescence emission detected in the 505 - 560 nm, and Yellow channel refers to fluorescence emission detected in the 560-595 nm. (a-e) Image galleries displaying morphology of cholesterol particles formed in the presence of lovastatin, simvastatin, atorvastatin, rosuvastatin, and fluvastatin, respectively. (f) Cholesterol particles formation in the absence of statin (Negative control). Scale bars = 10 µm. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 4: Demonstrating the differential effect of lipid-lowering drugs in modulating cholesterol particles formation. (a-d) Image galleries displaying morphology of cholesterol particles formed in the presence of ezetimibe, niacin, fibrate, and omega-3 fatty acid, respectively. Green channel refers to fluorescence emission detected in the 505 - 560 nm, and Yellow channel refers to fluorescence emission detected in the 560-595 nm. Scale bars = 10 µm. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 5: Analysis of VLDL, LDL, and HDL cholesterol particles formation in the absence of drug. Dot-plots: X-axis displays a spectrum of cholesterol particles detected in the green fluorescence channel (505 - 560 nm) and Y-axis displays side scatter. Gating shows regions of VLDL, LDL, and HDL particles detected in the fluorescence dot-plots. (a) Cholesterol particles formation in the presence of purified VLDL. (b) Representative images of VLDL particles. (c) Cholesterol particles formation in the presence of purified LDL. (d) Representative images of LDL particles. (e) Cholesterol particles formation in the presence of purified HDL. (f) Representative images of HDL particles. Scale bars = 10 µm. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 6: Demonstrating the effect of lipid lowering drugs on purified VLDL and LDL cholesterol particles. (a) VLDL particles without the drug. (b) VLDL particles incubated with ezetimibe. (c) VLDL particles incubated with lovastatin. (d) VLDL particles incubated with simvastatin. (e) VLDL particles incubated with niacin. (f) LDL particles incubated without the drug. (g) LDL particles incubated with ezetimibe. (h) LDL particles incubated with lovastatin. (i) LDL particles incubated with simvastatin. (j) LDL particles incubated with niacin. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 7: Fluorescence dot-plots showing a differential effect of lipid lowering drugs in modulating VLDL, LDL, and HDL cholesterol particles formation in serum samples. Top row, screening of serum 1 showing low level drug response in increasing 0 to 15% HDL particles formation; middle row, screening of serum 2 showing moderate level drug response in increasing 16 to 50% HDL particles; Bottom row, screening of serum 3 showing higher level drug response in increasing 51 to 100% HDL particles. (a, f, k) Serum samples without drugs. (b, g, l) Serum samples incubated with ezetimibe. (c, h, m) Serum samples incubated with lovastatin. (d, i, n) Serum samples incubated with simvastatin. (e, j, o) Serum samples incubated with niacin. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 8: Image galleries displaying morphology of cholesterol particles identified in serum sample 1. Green channel shows images of the fluorescence emission from the particles; side scatter (cyan channel) shows images of the excitation laser light scattered by the particles. (a) Globular and linear shaped cholesterol particles formed without the drug. (b, c, d, e) Cholesterol particles formed in the presence of ezetimibe, lovastatin, simvastatin, and niacin, respectively. Scale bars = 10 µm. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
| Serum ID | Without drug (Control) | With Ezetimibe | With Lovastatin | With Simvastatin | With Niacin |
| % Linear, LDL particles | % Linear, HDL particles | % Linear, LDL particles | % Linear, HDL particles | % Linear, LDL particles | % Linear, HDL particles | % Linear, LDL particles | % Linear, HDL particles | % Linear, LDL particles | % Linear, HDL particles |
| PNDS-01 | 1.73 | 45.2 | 0.81 | 18.1 | 0.61 | 16.1 | 0.59 | 13.9 | 2.26 | 33.6 |
| PNDS-02 | 2.86 | 35.9 | 1.26 | 30.9 | 1.27 | 22.7 | 0.73 | 15.2 | 3.03 | 37.7 |
| PNDS-03 | 2.04 | 35.8 | 0.87 | 4.82 | 1.02 | 4.14 | 0.36 | 3.06 | 0.45 | 9.57 |
| PNDS-04 | 2.56 | 32.9 | 1.15 | 21.8 | 1.12 | 18.6 | 0.77 | 17.2 | 3.37 | 36.5 |
| PNDS-05 | 0.42 | 29.2 | 0.24 | 5.62 | 0.22 | 8.72 | 0.16 | 9.91 | 0.35 | 22.2 |
| PNDS-06 | 1.8 | 28.1 | 0.4 | 16.8 | 0.62 | 15 | 0.42 | 9.27 | 2.28 | 38.4 |
| PNDS-07 | 1.8 | 26.5 | 0.85 | 10.5 | 1.18 | 19.9 | 0.62 | 7.32 | 1.29 | 23.4 |
| PNDS-08 | 0.98 | 22.8 | 0.86 | 7.28 | 1.55 | 10.2 | 0.14 | 5.98 | 0.59 | 13.3 |
| PNDS-09 | 3.87 | 22.1 | 1.98 | 9.56 | 1.87 | 10.3 | 1.46 | 7.96 | 2.86 | 9.88 |
| PNDS-10 | 4.46 | 21.9 | 2.57 | 13.6 | 4.04 | 17.1 | 2.28 | 11.9 | 0.71 | 25.7 |
| PNDS-11 | 1.57 | 19.2 | 1.15 | 9.24 | 1.37 | 6.98 | 0.74 | 5.03 | 1.37 | 16 |
| PNDS-12 | 1.06 | 16.7 | 0.66 | 4.38 | 0.7 | 4.74 | 0.99 | 6.36 | 1.14 | 4.73 |
| PNDS-13 | 4.85 | 16.6 | 1.28 | 30.4 | 1.4 | 32.6 | 0.8 | 16.6 | 4.02 | 31 |
| PNDS-14 | 2.08 | 16 | 0.68 | 15.4 | 0.64 | 16.5 | 1.97 | 10.2 | 1.25 | 20.11 |
| PNDS-15 | 1.5 | 11.9 | 1.14 | 13.3 | 1.21 | 11.4 | 0.8 | 6.12 | 1.38 | 4.59 |
| PNDS-16 | 1.82 | 10.4 | 2.04 | 9.59 | 1.24 | 5.62 | 0.91 | 5.38 | 1.31 | 7.61 |
| PNDS-17 | 1.05 | 10.3 | 1.02 | 4.7 | 1.78 | 15.1 | 0.93 | 7.81 | 1.27 | 13 |
| PNDS-18 | 1.11 | 8.76 | 0.54 | 3.68 | 0.61 | 3.51 | 1.01 | 5.03 | 1.02 | 6.69 |
| PNDS-19 | 1 | 8.52 | 0.75 | 6.67 | 0.76 | 5.86 | 0.91 | 8.36 | 1.22 | 11.9 |
| PNDS-20 | 3.54 | 7.92 | 3.78 | 12 | 3.56 | 5.81 | 3.28 | 8.28 | 3.44 | 12.3 |
| PNDS-21 | 1.88 | 7.69 | 2.12 | 11.4 | 1.73 | 9.54 | 1.77 | 8.34 | 2.32 | 16.7 |
| PNDS-22 | 1.64 | 7.17 | 0.35 | 5.75 | 0.56 | 13.2 | 0.14 | 4.33 | 1.23 | 17.8 |
| PNDS-23 | 1.54 | 6.27 | 1.25 | 7.24 | 1.02 | 6.12 | 0.73 | 3.58 | 1.42 | 6.69 |
| PNDS-24 | 0.53 | 6.22 | 0.52 | 4.49 | 0.91 | 5.57 | 0.54 | 4.01 | 0.65 | 10.5 |
| PNDS-25 | 2.97 | 5.1 | 1.59 | 11 | 1.88 | 9 | 1.03 | 6.54 | 2.61 | 29.1 |
Table 1: Screening of dyslipidemia serum samples in the plaque array assay show the differential effect of lipid-lowering drugs. Compared to controls without drug (columns 2, 3), serum samples incubated with ezetimibe (columns 4, 5), lovastatin (columns 6, 7), simvastatin (columns 8, 9), and niacin (columns 10, 11) showed variations on inducing linear-shaped LDL and HDL cholesterol particles formation.
| Serum ID | Without drug | With Ezetimibe | With Lovastatin | With Simvastatin | With Niacin |
| % Linear, LDL particles | % Linear, HDL particles | % Linear, LDL particles | % Linear, HDL particles | % Linear, LDL particles | % Linear, HDL particles | % Linear, LDL particles | % Linear, HDL particles | % Linear, LDL particles | % Linear, HDL particles |
| PNAN-01 | 2.05 | 26.8 | 0.62 | 11.9 | 0.56 | 16.9 | 0.52 | 9.28 | 1.4 | 11.9 |
| PNAN-02 | 1.35 | 26.3 | 1.68 | 21.8 | 2.59 | 23.6 | 0.79 | 6.92 | 2.16 | 29.7 |
| PNAN-03 | 2.4 | 24.9 | 0.53 | 7.54 | 0.57 | 13.8 | 0.55 | 5.82 | 1.7 | 4.71 |
| PNAN-04 | 1.99 | 21.5 | 1.54 | 9.45 | 1.56 | 8.25 | 0.31 | 3.74 | 2.88 | 20.8 |
| PNAN-05 | 1.77 | 18.8 | 1.49 | 6.03 | 1.65 | 5.5 | 0.54 | 4.67 | 1.2 | 8.19 |
| PNAN-06 | 1.12 | 15.2 | 0.67 | 4.42 | 2.68 | 13.3 | 0.5 | 2.37 | 1.54 | 16.3 |
| PNAN-07 | 1.03 | 14.4 | 0.79 | 6.83 | 1.45 | 7.91 | 0.67 | 5.36 | 1.57 | 12 |
| PNAN-08 | 0.98 | 14.3 | 0.88 | 4.48 | 2 | 7.1 | 0.19 | 2.66 | 1.02 | 18.1 |
| PNAN-09 | 2.85 | 14.1 | 1.95 | 12.6 | 2.34 | 12.5 | 0.7 | 6.24 | 1.84 | 18.7 |
| PNAN10 | 1.01 | 10.4 | 0.8 | 5.07 | 0.51 | 5.9 | 0.87 | 6.5 | 1.63 | 10.9 |
| PNAN-11 | 0.92 | 12.4 | 0.21 | 9.94 | 0.29 | 3.31 | 0.29 | 6.52 | 0.58 | 10.4 |
| PNAN-12 | 0.6 | 10.5 | 0.56 | 5.78 | 1.06 | 4.74 | 0.4 | 3.32 | 0.91 | 11.8 |
| PNAN-13 | 1.25 | 10.3 | 0.45 | 3.79 | 0.67 | 6.53 | 0.27 | 3.17 | 0.8 | 6.28 |
| PNAN-14 | 1.03 | 9.86 | 1.12 | 8.51 | 1.05 | 6.91 | 0.6 | 5.94 | 1.05 | 8.14 |
| PNAN-15 | 2.28 | 8.1 | 1.93 | 10.4 | 2.14 | 8.86 | 1.56 | 6.84 | 2.31 | 8.61 |
| PNAN-16 | 1.98 | 7.69 | 0.45 | 4.36 | 1 | 5.46 | 0.27 | 2.89 | 0.49 | 4.12 |
| PNAN-17 | 1.72 | 6.72 | 0.75 | 14.8 | 0.74 | 9.26 | 0.49 | 5.58 | 1.98 | 12.8 |
| PNAN-18 | 2.45 | 6.38 | 0.85 | 16.8 | 0.89 | 14.2 | 0.58 | 5.9 | 1.8 | 20.6 |
| PNAN-19 | 1.67 | 5.12 | 0.58 | 8.63 | 0.65 | 5.7 | 0.64 | 8.8 | 1.88 | 2.08 |
| PNAN-20 | 1.17 | 4.41 | 0.85 | 7.77 | 0.91 | 6.43 | 0.69 | 5.08 | 1.21 | 6.12 |
| PNAN-21 | 0.31 | 4.18 | 0.48 | 6.95 | 0.19 | 5.09 | 0.15 | 2.1 | 0.29 | 5.93 |
| PNAN-22 | 0.77 | 4.02 | 1.24 | 7.41 | 0.61 | 5.02 | 0.29 | 3.49 | 0.42 | 3.98 |
| PNAN-23 | 0.4 | 1.25 | 0.75 | 6.25 | 0.88 | 5.91 | 0.9 | 5.06 | 0.82 | 6.71 |
| PNAN-24 | 0.45 | 1.1 | 0.63 | 2.5 | 0.55 | 5.32 | 0.9 | 4.3 | 0.71 | 3.5 |
| PNAN-25 | 0.36 | 1 | 0.73 | 2.4 | 0.66 | 5.1 | 0.82 | 4 | 0.7 | 3.4 |
Table 2: Screening of age-matched control serum samples in the plaque array assay show the differential effect of lipid-lowering drugs. Compared to controls without drug (columns 2, 3), serum samples incubated with ezetimibe (columns 4, 5), lovastatin (columns 6, 7), simvastatin (columns 8, 9), and niacin (columns 10, 11) showed variations on inducing linear-shaped LDL and HDL cholesterol particles formation.