A subscription to JoVE is required to view this content. Sign in or start your free trial.

Method Article

Trans-inner Cell Mass Injection of Embryonic Stem Cells Leads to Higher Chimerism Rates

11.4K views

⸱

DOI:

10.3791/56955

⸱

May 29th, 2018

 ,  ,  , 

In This Article

Summary

Here we present a protocol to increase chimera production without the use of new equipment. A simple orientation change of the embryo for injection can increase the number of embryos produced, and potentially reduce the timeline to germline transmission.

Abstract

In an effort to increase efficiency in the creation of genetically modified mice via ES Cell methodologies, we present an adaptation to the current blastocyst injection protocol. Here we report that a simple rotation of the embryo, and injection through Trans-Inner cell mass (TICM) increased the percentage of chimeric mice from 31% to 50%, with no additional equipment or further specialized training. 26 different inbred clones, and 35 total clones were injected over a period of 9 months. There was no significant difference in either pregnancy rate or recovery rate of embryos between traditional injection techniques and TICM. Therefore, without any major alteration in the injection process and a simple positioning of the blastocyst and injecting through the ICM, releasing the ES cells into the blastocoel cavity can potentially improve the quantity of chimeric production and subsequent germline transmission.

Introduction

For nearly 25 years, the creation of genetically targeted mice has been a slow process, often hampered by a bottleneck at the blastocysts ES cell microinjection stage for the generation of germline transmitting chimeras. Recent advancements, including CRISPR/Cas91,2 targeting in ES cells and high-throughput ES cell generation consortiums like KOMP, have improved the generation/availability of genetically modified ES cells. However, the generation of germline chimeras remains a bottleneck in creating genetically modified mice from these ES cells3,4. Hig....

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Protocol

All operations were done as part of the normal operation of the NIEHS Knock Out Mouse Core facility. All mice were kept on a 12:12 h light:dark cycle, and were feed a diet of NIH-31 and water ad libitum. All experiments were performed in accordance with the Animal Care and Use Committee of the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences.

1. Animal Preparation

  1. Breed donor mice, B6(Cg)-Tyr<c-2J>/J female mice at 8 - 10 weeks of age naturally to B6(Cg)-Tyr<c-2J>/J male mice between 8 and 26 weeks of age. Check plugs visually the following morning (E0.5).
  2. Breed recipient mice, Swiss Webster....

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Results

Treating cell-line as the random effect, a mixed effects linear model was used to analyze the data in the software (e.g. SAS (version 9.2)). Each analysis controlled for the number of embryos transferred and the cell line. The second analysis also controlled for the number of pups that survived.

For this study, each ES Cell line and clone was injected both with traditional and TICM techniques, alternating between the two methods.......

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Discussion

It has long been thought that any disturbance of the ICM could lead to mortality, in fact, current blastocyst microinjection protocols still warn of this12,13. What we have shown here is that microinjection through the ICM is not detrimental to the embryo, and increases the yield of chimeras.

The exact mechanism for this effect has not been identified. However, the mechanical disruption of the ICM, and the accompanying hypoblast, shoul.......

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Disclosures

The authors have no competing interests to disclose.

Acknowledgements

This research was supported [in part] by the Intramural Research Program of the NIH, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences. Special thanks to Shyamal Peddada for statistical analysis. We also wish to thank Humphrey Yao, Gary Bird, and Yuki Arao for review of this manuscript, and Franco DeMayo for his continued support and advice.

....

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Materials

List of materials used in this article
NameCompanyCatalog NumberComments
ES Cell injection needleHumagenMSC-20-0
NSET deviceParatechs60010
DMEMGibco (life technologies)11965-092
FBSGibco (life technologies)10439-024lots should be individually tested for ES Cell compatibility.
HEPESSigmaH0887
β-mercaptoethanolSigmaM7522
Micro manipulatorLeicaMicro manipulator
micro injectorEppendorf AGCell Tram Air 5176
MicroscopeLeicaDM IRB
4 well dishThermo Scientific176740
60 mm dishSarstedt83.3901
B6(Cg)-Tyr<c-2J>/JJackson Labs, Bar Harbor, Maine, USA000058
Swiss Webster miceTaconic, USATac:SW
Injection DishMatTek Corp.P50G-0-30-F

References

  1. Cong, L., et al. Multiplex Genome Engineering Using CRISPR/Cas Systems. Science. 339 (6), 819-823 (2013).
  2. Mali, P., et al. RNA-guided human genome engineering via Cas9. Science. 339 (6), 823-826 (2013).
  3. Friedel, R., Seisenberger, C., Kaloff, C., Wurst, W.

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Reprints and Permissions

Explore More Articles

Blastocyst Injection ProtocolEmbryo TransferMicroscope SetupEmbryo HandlingGermline TransmissionPregnancy RateEmbryo Recovery