Optimized Scratch Assay for In Vitro Testing of Cell Migration with an Automated Optical Camera

Summary

Here we describe a procedure to test the cell migration in vitro with an automated optical camera microscope. The scratch assay has been widely used where the closure of the scratch is followed for a set period. The optical microscope enables dependable and cheap detection of cell migration.

Abstract

Cell migration is an important process that influences many aspects of health, such as wound healing and cancer, and it is, therefore, crucial for developing methods to study the migration. The scratch assay has long been the most common in vitro method to test compounds with anti- and pro-migration properties because of its low cost and simple procedure. However, an often-reported problem of the assay is the accumulation of cells across the edge of the scratch. Furthermore, to obtain data from the assay, images of different exposures must be taken over a period of time at the exact same spot to compare the movements of the migration. Different analysis programs can be used to describe the scratch closure, but they are labor intensive, inaccurate, and forces cycles of temperature changes. In this study, we demonstrate an optimized method for testing the migration effect, e.g. with the naturally occurring proteins Human- and Bovine-Lactoferrin and their N-terminal peptide Lactoferricin on the epithelial cell line HaCaT. A crucial optimization is to wash and scratch in PBS, which eliminates the aforementioned accumulation of cells along the edge. This could be explained by the removal of cations, which have been shown to have an effect on keratinocyte cell-cell connection. To ensure true detection of migration, pre-treating with mitomycin C, a DNA synthesis inhibitor, was added to the protocol. Finally, we demonstrate the automated optical camera, which eliminates excessive temperature cycles, manual labor with scratch closure analysis, while improving on reproducibility and ensuring analysis of identical sections of the scratch over time.

Introduction

Migration is an important process that influences several physiological aspects. In wound healing, migration facilitates re-epithelization of the skin. In non-healing wounds, such as chronic wounds, opportunistic bacteria cause infection of the wound, and open wounds are ideal for bacteria growth and formation of biofilm^1,2. Biofilm is one of the causes of the development of resistant bacteria, which is one of the biggest threats to our modern society³. In wound healing, the immune cells cannot penetrate the biofilm. In cancer, migration of the cancer cells is a pivotal step of metastasis, which is the primary cause of death for patients with solid tumors^4,5. Therefore, it is crucial to be able to study migration.

The scratch assay is often used to test cell migration because it is cheap and easy to perform on adherent cell lines, such as fibroblast, endothelial, and epithelial cell lines^6,7. Today, several methods exist for performing scratches⁸, and different materials have been reported to be used, including toothpicks⁹, cell scrapers¹⁰, lasers¹¹, and electric currents¹². All of the methods have different pros and cons, and the method should be decided upon according to the cell type, budget, and analysis tool. As an example, if the used cell type requires coating, manual pressure removal, e.g. with a toothpick or pipette tip, will influence migration within the area, a different method should be used. In this study, we will focus on manual scraping.

A downside for manual scraping is the variation of the size, shapes of the scratches, and accumulation of cell on the edges of the scratch. Many protocols exist, and a highly cited paper advises increased speed and/or thorough washing after scratching¹³. Additionally, several methods have been used to minimize proliferation, since the proliferation of the cells cannot be distinguished from migration and therefore may give false-positive results of migration. Some reported methods are serum starvation preceding the scratch¹⁴ and decreasing the amount of serum¹⁵. However, neither of these methods can ensure that there is no proliferation. Therefore, we report a pre-treatment of the cells with mitomycin C to ensure true results of migration. Mitomycin C is an antibiotic that inhibits DNA synthesis by forming a covalent bond with the DNA, which prevents the DNA from separating¹⁶. By pre-treating with mitomycin C and washing with PBS before scratching, the detected closure of the gap demonstrates the true migration of the cells (Figure 1).

A characteristic of all the methods is the need for a system to analyze the process of migration¹⁷. A common and an inexpensive method to analyze the progress is to use a light-field microscope to take images of the scratch at pre-determined time points, followed by an analysis of the closure of the gap in an image software^18,19. This method is time-consuming, unreliable with regards to taking pictures at the same spot and focus, and the movement from incubator to camera forces cycles of temperature changes while pictures are taken. Other methods have been developed to detect migration by measuring the current flow. The current changes, as cells cover more space on the plate, which is read as an increase in the impedance²⁰. By measuring impedance, the environment of the cells is not affected, and the method is therefore considered non-invasive. This method relies on specialized plates with gold electrodes, which are expensive, but they enable detection of many processes, such as cellular adherence, proliferation, migration, and cell death. A big disadvantage of this method is that the impedance measurement does not directly indicate migration, as factors such as temperature have a great impact on the impedance. Changes in the impedance can be caused by several factors that are not reviewed by the software, making the analysis of the data more difficult. Therefore, the lack of visualization requires a conventional light microscope to verify migration.

To overcome many of the downsides of the available techniques, we use a real-time automated optical camera. The optical camera is a detection system with a high-throughput microscope in a small platform with a lens, illumination unit, and a digital camera. It has a built-in software, which can test migration and proliferation among other things. To detect migration, two algorithms are used to analyze the growth and the migration kinetics of cells, which are called the proliferation and the wound healing analysis, respectively. The proliferation analysis is based on a two-step image segmentation algorithm that applies texture analysis to detect the difference between cell-covered areas (shown in yellow) and empty background areas by advanced histogram analysis. The wound healing analysis is based on a three-step algorithm that detects the cell monolayer, locates the wound gap, and determines the gap width. These steps are conducted at user-determined time-points, and the data is presented as covered area, gap width, and gap area. One of the great advantages of this machine is that it enables imaging of adherent cells through liquid because of the angle of the camera²¹. The camera lenstakes tilted images that are projected to a z-stack of a single z-plane generate to ensure that the pictures are in-focus (Figure 2). z-stacks are generated by merging the series of pictures (e.g. 40) taken perpendicular to the wound edge, and across the entire wound. The z-stacks enables capturing of the depth of the cell layer as well as an in-focus plane across the wound. Furthermore, the series of images can be put together to a video collection of the images, with the click of a button.

We demonstrate an optimized protocol for detection of migration in the keratinocyte cell line HaCaT. We tested Lactoferrin and its N-terminal peptide, Lactoferricin, from humans and cows, to analyze their effect on migration as these molecules have been demonstrated to have numerous applications as antimicrobial and immune modulating molecules^22,23. The four compounds were compared to untreated HaCaT cells and epidermal growth factor (EGF) was used as a positive control.

Protocol

The experimental setup has no ethical and legal restriction and was conducted in agreement with Roskilde University. An overview of the experimental set-up can be seen in Figure 1 and the mechanisms of the optical camera in Figure 2.

1. Preparation

1. Perform all steps in a sterile laminar flow-bench by cleaning the bench and all equipments with 70% ethanol prior to the start of the experiment.
2. Place the optical camera in a conventional incubator at 37 °C with 5% CO₂ to ensure optimal conditions for the cells.
3. Grow HaCaT cells in DMEM media with 10% FBS and 1x antibiotics (penicillin and streptomycin) in a T75 flask.
4. Use 1 mL 1x trypsin to detach the cells and sub-cultivate them every 3-4 days, by dispersing it over the cellular layer. Pre-heat to room temperature before use.

2. Generating a Monolayer of HaCaT Cells in a 48-wells Microtiter Plate

1. Remove the medium from the T75 flask with a Pasteur pipette.
2. Wash the adherent cells in the flask by adding 5 mL 1x sterile PBS to the T75 flask.
   Note: Ensure that the PBS is free of calcium and magnesium.
3. Circulate the PBS and remove it with a Pasteur pipette.
4. Repeat step 2.2-2.3.
5. Add 1 mL 1x trypsin to the flask and disperse it across the cell layer.
6. Incubate the flask at 37 °C in a conventional incubator until the cells are detached (5-8 min is sufficient for most cell lines).
7. View under the microscope if the cells are detached. Once the cells are detached, add 9 mL of the regular culture media with 10% FBS to inactivate the 1x trypsin.
8. Count the cell with either a hemocytometer, a coulter-counter or similar.
   Note: Trypan blue can be used to view dead cells. However, in 1x trypsin HaCaT cells are perfectly round when alive.
9. Transfer 7.5 x 10⁴ cells/well in 250 µL 10% FBS media to a round-bottomed 48-well tissue culture plate (standard plate).
   Note: Assay can also be set up in 6-, 12-, 24-, or 96-well plates, which all can be assayed under the optical microscope.
10. Gently move the plate from side to side to ensure the cells are equally spread in the wells, or the cells will gather in the center of the wells. Inspect under a light microscope to make sure the cell is evenly spread in the media
11. Put the plate in a conventional CO₂ incubator at 37 °C overnight or until the cells have adhered to the bottom of the wells.

3. Addition of Stimuli for Migration Effects

1. Check if the wells are 90-95% confluent under a light microscope.
2. Prepare 10 µg/mL of mitomycin C in an appropriate amount of the medium.
   Note: In this study, Mitomycin C is kept at 4 °C in a stock solution at 1 mg/mL. Mitomycin C in solution can be stored up to one week in the dark at 2-8 °C.
3. Remove the spent media with a Pasteur pipette from each well.
4. Add 250 µL of 5 µg/mL of mitomycin C to each well.
5. Incubate the plate for 2 h at 37 °C and 5% CO₂.
6. Prepare stimuli of peptides by diluting them in an appropriate amount of the medium.
   Note: In this study, both the human and bovine Lactoferrin and Lactoferricin were tested at 25 µg/mL in a volume of 250 µL
7. Remove the medium with mitomycin C with a Pasteur pipette.
8. Wash the wells 1x with 250 µL of 1x PBS (room temperature) and remove the wash with a Pasteur pipette.
9. Add 250 µL of 1x PBS and manually scratch the wells vertically with a 200 µL pipette tip. Use a new pipette tip for each well.
10. Remove the PBS and add 250 µL peptide stimuli.
11. Mount the plate in optical camera system by adjusting the screws on both sides of the plate. Leave the lid on the microtiter plate.
    Note: The camera can operate with the lid open if necessary.

4. Set Up the Program for the Optical Camera on the Computer

1. Click Acquire in the taskbar on the left.
2. Choose the function Wound healing in the taskbar on the left.
3. Choose the plate type by clicking below the Plate illustration.
4. Unselect wells, not in use, by marking them and click Enable at the upper left side on the screen.
   Note: All wells are selected by default.
5. Adjust the focus of the lens on the wells to fit the position of the cells by right-clicking on one of the wells.
   Note: Autofocus can also be adjusted manually by moving the bar to the right of the plate illustration.
6. Set the time period for images under Picture Interval (e.g. (00:30:00)).
7. Set the number of repetition to fit the desired period (e.g. 97 repetitions).
8. Start the run by clicking Start button in the lower right corner.

Results

HaCaT is a keratinocyte cell line, one of the most abundant cell types in the skin. When a wound occurs, the skin cells start to proliferate and migrate over to the wound bed to close the wound (Figure 3). Both processes are, therefore, of utmost importance for proper healing.

The optical camera can follow both processes in real-time. For migration, the system gives three data sets: cell covered are...

Discussion

The importance of migration in studies of development, wound healing, immunology, and cancer has led to several different methods to study migration. Migration can either be an expression of the expansion or the closure of the gap by the cells. Most often closure of the scratch is tested, as it is easier to grow cells in a monolayer and then make a scratch than growing the cells in a specific form⁸. Our study demonstrates an optimized method for manual scratching, as the technique is easy to maste...

Materials

List of materials used in this article

Name	Company	Catalog Number	Comments
oCelloScope	BioSense Solution ApS		Optical camera
UniExplorer software	BioSense Solution ApS		(8.0.0.7144 (RL3))
HaCaT cell			Donated from Bispebjerg Hospital
DMEM (1x) + GlutaMAX	Gibco	31966-021	Medium for HaCaT
FBS	Gibco	10270	Fetal bovine serum
PBS	Gibco	D837	Without Mg+ and Ca2+
Pencillin-Streptomycin	Sigma	P0781	Antibiotics
Trypsin (10x)	Sigma	T3924
Mitomycin C	Tocris	3258	Inhibits proliferation
Microtiter plate	Greiner Bio-one	677 180
Incubator	Panasonic		37°C, 5% CO2
Hemocytometer	Assistent		Türk (0.1 mm)
Pipet boy	Accu-Jet pro